Summary:
In light of China's transition to a new phase of economic development, the focus on quality is gaining prominence in driving economic growth. Enterprises that fail to meet criteria regarding scale, technology, and environmental protection experience a gradual accumulation of excess production capacity. Generally speaking, the longer overcapacity persists, the more profound its impact on the economy becomes. On the one hand, the rapid growth of the economy may be hindered by the existence of overcapacity, which in turn may slow down employment expansion. On the other hand, overcapacity will also force the adjustment of domestic industrial structure, leading to an increased demand for innovative and high skilled labor by enterprises. Thus, questions arise: What is the impact of overcapacity on employment？ Are there region, ownership, and industry-related disparities in this impact？ If so, what factors contribute to these differences？ Answering the above questions will not only enhance our understanding of the relationship between overcapacity and employment volatility, but also aid in identifying countermeasures to mitigate the adverse effect of overcapacity. To explore this topic, this article utilizes industrial enterprise data from China spanning 1998 to 2007, as well as panel data from various manufacturing sub-industries across different regions in China from 1999 to 2020. The employment growth rate of different industries in different regions is calculated, and the capacity utilization rate is measured using the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) method. Subsequently, we delve into the relationship between overcapacity and employment growth in detail. In addition, we eliminate the potential impact of resolving overcapacity on labor demand and re-examine the relationship between overcapacity and employment volatility. Furthermore, we characterize manufacturing employment volatility from three dimensions: the employment creation rate, the employment destruction rate, and the employment net growth rate. Meanwhile, we endeavor to identify the mechanisms through which overcapacity affects employment volatility, thereby providing a test of employment creation and destruction theory in the context of Chinese style overcapacity. Our study yields five key findings. Firstly, overcapacity significantly suppress employment growth overall. Secondly, only overcapacity in the eastern region exhibits a notable inhibition effect on the employment growth rate from a regional perspective. Thirdly, only the overcapacity of private enterprises exerts a significant exclusion effect on employment growth while considering enterprise ownership. Fourthly, the decline in the employment growth rate caused by overcapacity in the manufacturing industries is primarily evident in labor-intensive ones from an industry nature standpoint. Finally, the mechanism analysis shows that a high degree of financialization strengthens the employment destruction caused by overcapacity in the manufacturing industries, while corporate social responsibility and industrial structure upgrading mitigate employment volatility stemming from overcapacity. Building upon these conclusions, we tentatively propose the following policy recommendations: (1) regions should continue to address overcapacity and minimize its adverse impact on employment; (2) skill training should be provided to enhance and diversify the vocational skills of ordinary workers; (3) private enterprises ought to accelerate their transformation pace, while state-owned enterprises need to establish suitable internal competition mechanisms; (4) labor-intensive industries should regard the improvement of technological content of products as the direction of industrial transformation; and (5) local governments should focus on creating a healthy and orderly financial market environment, guiding manufacturing enterprises to manage financial assets prudently and focus on their main business. This article offers three innovative contributions. Firstly, by covering the four stages of overcapacity experienced by China since the 1990s, this article uses two sets of data: panel data on Chinese industrial enterprises from 1998 to 2007 and panel data on manufacturing sub-industries in various regions from 1999 to 2020. Secondly, this article comprehensively considers region, ownership, and industry-related differences in the impact of overcapacity on employment volatility, enabling the identification of targeted measures to address the impact of overcapacity. Thirdly, we attempt to clarify the mechanism through which overcapacity affects employment volatility by examining the degree of financialization development, corporate social responsibility, and industrial structure upgrading. For future research, an interesting direction would be to compare the effect of overcapacity on employment volatility between developed and developing countries and uncover the underlying reasons behind national disparities. Obviously, such a study would enrich the research on the employment volatility effects of overcapacity.
皮建才, 宋大强. 中国制造业的产能过剩与就业波动[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 521(11): 115-131.
PI Jiancai, SONG Daqiang. Manufacturing Overcapacity and Employment Volatility in China. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 521(11): 115-131.
