Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 509 Issue (11): 98-116    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国家庭偿债能力:衡量与影响因素
徐佳, 李冠华, 齐天翔
对外经济贸易大学金融学院,北京 100029
The Solvency of Chinese Households: Measurement and Determinants
XU Jia, LI Guanhua, QI Tianxiang
School of Finance, University of International Business and Economics
下载:  PDF (689KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 居民部门债务的快速增长和过度累积可能导致经济体系产生潜在的金融风险。本文以2011-2017年中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)数据为研究样本,选取了综合衡量家庭偿债能力的指标,并根据宏观层面的不良贷款率对该指标进行校准。进一步地,本文基于衡量结果分析了我国家庭偿债能力的影响因素。研究发现:第一,2011-2017年期间我国金融脆弱性家庭占比呈逐年上升趋势,且现阶段我国金融脆弱性家庭变动状况存在明显的人群异质性和地区异质性。应警惕居民部门杠杆率过快上升的透支效应和潜在风险,关注低收入家庭的偿债风险。第二,购房预期收益上升使家庭产生加杠杆行为,导致家庭过度负债从而使家庭偿债能力进一步恶化。本研究对我国居民部门的金融风险监测、评估和预警有一定启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
徐佳
李冠华
齐天翔
关键词:  家庭负债  偿债能力  金融脆弱性  金融稳定    
Summary:  The global financial crisis highlighted excessive indebtedness of the household sector as an important source of systemic risk and demonstrated that the health of balance sheets in the household sector plays a key role in the economy. A healthy balance sheet in the household sector provides a solid foundation for rapid economic recovery in the post-pandemic era, whereas a rapid and excessive accumulation of household sector debt may lead to financial risks in the economy. Preventing and controlling financial risks is a core objective of China's economic and financial system. In recent years, against the background of a loose monetary policy and a rapid rise in real estate prices, Chinese residents have begun to buy houses with a large amount of debt, leading to a rapid increase in the leverage ratio (Debt/GDP) of the Chinese household sector. According to the Bank for International Settlements, from 2011 to 2021, the leverage ratio of China's household sector rose by 33.8 percentage points, ranking first in the world. The rising leverage ratio in China is quite similar to the conditions before the outbreak of economic crises in America and Japan, and therefore warrants vigilance. The underlying danger of systemic risk caused by an increasing leverage ratio and insufficient repayment ability has attracted increasing attention. Many studies have assessed the solvency and liquidity risks of banks and other financial institutions, but there remains a lack of measurement of financial fragility caused by the growing debt risk of the household sector. The financial risk and solvency of this sector needs to be addressed.
Using China Household Finance Survey data from 2011 to 2017, this study studies the solvency of Chinese households. Drawing on the most common measures of household debt burden, this study selects an indicator to comprehensively measure the financial fragility of households, which is used as an early warning signal to measure the default risk of indebted households, and adds liquid assets to consider household solvency. First, we measure household solvency using the financial margin (FM), then identify financially vulnerable households according to whether the household's liquid assets can cover the negative financial margin in a given period, and calibrate this according to the non-performing loan rate at the macro- level. Then, through the exogenous variable of expected housing returns, we further analyze the influencing factors and channels of solvency of the Chinese household sector.
This study yields several key findings. First, the proportion of financially vulnerable households in China increased from 2011 to 2017, with obvious population and regional heterogeneities observed in the changes of financially vulnerable households.The risk posed by the household sector to the stability of the financial system are generally contained in China. We should continue to pay attention to the debt repayment risks of young households, rural households and households in the Eastern region. Household financial risks are significantly related to household characteristics. Attention should be paid to the debt repayment risks of low-income households and to strengthen social security. Second, a rise in expected returns leads to excessive debt behavior in households, which may be an important factor for the deterioration of the household financial fragility, and the financial fragility of households continues to increase mainly through the channels of real estate purchase and risk preference. With increasing economic uncetrtainty, we should focus on guiding real estate market expectations, improving financial literacy nationwide and helping households make reasonable investment and consumption decisions.
