Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 518 Issue (8): 55-73    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
地区汇总的庞氏利息程度变化与商业银行不良贷款预测
谢德仁, 史学智
清华大学经济管理学院,北京 100084
Changes in Aggregate Ponzi Interests and Commercial Banks' Non-Performing Loan Forecasting
XIE Deren, SHI Xuezhi
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
下载:  PDF (618KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文基于企业的第一还款来源视角构建省份(含直辖市)层面汇总的上市公司庞氏利息程度指标,考察各省份层面汇总的庞氏利息程度变化对于该省份未来期间商业银行不良贷款增长的预测价值。研究发现,地区汇总的庞氏利息程度变化能够有效预测商业银行未来不良贷款增长。其原因在于,庞氏利息程度指标反映了企业第一还款来源的可靠性,庞氏利息程度的加深会导致企业未来经营风险上升,有更大概率陷入经营困境。进一步研究还发现,上述预测价值在庞氏型融资可持续性较低、银行不良贷款隐藏动机或能力较弱的地区更为明显。本文的研究发现意味着,由微观企业会计信息所构建的地区汇总的庞氏利息程度及其变化指标包含了未来期间地区商业银行信贷资产的信用风险与预期信用损失的增量信息,具有预测价值,商业银行在其预期信用损失模型中应该引入这一指标。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
谢德仁
史学智
关键词:  庞氏利息  第一还款来源  地区汇总  不良贷款  预测价值    
Summary:  The emerging literature suggests that the accounting information disclosed by micro-enterprises is useful for macro forecasting. Previous studies have mainly analyzed the relevance of aggregate accounting information for predicting macroeconomic indicators, such as future GDP growth, job creation and destruction, monetary policy, and inflation (Konchitchki and Patatoukas, 2014a; Crawley, 2015; Luo et al., 2016; Shivakumar and Urcan, 2017; Rouxelin et al., 2018; Ma and Zhang, 2020; Ye et al., 2020; Hann et al., 2021). However, little is known about the usefulness of aggregate accounting information in predicting meso-level indicators, especially the credit risk of the regional banking industry.
The non-performing loan ratio is a leading indicator of an impending banking crisis (Reinhart and Rogoff, 2011) and can effectively reflect a bank's risk status (Fang, 2015). Thus, this paper investigates the predictive value of changes in aggregate Ponzi Interests for the growth of non-performing loans in commercial banks. This study uses data from publicly listed companies to construct a measure of firm Ponzi Interests, considering the primary repayment source and subsequently aggregating this measure to the provincial level. We measure Ponzi Interests by tracking the financial sources of firms' interest payments over an extended period and separating the component of total cumulative interest payments covered by financing cash inflows.
Consistent with our conjecture, we find that changes in aggregate Ponzi Interests effectively predict the subsequent growth of non-performing loans in commercial banks. We observe a significantly positive association between changes in aggregate Ponzi Interests and the subsequent growth of non-performing loans in commercial banks at the provincial level. This relationship is attributed to the fact that our Ponzi Interests indicator reflects the reliability of a firm's primary repayment source. Firms with a deepening degree of Ponzi Interests will have a higher operating risk and likelihood of experiencing financial distress. Furthermore, the increase in non-performing loans in commercial banks is primarily driven by firms experiencing a deterioration in their financing capacity and asset profitability as well as firms lacking affiliations with banks. Moreover, the findings of a cross-sectional analysis reveal that the forecasting power of the aggregate Ponzi Interests indicator is more pronounced in provinces where Ponzi financing sustainability is poorer and banks have less incentive and ability to conceal non-performing loans.
Our paper contributes to the literature in three aspects. First, it introduces an innovative approach by constructing a regional aggregate Ponzi Interests indicator based on the primary repayment source of firms. In addition, this study establishes the relationship between changes in aggregate Ponzi Interests and the subsequent growth of non-performing loans in commercial banks. By delving into enterprise cash flow and the ability to pay interest, our paper extends the research on the meso and macro predictive value of accounting information (Konchitchki and Patatoukas, 2014a; Crawley, 2015; Luo et al., 2016; Shivakumar and Urcan, 2017; Rouxelin et al., 2018; Ma and Zhang, 2020; Ye et al., 2020; Hann et al., 2021).
Second, this paper enhances the literature on the prediction of firms' financial distress and default risk. Previous studies in this field have mainly focused on the predictive value of financial indicators (Altman, 1968), short-term cash flow (Aziz et al., 1988), and market return (Beaver, 1966) information. Our study provides evidence that the Ponzi Interests indicator based on long-term cash flow information can be effectively used to predict corporate default risk.
This paper complements the literature on bank risk-taking determinants. We examine how accounting information about the reliability of a firm's primary repayment source influences a bank's passive risk-taking, thereby affecting changes in non-performing loans. Given that the literature has mainly focused on the effects of macroeconomic conditions and bank characteristics on banks' passive risk-taking, this paper provides additional insights from the perspective of firms acting as loan demanders.
