Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2021, Vol. 494 Issue (8): 80-99    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
“活在当下”还是“未雨绸缪”?——地震对中国城镇家庭储蓄和消费习惯的长期影响
章元, 刘茜楠
复旦大学中国社会主义市场经济研究中心, 上海 200433
“Living in the Moment” or “Saving for the Future”? Long-Term Effects of Earthquake Experiences on Chinese Urban Household Savings Rates and Consumption Habits
ZHANG Yuan, LIU Qiannan
China Center for Economic Studies, Fudan University
下载:  PDF (800KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 全球有27亿人口生活在地震带上,但现有经济学文献关于地震对家庭储蓄和消费行为的影响研究并不充分。本文认为,相比“未雨绸缪”,“活在当下”假说更适合刻画地震经历对家庭储蓄和消费习惯的长期影响,并提出如下经济机制:地震经历在长期内并不会影响家庭的收入水平,但它带来的死亡风险和心理冲击会使地震带居民更多地进行享受型消费,从而降低家庭储蓄率。基于国家统计局的城镇住户调查数据,本文实证发现:户主5岁以后经历的地震频率越多,其家庭储蓄率显著越低;户主经历的地震频率显著提高了家庭的享受型消费支出(如文化娱乐、养生保健、美容奢侈品支出等),但是对家庭可支配收入和非享受型消费没有显著影响。本文的研究结论有助于理解地震对城镇居民储蓄和消费习惯的长期影响,并为制定激发居民消费潜力的有关政策提供启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
章元
刘茜楠
关键词:  地震经历  死亡风险  家庭储蓄率  享受型消费    
Summary:  Economic theory demonstrates that a household increases its precautionary savings rate over time to cope with natural disasters and smooth consumption. However natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, droughts, hurricanes, and insect plagues have different effects on households, and thus the empirical testing of combinations of different kinds of natural disasters will generate biased estimates.
Approximately 2.7 billion people worldwide live in areas that are considered seismic zones, but the economic literature inadequately depicts their consumption and saving patterns. This paper holds that earthquakes, unlike other natural disasters, threaten the lives of people who dwell in seismic zones, and thus trigger fear and anxiety in these people. Consequently, those who live in seismic zones may have different consumption and savings habits than those who live in non-seismic zones. This paper hypothesizes that the long-term effect of earthquakes results in residents living in a seismic zone exhibiting a “living in the moment” attitude, which affects their consumption and saving habits. Specifically, although the experience of earthquakes has no significant long-term effects on levels of household income, the earthquake-associated risk of death and psychological shock has significantly positive effects on hedonic consumption, which reduces rates of household saving.
This paper uses nationally representative household survey data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China that covers 18 provinces from 2002 to 2009 and conducts empirical tests to obtain the following conclusions. First, each experience of an earthquake (ML ≥ 4.5) reduces the rate of household savings by 0.2 percent point . Second, the frequency of earthquakes experienced by household heads does not have significant long-term effects on levels of household disposable income, but does have significant positive effects on levels of household consumption. Third, an increase in the frequency of earthquakes experienced by household heads leads to an increase in household hedonic consumption (such as the consumption of cultural entertainment, non-essential health care, cosmetology, and luxury goods), but has no effect on non-hedonic consumption. Fourth, several robustness checks are carried out (e.g., controlling for the frequency of earthquakes when household heads were 7 years old and controlling for the experience of earthquakes with an ML > 6) on subsamples that did not migrate from a seismic zone, and the above conclusions remain valid. Fifth, empirical evidence from migrant workers suggests that the endogeneity problem in the empirical models does not affect the conclusions.
This paper contributes to academic research and policymaking in China. In terms of academic research, this paper's first contribution is to the literature on the effect of earthquakes on household consumption and saving patterns, as it provides empirical evidence from urban China. It also provides evidence from economic research to the psychology literature, revealing the effect of the risk of earthquake-associated death on individual consumption behaviors; this has implications for the optimal location of companies that provide hedonic products or services. Second, this paper helps to explain the savings rates in China from the perspective of consumption behavior shaped by earthquakes.
