Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2021, Vol. 498 Issue (12): 116-132    
  绿色金融专辑 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
“多言寡行”的环境责任表现能否影响银行信贷获取——基于“言”和“行”双维度的文本分析
李哲, 王文翰
中央财经大学会计学院/中国管理会计研究中心,北京 100872;
中央财经大学金融学院,北京 102206
Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Bank Credit: Text Analysis of Words and Deeds
LI Zhe, WANG Wenhan
School of Accountancy & China Management Accounting Research Center, Central University of Finance and Economics;
School of Finance,Central University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (577KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 基于我国推行绿色信贷的政策背景,本文考察了企业“多言寡行”的环境责任表现能否影响银行的信贷决策。研究发现:(1)从总体来看,“多言寡行”的环境责任表现有助于企业获取更多的银行借款。(2)相比于长期银行借款,“多言寡行”对于短期银行借款的正向影响更为明显。(3)《关于构建绿色金融体系的指导意见》的出台抑制了“多言寡行”对银行借款的正向影响。(4)进一步分析发现,相比于环境责任表现“少言多行”以及“少言寡行”的企业,企业“多言寡行”的环境责任表现对于银行的信贷资源具有显著的正向影响;“多言寡行”对银行借款的正向影响在无背景关联、价值较低以及市场环境更差的企业中更为明显。本文有助于信贷机构认识到绿色信贷政策面临的执行风险,为确保绿色信贷的健康发展提供了新的决策参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李哲
王文翰
关键词:  环境责任表现  绿色金融  绿色信贷  文本分析    
Summary:  China officially launched its green credit policy in 2007. Green credit requires financial institutions to consider enterprises' environmental responsibility in their credit decisions. China's green credit policy has developed rapidly since its implementation. However, some enterprises obtain capital support by addressing environmental protection in name only, threatening the healthy development of China's green financial system and creating an unfavorable factor in China's environmental protection marketization mechanism. Therefore, this paper focuses on the “more words than deeds” phenomenon in enterprises' environmental protection practices and investigates its influence on banks' credit decisions. The results will help credit institutions to recognize the implementation risks of green credit policy. This paper provides a new decision-making reference for ensuring the healthy development of green credit.
Using text analysis to collect environmental performance data from the reports of listed companies, this paper identifies the characteristics of more words than deeds enterprises and empirically tests the effect of the more words than deeds approach on bank credit. The findings are as follows. (1) The more words than deeds approach helps enterprises obtain more bank loans. (2) Compared with long-term bank loans, the positive effect is more obvious for short-term bank loans. (3) The promulgation of the Guiding Opinions has restrained the positive influence of the more words than deeds approach on bank loans. (4) Further analysis shows that compared with enterprises that do not use the more words than deeds approach, the environmental responsibility performance of enterprises with more words than deeds has a significant positive impact on the credit resources of banks. This positive impact is more obvious in enterprises with no political connections, lower value and a worse market environment.
The potential contributions of this paper are as follows. (1) Under the current green credit policy, this paper deepens understanding of corporate environmental behavior decision-making and practices. (2) This paper enriches research on the factors that influence bank credit decisions and on corporate information manipulation. In addition, this paper provides new support for improving the environmental information disclosure of listed companies in China. (3) The Guiding Opinions is the systematic framework of China's current green financial policy. However, most of the related academic research focuses on policy interpretation, with a lack of empirical support at the data level. This paper provides micro-level empirical evidence of how to improve the implementation of green credit.
The policy implications of this paper are as follows. (1) Financial institutions should recognize that environmental reports may be used by enterprises for impression management. Therefore, when making credit decisions, banks should strengthen the scrutiny of corporate environmental responsibility performance. (2) In practice, implementing the green credit policy is necessary; however, the financing of heavily polluting enterprises should not be blindly restricted. Instead, a balance of punishments and incentives can achieve a win-win balance of environmental protection and economic development. (3) Building a green financial system is a long-term project. Therefore, all departments should continue to cooperate with each other to ensure the appropriate and sustainable implementation of the green credit policy. (4) Regulators should improve the environmental information disclosure system and focus on the supervision of companies whose words and deeds are inconsistent, supplemented by certain punishment measures.
Keywords:  Environmental Responsibility Performance    Green Finance    Green Credit    Text Analysis
JEL分类号:  G21   G32   M14  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金青年项目“交易所信息披露监管的长短期治理效果研究”(71902210);中央财经大学科研创新团队支持计划“企业环保‘多言寡行'的经济后果和治理路径:基于多学科视角”;国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国绿色金融体系构建及发展实践研究”(18AZD013)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  李哲,管理学博士,副教授,中央财经大学会计学院;E-mail:lizhewenbei@163.com.   
作者简介:  王文翰,博士研究生,中央财经大学金融学院;E-mail:wwh1522654707@163.com.
引用本文:    
李哲, 王文翰. “多言寡行”的环境责任表现能否影响银行信贷获取——基于“言”和“行”双维度的文本分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 116-132.