This paper has crucial policy implications and practical relevance. Our results suggest that aggregate Ponzi Interests derived from micro-enterprises' accounting data contain valuable information regarding future credit risk and expected credit losses associated with bank credit assets. These findings imply that regulators should consider the Ponzi Interests indicator to enhance their credit supervision. In addition, commercial banks should incorporate the Ponzi Interests indicator in their specific loan approval procedures and expected credit loss models.
Keywords:  Ponzi Interests    Primary Source of Repayment    Regional Aggregation    Non-Performing Loans    Predictive Value
JEL分类号:  G17   G21  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金(71672098)、清华大学经济管理学院研究基金(2020051009)和清华大学中国现代国有企业研究院专项课题(iSOEYB202102)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  谢德仁,管理学博士,教授,清华大学经济管理学院,E-mail:xiedr@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  史学智,博士研究生,清华大学经济管理学院,E-mail:shixz19@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
谢德仁, 史学智. 地区汇总的庞氏利息程度变化与商业银行不良贷款预测[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 518(8): 55-73.
XIE Deren, SHI Xuezhi. Changes in Aggregate Ponzi Interests and Commercial Banks' Non-Performing Loan Forecasting. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 518(8): 55-73.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V518/I8/55
[1]方意,2015,《货币政策与房地产价格冲击下的银行风险承担分析》,《世界经济》第7期,第73~98页。
[2]罗宏、陈坤和曾永良,2020,《上市公司行业间会计盈余差异与宏观经济增长预测》,《会计研究》第11期,第16~32页。
[3]罗宏、曾永良、方军雄和周大伟,2016,《会计信息的宏观预测价值:基于中国制度环境的研究》,《会计研究》第4期,第9~18+95页。
[4]马永强和张志远,2020,《固定资产信息与宏观经济增长预测》,《会计研究》第10期,第50~65页。
[5]史永东和王龑,2017,《职务犯罪是否加剧了银行风险?——来自中国城商行和农商行的经验证据》,《金融研究》第9期,第99~114页。
[6]王小鲁、胡李鹏和樊纲,2021,《中国分省份市场化指数报告(2021)》,社会科学文献出版社。
[7]吴世农、陈韫妍、吴育辉和汪金祥,2021,《企业融资模式、金融市场安全性及其变动特征》,《中国工业经济》第8期,第37~55页。
[8]吴世农和卢贤义,2001,《我国上市公司财务困境的预测模型研究》,《经济研究》第6期,第46~55+96页。
[9]谢德仁,2013,《企业分红能力之理论研究》,《会计研究》第2期,第22~32+94页。
[10]谢德仁,2021,《自由现金流量创造力十问》,《财会月刊》第21期,第22~27页。
[11]谢德仁和刘劲松,2022,《自由现金流量创造力与违约风险——来自A股公司的经验证据》,《金融研究》第12期,第168~186页。
[12]谢德仁、刘劲松和廖珂,2020,《A股公司资本回报支付能力总体分析(1998—2018)——基于自由现金流量创造力视角》,《财会月刊》第19期,第9~31页。
[13]谢德仁和张梅,2016,《论商业银行现金流量表的重构——兼析我国商业银行可持续分红能力》,《会计研究》第3期,第21~28+95页。
[14]杨子晖和李东承,2018,《我国银行系统性金融风险研究——基于“去一法”的应用分析》,《经济研究》第8期,第36~51页。
[15]叶康涛、庄汶资和孙苇杭,2020,《资产减值信息与宏观经济预测》,《经济学(季刊)》第5期,第43~64页。
[16]翟胜宝、张胜、谢露和郑洁,2014,《银行关联与企业风险——基于我国上市公司的经验证据》,《管理世界》第4期,第53~59页。
[17]张健华和王鹏,2012,《银行风险、贷款规模与法律保护水平》,《经济研究》第5期,第18~30+70页。
[18]祝继高、饶品贵和鲍明明,2012,《股权结构、信贷行为与银行绩效——基于我国城市商业银行数据的实证研究》,《金融研究》第7期,第48~62页。
[19]Altman, E. I., 1968, “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy”, Journal of Finance, 23(4), pp.589~609.
[20]Aziz, A., D. C. Emanuel and G. H. Lawson, 1988, “Bankruptcy Prediction-An Investigation of Cash Flow Based Models”, Journal of Management Studies, 25(5), pp.419~437.
[21]Baker, S. R., N. Bloom and S. J. Davis, 2016, “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), pp.1593~1636.
[22]Beaver, W. H., 1966, “Financial Ratios as Predictors of Failure”, Journal of Accounting Research, 4, pp.71~111.
[23]Berger, A. N. and R. DeYoung, 1997, “Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(6), pp.849~870.
[24]Berger, A. N., L. F. Klapper and R. Truk-Ariss, 2009, “Bank Competition and Financial Stability”, Journal of Financial Service, 35(2), pp.99~118.
[25]Bouvatier, V., L. Lepetit and F. Strobel, 2014, “Bank Income Smoothing, Ownership Concentration and the Regulatory Environment”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 41, pp.253~270.