In terms of policymaking, this paper's first contribution is to highlight a way to promote domestic consumption. China has a very high household savings rate compared with other developing and developed economies, and the Chinese government consistently endeavors to promote domestic consumption to boost economic growth. In recent years, the Chinese government has emphasized the need for reform on the demand side and on the supply side to better match both sides and thus improve economic growth. China has a huge domestic market, which serves as a substitute foreign market, and this suggests that improving domestic demand rather than export demand will be fruitful, especially as the China-US trade relationship is not healthy. Thus, this paper indicates that policies aimed at promoting domestic consumption should focus on reshaping consumption habits, i.e., encouraging spending on cultural entertainment, non-essential health care, and other hedonic consumption. Second, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is also a natural disaster, and it warrants more academic research. The conclusions from this paper suggest ways to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on household consumption and savings rates. The findings of this paper also suggest that new COVID-19-associated habits, such as mask-wearing and the frequent use of hand disinfectants, will have long-term effects on consumption habits and household savings rates.
Keywords:  Experience of Earthquake    Risk of Death    Household Savings Rate    Hedonic Consumption
JEL分类号:  D81   D91   D12   E21  
基金资助: * 感谢国家自然科学基金项目(批准号:71833003、71703088)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  刘茜楠,经济学博士研究生,复旦大学中国社会主义市场经济研究中心,E-mail:qnliu18@fudan.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  章 元,经济学博士,教授,复旦大学中国社会主义市场经济研究中心,E-mail:zhangyuanfd@fudan.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
章元, 刘茜楠. “活在当下”还是“未雨绸缪”?——地震对中国城镇家庭储蓄和消费习惯的长期影响[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 80-99.
ZHANG Yuan, LIU Qiannan. “Living in the Moment” or “Saving for the Future”? Long-Term Effects of Earthquake Experiences on Chinese Urban Household Savings Rates and Consumption Habits. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 494(8): 80-99.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V494/I8/80
[1] 陈斌开和杨汝岱,2013,《土地供给、住房价格与中国城镇居民储蓄》,《经济研究》第1期,110~122页。
[2] 程令国和张晔,2011,《早年的饥荒经历影响了人们的储蓄行为吗?——对我国居民高储蓄率的一个新解释》,《经济研究》第8期,第119~132页。
[3] 范子英和刘甲炎,2015,《为买房而储蓄——兼论房产税改革的收入分配效应》,《管理世界》第5期,第18~27+187页。
[4] 楼海棠,1996,《中国古今地震灾情总汇》,地震出版社。
[5] 卢晶亮、冯帅章和艾春荣,2014,《自然灾害及政府救助对农户收入与消费的影响:来自汶川大地震的经验》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第745~766页。
[6] 罗楚亮,2004,《经济转轨、不确定性与城镇居民消费行为》,《经济研究》第4期,第100~106页。
[7] 山立威,2011,《心理还是实质:汶川地震对中国资本市场的影响》,《经济研究》第4期,第121~134+146页。
[8] 沈坤荣和谢勇,2012,《不确定性与中国城镇居民储蓄率的实证研究》,《金融研究》第3期,第1~13页。
[9] 谭静、余静文和饶璨,2014,《二元结构下中国流动人口的回迁意愿与储蓄行为——来自2012年北京、上海、广州流动人口动态监测数据的经验证据》,《金融研究》第12期,第23-38页。
[10] 谢致慧和凌义玲,2014,《死亡威胁下人生观对享乐与实用消费之影响》,《台大管理论丛》第1期,第157~184页。
[11] 徐现祥、刘毓芸和肖泽凯,2015,《方言与经济增长》,《经济学报》第2期,第1~32页。
[12] 杨汝岱和陈斌开,2009,《高等教育改革、预防性储蓄与居民消费行为》,《经济研究》第8期,第113~124页。
[13] 姚东旻和许艺煊,2018,《自然灾害与居民储蓄行为——基于汶川地震的微观计量检验》,《经济学动态》第5期,第55~70页。
[14] 姚东旻、许艺煊和张鹏远,2019,《灾难经历、时间偏好与家庭储蓄行为》,《世界经济》第1期,第145~169页。
[15] 殷兴山、孙景德和张超群,2007,《制度变迁、不确定性、收入增长与居民储蓄率——基于宁波案例的因子分析》,《金融研究》第9期,第102~112页。
[16] 游珍、封志明和杨艳昭,2018,《中国地形起伏度公里网格数据集》,全球变化科学研究数据出版系统。
[17] Alba, J. W. and E. F. Williams. 2013. “Pleasure Principles: A Review of Research on Hedonic Consumption”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1):2~18.
