Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 509 Issue (11): 117-135    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
金融教育是有效的吗?
吴锟, 吴卫星, 王沈南
北京物资学院经济学院,北京 101149;
对外经济贸易大学应用金融研究中心,北京 100029;
北京工商大学学报编辑部/国际经管学院,北京 100048
Is Financial Education Effective?
WU Kun, WU Weixing, WANG Shennan
School of Economics, Beijing Wuzi University;
Research Center for Applied Finance, University of International Business and Economics;
Editorial Board/School of International Economics and Management, Beijing Technology and Business University
下载:  PDF (705KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 2008年国际金融危机以来,金融教育备受关注。然而,学术界对于其效果并未达成共识。本文选取清华大学中国金融研究中心2012年调查数据,辅助以CHFS2015年调查数据,利用倾向得分匹配法(PSM)和工具变量法(IV)等模型实证考察了金融教育对我国居民金融行为的影响效果,研究发现:相对于未接受过金融教育的家庭,接受过金融教育家庭资产组合的分散化程度更佳、夏普比率更高;他们更有可能制定理财规划,且制定理财规划的年限更长;当权益受损时,他们更懂得寻求帮助。进一步地,随着社会互动水平的提高,金融教育的优化效果会更大。因此,在构建现代金融体系背景下,应扎实推进金融教育普及工作,全面提升居民金融素养,助力实现共同富裕。同时,针对群体互动特征实施更加多样化的金融教育方案,不断强化金融教育的总体效果。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴锟
吴卫星
王沈南
关键词:  金融教育  有效性  金融素养  金融行为  社会互动    
Summary:  Financial products, especially financial technology, have become increasingly sophisticated and complicated with the growth of the digital economy. Financial products are deeply embedded in the investment and consumption behavior of individuals. The popularization and spread of financial literacy can help to improve asset allocation efficiency and prevent debt risks, which are important for the prosperity of all people. Since the 2008 global financial crisis, financial education has become an important topic of discussion, and governments around the world are incorporating it into their national strategy and creating conditions to enable it through legislation and institutional development. In the process of building a modern financial system, the financial market may break the “rigid payment” and the financial market may “break the net”, and the shortcomings of households lacking financial literacy may be amplified more quickly. Hence, targeted intervention measures are urgently needed for a scientific evaluation of the effect of financial education.
This study systematically reviews the cognitive differences between different academic groups on the effectiveness of financial education using data from the 2012 survey of Chinese urban households by the China Center for Financial Studies of Tsinghua University and the 2015 China Household Finance Survey. Using the propensity score matching (PSM) and instrumental variable (IV) methods, this study empirically investigates the effect of financial education on the financial investment behavior of Chinese households and the moderating role of social interaction. The results show that financially literate households have a more diversified asset portfolio and higher Sharpe ratio than financially illiterate households. Financially literate households are also more likely to engage in financial planning over a longer planning horizon, and to ask for help when their equity suffers. Furthermore, increased social interaction increases the optimization effect of financial education. This study provides positive evidence that financial education helps optimize household investment behavior. Although the work in this study is a preliminary exploration compared with the complex evaluation framework used by studies conducted abroad, it has important practical and policy implications.
First, there should be a greater focus on the spread of financial literacy, and the process should be expedited through legislation and the establishment of dedicated institutions. The strategic importance of financial education should be examined from the perspective of improving the financial well-being of people. Second, diverse financial education programs should be implemented by category to strengthen the overall effect of financial education. As people become more financially literate, the program should guide them to increase their social interactions simultaneously so as to enhance the effect of financial education. Finally, there should be active exploration of an evaluation framework for effective innovative financial education using an optimal combination of policy tools. Various alternatives should be identified for different objectives, and a policy evaluation system of “objectives-solutions (alternatives)-cost benefit evaluation” must be established; this will help to evaluate the effectiveness of financial education, clarify its feasibility, and determine the optimal mode and level of financial education.