[26]Breuer, J. B., 2006, “Problem Bank Loans, Conflicts of Interest, and Institutions”, Journal of Financial Stability, 2(3), pp.266~285.
[27]Chi, Q. and W. Li, 2017, “Economic Policy Uncertainty, Credit Risks and Banks' Lending Decisions: Evidence from Chinese Commercial Banks”, China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(1), pp.33~50.
[28]Crawley, M. J., 2015, “Macroeconomic Consequences of Accounting: The Effect of Accounting Conservatism on Macroeconomic Indicators and the Money Supply”, The Accounting Review, 90(3), pp.987~1011.
[29]Flanagan, T. and A. Purnanandam, 2019, “Why Do Banks Hide Losses?”, SSRN Working Paper, No.3329953.
[30]Gaertner, F. M., A. Kausar and L. B. Steele, 2020, “Negative Accounting Earnings and Gross Domestic Product”, Review of Accounting Studies, 25(4), pp.1382~1409.
[31]Gallo, L. A., R. N. Hann and C. Li, 2016, “Aggregate Earnings Surprises, Monetary Policy, and Stock Returns”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62(1), pp.103~120.
[32]Giannetti, M., 2003, “Bank-Firm Relationship and Contagious Banking Crises”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35(2), pp.239~261.
[33]Hann, R. N., C. Li and M. Ogneva, 2021, “Another Look at the Macroeconomic Information Content of Aggregate Earnings: Evidence from the Labor Market”, The Accounting Review, 96(2), pp.365~390.
[34]Konchitchki, Y. and P. N. Patatoukas, 2014a, “Accounting Earnings and Gross Domestic Product”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(1), pp.76~88.
[35]Li, H., S. Rozelle and L. Zhou, 2007, “Incentive Contracts and Bank Performance”, Economics of Transition, 15(1), pp.109~124.
[36]Louzis, D. P., A. T. Vouldis and V. L. Metaxas, 2012, “Macroeconomic and Bank-Specific Determinants of Non-Performing Loans in Greece: A Comparative Study of Mortgage, Business and Consumer Loan Portfolios”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), pp.1012~1027.
[37]Minsky, H. P., 2008, Stabilizing An Unstable Economy, New York: McGraw-Hill Press.
[38]Nallareddy, S. and M. Ogneva, 2017, “Predicting Restatements in Macroeconomic Indicators using Accounting Information”, The Accounting Review, 92(2), pp.151~182.
[39]Newey, W. K. and K. D. West, 1987, “Hypothesis Testing with Efficiency Method of Moments Estimation”, International Economic Review, 28(3), pp.777~787.
[40]Reinhart, C. M. and K. S. Rogoff, 2011, “From Financial Crash to Debt Crisis”, American Economic Review, 101(5), pp.1676~1706.
[41]Rouxelin, F., W. Wongsunwai and N. Yehuda, 2018, “Aggregate Cost Stickiness in GAAP Financial Statements and Future Unemployment Rate”, The Accounting Review, 93(3), pp.299~325.
[42]Salas, V. and J. Saurina, 2002, “Credit Risk in Two Institutional Regimes: Spanish Commercial and Savings Banks”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 22(3), pp.203~224.
[43]Shivakumar, L. and O. Urcan, 2017, “Why Does Aggregate Earnings Growth Reflect Information about Future Inflation?”, The Accounting Review, 92(6), pp.247~276.
[44]Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss, 1981, “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information”, American Economic Review, 71(3), pp.393~410.
[1] 吴偎立, 刘杰, 张峥. 超预期股本扩张与分析师每股盈余预测[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 484(10): 170-188.
[2] 王聪, 焦瑾璞. 国内外黄金市场价格间的联动关系稳定吗?——基于外部冲击视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 75-93.
[3] 郑振龙, 黄珊珊, 郭博洋. 外汇期权信息含量与在岸离岸市场效率[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 21-39.
[4] 李政, 梁琪, 方意. 中国金融部门间系统性风险溢出的监测预警研究——基于下行和上行ΔCoES指标的实现与优化[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 40-58.
[5] 苏治, 卢曼, 李德轩. 深度学习的金融实证应用:动态、贡献与展望[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 111-126.
[1] 潘彬, 王去非, 金雯雯. 时变视角下非正规借贷利率的货币政策反应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 52 -67 .
[2] 祝继高, 李天时, 尤可畅. 房地产价格波动与商业银行贷款损失准备——基于中国城市商业银行的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 83 -98 .
[3] 纪敏, 严宝玉, 李宏瑾. 杠杆率结构、水平和金融稳定——理论分析框架和中国经验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 11 -25 .
[4] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 卢洪友, 余锦亮, 张楠. 纵向行政管理结构与地方政府财政支出规模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 35 -51 .
[7] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[8] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[9] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[10] 李万福, 杜静, 张怀. 创新补助究竟有没有激励企业创新自主投资——来自中国上市公司的新证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 130 -145 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1