[18] Arndt, J., J. Schimel, and J. Goldenberg. 2003. “Death Can Be Good for Your Health: Fitness Intentions as A Proximal and Distal Defense against Mortality Salience”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(8):1726~1746.
[19] Arndt, J., S. Solomon, T. Kasser, et al. 2004. “The Urge to Splurge: A Terror Management Account of Materialism and Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3):198~212.
[20] Bchir, M. and M. Willinger. 2013. “Does the Exposure to Natural Hazards Affect Risk and Time Preferences? Some Insights from A Field Experiment in Perú”, Working Paper, No. 04, LAMETA, Universitiy of Montpellier.
[21] Bernile, G., V. Bhagwat, and P. R. Rau. 2017. “What Doesn't Kill You Will Only Make You More Risk-Loving: Early-Life Disasters and CEO Behavior”, Journal of Finance, 72(1):167~206.
[22] Boustan L. P., M. E. Kahn, P. W. Rhode, et al. 2020. “The Effect of Natural Disasters on Economic Activity in US Counties: A Century of Data”, Journal of Urban Economics, 118:103257.
[23] Brown, P., A. J. Daigneault, E. Tjernström, et al. 2018. “Natural Disasters, Social Protection, and Risk Perceptions”, World Development, 104:310~325.
[24] Callen, M. 2015. “Catastrophes and Time Preference: Evidence from the Indian Ocean Earthquake”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118:199~214.
[25] Caruso, G. D. 2017. “The Legacy of Natural Disasters: The Intergenerational Impact of 100 Years of Disasters in Latin America”, Journal of Development Economics, 127:209~233.
[26] Cassar, A., A. Healy, and C. von Kessler. 2017. “Trust, Risk, and Time Preferences after A Natural Disaster: Experimental Evidence from Thailand”, World Development, 94:90~105.
[27] Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) and United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). 2016. “Poverty & Death: Disaster Mortality 1996-2015”, Brussels: CRED & Geneva: UNISDR.
[28] Deng, G., L. Gan, and M. A. Hernandez. 2015. “Do Natural Disasters Cause An Excessive Fear of Heights? Evidence from the Wenchuan Earthquake”, Journal of Urban Economics, 90:79~89.
[29] Dercon, S. 2002. “Income Risk, Coping Strategies, and Safety Nets”, The World Bank Research Observer, 17(2):141~166.
[30] Elbers, C., J. W. Gunning, and B. Kinsey. 2007. “Growth and Risk: Methodology and Micro Evidence”, The World Bank Economic Review, 21(1):1-20.
[31] Filipski, M., L. Jin, X. Zhang, et al. 2019. “Living Like There's No Tomorrow: The Psychological Effects of An Earthquake on Savings and Spending Behavior”, European Economic Review, 116:107~128.
[32] Fransen, M. L., D. Semeesters, and B. M. Fennis. 2011. “The Role of Social Presence in Mortality Salience Effects”, Journal of Business Research, 64(1):29~33.
[33] Gallagher, J. 2014. “Learning about An Infrequent Event: Evidence from Flood Insurance Take-Up in the United States”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(3):206~233.
[34] Gignoux, J. and M. Menéndez. 2016. “Benefit in the Wake of Disaster: Long-Run Effects of Earthquakes on Welfare in Rural Indonesia”, Journal of Development Economics, 118:26~44.
[35] Greenberg, J., T. Pyszczynski, and S. Solomon. 1986. “The Causes and Consequences of A Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory”, In Baumeister R. F. (Ed.), Public Self and Private Self, New York: Springer.
[36] Guan, S., L. Cheng, Y. Fan, et al. 2015. “Myopic Decisions under Negative Emotions Correlate with Altered Time Perception”, Frontiers in Psychology, 6:468.
[37] Gunning, J. W. 2010. “Risk and Savings: A Taxonomy”, Economics Letters, 107(1):39~41.