This study makes the following three contributions. First, this study considers household portfolio diversification, portfolio effectiveness and financial planning, and consumer protection as indicators of the effectiveness of financial education, thus extending the measurement category of the domestic literature on financial education intervention. Second, we comprehensively use the PSM and IV methods to scientifically deal with possible endogeneity, such as self-selection, and use different questionnaires for empirical analysis. The results of this study are more reliable than those of similar studies in China. Third, this study deeply discusses the heterogeneous effect of social interaction on the effect of financial education, especially the key role played by social interaction in less financially literate families, which enriches the research dimensions of the domestic literature on financial education effect evaluation. Although there are some limitations in the evaluation methods used by this study compared with studies conducted abroad, it makes an important contribution to the construction of a conceptual framework, selection of evaluation indicators and technical means, and expansion of research perspectives to evaluate the effectiveness of domestic financial education.
Keywords:  Financial Education    Effectiveness    Financial Literacy    Financial Behavior    Social Interaction
JEL分类号:  G11   G53   I21  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(20FJYB028)、国家自然科学基金重点项目(71733004)和北京市宣传文化高层次人才培养资助项目的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  王沈南,经济学博士,编辑(讲师),北京工商大学学报编辑部,国际经管学院,E-mail:wangshennan1985@aliyun.com.   
作者简介:  吴 锟,经济学博士,副教授,北京物资学院经济学院,E-mail:flag95@163.com.
吴卫星,理学博士,教授,对外经济贸易大学应用金融研究中心,E-mail:wxwu@uibe.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
吴锟, 吴卫星, 王沈南. 金融教育是有效的吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 117-135.
WU Kun, WU Weixing, WANG Shennan. Is Financial Education Effective?. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 509(11): 117-135.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V509/I11/117
[1] 杜征征、李云峰和闫彬,2017,《金融教育有助于投资者权益保护吗?》,《证券市场导报》第6期,第43~49页。
[2] 雷晓燕、沈艳和杨玲,2022,《数字时代中国老年人被诈骗研究:互联网与数字普惠金融的作用》,《金融研究》第8期,第113~131页。
[3] 李丁、丁俊菘和马双,2019,《社会互动对家庭商业保险参与的影响》,《金融研究》第7期,第96~114页。
[4] 李涛,2006,《社会互动与投资选择》,《经济研究》第8期,第45~57页。
[5] 罗靳雯和彭湃,2016,《教育水平、认知能力和金融投资收益——来自CHFS的证据》,《教育与经济》第6期,第77~85页。
[6] 孙同全和潘忠,2014,《普惠金融建设中的金融教育》,《中国金融》第10期,第62~63页。
[7] 孙武军和林惠敏,2018,《金融排斥、社会互动和家庭资产配置》,《中央财经大学学报》第3期,第21~38页。
[8] 万海远,2022,《共同富裕的改革路径与推进逻辑》,《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》第3期,第23~34页。
[9] 吴锟和王沈南,2022,《认知能力对居民金融素养的影响研究》,《财经问题研究》第3期,第63~71页。
[10] 吴卫星、丘艳春和张琳琬,2015,《中国居民家庭投资组合有效性:基于夏普率的研究》,《世界经济》第1期,第154~172页。
[11] 张勇菊,2016,《普惠制金融环境下传统金融知识教育与拇指规则培训有效性研究》,《上海金融》第2期,第68~75页。
[12] 周弘,2016,《金融教育需求、闲暇时间配置与消费者金融教育选择》,《上海财经大学学报》第4期,第40~51页。
[13] 朱鹤、王沈南和何帆,2021,《基于明斯基理论的中国居民部门杠杆率重估与债务风险探讨》,《经济学家》第12期,第62~71页。
[14] Bernheim, B., Garrett, D., and Maki, D. 2001. “Education and Saving: The Long-term Effects of High School Financial Curriculum Mandates”, Journal of Public Economics, 80(6):435~465.
