Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 500 Issue (2): 98-116    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
信用评级变动能反映企业真实财务信息吗?——基于财务重述的视角
刘星, 杨羚璇
重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆 400030
Do Credit Rating Adjustments Reflect Issuers' Real Financial Information? A Financial Restatement Perspective
LIU Xing, YANG Lingxuan
School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University
下载:  PDF (568KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以2007-2018年拥有主体信用评级的A股上市公司为研究对象,利用企业财务错报在未来被重述这一场景,检验主体信用评级变动能否反映企业真实财务信息。研究发现,评级机构在发债企业财务错报年显著下调了主体信用评级,而在重述公告发布年没有上述现象,这表明主体信用评级下调反映了企业的真实财务信息。在控制内生性影响后,结论仍然成立。进一步研究发现,发债企业当期财务错报涉及盈余时,主体信用评级被下调的幅度更大,说明评级机构更加关注与盈余相关的财务信息。机制分析表明,评级机构维护自身声誉是主体信用评级变动能够反映企业真实财务信息的主要机制。此外,主体信用评级被下调还导致了资本市场投资者的负面反应。本文的研究结果为主体信用评级变动反映企业真实财务信息提供了直接的证据支持,揭示了主体信用评级的信息含量,也对理解中国情境下评级机构调整主体信用评级的行为动机提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘星
杨羚璇
关键词:  信用评级  评级机构  声誉效应  财务重述    
Summary:  As a direct financing tool for companies, corporate bonds are an important aspect of deepening financial system reform and building a multilevel capital market. Establishing a credit rating system helps to classify issuers' credit risk using rating symbols, evaluate their solvency, provide incremental information to the bond market, and reduce information asymmetry. However, whether credit rating agencies (CRAs) can transfer information to the bond market carefully and objectively is still controversial. On the one hand, the network of interests between CRAs and issuers leads to a decrease in the information content of credit ratings. On the other hand, CRAs are constrained by their reputations and will forgo their short-term gains in favor of communicating true information about the bond market. Therefore, CRAs choose to publish credit rating downgrades when they believe that the negative information about issuers credibly damages their reputation.
Financial restatements by companies indicating their misrepresentation of prior years' financial information intuitively and clearly illustrate the lack of credibility of the restated financial reports. This provides a unique setting in which to study whether credit rating adjustments reflect issuers' true financial information. We distinguish between the years of the financial misstatement and restatement announcements. If the CRA downgrades the credit rating in the financial misstatement year based on the issuer's private information, the result can prove that the credit rating adjustment reflects the issuer's true financial information. We use data from Chinese A-share listed companies with issuer-level long-term credit ratings and find that the rating agencies significantly downgrade issuers' credit ratings in financial misstatement years, rather than in restatement announcement years. This result indicates that credit rating downgrades reflect issuers' real financial information prospectively. Our results hold in the presence of alleviating endogenous concerns and applying other robustness tests. In additional tests, when the issuer's financial misstatement involves their earnings, their credit rating is downgraded more fiercely. In a channel test, we find that protecting the reputation of the credit agency is the main channel by which credit rating adjustments reflect issuers' real financial information. We further find that credit rating downgrades result in investors' negative reactions to stock prices.
We contribute to the literature in the following ways. First, we use a unique setting in which issuers' financial misstatements may be restated in subsequent years. Thus, we discuss the behavior of CRAs in financial misstatement years. The results support the effectiveness of credit ratings. Cheng and Subramanyam (2008) and Bonsall IV et al. (2018) focus on the impact of issuers' public information in their credit rating assessments. We still do not know how the CRAs react to private information because of the lack of private information data. Following previous studies, we find that the credit rating adjustments include the issuers' real financial information obtained by CRAs. This finding indicates that CRAs transfer negative private information to the bond market through credit rating downgrades, which also complements findings in the literature for the validity of credit ratings from an ex post facto perspective. Second, we divide financial misstatements into earnings and non-earnings misstatements and find that the issuers' credit ratings are downgraded to a greater extent in the earnings misstatement year. This finding indicates that CRAs pay more attention to financial information related to earnings, which provides insight into the role of financial information in credit rating assessments. Third, we find that in the institutional context of rating inflation in the Chinese bond market, CRAs adjust credit ratings according to issuers' real financial information in consideration of their own reputation. Our finding enriches the literature on the mechanism of the impact of enterprise financial information quality on credit ratings and identifies the behavioral motivation of CRAs to adjust their credit ratings for the Chinese bond market.
