Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2026, Vol. 553 Issue (7): 39-57    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
存款保险制度、显性储蓄安全与金融稳定
王擎, 姚帅, 苏育洲
Deposit Insurance System, Explicit Savings Security and Financial Stability
WANG Qing, YAO Shuai, SO Yukchow
School of Finance/Institute of Chinese Financial Studies,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology
下载:  PDF (753KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 保障储蓄安全对于维护金融稳定具有重要意义。本文基于拓展的储户异质性均衡理论模型,结合1985—2022年60个主要经济体的非平衡面板数据,检验了保障储蓄安全对维护金融稳定的影响。研究发现,依托存款保险制度实现的显性储蓄安全具有正向的金融稳定效应。机制分析表明,一方面,“稳定锚”机制通过直接效应渠道稳定银行部门,并通过溢出效应渠道稳定非银金融部门,进而促进金融稳定;另一方面,“信任锚”机制通过政府信任和社会信任渠道提高公众信任,进而促进金融稳定。进一步分析表明,显性储蓄安全的金融稳定效应在隐性担保预期较弱和金融安全网存在短板的国家更加明显。本文为我国坚定保障储蓄安全、发展具有中国特色的存款保险制度提供了经验支持。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王擎
姚帅
苏育洲
关键词:  存款保险制度  储蓄安全  金融稳定  直接效应  溢出效应    
Summary:  Financial security is pivotal to the overall national economy and social stability. As a core pillar of the financial safety net, the explicit deposit insurance system is a crucial instrument for safeguarding financial stability. Protecting the safety of public savings is also the original intent and mission of implementing an explicit deposit insurance system. China's high savings rate and its strong resilience to economic fluctuations are the root causes of its robust risk-resistant capacity. This reality also constitutes a key reason why China needs to rely on an explicit deposit insurance system to fully safeguard public savings. In the context of China's accelerated advancement of deposit insurance system reform, it is necessary to explore the significant value of explicit savings security for maintaining financial stability. Existing literature predominantly focuses on its partial value for banking stability, leaving its comprehensive value for broader financial stability and the underlying transmission channels unexplored. There remain shortcomings in terms of research samples, measurement indicators, analytical perspectives, theoretical modeling, and empirical design.
Theoretically, this paper is the first to integrate the stability of both the banking sector and the non-bank sector into a unified analytical framework for studying savings security and financial stability. By introducing non-bank sectors and survival preferences, we extend the heterogeneous depositor equilibrium model of Dávila and Goldstein (2023). We treat banking sector stability as the direct perspective for examining financial stability, and non-bank financial sector stability as the spillover effect. The study investigates how the degree of explicit savings security affects financial stability through specific channels. Empirically, utilizing panel data from 60 countries spanning from 1985 to 2022 and employing a two-way fixed effects model, this paper examines the impact of explicit savings security on financial stability. The empirical results demonstrate that explicit savings security has a positive effect on financial stability. On the one hand, it functions as a “stability anchor” through direct effect channels that stabilize the banking sector and spillover effect channels that stabilize other financial sectors. On the other hand, it serves as a “trust anchor” through channels of government and social trust. Further research indicates that the financial stability effect of explicit savings security is more pronounced in countries with weaker implicit guarantee expectations and more evident shortcomings in their financial safety nets.
Compared to existing literature, this research makes four primary contributions. First, shifting from the broad concept of savings to a narrow concept of savings security, this paper thoroughly demonstrates the significant value of explicit savings security, based on deposit insurance coverage levels, for maintaining financial stability. Second, relevant research frequently concentrates on bank runs but less on runs in non-bank financial sectors, and fails to adequately discuss the roles of the “stability anchor” and “trust anchor” in safeguarding financial stability. This paper introduces interbank sectors and survival preferences into the model to explain the mechanism through which explicit savings security promotes financial stability by stabilizing both the banking and non-bank financial sectors. Third, existing studies tend to focus on the partial stability of banks rather than the overall stability of the financial system, lacking attention to relevant causal chains and mechanisms. There is also a scarcity of multinational evidence covering long time spans and various channels. This paper, combining long-term panel data from major global economies and employing robust estimation strategies, identifies empirical evidence that explicit savings security promotes financial stability through the “stability anchor” and “trust anchor” mechanisms. Fourth, our findings enrich the understanding of the narrow concept of savings security, particularly demonstrating the important practical value of the deposit insurance system and explicit savings security. This counters arguments of “nominal existence” or “ineffectiveness” regarding deposit insurance system construction, providing a basis for China to steadfastly develop a deposit insurance system with Chinese characteristics.