LI Zhe, WANG Wenhan. Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Bank Credit: Text Analysis of Words and Deeds. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 498(12): 116-132.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V498/I12/116
[1]蔡海静、汪祥耀和谭超,2019,《绿色信贷政策、企业新增银行借款与环保效应》,《会计研究》第3期,第88~95页。
[2]常莹莹和曾泉,2019,《环境信息透明度与企业信用评级——基于债券评级市场的经验证据》,《金融研究》第5期,第132~151页。
[3]戴璐,2010,《“双高”现象、银企博弈与转型经济融资环境的影响》,《中国软科学》第2期,第40~52页。
[4]范从来、盛天翔和王宇伟,2012,《信贷量经济效应的期限结构研究》,《经济研究》第1期,第80~91页。
[5]何贤杰、肖土盛和陈信元,2012,《企业社会责任信息披露与公司融资约束》,《财经研究》第8期,第60~71页。
[6]黄溶冰、谢晓君和周卉芬,2020,《企业漂绿的“同构”行为》,《中国人口·资源与环境》第11期,第139~150页。
[7]李哲,2018,《“多言寡行”的环境披露模式是否会被信息使用者摒弃》,《世界经济》第12期,第167~188页。
[8]连立帅、朱松和陈关亭,2019,《资本市场开放、非财务信息定价与企业投资——基于沪深港通交易制度的经验证据》,《管理世界》第8期,第136~154页。
[9]梁上坤和陈冬华,2017,《银行贷款决策中的私人效用攫取——基于业务招待费的实证研究》,《金融研究》第4期,第112~127页。
[10]林雁、毛奕欢和谭洪涛,2021,《政治关联企业环保投资决策——“带头表率”还是“退缩其后”?》,《会计研究》,第6期,第159~175页。
[11]吕明晗、徐光华、沈弋和钱明,2018,《异质性债务治理、契约不完全性与环境信息披露》,《会计研究》第5期,第67~74页。
[12]陆正飞、祝继高和孙便霞,2008,《盈余管理、会计信息与银行债务契约》,《管理世界》第3期,第152~158页。
[13]马骏、程琳和谢文泓,2018,《中国在绿色金融领域的全球影响力》,《清华金融评论》第12期,第56~58页。
[14]沈洪涛和冯杰,2012,《舆论监督、政府监管与企业环境信息披露》,《会计研究》第2期,第72~78页。
[15]沈洪涛、黄珍和郭肪汝,2014,《告白还是辩白——企业环境表现与环境信息披露关系研究》,《南开管理评论》第2期,第56~63页。
[16]沈洪涛和马正彪,2014,《地区经济发展压力、企业环境表现与债务融资》,《金融研究》第2期,第153~166页。
[17]宋敏、周鹏和司海涛,2021,《金融科技与企业全要素生产率——“赋能”和信贷配给的视角》,《中国工业经济》第4期,第138~155页。
[18]苏冬蔚和连莉莉,2018,《绿色信贷是否影响重污染企业的投融资行为?》,《金融研究》第12期,第123~137页。
[19]孙铮、刘凤委和李增泉,2005,《市场化程度、政府干预与企业债务期限结构——来自我国上市公司的经验证据》,《经济研究》第5期,第52~63页。
[20]王克敏、王华杰、李栋栋和戴杏云,2018,《年报文本信息复杂性与管理者自利——来自中国上市公司的证据》,《管理世界》第12期,第120~132页。
[21]王霞、徐晓东和王宸,2013,《公共压力、社会声誉、内部治理与企业环境信息披露——来自中国制造业上市公司的证据》,《南开管理评论》第2期,第82~91页。
[22]王遥、潘冬阳、彭俞超和梁希,2019,《基于DSGE模型的绿色信贷激励政策研究》,《金融研究》第11期,第1~18页。
[23]王珏、骆力前和郭琦,2015,《地方政府干预是否损害信贷配置效率?》,《金融研究》第4期,第99~114页。
[24]吴德胜、曹渊、汤灿和郝希阳,2021,《分类管控下的债务风险与风险传染网络研究》,《管理世界》第4期,第35~54页。
[25]吴红军、刘啟仁和吴世农,2017,《公司环保信息披露与融资约束》,《世界经济》第5期,第124~147页。
[26]许年行和李哲,2016,《高管贫困经历与企业慈善捐赠》,《经济研究》第12期,第133 ~146页。
[27]余明桂和潘红波,2008,《政治关系、制度环境与民营企业银行贷款》,《管理世界》第8期,第9~21页。
[28]于蔚、汪淼军和金祥荣,2012,《政治关联和融资约束:信息效应与资源效应》,《经济研究》第9期,第125~139页。
[29]袁卫秋,2004,《债务期限结构理论综述》,《会计研究》第10期,第9~13页。
[30]张琦、郑瑶和孔东民,2019,《地区环境治理压力、高管经历与企业环保投资——一项基于<环境空气质量标准(2012)>的准自然实验》,《经济研究》第6期,第183~198页。
[31]Bloomfield, R.J., 2002, “The ‘Incomplete Revelation Hypothesis' and Financial Reporting”, Accounting Horizons, 16(3): 233~243.