The study makes three main contributions. First,using household data to directly and effectively measure the solvency of China's household sector, and accuracy is improved further by the calibration of the non-performing loan ratio at the macro-level. Second, the study comprehensively addresses the financial risk of the household sector and identifies the dynamic changes and structural distribution of China's household financial fragility using panel data from 2011 to 2017. Accordingly, this study resolves the identification errors by using cross-sectional data, which is crucial for the monitoring, assessment and early warning of financial risk in the household sector. Third, this study explores the factors that cause households to fall into financial distress through the channel of expected housing returns, thus providing a new perspective on the forces driving household financial fragility. This perspective can help to evaluate the debt risk in China's household sector in the post-pandemic era and provides support for the implementation of macro policies.
Keywords:  Household Indebtedness    Solvency    Financial Fragility    Financial Stability
JEL分类号:  D14   G51   R20  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金青年项目(72003029)和对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(20YQ14)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  李冠华,经济学博士,对外经济贸易大学金融学院,E-mail:liguanhua0110@126.com.   
作者简介:  徐 佳,经济学博士,副教授,对外经济贸易大学金融学院,E-mail:jia.xu@uibe.edu.cn.
齐天翔,经济学博士,教授,对外经济贸易大学金融学院,E-mail:qitianxiang@uibe.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
徐佳, 李冠华, 齐天翔. 中国家庭偿债能力:衡量与影响因素[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 98-116.
XU Jia, LI Guanhua, QI Tianxiang. The Solvency of Chinese Households: Measurement and Determinants. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 509(11): 98-116.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V509/I11/98
[1] 甘犁、尹志超、贾男、徐舒和马双,2013,《中国家庭资产状况及住房需求分析》,《金融研究》第4期,第1~14页。
[2] 甘犁、尹志超和谭继军,2015,《中国家庭金融调查报告2014》,西南财经大学出版社2015年12月第二版。
[3] 甘犁,2018,《中国家庭债务风险有多大》,财新网,2018年10月9日。
[4] 高波、王辉龙和李伟军,2014,《预期、投机与中国城市房价泡沫》,《金融研究》第2期,第44~58页。
[5] 李扬和张晓晶等,2020,《中国国家资产负债表2020》,中国社会科学出版社2020年12月第一版。
[6] 李冠华和徐佳,2021,《预期收益、住房购买与房产负债决策——基于中国城市家庭的微观证据》,《金融论坛》第3期,第37~47页。
[7] 李奇霖、张德礼和钟林楠,2019,《深度解析中国杠杆率》,联讯证券研究报告。
[8] 潘敏和刘知琪,2018,《居民家庭“加杠杆”能促进消费吗?——来自中国家庭微观调查的经验证据》,《金融研究》第4期,第71~87页。
[9] 吴卫星、丘艳春和张琳琬,2015,《中国居民家庭投资组合有效性:基于夏普率的研究》,《世界经济》第1期,第154~172页。
[10] 吴卫星、邵旭方和陶利斌,2016,《家庭财富不平等会自我放大吗?—基于家庭财务杠杆的分析》,《管理世界》第9期,第44~54页。
[11] 西南财经大学中国家庭金融调查与研究中心,2017,《中国工薪阶层信贷发展报告》。
[12] 易行健和周利,2018,《数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费——来自中国家庭的微观证据》,《金融研究》第11期,第47~67页。
[13] 尹志超和张诚,2019,《女性劳动参与对家庭储蓄率的影响》,《经济研究》第4期,第165~181页。
[14] 张冀、祝伟和王亚柯,2016,《家庭经济脆弱性与风险规避》,《经济研究》第6期,第157~171页。
[15] 周广肃和王雅琦,2019,《住房价格、房屋购买与中国家庭杠杆率》,《金融研究》第6期,第1~19页。
[16] 庄毓敏和张祎,2020,《居民部门债务增长的宏观效应》,《中国金融》第2期,第16~18页。
[17] 中国人民银行货币政策分析小组,2019,《中国区域金融运行报告2019》。
[18] Albacete, N., and Lindner, P., 2013, “Household Vulnerability in Austria—a microeconomic Analysis Based on the Household Finance and Consumption Survey”, Oesterreichische Nationalbank Financial Stability Report 25:57~73.
