Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2026, Vol. 554 Issue (8): 132-149    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
数字化转型、供应链溢出与劳动技能溢价
张彩云, 杜碧娆, 谢谦
Digital Transformation, Supply Chain Spillover and Labor Skill Premium
ZHANG Caiyun, DU Birao, XIE Qian
Institute of Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences;School of Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
下载:  PDF (551KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文从数字化转型的供应链溢出效应出发,考察中游企业数字化转型对上、下游企业劳动技能溢价(高、低技能劳动力之间的工资差距)的影响。研究发现,中游企业数字化转型会显著降低上、下游企业的劳动技能溢价,且该影响在下游企业中更为突出。机制分析表明,这一效应主要通过推动数字技术扩散、增强协同化生产、优化产需匹配以及提升信息透明度四条渠道传导至上、下游企业。进一步分析发现,中游企业数字化转型的影响在不同链路上呈现出差异性特征,上游企业劳动技能溢价的降低主要取决于中游企业信息化制造、定制化产品与定向化服务链路的数字化转型,而下游企业劳动技能溢价的降低主要取决于中游企业信息化制造链路的数字化转型。本文为充分发挥数字化转型的链式效应、推动构建更加合理有序的收入分配格局提供了实证参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
()
作者相关文章
张彩云
杜碧娆
谢谦
关键词:  数字化转型  供应链溢出  协同化生产  劳动技能溢价    
Summary:  Digital technologies have thoroughly reshaped the income distribution pattern of global labor markets. Nevertheless, China is confronted with the “skill premium puzzle”: the wage gap between high-skilled and low-skilled labor keeps widening as the wages of high-skilled workers grow at a faster pace. This issue exerts adverse impacts on sustained economic growth and long-term social stability, such as slower employment growth and declining consumption levels. Among various driving factors, the impact of digitalization on labor skill premium cannot be ignored. As core production factors embedded within traditional corporate operations, data and digital technologies rely on other input factors to create value, which triggers the restructuring of various production factors within firms. Specifically, digitalization reshapes the allocation structure of high-skilled and low-skilled labor inputs, altering the internal labor allocation of enterprises. Accordingly, firms will witness changes in their internal labor demand structure and wage levels during the process of digital transformation. Furthermore, as production networks between enterprises become increasingly interconnected, the impacts of digitalization are not confined within individual firms. Instead, knowledge, information and technological factors are transmitted through business cooperation and transactions among supply chain participants, generating spillover effects on other firms along the industrial chain. Therefore, exploring how digital transformation affects labor skill premium and its internal mechanisms from a supply chain perspective not only helps theoretically clarify how digitalization shapes the factor income distribution structure, but also offers practical references for leveraging digital tools to improve income distribution.
  Extant literature has conducted extensive discussions on digital transformation and intra-firm labor skill premium. However, most studies treat firms as isolated entities, ignoring the spillover effects generated by vertical supply chain linkages. Few studies distinguish the heterogeneous impacts of midstream firms' digital transformation on upstream suppliers and downstream customers. This paper adopts the perspective of supply chain spillover to systematically investigate the effects, transmission paths and asymmetric disparities of midstream enterprises' digital transformation on the labor skill premium of upstream and downstream firms, providing practical insights for optimizing income distribution via digitalization. Based on matched “supplier-firm-customer” samples constructed with data of China's A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2023, this paper empirically examines the impacts of digital transformation on upstream and downstream labor skill premium from the supply chain spillover perspective. The results show that midstream firms' digital transformation significantly reduces labor skill premium of upstream and downstream enterprises, and this narrowing effect is more pronounced for downstream firms. Mechanism analysis indicates that the impacts of midstream digital transformation on labor skill premium spread to upstream and downstream firms through four channels: boosting digital technology diffusion, accelerating collaborative production, optimizing production-demand coordination and improving information transparency, with all four channels exerting stronger effects on downstream enterprises.Further analysis reveals that theimpacts of midstream enterprises' digital transformation exhibitheterogeneous characteristicsacross different industrial links.The reduction in labor skillpremiums of upstreamenterprises is mainly driven bymidstream firms' digitaltransformation in theinformatized manufacturing,customized product, and targetedservice links, while thenarrowing of labor skillpremiums for downstreamenterprises primarily stems frommidstream firms' digitaltransformation within theinformatized manufacturing linkalone.