Our findings should be of interest to regulators in other emerging economies attempting to suppress rating inflations and improve their bond market efficiency. First, reputation is one of CRAs' most important qualities; thus, they will adopt more stringent rating standards when considering the credibility of their reputational costs. It is necessary for regulators to increase their penalty for improper CRA ratings through the improvement of the relevant institutional systems and increase the reputational costs for CRAs. Second, CRAs should build their competitive advantages by establishing a brand effect with high-quality ratings. Meanwhile, CRAs should expand other revenue channels to get rid of their dependence on revenue from their credit ratings. Third, issuers should strive to improve their corporate fundamentals and value the role that high-quality financial information plays in improving their credit ratings and reducing their corporate bond financing costs.
Keywords:  Credit Rating    Credit Rating Agency    Reputation Effects    Financial Restatement
JEL分类号:  D82   G24   L14  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金项目(71232004;71872022;71802029)的资助。感谢匿名审稿专家的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  杨羚璇,博士研究生,重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,E-mail:ylx414@126.com.   
作者简介:  刘星,管理学博士,教授,重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,E-mail:liuxing@cqu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
刘星, 杨羚璇. 信用评级变动能反映企业真实财务信息吗?——基于财务重述的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 500(2): 98-116.
LIU Xing, YANG Lingxuan. Do Credit Rating Adjustments Reflect Issuers' Real Financial Information? A Financial Restatement Perspective. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 500(2): 98-116.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V500/I2/98
[1]常莹莹和曾泉,2019,《环境信息透明度与企业信用评级——基于债券评级市场的经验证据》,《金融研究》第5期,第132~151页。
[2]陈关亭、连立帅和朱松,2021,《多重信用评级与债券融资成本——来自中国债券市场的经验证据》,《金融研究》第2期,第94~113页。
[3]陈关亭、朱松和黄小琳,2014,《审计师选择与会计信息质量的替代性研究——基于稳健性原则对信用评级影响视角》,《审计研究》第5期,第77~85页。
[4]何平和金梦,2010,《信用评级在中国债券市场的影响力》,《金融研究》第4期,第15~28页。
[5]寇宗来、千茜倩和陈关亭,2020,《跟随还是对冲:发行人付费评级机构如何应对中债资信的低评级?》,《管理世界》第9期,第26~39页。
[6]李春涛、薛原和惠丽丽,2018,《社保基金持股与企业盈余质量:A股上市公司的证据》,《金融研究》第7期,第124~142页。
[7]李琦、罗炜和谷仕平,2011,《企业信用评级与盈余管理》,《经济研究》第2期,第88~99页。
[8]李善民、杨继彬和钟君煜,2019,《风险投资具有咨询功能吗?——异地风投在异地并购中的功能研究》,《管理世界》第12期,第164~180页。
[9]林晚发、何剑波、周畅和张忠诚,2017,《“投资者付费”模式对 “发行人付费”模式评级的影响:基于中债资信评级的实验证据》,《会计研究》第9期,第62~68页。
[10]林晚发、王雅炯和幸丽霞,2020,《企业定性信息与债券信用评级:基于股权性质的分析》,《中国软科学》第4期,第123~131页。
[11]刘星和陈西婵,2018,《证监会处罚、分析师跟踪与公司银行债务融资——来自信息披露违规的经验证据》,《会计研究》第1期,第60~67页。
[12]马榕和石晓军,2016,《中国债券信用评级结果具有甄别能力吗?——基于盈余管理敏感性的视角》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第197~216页。
[13]施丹和姜国华,2013,《会计信息在公司债信用等级迁移中的预测作用研究》,《会计研究》第3期,第43~50页。