[19] Ampudia, M., Vlokhoven, H.V. and Zochowski, D., 2016, “Financial Fragility of Euro Area Households”, Journal of Financial Stability, 27:250~262.
[20] Bańkowska, K., Honkkila, J., Pérez-Duarte, S., and Lefebvre, L., 2017, “Household Vulnerability in the Euro Area”, IFC-National Bank of Belgium Workshop.
[21] Bettocchi, A., Giarda, E., Moriconi, C., Orsini, F. and Romeo, R., 2018, “Assessing and Predicting Financial Vulnerability of Italian Households: A Micro-macro Approach”, Empirica, 45(3):587~605.
[22] Campbell, J., and Cocco, J.,2015, “A Model of Mortgage Default”, The Journal of Finance,70(4):1495~1554.
[23] Cao, Y., Chen, J., and Zhang Q.,2018, “Housing Investment in Urban China”. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(1):212~247.
[24] Dalio, R.,2018, Big Debt Crises, Bridgewater Press.
[25] Dey, S., Djoudad, R., and Terajima, Y., 2008, “A Tool for Assessing Financial Vulnerabilities in the Household Sector”, Bank of Canada Review, Summer:45~54.
[26] Dynan,K., and Kohn,D.,2007, “The Rise in U.S. Household Indebtedness: Causes and Consequences”, Federal Reserve Board Working Paper.
[27] Fang, H., Gu, Q., Xiong, W. and Zhou, L.,2016, “Demystifying the Chinese Housing Boom”. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 30:105~166.
[28] Glaeser, E., Huang W., Ma, Y., and Shleifer, A., 2017, “A Real Estate Boom with Chinese Characteristics”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1):93~116.
[29] Herrala, R., and Kauko, K., 2007, “Household Loan Loss Risks in Finland—Estimations and Simulations with Micro Data”, Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers.
[30] Greenwald, D., 2018, “The Mortgage Credit Channel of Macroeconomic Transmission”, MIT Sloan Research Paper, No. 5184~16.
[31] Galuščák, K., Hlavác, P.,and Jakubík, P., 2016,“Household Resilience to Adverse Macroeconomic Shocks: Evidence from Czech Microdata”,International Review of Applied Economics, 30(3):377~402.
[32] Holló, D., and Papp M., 2007, “Assessing Household Credit Risk: Evidence from a Household Survey”. MNB Occasional Papers No.70.
[33] IMF, 2012, “Spain: Vulnerabilities of Private Sector Balance Sheets and Risks to the Financial Sector Technical Notes”, IMF Country Report No.12/140.
[34] Jordà, Ò., Schularick,M., and Taylor,A., 2013. “When Credit Bites Back”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45(2):107~152.
[35] Leika, M.and Marchettini, D., 2017, “A Generalized Framework for the Assessment of Household Financial Vulnerability”, IMF Working Paper.
[36] May, O. and Tudela, M., 2005, “When is Mortgage Indebtedness a Financial Burden to British Households? A Dynamic Probit Approach”, Bank of England Working Paper.
[37] Meriküll,J.,and Rõõm,T.,2017, “The Financial Fragility of Estonian Households: Evidence from Stress Tests on the HFCS Microdata”, Bank of Estonia Working Papers.
[38] Mian, A., Rao K., and Sufi A.,2013, “Household Balance Sheets, Consumption, and the Economic Slump”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4):1687~1726.