  This paper makes three marginal contributions relative to prior research. First, it expands the research scope on the nexus between digital transformation and labor skill premium by incorporating cross-firm supply chain spillover along industrial chains. Most existing studies analyze the influences of technological progress and artificial intelligence on labor skill premium within single firms, regarding each enterprise as an independent unit and rarely discussing how supply chain linkages amplify or mitigate the labor skill premium induced by digital transformation. By incorporating inter-firm supply chain connections into the analytical framework, this paper provides a novel research perspective for relevant fields. Second, it uncovers the underlying mechanisms through which digital transformation reshapes labor skill premium across upstream and downstream supply chain participants. Previous research on the supply chain spillover of digitalization mainly focuses on information exchange, knowledge dissemination and resource allocation, with little attention paid to labor skill premium. From the supply chain spillover perspective, this paper identifies four transmission channels linking digital transformation to labor skill premium of supply chain partners, supplementing new theoretical mechanisms for subsequent studies. Third, this paper further explores the differentiated spillover influences of digital transformation across different production links of midstream firms on upstream and downstream labor skill premium, and provides new empirical evidence for the government and enterprises to optimize corporate labor demand structures and factor income distribution through digital transformation.
Keywords:  Digital Transformation    Supply Chain Spillover    Collaborative Production    Labor Skill Premium
JEL分类号:  D31   D33   O33  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(72373161、72173132)以及中国社会科学院智库基础项目(ZKJC240601)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  谢 谦,经济学博士,研究员,中国社会科学院经济研究所,E-mail: xieqian@cass.org.cn.   
作者简介:  张彩云,经济学博士,副研究员,中国社会科学院经济研究所, E-mail:zhangcaiyunlisa@163.com
杜碧娆,博士研究生,中国社会科学院大学经济学院,E-mail:dubirao@163.com.
引用本文:    
张彩云, 杜碧娆, 谢谦. 数字化转型、供应链溢出与劳动技能溢价[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 554(8): 132-149.
ZHANG Caiyun, DU Birao, XIE Qian. Digital Transformation, Supply Chain Spillover and Labor Skill Premium. Journal of Financial Research, 2026, 554(8): 132-149.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2026/V554/I8/132
[1] 柏培文和张云,2021,《数字经济、人口红利下降与中低技能劳动者权益》,《经济研究》第5期,第91~108页。
[2] 蔡宏波、汤城建和韩金镕,2023,《减税激励、供应链溢出与数字化转型》,《经济研究》第 7 期,第 156~173 页。
[3] 陈岑、张彩云和周云波,2023,《信息技术、常规任务劳动力与工资极化》,《世界经济》第1期,第95~120页。
[4] 陈东和郭文光,2024,《数字化转型如何影响劳动技能溢价 —— 基于 A 股上市公司数据的经验研究》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第 3 期,第 173~192 页。