Keywords:  Deposit Insurance System    Savings Security    Financial Stability    Direct Effect    Spillover Effect
JEL分类号:  G01   G21   G28  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金重大项目(22&ZD121)、教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助重大项目(24JHQ011)和四川省软科学项目(2025NSFSCR0007)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  姚 帅,博士研究生,西南财经大学金融学院,E-mail:shuaiyshawn@163.com.   
作者简介:  王 擎,经济学博士,教授,西南财经大学金融学院、中国金融研究院,E-mail:wqing@swufe.edu.cn.
苏育洲,哲学博士,教授,澳门科技大学商学院,E-mail:jycso@must.edu.mo.
引用本文:    
王擎, 姚帅, 苏育洲. 存款保险制度、显性储蓄安全与金融稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 39-57.
WANG Qing, YAO Shuai, SO Yukchow. Deposit Insurance System, Explicit Savings Security and Financial Stability. Journal of Financial Research, 2026, 553(7): 39-57.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2026/V553/I7/39
[1]陈雨露、马勇和阮卓阳,2016,《金融周期和金融波动如何影响经济增长与金融稳定?》,《金融研究》第2期,第1~22页。
[2]高睿、王营和曹廷求,2022,《气候变化与宏观金融风险——来自全球58个代表性国家的证据》,《南开经济研究》第3期,第3~20页。
[3]纪洋、边文龙和黄益平,2018,《隐性存保、显性存保与金融危机:国际经验与中国实践》,《经济研究》第8期,第20~35页。
[4]纪洋、葛婷婷、边文龙和黄益平,2021,《杠杆增速、部门差异与金融危机——“结构性去杠杆”的实证分析与我国杠杆政策的讨论》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第843~862页。
[5]马勇、田拓、阮卓阳和朱军军,2016,《金融杠杆、经济增长与金融稳定》,《金融研究》第6期,第37~51页。
[6]明雷、秦晓雨和杨胜刚,2022,《差别化存款保险费率与银行风险承担——基于我国农村银行的经验证据》,《金融研究》第3期,第41~59页。
[7]潘敏和秦力宸,2023,《金融结构对宏观经济韧性的影响——来自跨国比较的经验证据》,《金融研究》第11期,第39~58页。
[8]秦晓雨、刘方和刘莉亚,2025,《存款保险制度、存款稳定性与中小银行风险承担》,《国际金融研究》第9期,第49~61页。
[9]谭小芬、耿亚莹和苟琴,2024,《跨境资本流动、信贷配置风险与银行体系稳定》,《经济研究》第1期,第129~147页。
[10]王道平,2016,《利率市场化、存款保险制度与系统性银行危机防范》,《金融研究》第1期,第50~65页。
[11]项后军和张清俊,2020,《中国的显性存款保险制度与银行风险》,《经济研究》第12期,第165~181页。
[12]周镕基、姚帅和苏育洲,2024,《最优存款保险定价模型与中国抉择》,《金融监管研究》第5期,第78~95页。
[13]Abdelsalam, O., A. Chantziaras., N. L. Joseph and N. Tsileponis, 2024, “Trust Matters: A Global Perspective on the Influence of Trust on Bank Market Risk”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 92, No.101959.
[14]Anginer, D., A. Demirguç-Kunt and M. Zhu, 2014, “How Does Deposit Insurance Affect Bank Risk? Evidence From the Recent Crisis”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, pp.312~321.
[15]Angkinand, A. and C. Wihlborg, 2010, “Deposit Insurance Coverage, Ownership, and Banks' Risk-taking in Emerging Markets”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(2), pp.252~274.
