Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 507 Issue (9): 152-168    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
社会信任与企业劳动投资效率
申丹琳, 江轩宇
中国矿业大学(北京)管理学院,北京 100083;
中央财经大学会计学院/中国管理会计研究与发展中心,北京 100081
Social Trust and Corporate Labor Investment Efficiency
SHEN Danlin, JIANG Xuanyu
School of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing);
School of Accountancy, Central University of Finance & Economics / China's Management Accounting Research & Development Center
下载:  PDF (523KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文从非正式制度的视角,研究了社会信任与企业劳动投资效率的关系。研究发现,社会信任有助于提高企业劳动投资效率。进一步研究表明,社会信任与企业劳动投资效率的相关关系在融资约束越强以及代理冲突更严重的企业中更显著。同时,随着信息不对称程度的加大,社会信任对企业劳动投资效率的提升作用更显著。此外,社会信任对企业劳动投资效率的改善主要表现为降低劳动投资不足,且对雇佣不足与解雇过度两个方面都存在抑制作用。本文丰富了社会信任的经济后果和企业投资效率影响因素的研究,对于揭示社会信任在企业劳动投资中的作用以及提高劳动投资效率具有一定启示意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
申丹琳
江轩宇
关键词:  社会信任  劳动投资效率  融资约束  代理冲突  信息不对称    
Summary:  Labor is an especially important resource for firms, and it is crucial for the competitiveness of micro enterprises and the development of the macro economy. Therefore, exploring the factors that influence corporate labor investment efficiency is significant in both theory and practice for enhancing the competitive advantage of enterprises and adapting to economic development trends.
The literature examines the factors that influence labor investment efficiency from the perspective of formal systems, such as labor protection, relaxation of short selling constraints, and financial reporting quality, but it neglects the role of informal systems. It is worth noting that formal systems cannot stipulate all operating rules in detail. This suggests the need to investigate the role of informal systems that are internalized in habit and cognition and impose involuntary constraints. As an informal system, trust is a vital form of social capital. However, current research does not explore whether and how social trust affects labor investment efficiency.
Based on a sample of China's A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2018, this paper studies the relation between social trust and labor investment efficiency. The results show that social trust improves corporate labor investment efficiency. Further research demonstrates that the relation between social trust and labor investment efficiency is stronger in firms with severe financial constraints and serious agency conflicts. Moreover, as information asymmetry increases, social trust plays a more significant role in promoting labor investment efficiency. In addition, the effect of improved social trust on corporate labor investment efficiency is mainly manifested in a reduction in under-investment in labor. Social trust can reduce both under-hiring and over-firing of labor.
The main contributions of this paper are as follows. First, by focusing on social trust, the study enriches the literature on the factors influencing corporate labor investment efficiency. Previous studies show that financial reporting quality, conditional conservatism, monitoring of long-term institutional investors, relaxation of short selling constraints, and labor protection are significantly related to corporate labor investment efficiency. However, the literature mainly focuses on formal systems. This paper extends attention to informal systems and discusses the relation between social trust and corporate labor investment efficiency, and thus supplements the existing research.
Second, the study expands the literature on the impact of social trust on micro enterprises from the perspective of corporate labor investment efficiency. Previous research demonstrates the effect of social trust on trade credit, bank loans, risk-taking, mergers and acquisitions, innovation, capital investment efficiency, etc., but neglects labor investment efficiency. There are many differences between labor investment and capital expenditure, and thus the conclusions of previous research concerning the relation between social trust and capital investment efficiency may not be applicable to labor investment efficiency. In addition, labor investment efficiency affects firm performance and macroeconomic growth. This paper relates social trust to labor investment efficiency to obtain a better understanding of how social trust influences the development of micro enterprises and macroeconomic growth.
Third, this paper identifies the mechanisms and specific forms of social trust that can improve corporate labor investment efficiency. The study provides empirical evidence for the mechanisms through which social trust enhances labor investment efficiency from the perspective of financial constraints and agency conflicts. Following prior studies, the paper partitions the sample into subsamples: labor over-investment (over-hiring and under-firing) and labor under-investment (under-hiring and over-firing). It then runs regressions on the subsamples to explore the specific forms of social trust affecting labor investment efficiency. This can not only reveal the underlying mechanisms of social trust influencing labor investment efficiency but also provide insights into the relation between social trust and corporate labor investment.