[5] 戴翔、马皓巍和张二震,2023,《数字化转型一定能提升企业加成率吗?》,《金融研究》第5期,第134~151页。
[6] 丁倩和朱学红,2025,《供应链溢出视角下客户企业数字化转型的资源配置优化效应研究》,《系统工程理论与实践》第 10 期,第 3372~3386 页。
[7] 黄浩权、戴天仕和沈军,2024,《人工智能发展、干中学效应与技能溢价——基于内生技术进步模型的分析》,《中国工业经济》第 2 期,第 99~117页。
[8] 冀云阳、周鑫和张谦,2023,《数字化转型与企业创新——基于研发投入和研发效率视角的分析》,《金融研究》第4期,第111~129页。
[9] 李青原、李昱、章尹赛楠等,2023,《企业数字化转型的信息溢出效应 —— 基于供应链视角的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第 7 期,第 142~159 页。
[10] 刘啟仁和赵灿,2020,《税收政策激励与企业人力资本升级》,《经济研究》第4期,第70~85页。
[11] 陆蓉、吕静和王怡靓,2024,《党建生态群与供应链韧性》,《财经研究》第7期,第4~20页。
[12] 宁光杰、崔慧敏和付伟豪,2023,《信息技术发展如何影响劳动力跨行业流动?——基于工作任务与技能类型的实证研究》,《管理世界》第8期,第1~21页。
[13] 彭俞超、王南萱和梁钰茼,2025,《数字化转型、劳动收入份额与技术溢价——来自供应链视角的证据》,《中国人民大学学报》第1期,第85~97页。
[14] 肖土盛、孙瑞琦、袁淳和孙健,2022,《企业数字化转型、人力资本结构调整与劳动收入份额》,《管理世界》第12期,第220~237页。
[15] 解恩泽和余淼杰,2024,《制造业企业劳资收入分配改善了么?—— 来自劳动力市场竞争性角度的实证证据》,《管理世界》第6期,第92~117页。
[16] 谢杰、过重阳和陈科杰,2022,《最低工资、工业自动化与技能溢价》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第102~120页。
[17] 严兵、程敏和王乃合,2024,《ESG 绿色溢出、供应链传导与企业绿色创新》,《经济研究》第7期,第72~91页。
[18] 杨金玉、彭秋萍和葛震霆,2022,《数字化转型的客户传染效应——供应商创新视角》,《中国工业经济》第8期,第156~174页。
[19] 杨小军和熊紫延,2026,《工业机器人应用与企业内部薪酬差距》,《软科学》第3期,第110~118页。
[20] 曾艺、周小昶和冯晨,2023,《减税激励、供应链溢出与稳就业》,《管理世界》第7期,第19~29+45+30~36页。
[21] 张鹏杨、肖音和刘会政,2024,《数字化转型对供应链上、下游产出波动的非对称影响研究》,《世界经济》第7期,第123~152页。
[22] 张同斌、刘文龙和王蕾,2024,《高质量创新的溢出效应:企业供应链的视角》,《经济研究》第11期,第38~54页。
[23] 赵烁、施新政、陆瑶和刘心悦,2020:《兼并收购可以促进劳动力结构优化升级吗?》,《金融研究》第10期,第150~169页。
[24] 甄红线、王玺和方红星,2023,《知识产权行政保护与企业数字化转型》,《经济研究》第11期,第62~79页。
[25] 祝继高、曲馨怡和韩慧博,2024,《数字化转型与财务管控创新研究——基于国家电网的探索性案例分析》,《管理世界》第2期,第172~192页。
[26] Acemoglu, D., 2002, “Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market”,Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), pp.7~72.
[27] Acemoglu, D. and P. Restrepo, 2018, “The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment”, American Economic Review, 108(6), pp.1488~1542.
[28] Acemoglu, D. and P. Restrepo, 2020, “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”,Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), pp.2188~2244.
[29] Autor, D. H., F. Levy and R. J. Murnane, 2003, “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration”,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), pp.1279~1333.
[30] Bian, Z. and Luo, M., 2026, “Digital Transformation's Impact on Upstream Green Technology Innovation: a Supply Chain Perspective”, Applied Economics, 58(15), pp.2811~2828.
[31] Du, J.G., Wang, Q.D. and Chang, T.Y., 2026, “The Spillover Effects of Corporate Digital Transformation within Supply Chain Networks”, Economic Analysis and Policy, 91, pp.1522~1536.
[32] Isaksson, O. H. D., M. Simeth and R. W. Seifert, 2016, “Knowledge Spillovers in the Supply Chain: Evidence from the High Tech Sectors”,Research Policy, 45(3), pp.699~706.
[33] Lee, H. L., V. Padmanabhan and S. Whang, 1997, “Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect”, Management Science, 43(4), pp.546~558.