[16]Bergbrant, M. C., K. T. Campbell, D. M. Hunter and J. E. Owers, 2016, “Does Deposit Insurance Retard the Development of Non-Bank Financial Markets?”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 66, pp.102~125.
[17]Calomiris, C. W. and S. Chen, 2022, “The Spread of Deposit Insurance and the Global Rise in Bank Asset Risk Since the 1970s”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 49, No.100881.
[18]Choudhary, M. A. and N. Limodio, 2022, “Liquidity Risk and Long-Term Finance: Evidence from a Natural Experiment”, The Review of Economic Studies, 89(3), pp.1278~1313.
[19]Dávila, E. and I. Goldstein, 2023, “Optimal Deposit Insurance”, Journal of Political Economy, 131(7), pp.1676~1730.
[20]Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and H. P. Huizinga, 2004, “Market Discipline and Deposit Insurance”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(2), pp.375~399.
[21]Demirgüç-Kunt, A., E. Kane and L. Laeven, 2015, “Deposit Insurance Around the World: A Comprehensive Analysis and Database”, Journal of Financial Stability, 20, pp.155~183.
[22]Drechsler, I., A. Savov, P. Schnabl and O. Wang, 2026, “Deposit Franchise Runs”, Journal of Finance, 81, pp.1573~1617.
[23]Dudley, E. and N. Zhang, 2016, “Trust and Corporate Cash Holdings”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, pp.363~387.
[24]Egan, M., A. Hortaçsu and G. Matvos, 2017, “Deposit Competition and Financial Fragility: Evidence from the US Banking Sector”, American Economic Review, 107(1), pp.169~216.
[25]Flannery, M. J. and E. Giacomini, 2015, “Maintaining Adequate Bank Capital: An Empirical Analysis of the Supervision of European Banks”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, pp.236~249.
[26]Guiso, L., P. Sapienza. and L. Zingales, 2008, “Trusting the Stock Market”, Journal of Finance, 63(6), pp.2557~2600.
[27]Hardy, D. C. and C. Pazarbasioglu, 1999, “Determinants and Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Further Evidence”, IMF Staff Papers, 46(3), pp.247~258.
[28]Heyert, A. and L. Weill, 2025, “Trust in Banks and Financial Inclusion: Micro-level Evidence from 28 Countries”, Economic Systems, 49(1), No.101248.
[29]Jamilov, R., T. König, K. Müller and F. Saidi, 2025, “Two Centuries of Systemic Bank Runs”, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 19382.
[30]Ji, Y., W. L. Bian and Y. P. Huang, 2018, “Deposit Insurance, Bank Exit, and Spillover Effects”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 96, pp.268~276.
[31]Laeven, L. and F. Valencia, 2013, “Systemic Banking Crises Database”, IMF Economic Review, 61(2), pp.225~270.
[32]Laeven, L. and F. Valencia, 2026, “Systemic Banking Crises Database: 1970-2025”, IMF Working Paper, 94, No. 2026/094.
[33]Nguyen, T.C., V. Castro and J. Wood, 2022, “A New Comprehensive Database of Financial Crises: Identification, Frequency, and Duration”, Economic Modelling, 108, No.105770.
[34]Oosthuizen, D. and R. Zalla, 2024, “Funding Deposit Insurance”, Journal of Financial Stability, 75, No. 101342.
[35]Prean, N. and H. Stix, 2011, “The Effect of Raising Deposit Insurance Coverage in Times of Financial Crisis—Evidence from Croatian Microdata”, Economic Systems, 35(4), pp.496~511.
[36]Reinhart, C.M. and K. S. Rogoff, 2009, “This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly”, Princeton: Princeton University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831722.
[37]Rodríguez-Pose, A. and A. Sandu, 2025, “Banking on Trust: Institutional Trust and the Geography of Financial Exclusion in Central and Eastern Europe”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 57(7), pp.921~948.
[38]So, Y. C., S. Yao, S. B. Wu and R. J. Zhou, 2024, “Independent Institution or Cooperative Institution? China's Deposit Insurance Institution Model and the Honey Badger Algorithm”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 96, No.101866.