[39] Mian, A., and Sufi, A.,2009, “The Consequences of Mortgage Credit Expansion: Evidence from the U.S. Mortgage Default Crisis”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4):1449~1496.
[40] Mian, A., and Sufi, A.,2011, “House Prices, Home Equity-Based Borrowing, and the US Household Leverage Crisis”, American Economic Review, 101(5):2132~2156.
[41] Mian, A., and Sufi, A., 2018, “Finance and Business Cycles: The Credit-driven Household Demand Channel”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(3):31~58.
[42] Michelangeli, V., and Pietrunti, M., 2014, “A Microsimulation Model to Evaluate Italian Households' Financial Vulnerability”, International Journal of microsimulation ,7(3):53~79.
[43] Piketty,T.Yang L., Zucman,G.,2019, “Capital Accumulation, Private Property and Rising Ineguality in China,1978-2015” American Economic Review,109(7): 2469~2496.
[44] Vatne, B., 2006. “How Large Are the Financial Margins of Norwegian Households? An Analysis of Micro Data for the Period 1987-2004?”, Economic Bulletin,77(4):173~180.
[1] 龙海明, 吴迪. 实体杠杆对经济增长的影响研究——基于金融稳定的调节效应[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 38-54.
[2] 吴迪, 张楚然, 侯成琪. 住房价格、金融稳定与宏观审慎政策[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 57-75.
[3] 邢秉昆. 碳减排约束下中国工业企业信用评级[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 77-97.
[4] 马勇, 付莉. “双支柱”调控、政策协调搭配与宏观稳定效应[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 1-17.
[5] 姜富伟, 郭鹏, 郭豫媚. 美联储货币政策对我国资产价格的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 37-55.
[6] 司登奎, 葛新宇, 曾涛, 李小林. 房价波动、金融稳定与最优宏观审慎政策[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 38-56.
[7] 李锋森. 我国融资融券助涨助跌了吗?——基于波动非对称性视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 147-162.
[8] 李力, 王博, 刘潇潇, 郝大鹏. 短期资本、货币政策和金融稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 435(9): 18-32.
[9] 马勇, 田拓, 阮卓阳, 朱军军. 金融杠杆、经济增长与金融稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 37-51.
[10] 陈雨露, 马勇, 阮卓阳. 金融周期和金融波动如何影响经济增长与金融稳定?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 1-22.
[11] 陆磊, 杨骏. 流动性、一般均衡与金融稳定的“不可能三角”[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 1-13.
[1] 张牧扬, 潘妍, 余泳泽. 社会信用、刚兑信仰与地方政府隐性债务[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 1 -19 .
[2] 郭晔, 未钟琴, 方颖. 金融科技布局、银行信贷风险与经营绩效——来自商业银行与科技企业战略合作的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 20 -38 .
[3] 潘敏, 刘红艳, 程子帅. 极端气候对商业银行风险承担的影响——来自中国地方性商业银行的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 39 -57 .
[4] 祝梓翔, 高然. 通胀—增长权衡和中国菲利普斯曲线的平坦化[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 1 -20 .
[5] 邢秉昆. 碳减排约束下中国工业企业信用评级[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 77 -97 .
[6] 刘建建, 王忏, 赵扶扬, 龚六堂. 住房耐用品、土地市场分割与货币失踪之谜[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 21 -39 .
[7] 李孟哲, 麻志明, 吴联生. 上市公司数量与非上市公司创新[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 171 -188 .
[8] 朱永华, 张一林, 林毅夫. 赶超战略与大银行垄断——基于新结构经济学的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 40 -57 .
[9] 高翔, 张敏, 刘啟仁. 工业机器人应用促进了“两业融合”发展吗?——来自中国制造企业投入服务化的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 58 -76 .
[10] 吴锟, 吴卫星, 王沈南. 金融教育是有效的吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 117 -135 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1