[14]宋敏、甘煦和林晚发,2019,《债券信用评级膨胀:原因、影响及对策》,《经济学动态》第3期,第134~147页。
[15]王博森,吕元稹和叶永新,2016,《政府隐性担保风险定价:基于我国债券交易市场的探讨》,《经济研究》第10期,第155~167页。
[16]王小鲁、樊纲和胡李鹏,2019,《中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)》,社会科学文献出版社。
[17]王雄元和张春强,2013,《声誉机制、信用评级与中期票据融资成本》,《金融研究》第8期,第150~164页。
[18]吴育辉、翟玲玲、张润楠和魏志华,2020,《“投资人付费”vs.“发行人付费”:谁的信用评级质量更高?》,《金融研究》第1期,第130~149页。
[19]杨国超和盘宇章,2019,《信任被定价了吗?——来自债券市场的证据》,《金融研究》第1期,第35~53页。
[20]袁蓉丽、文雯和谢志华,2018,《董事高管责任保险和财务报表重述》,《会计研究》第5期,第21~27页。
[21]Ahn,M.,S. B. Bonsall IV,and A. Van Buskirk. 2019. “Do Managers Withhold Bad News from Credit Rating Agencies?”,Review of Accounting Studies,24(3):972~1021.
[22]Altamuro,J.,and A. Beatty. 2010. “How Does Internal Control Regulation Affect Financial Reporting?”, Journal of Accounting and Economics,49(1-2):58~74.
[23]Bae, K.,J. Kang,and J. Wang. 2015. “Does Increased Competition Affect Credit Ratings? A Reexamination of the Effect of Fitch's Market Share on Credit Ratings in the Corporate Bond Market”,Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(5),pp. 1011~1035.
[24]Becker,B. and T. Milbourn. 2011. “How Did Increased Competition Affect Credit Ratings?”Journal of financial Economics,101(3):493~514.
[25]Bolton,P.,X. Freixas,and J. Shapiro. 2012. “The Credit Ratings Game”,Journal of Finance,67(1):85~111.
[26]Bonsall IV,S. B.,J. R. Green,and K. A. I. Muller. 2018. “Are Credit Ratings More Rigorous for Widely Covered Firms?”,The Accounting Review,93(6):61~94.
[27]Bonsall IV,S. B.,K. Koharki,and M. Neamtiu. 2016. “When Do Differences in Credit Rating Methodologies Matter? Evidence from High Information Uncertainty Borrowers”,The Accounting Review,92(4):53~79.
[28]Cheng,M.,and K. R. Subramanyam. 2008. “Analyst Following and Credit Ratings”,Contemporary Accounting Research,25(4):1007~1044.
[29]Cornaggia,J., and Cornaggia,K. J. 2013. “Estimating The Costs of Issuer-Paid Credit Ratings”The Review of Financial Studies,26(9):2229~2269.
[30]Dechow,P.,W. Ge,and C. Schrand. 2010. “Understanding Earnings Quality: A Review of the Proxies, Their Determinants and Their Consequences”,Journal of Accounting and Economics,50(2-3):344~401.
[31]Dimitrov,V.,D. Palia, and L. Tang. 2015. “Impact of The Dodd-Frank Act on Credit Ratings”,Journal of Financial Economics,115(3):505~520.
[32]Goldstein, I.,and C. Huang. 2020. “Credit rating inflation and firms' investments”, The Journal of Finance,75(6), 2929~2972.
[33]Hunt,J. P. 2009. “Credit Rating Agencies and the Worldwide Credit Crisis: the Limits Of Reputation, the Insufficiency Of Reform, and A Proposal for Improvement”,Colum. Bus. L. Rev,109.
[34]Kothari,S. P.,A. J. Leone,and C. E. Wasley. 2005. “Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measures”,Journal of Accounting and Economics,39(1):163~197.