[15] Betti, G., Dourmashkin, N., Rossi, M., and Yin, Y.P. 2007. “Consumer Over-indebtedness in the EU: Measurement and Characteristics”, Journal of Economic Studies, 34(2): 136~156.
[16] Borden, L.M., Lee, S.A., Serido, J., and Collins, D. 2008. “Changing College Students' Financial Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Through Seminar Participation”,Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(1): 23~40.
[17] Braunstein, S., and Welch, C. 2002. “Financial Literacy: An Overview of Practice, Research, and Policy”, Federal Reserve Bulletin, 88(11): 445~457.
[18] Brown, J.R., Kapteyn, A., and Mitchell, O.S. 2016. “Framing and Claiming: How Information-framing Affects Expected Social Security Claiming Behavior”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1):139~162.
[19] Bruhn, M., Leao, L., Legovini, A., Marchetti, R., and Zia, B. 2016. “The Impact of High School Financial Education: Evidence from a Large-scale Evaluation in Brazil”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(4): 256~295.
[20] Clark, R., Lusardi, A., and Mitchell, O.S. 2017. “Employee Financial Literacy and Retirement Plan Behavior: A Case Study”, Economic Inquiry, 55(1): 248~259.
[21] Doi, Y., McKenzie, D., and Zia, B. 2014. “Who You Train Matters: Identifying Combined Effects of Financial Education on Migrant Households”, Journal of Development Economics, 109(7): 39~55.
[22] Dolvin, S.D., and Templeton, W.K. 2006. “Financial Education and Asset Allocation”, Financial Services Review, 15(2): 133~149.
[23] Fünfgeld, B., and Wang, M. 2009. “Attitudes and Behaviour in Everyday Finance: Evidence from Switzerland”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(2): 108~128.
[24] Gale, W.G., and Levine, R. 2011. “Financial Literacy: What Works? How Could It Be More Effective? ”, Financial Security at Boston College Working Paper, FSP(2011-1).
[25] Hadar, L., Sood, S., and Fox, C.R. 2015. “Subjective Knowledge in Consumer Financial Decision Making”, Journal of Marketing Research, 50(3):303~316.
[26] Jappelli, T., and Padula, M. 2013. “Investment in Financial Literacy and Saving Decisions”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8): 2779~2792.
[27] Joo, S., and Grable, J.E. 2005. “Employee Education and the Likelihood of Having a Retirement Savings Program”, Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 16(1): 37~49.
[28] Klapper, L., Lusardi, A., and Panos, G.A. 2013. “Financial Literacy and its Consequences: Evidence from Russia During the Financial Crisis”, Journal of Banking & Finance , 37(10): 3904~3923.
[29] Laverty, D. 2016. “How Workplace Financial Education Can Benefit Your Employees”, Strategic HR Review, 15(6): 242~246.
[30] Lusardi, A., Michaud, P.C., and Mitchell, O.S. 2017. “Optimal Financial Knowledge and Wealth Inequality”, Journal of Political Economy, 125(2): 431~477.
[31] Lusardi, A., Michaud, P.C., and Mitchell., O.S. 2020. “Assessing the Impact of Financial Education Programs: A Quantitative Model”, Economics of Education Review, 78(c):101899.
[32] Lyons, A. 2004. “A Profile of Financially At-risk College Students”, The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38(1): 56~80.
[33] Mandell, L., and Klein, L. 2009. “The Impact of Financial Literacy Education on Subsequent Financial Behavior”, Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 20(1): 15~24.
[34] McCormick, M.H. 2009. “The Effectiveness of Youth Financial Education: A Review of the Literature”, Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 20(1): 70~83.
[35] Novarese, M., and Giovinazzo, V.D. 2018. “Financial Education, In: Marciano A., and G. Ramello (eds.) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics”. Springer, New York.