Keywords:  Social Trust    Labor Investment Efficiency    Financial Constraints    Agency Conflicts    Information Asymmetry
JEL分类号:  G31   M51   Z13  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972193、71872175)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2022YQGL01)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  申丹琳,管理学博士,讲师,中国矿业大学(北京)管理学院,E-mail:shendanlin@126.com.   
作者简介:  江轩宇,管理学博士,副教授,中央财经大学会计学院/中国管理会计研究与发展中心,E-mail:jiangxuanyu@163.com.
引用本文:    
申丹琳, 江轩宇. 社会信任与企业劳动投资效率[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 507(9): 152-168.
SHEN Danlin, JIANG Xuanyu. Social Trust and Corporate Labor Investment Efficiency. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 507(9): 152-168.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V507/I9/152
[1] 褚剑和方军雄,2020,《卖空约束放松能够改善企业劳动投资效率吗》,《外国经济与管理》第2期,第84~96页。
[2] 贾平和陈关亭,2010,《公允价值计量下审计质量的作用研究》,《审计研究》第3期,第59~66页。
[3] 孔东民、唐琦和项君怡,2020,《劳动保护与企业劳动投资效率》,《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》第5期,第36~47页。
[4] 孔东民、项君怡和代昀昊,2017,《劳动投资效率、企业性质与资产收益率》,《金融研究》第3期,第145~158页。
[5] 雷光勇、邱保印和王文忠,2014,《社会信任、审计师选择与企业投资效率》,《审计研究》第4期,第72~80页。
[6] 李明辉,2019,《社会信任对审计师变更的影响——基于CGSS调查数据的研究》,《审计研究》第1期,第110~121页。
[7] 李小荣、万钟和陆瑶,2019,《劳动力市场与公司金融关系研究进展》,《经济学动态》第3期,第120~133页。
[8] 凌鸿程和孙怡龙,2019,《社会信任提高了企业创新能力吗?》,《科学学研究》第10期,第1912~1920页。
[9] 刘凤委、李琳和薛云奎,2009,《信任、交易成本与商业信用模式》,《经济研究》第8期,第130~133页。
[10] 罗炜和朱春艳,2010,《代理成本与公司自愿性披露》,《经济研究》第10期,第143~155页。
[11] 吕劲松,2015,《关于中小企业融资难、融资贵问题的思考》,《金融研究》第11期,第115~123页。
[12] 申丹琳,2019,《社会信任与企业风险承担》,《经济管理》第8期,第147~161页。
[13] 王小鲁、樊纲和胡李鹏,2019,《中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)》,社会科学文献出版社。
[14] 王艳和李善民,2017,《社会信任是否会提升企业并购绩效?》,《管理世界》第12期,第125~140页。
[15] 薛云奎和白云霞,2008,《国家所有权,冗余雇员与公司业绩》,《管理世界》第10期,第96~105页。
[16] 伊志宏、申丹琳和江轩宇,2018,《基金股权关联分析师损害了股票市场信息效率吗——基于股价同步性的经验证据》,《管理评论》第8期,第3~15页。
[17] Beer, M. 1987. “Revitalizing Organizations: Change Process and Emergent Model”, The Academy of Management Executive, 1(1):51~55.
[18] Ben-Nasr, H., and A. A. Alshwer. 2016. “Does Stock Price Informativeness Affect Labor Investment Efficiency?”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 38:249~271.
[19] Chen, D., L. Li, X. Liu, and G. J. Lobo. 2018. “Social Trust and Auditor Reporting Conservatism”, Journal of Business Ethics, 153(4):1083~1108.
[20] Chen, D., X. Liu, and C. Wang. 2016. “Social Trust and Bank Loan Financing: Evidence from China”, Abacus, 52(3):374~403.
[21] Chen, X., and P. Wan. 2020. “Social Trust and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 27(2):485~500.