[1]陈爱贞、葛海燕和何诚颖,2021,《行业产能过剩如何影响正常企业出口？》,《经济学动态》第7期,第82～98页。 [2]范林凯、吴万宗、余典范和苏婷,2019,《中国工业产能利用率的测度、比较及动态演化——基于企业层面的经验研究》,《管理世界》第8期,第84～96页。 [3]高晓娜和兰宜生,2016,《产能过剩对出口产品质量的影响——来自微观企业数据的证据》,《国际贸易问题》第10期,第50～61页。 [4]顾雷雷、郭建鸾和王鸿宇,2020,《企业社会责任、融资约束与企业金融化》,《金融研究》第2期,第109～127页。 [5]黄信灶和赵波,2019,《产能过剩倒逼我国产业结构升级了吗？》,《经济社会体制比较》第2期,第18～29页。 [6]黄赜琳,2006,《技术进步与就业波动变化的影响分析——基于可分劳动RBC模型的实证检验》,《统计研究》第6期,第34～38页。 [7]金智和黄承浩,2022,《税收征管与企业社会责任——基于“金税三期”的证据》,《会计研究》第10期,第71～84页。 [8]纪志宏和纪敏,2018,《中国式产能过剩:风险·症结·治理》,中国金融出版社2018年3月第1版。 [9]李娟和吴建利,2015,《中国劳动力市场需求弹性估算》,《人口学刊》第6期,第93～102页。 [10]林毅夫、巫和懋和邢亦青,2010,《“潮涌现象”与产能过剩的形成机制》,《经济研究》第10期,第4～19页。 [11]刘斌和张列柯,2018,《去产能粘性粘住了谁:国有企业还是非国有企业》,《南开管理评论》第4期,第109～121+147页。 [12]刘晨跃、徐盈之和刘晴,2021,《产能过剩偏向性与环境污染——基于中介效应的检验》,《管理工程学报》第1期,第57～68页。 [13]马红旗和申广军,2021,《规模扩张、“创造性破坏”与产能过剩——基于钢铁企业微观数据的实证分析》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第71～92页。 [14]毛其淋和王玥清,2023,《ESG的就业效应研究:来自中国上市公司的证据》,《经济研究》第7期,第86～103页。 [15]毛其淋和杨晓冬,2022,《破解中国制造业产能过剩的新路径:外资开放政策的视角》,《金融研究》第7期,第38～56页。 [16]聂辉华、张彧和江艇,2014,《中国地区腐败对企业全要素生产率的影响》,《中国软科学》第5期,第37～48页。 [17]皮建才和宋大强,2021,《中国制造业体制性产能过剩的测度与比较》,《中南财经政法大学学报》第5期,第135～143页。 [18]曲玥,2014,《产能过剩与就业风险》,《劳动经济研究》第5期,第130～147页。 [19]任继球,2017,《我国钢铁和煤炭去产能对就业的影响——基于投入产出表的实证分析》,《宏观经济研究》第10期,第83～91页。 [20]沈坤荣、金刚和方娴,2017,《环境规制引起了污染就近转移吗？》,《经济研究》第5期,第44～59页。 [21]唐晓华、张欣钰和李阳,2018:《中国制造业与生产性服务业动态协调发展实证研究》,《经济研究》第3期,第79～93页。 [22]王君斌和刘河北,2021,《提高出口退税能够“稳就业”和“稳外贸”吗？》,《金融研究》第12期,第152～169页。 [23]宣烨,2019,《要素价格扭曲、制造业产能过剩与生产性服务业发展滞后》,《经济学动态》第3期,第91～104页。 [24]阳立高、龚世豪、王铂和晁自胜,2018,《人力资本、技术进步与制造业升级》,《中国软科学》第1期,第138～148页。 [25]杨振兵和张诚,2015,《中国工业部门产能过剩的测度与影响因素分析》,《南开经济研究》第6期,第92～109页。 [26]于斌斌和陈露,2019,《新型城镇化能化解产能过剩吗？》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第1期,第22～41页。 [27]于斌斌、孙波约和郭东,2022,《企业金融化与产能过剩治理:“雪中送炭”还是“雪上加霜”》,《经济学家》第10期,第84～95页。 [28]张成思和张步昙,2016,《中国实业投资率下降之谜:经济金融化视角》,《经济研究》第12期,第32～46页。 [29]Acemoglu, D. and P. Restrepo, 2022, “Tasks, Automation, and the Rise in U. S. Wage Inequality”, Econometrica, 90(5), pp.1973～2016. [30]Bas, M., P. Bombarda, S. Jean and G. Orefice, 2021, “Firms' Exports, Volatility and Skills: Evidence from France”, European Economic Review, 140, 103941. [31]Berndt, E. R. and C. J. Morrison, 1981, “Capacity Utilization Measures: Underlying Economic Theory and an Alternative Approach”, American Economic Review, 71(2), pp.48～52. [32]Belke, A., A. Oeking and R. Setzer, 2015, “Domestic Demand, Capacity Constraints and Exporting Dynamics: Empirical Evidence for Vulnerable Euro Area Countries”, Economic Modelling, 48(C), pp.315～325. [33]Brandt, L., J. V. Biesebroeck and Y. Zhang, 2012, “Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction？ Firm-level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing”, Journal of Development Economics, 97(2), pp.339～351. [34]Dinopoulos, E., W. H. Grieben and F. Sener, 2023, “A Policy Conundrum: Schumpeterian Growth or Job Creation？”, Economic Modelling, 126, 106378. [35]Feng, Y., D. Lagakos and J. E. Rauch, 2018, “Unemployment and Development”, NBER Working Paper, No.25171. [36]Fisman, R. and J. Svensson, 2007, “Are Corruption and Taxation Really Harmful to Growth？ Firm Level Evidence”, Journal of Development Economics, 83(1), pp.63～75. [37]Haltiwanger, J., R. S. Jarmin and J. Miranda, 2013, “Who Create Jobs？ Small versus Large versus Young”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), pp.347～361. [38]Klein, L. R., 1960, “Some Theoretical Issues in the Measurement of Capacity”, Econometrica, 28(2), pp.272～286. [39]Klein, L. R. and R. S. Preston, 1967, “Some New Results in the Measurement of Capacity Utilization”, American Economic Review, 57(1), pp.34～58. [40]Kurz, C. and M. Z. Senses, 2016, “Importing, Exporting, and Firm-Level Employment Volatility”, Journal of International Economics, 98(C), pp.160～175. [41]Long, J. B. and C. Plosser, 1983, “Real Business Cycles”, Journal of Political Economy, 91(1), pp.39～69. [42]Ma, H., X. Qiao and Y. Xu, 2015, “Job Creation and Job Destruction in China during 1998-2007”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(4), pp.1085～1100. [43]Mortensen, D. T. and C. A. Pissarides, 1994, “Job Creation and Job Destruction in the Theory of Unemployment”, Review of Economic Studies, 61(3), pp.397～415.