[39]Svirydzenka, K., 2016, “Introducing A New Broad-Based Index of Financial Development”, IMF Working Paper, No. 2016/005.
[1] 王擎附录 Download
[2] 王擎内容精粹 Download
[1] 刘颖斐, 李豪飞, 林晚发, 祝小全. 科创债发行的行业溢出效应——来自债券发行定价的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 77-94.
[2] 史永东, 张曦仁, 陈火亮, 甄红线. 科技创新债券发行对承销商业绩的溢出效应[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 552(6): 169-187.
[3] 刘穷志, 廖韫琪. 地方政府债务、企业违约风险与金融稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 551(5): 20-39.
[4] 李涛, 吴颖怡, 郑登津. 出口退税分担机制改革的供应链溢出效应[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 551(5): 59-77.
[5] 杨鹏, 孙伟增, 田轩, 左祥太. 网络安全风险治理与企业创新——基于大语言模型的识别与发现[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 547(1): 76-94.
[6] 兰天琪, 陈运森, 赵瑞瑞, 贾宁. 股东诉讼溢出与策略性信息披露[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 188-206.
[7] 栾稀, 朱浣君, 彭雨洁, 徐奇渊. 地缘政治冲击下的主权债务风险:溢出效应和传导渠道[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 1-19.
[8] 李政, 李薇, 李丽雯. 美国三类不确定性冲击、生产网络传导与中国行业尾部风险[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 39-57.
[9] 李嘉楠, 陈立, 周颖刚. 外部货币冲击与金融稳定——基于近代白银法案的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 188-206.
[10] 赵葆颖, 江轩宇, 伊志宏, 张澈. 注册制改革对企业劳动生产率的溢出效应研究——基于信息反馈效应的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 525(3): 132-149.
[11] 林晚发, 夏小涵, 钟辉勇. 信用评级行业声誉冲击的溢出效应:盈余管理的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 525(3): 169-187.
[12] 王正位, 朱怡哲, 张弘. 环境处罚对企业生产率的溢出效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 524(2): 113-130.
[13] 梅冬州, 宋佳馨, 马振宇. 美联储货币政策紧缩的跨国异质性影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 517(7): 1-20.
[14] 李志辉, 朱明皓, 李源, 李政. 我国金融机构的系统性风险溢出研究:测度、渠道与防范对策[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 514(4): 55-73.
[15] 董文华, 谭小芬, 朱菲菲, 李兴申. 美国货币政策会影响其他经济体贷款者的风险承担吗?——基于全球辛迪加贷款市场的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 57-73.
[1] 刘珺, 康立, 丁雨婷. 资产价格与通胀感知偏差——基于数字金融发展的再思考[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 552(6): 1 -19 .
[2] 张成思, 何启志, 刘泽豪. 中央银行流动性供给机制与货币政策精准调控[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 1 -19 .
[3] 王芳, 刘瑶琚, 王晨曦. 助消费提振:财政支出结构调整与结构性货币政策配合[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 551(5): 1 -19 .
[4] 范志勇, 安戈洋, 杨怡璇. 中国货币政策的要素收入分配效应研究——基于劳动力市场与金融市场双重摩擦视角[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 20 -38 .
[5] 陈国进, 赵宇磊, 赵向琴. 信息不对称、气候适应性投资缺口与金融监管政策应对[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 95 -113 .
[6] 王雄元, 崔荡荡, 王慧娴, 王子平. 市场准入管制放松与企业技术多元化[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 551(5): 170 -187 .
[7] 孟源祎, 聂卓, 马光荣, 赵耀红. 开“前门”是否有助堵“后门”?——地方政府专项债务发行对隐性债务举借的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 552(6): 20 -37 .
[8] 王修华, 梁中旗, 刘锦华. 保险资金入市的创新驱动效应:发展“耐心资本”的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 58 -76 .
[9] 刘颖斐, 李豪飞, 林晚发, 祝小全. 科创债发行的行业溢出效应——来自债券发行定价的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 77 -94 .
[10] 丁攀, 李力, 李向阳. 气候物理冲击、地方债务风险与实体经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 114 -132 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1