[36] Skimmyhorn, W. 2016. “Assessing Financial Education: Evidence from Boot Camp”, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(2): 322~343.
[37] Subrahmanyam, A. 2009. “Optimal Financial Education”, Review of Financial Economics, 18(11):1~9.
[38] Urban, C., Schmeiser, M., Collins, J.M., and Brown, A. 2020. “The Effects of High School Personal Financial Education Policies on Financial Behavior”, Economics of Education Review, 78(c): 101786.
[39] Van-rooij, M., Lusardi, A., and Alessie, R. 2011. “Financial Literacy and Retirement Planning in the Netherlands”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(4): 593~608.
[40] Walstad, W., Rebeck, K., and Macdonald, R. 2010. “The Effects of Financial Education on the Financial Knowledge of High School Students”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2): 336~357.
[41] Willis, L.E. 2011. “The Financial Education Fallacy”, American Economic Review, 101 (3): 429~434.
[42] Wu, K., Li, Y.H., Cai, X.J., and Yin, J.M. 2022. “Cognitive Ability and Household Portfolio Diversification: Evidence from China”, Pacific-basin Finance Journal, 75:101840.
[43] Xiao, J.J., and O'Neill, B. 2016. “Consumer Financial Education and Financial Capability”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(6): 712~721.
[1] 吴卫星, 张旭阳, 吴锟. 金融素养与家庭储蓄率——基于理财规划与借贷约束的解释[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 119-137.
[2] 郑路, 徐旻霞. 传统家庭观念抑制了城镇居民商业养老保险参与吗?———基于金融信任与金融素养视角的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 133-151.
[3] 郦金梁, 吴谣, 雷曜, 黄燕婷. 有效预警上市公司违规的递延所得税异动指标和人工智能模型[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 149-168.
[4] 李建军, 李俊成. 普惠金融与创业:“授人以鱼”还是“授人以渔”?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 475(1): 69-87.
[5] 李丁, 丁俊菘, 马双. 社会互动对家庭商业保险参与的影响——来自中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)数据的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 96-114.
[6] 刘国强. 我国消费者金融素养现状研究——基于2017年消费者金融素养问卷调查[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 1-20.
[7] 吴锟, 吴卫星. 理财建议可以作为金融素养的替代吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 161-176.
[8] 周慕冰. 关于做好新常态下银行监管工作的几点思考[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 421(7): 13-23.
[9] 郑济孝. XBRL格式财务报告对中国股市有效性的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 426(12): 194-207.
[1] 张牧扬, 潘妍, 余泳泽. 社会信用、刚兑信仰与地方政府隐性债务[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 1 -19 .
[2] 郭晔, 未钟琴, 方颖. 金融科技布局、银行信贷风险与经营绩效——来自商业银行与科技企业战略合作的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 20 -38 .
[3] 潘敏, 刘红艳, 程子帅. 极端气候对商业银行风险承担的影响——来自中国地方性商业银行的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 39 -57 .
[4] 祝梓翔, 高然. 通胀—增长权衡和中国菲利普斯曲线的平坦化[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 1 -20 .
[5] 邢秉昆. 碳减排约束下中国工业企业信用评级[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 77 -97 .
[6] 刘建建, 王忏, 赵扶扬, 龚六堂. 住房耐用品、土地市场分割与货币失踪之谜[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 21 -39 .
[7] 徐佳, 李冠华, 齐天翔. 中国家庭偿债能力:衡量与影响因素[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 98 -116 .
[8] 李孟哲, 麻志明, 吴联生. 上市公司数量与非上市公司创新[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 171 -188 .
[9] 朱永华, 张一林, 林毅夫. 赶超战略与大银行垄断——基于新结构经济学的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 40 -57 .
[10] 高翔, 张敏, 刘啟仁. 工业机器人应用促进了“两业融合”发展吗?——来自中国制造企业投入服务化的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 58 -76 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1