[34] Liu, Y.B., Hu, S. and Wang, C.C., 2024, “The Green Innovation Spillover Effect of Enterprise Digital Transformation: Based on Supply Chain Perspective”, Economic Analysis and Policy, 84(C), pp.1381~1393.
[1] 张彩云附录 Download
[2] 张彩云内容精粹 Download
[1] 李涛, 吴颖怡, 郑登津. 出口退税分担机制改革的供应链溢出效应[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 551(5): 59-77.
[2] 谢锐, 王豪, 易靖韬. 强制客户企业社会责任信息披露的供应链溢出效应——基于供应商视角[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 549(3): 169-186.
[3] 杨鹏, 孙伟增, 田轩, 左祥太. 网络安全风险治理与企业创新——基于大语言模型的识别与发现[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 547(1): 76-94.
[4] 江轩宇, 张明媚, 林雯. 银企数字化协同与企业信贷获取——基于银行贷款的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 39-56.
[5] 王修华, 彭德荣, 赵亚雄. 农信机构数字化转型能否促进双重目标兼顾?——基于省联社“大平台”模式视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 75-94.
[6] 赵静, 刘姝江. 数据治理对银行风险的影响——基于《银行业金融机构数据治理指引》的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 58-75.
[7] 卢垚, 战明华. 银行数字化转型、信息结构与商业信用和银行信用间的替代性[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 531(9): 39-58.
[8] 沈坤荣, 闫佳敏. 高铁开通与企业数字化转型——基于信息学习效应与资源集聚效应的双重视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 150-168.
[9] 王亮亮, 祁媛媛, 张海洋, 徐星美. 数字化转型与公司税负水平的动态调整[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 526(4): 188-206.
[10] 戴翔, 马皓巍, 张二震. 数字化转型一定能提升企业加成率吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 134-151.
[11] 冀云阳, 周鑫, 张谦. 数字化转型与企业创新——基于研发投入和研发效率视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 514(4): 111-129.
[12] 方明月, 聂辉华, 阮睿, 沈昕毅. 企业数字化转型与经济政策不确定性感知[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 512(2): 21-39.
[13] 徐照宜, 巩冰, 陈彦名, 成程. 金融科技、数字化转型与企业突破性创新 ——基于全球专利引用复杂网络的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 520(10): 47-65.
[14] 叶永卫, 李鑫, 刘贯春. 数字化转型与企业人力资本升级[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 510(12): 74-92.
[1] 刘珺, 康立, 丁雨婷. 资产价格与通胀感知偏差——基于数字金融发展的再思考[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 552(6): 1 -19 .
[2] 张成思, 何启志, 刘泽豪. 中央银行流动性供给机制与货币政策精准调控[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 1 -19 .
[3] 范志勇, 安戈洋, 杨怡璇. 中国货币政策的要素收入分配效应研究——基于劳动力市场与金融市场双重摩擦视角[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 20 -38 .
[4] 梅冬州, 王宝玲. 房地产下行背景下提振居民消费的宏观政策研究[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 554(8): 19 -37 .
[5] 褚荣泰, 向昊天. 耐心资本:基本特征、识别策略与实体效应[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 554(8): 38 -55 .
[6] 孟源祎, 聂卓, 马光荣, 赵耀红. 开“前门”是否有助堵“后门”?——地方政府专项债务发行对隐性债务举借的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 552(6): 20 -37 .
[7] 邓创, 吴健, 杨晨龙, 邓佳妮. 外部不确定性冲击、跨境资本异常流动与系统性金融风险防范[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 554(8): 1 -18 .
[8] 刘贯春, 柳杭娟, 吴佳其, 何枫. 融资平台市场化转型与债券融资成本:政府与企业双重视角[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 554(8): 56 -74 .
[9] 吴鼎纹, 李建强, 张振堃, 王红建. 数字金融、居民绿色消费与环境库兹涅茨曲线拐点跨越[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 554(8): 75 -94 .
[10] 卓志, 熊博, 朱衡. 政策价值信号、地方转化效应与城市创新驱动——来自科技保险的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 554(8): 95 -113 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1