[35]Kravet,T.,and T. Shevlin. 2010. “Accounting Restatements and Information Risk”,Review of Accounting Studies,15(2):264~294.
[36]Mathis,J.,J. Mcandrews,and J. C. Rochet. 2009. “Rating the Raters: Are Reputation Concerns Powerful Enough to Discipline Rating Agencies?”,Journal of Monetary Economics,56(5):657~674.
[37]Palmrose,Z. V.,and S. Scholz. 2004. “The Circumstances and Legal Consequences of Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from Restatements”,Contemporary Accounting Research,21(1):139~180.
[38]Roychowdhury,S and S. Srinivasan. 2019. “The Role of Gatekeepers in Capital Markets”,Journal of Accounting Research,57(2):295~322.
[39]Xia,H. 2014. “Can Investor-Paid Credit Rating Agencies Improve the Information Quality of Issuer-Paid Rating Agencies?”,Journal of Financial Economics,111(2):450~468.
[1] 郎香香, 田亚男, 迟国泰. 债券评级机构变更——基于评级选购与评级迎合视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 499(1): 135-152.
[2] 寇宗来, 千茜倩. 私有信息、评级偏差和中国评级机构的市场声誉[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 114-132.
[3] 陈关亭, 连立帅, 朱松. 多重信用评级与债券融资成本——来自中国债券市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 94-113.
[4] 林晚发, 赵仲匡, 刘颖斐, 宋敏. 债券市场的评级信息能改善股票市场信息环境吗? ——来自分析师预测的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 478(4): 166-185.
[5] 吴育辉, 翟玲玲, 张润楠, 魏志华. “投资人付费”vs.“发行人付费”:谁的信用评级质量更高?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 475(1): 130-149.
[6] 常莹莹, 曾泉. 环境信息透明度与企业信用评级——基于债券评级市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 132-151.
[7] 杨国超, 盘宇章. 信任被定价了吗? ——来自债券市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 35-53.
[8] 李春涛, 薛原, 惠丽丽. 社保基金持股与企业盈余质量:A股上市公司的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 457(7): 124-142.
[9] 李欢, 李丹, 王丹. 客户效应与上市公司债务融资能力——来自我国供应链客户关系的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 138-154.
[10] 许友传. 银行信用评级的信息质量及其次级债事前约束[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 445(7): 105-122.
[11] 黄小琳, 朱松, 陈关亭. 劳动投资效率、企业性质与资产收益率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 130-144.
[12] 张璇, 周鹏, 李春涛. 卖空与盈余质量——来自财务重述的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 434(8): 175-190.
[13] 李明明, 秦凤鸣. 主权信用评级、债务危机与经济增长——来自欧元区国家的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 436(10): 16-31.
[14] 寇宗来, 盘宇章, 刘学悦. 中国的信用评级真的影响发债成本吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 424(10): 81-98.
[1] 卢洪友, 余锦亮, 张楠. 纵向行政管理结构与地方政府财政支出规模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 35 -51 .
[2] 刘凤良, 章潇萌, 于泽. 高投资、结构失衡与价格指数二元分化[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 54 -69 .
[3] 牛霖琳, 林木材. 中国超长期国债的相对流动性溢价与收益率曲线的结构性建模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 17 -31 .
[4] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158 -174 .
[5] 茅锐. 企业创新、生产力进步与经济收敛:产业集聚的效果[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 83 -99 .
[6] 纪志宏, 曹媛媛. 信用风险溢价还是市场流动性溢价:基于中国信用债定价的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 1 -10 .
[7] 陈登科, 陈诗一. 中国财政支出乘数研究——基于金融摩擦与“超低利率”的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 17 -32 .
[8] 边文龙, 王向楠. 投资职能对保险公司风险的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 158 -173 .
[9] 林莞娟, 王辉, 韩涛. 股权分置改革对国有控股比例以及企业绩效影响的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 192 -206 .
[10] 孟庆斌, 荣晨. 中国房地产价格泡沫研究——基于马氏域变模型的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 101 -116 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1