[32]Diamond, D.W., 1993, “Seniority and Maturity of Debt Contracts”, Journal of Financial Economics, 33(3): 341~368.
[33]Gelb, D.S.and J.A.Strawser, 2001, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: An Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure”, Journal of Business Ethics,33(1): 1~13.
[34]Goss, A.and G.S.Roberts, 2011, “The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on The Cost of Bank Loans”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7): 1794~1810.
[35]Hamrouni, A., A.Uyar and R.Boussaada, 2019, “Are Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures Relevant for Lenders? Empirical Evidence from France”, Management Decision, 58(2): 267~279.
[36]Kim, Y., H.Li and S.Li, 2014, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 43(1): 1~13.
[37]Kim, Y., M.S.Park and B.Wier, 2012, “Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility?”, The Accounting Review, 87(3): 761~796.
[38]Li, F., 2008, “Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2-3): 221~247.
[39]Loughran, T.and B.McDonald, 2011, “When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10-Ks”, Journal of Finance, 66(1): 35~65.
[40]Loughran, T.and B.McDonald, 2016, “Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey”, Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4): 1187~1230.
[41]Mine, E., L.Jin, J.Qiu and W.Chi, 2016, “Annual Report Readability, Tone Ambiguity, and the Cost of Borrowing”, Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 52(2): 811~836.
[42]Myers, S.C., 1977, “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing”, Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2): 147~175.
[43]Piotroski, J.D., T.J.Wong and T.J.Zhang, 2015, “Political Incentives to Suppress Negative Information: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms”, Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2): 405~459.
[44]Roberts, M.R.and A.Sufi, 2009, “Renegotiation of Financial Contracts: Evidence from Private Credit Agreements”, Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2): 159~184.
[45]Sharfman, M.P.and C.S.Fernando, 2008, “Environmental Risk Management and The Cost of Capital”, Strategic Management Journal, 29(6): 569~592.
[46]Stiglitz, J.E.and A.Weiss, 1981, “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information”, American Economic Review, 71(3): 393~410.
[1] 阮睿, 孙宇辰, 唐悦, 聂辉华. 资本市场开放能否提高企业信息披露质量?——基于“沪港通”和年报文本挖掘的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 188-206.
[2] 陈国进, 丁赛杰, 赵向琴, 蒋晓宇. 中国绿色金融政策、融资成本与企业绿色转型——基于央行担保品政策视角[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 75-95.
[3] 潘冬阳, 陈川祺, Michael Grubb. 金融政策与经济低碳转型——基于增长视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 1-19.
[4] 文书洋, 张琳, 刘锡良. 我们为什么需要绿色金融?——从全球经验事实到基于经济增长框架的理论解释[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 498(12): 20-37.
[5] 郭晔, 房芳. 新型货币政策担保品框架的绿色效应[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 91-110.
[6] 丁宁, 任亦侬, 左颖. 绿色信贷政策得不偿失还是得偿所愿?——基于资源配置视角的PSM-DID成本效率分析[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 478(4): 112-130.
[7] 王遥, 潘冬阳, 彭俞超, 梁希. 基于DSGE模型的绿色信贷激励政策研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 1-18.
[8] 苏冬蔚, 连莉莉. 绿色信贷是否影响重污染企业的投融资行为?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 462(12): 123-137.
[9] 彭红枫, 林川. 言之有物:网络借贷中语言有用吗?——来自人人贷借款描述的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 133-153.
[10] 彭红枫, 赵海燕, 周洋. 借款陈述会影响借款成本和借款成功率吗?——基于网络借贷陈述的文本分析[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 158-173.
[1] 金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 李晓雪. 资本市场注意力总量是稀缺资源吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 162 -177 .
[2] 李建军, 马思超. 债券违约对涉事信用评级机构的影响:基于中国信用债市场违约事件的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 116 -129 .
[3] 李政. “811汇改”提高了人民币汇率中间价的市场基准地位吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 1 -16 .
[4] 牛霖琳, 林木材. 中国超长期国债的相对流动性溢价与收益率曲线的结构性建模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 17 -31 .
[5] 王弟海, 崔小勇, 邹恒甫. OLG模型中的多重均衡和经济效率——兼论政府在经济中的作用[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 1 -17 .
[6] 陈登科, 陈诗一. 中国财政支出乘数研究——基于金融摩擦与“超低利率”的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 17 -32 .
[7] 殷明明, 陈平, 王伟. 第三方市场竞争效应、投资效应与人民币有效汇率指数测算[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 33 -47 .
[8] 陆磊, 杨骏. 流动性、一般均衡与金融稳定的“不可能三角”[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 1 -13 .
[9] 陆前进. 最优货币政策规则参数的估计和中国货币状况指数的测度[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 35 -50 .
[10] 陈国进, 尹鲁晋, 赵向琴. 地方政府投资如何影响上市公司融资成本?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 434(8): 127 -142 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1