[22] Gambetta, D. 1988. “Can We Trust Trust?. In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations”, New York: Basil Blackwell.
[23] Ghaly, M., V. A. Dang, and K. Stathopoulos. 2020. “Institutional Investors' Horizons and Corporate Employment Decisions”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 64:101634.
[24] Gur, N., and C. Bjørnskov. 2017. “Trust and Delegation: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(3):644~657.
[25] Ha, J., and M. Feng. 2018. “Conditional Conservatism and Labor Investment Efficiency”, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 14(2):143~163.
[26] Hasan, I., Q. He, and H. Lu. 2022. “Social Capital, Trusting, and Trustworthiness: Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,57(4):1409~1453.
[27] Jung, B., W. J. Lee, and D. P. Weber. 2014. “Financial Reporting Quality and Labor Investment Efficiency”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(4):1047~1076.
[28] Kaplan, N. S., and L. Zingales. 1997. “Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?” ,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1):169~215.
[29] Khedmati, M., M. A. Sualihu, and A. Yawson. 2020. “CEO-Director Ties and Labor Investment Efficiency”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 65:101492.
[30] Li, H., P. Loyalka, S. Rozelle, and B. Wu. 2017a. “Human Capital and China's Future Growth”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1):25~48.
[31] Li, X., S. S. Wang, and X. Wang. 2017b. “Trust and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 76:74~91.
[32] Qiu, B., J. Yu, and K. Zhang. 2020. “Trust and Stock Price Synchronicity: Evidence from China”, Journal of Business Ethics, 167:97~109.
[33] Williamson, O. E. 1975. “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications”, New York: Free Press.
[34] Wu, W., M. Firth, and O. M. Rui. 2014. “Trust and the Provision of Trade Credit”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 39:146~159.
[1] 金祥义, 张文菲, 施炳展. 绿色金融促进了中国出口贸易发展吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 503(5): 38-56.
[2] 陈泽艺, 李常青, 李宇坤. 对外担保与企业创新投入[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 502(4): 133-150.
[3] 宁博, 潘越, 汤潮. 地域商会有助于缓解企业融资约束吗?——来自A股民营上市企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 500(2): 153-170.
[4] 尹洪英, 李闯. 智能制造赋能企业创新了吗?——基于中国智能制造试点项目的准自然试验[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 98-116.
[5] 陈诗一, 张建鹏, 刘朝良. 环境规制、融资约束与企业污染减排——来自排污费标准调整的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 51-71.
[6] 王春飞, 郭云南. 半强制股利政策与股权融资成本[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 172-189.
[7] 郭照蕊, 黄俊. 高铁时空压缩效应与公司权益资本成本——来自A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 190-206.
[8] 潘健平, 翁若宇, 潘越. 企业履行社会责任的共赢效应——基于精准扶贫的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 134-153.
[9] 宫汝凯. 信息不对称、过度自信与股价变动[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 152-169.
[10] 陈关亭, 连立帅, 朱松. 多重信用评级与债券融资成本——来自中国债券市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 94-113.
[11] 张会丽, 赵健宇, 陆正飞. 员工薪酬竞争力与上市公司员工持股[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 169-187.
[12] 刘晓光, 刘嘉桐. 劳动力成本与中小企业融资约束[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 483(9): 117-135.
[13] 杜立, 屈伸, 钱雪松, 金芳吉. 地理距离、契约设计与企业内部资本市场借贷风险防控——来自中国企业集团内部借贷交易的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 130-148.
[14] 李波, 朱太辉. 银行价格竞争、融资约束与企业研发投资——基于“中介效应”模型的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 134-152.
[15] 张盼盼, 张胜利, 陈建国. 融资约束、金融市场化与制造业企业出口国内增加值率[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 478(4): 48-69.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[5] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[6] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[7] 项后军, 闫玉. 理财产品发展、利率市场化与银行风险承担问题研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 99 -114 .
[8] 潘越, 肖金利, 戴亦一. 文化多样性与企业创新:基于方言视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 146 -161 .
[9] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
[10] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158 -174 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1