[38] Hirschman, E. C. and M. B. Holbrook. 1982. “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions”, Journal of Marketing, 46(3):92~101.
[39] Ho, M. C., D. Shaw, S. Lin, et al. 2008. “How Do Disaster Characteristics Influence Risk Perception?” Risk Analysis, 28(3):635~643.
[40] Kinsey, B., K. Burger, and J. W. Gunning. 1998. “Coping with Drought in Zimbabwe: Survey Evidence on Responses of Rural Households to Risk”, World Development, 26(1):89~110.
[41] Kung, Y. W. and S. H. Chen. 2012. “Perception of Earthquake Risk in Taiwan: Effects of Gender and Past Earthquake Experience”, Risk Analysis, 32(9):1535~1546.
[42] Lerner, J. S. and D. Keltner. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1):146~159.
[43] Levhari, D. and L. J. Mirman. 1977. “Savings and Consumption with An Uncertain Horizon”, Journal of Political Economy, 85(2):265~281.
[44] Lien, J. W., Q. Peng, and J. Zheng. 2015. “Major Earthquake Experience and Present-Focused Expenditures”, Working Paper, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Major-Earthquake-Experience-and-Present-Focused-Lien-Peng/bd4b20befe67840fb7ffc5fce199a2bca34487d4.
[45] Liu S., R. Weng, and D. Yang. 2018. “Natural Disaster, Fiscal Pressure and Tax Avoidance: A Typhoon-Based Study”, China Journal of Accounting Studies, 5(4):468-509.
[46] Pesaresi, M., D. Ehrlich, T. Kemper, et al. 2017. Atlas of the Human Planet 2017: Global Exposure to Natural Hazards, EUR 28556 EN.
[47] Russett, B. and J. Slemrod. 1993. “Diminished Expectations of Nuclear War and Increased Personal Savings: Evidence From Individual Survey Data”, American Economic Review, 83(4):1022~1033.
[48] Sawada, Y. and Y. Kuroishi. 2015. “How Does A Natural Disaster Affect People's Preference? The Case of A Large Scale Flood in the Philippines Using the Convex Time Budget Experiments”, In Sawada, Y., and S. Oum (Eds.), Disaster Risks, Social Preferences, and Policy Effects: Field Experiments in Selected ASEAN and East Asian Countries (pp.27~56), ERIA Research Project Report FY2013, No.34, Jakarta: ERIA.
[49] Skidmore, M. 2001. “Risk, Natural Disasters, and Household Savings in A Life Cycle Model”, Japan and the World Economy, 13(1):15~34.
[50] Voors, M. J., E. E. Nillesen, P. Verwimp, et al. 2012. “Violent Conflict and Behavior: A Field Experiment in Burundi”, American Economic Review, 102(2):941~964.
[51] Yaari, M. E. 1965. “Uncertain Lifetime, Life Insurance, and the Theory of the Consumer”, Review of Economic Studies, 32(2):137~150.
[1] 吴卫星, 张旭阳, 吴锟. 金融素养与家庭储蓄率——基于理财规划与借贷约束的解释[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 119-137.
[2] 范庆祝, 孙祁祥. 中国寿险市场存在逆向选择吗?——来自CHARLS数据的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 112-129.
[1] 杨连星. 反倾销如何影响了跨国并购[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 61 -79 .
[2] 朱宁, 刘伟其, 于之倩, 王兵. 中国银行业结构性全要素生产率增长研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 1 -18 .
[3] 张成思, 刘泽豪, 何平. 流动性幻觉与高杠杆率之谜[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 19 -39 .
[4] 牛欢, 严成樑. 环境税率、双重红利与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 40 -57 .
[5] 缪延亮, 郝阳, 费璇. 利差、美元指数与跨境资本流动[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 1 -21 .
[6] 王霞, 司诺, 宋涛. 中国季度GDP的即时预测与混频分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 22 -41 .
[7] 梁若冰, 张东荣, 方心, 林细细. 限购政策是否降低了上市房地产企业价值?——基于强度双重差分法的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 42 -60 .
[8] 罗明津, 铁瑛. 企业金融化与劳动收入份额变动[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 100 -118 .
[9] 吴卫星, 张旭阳, 吴锟. 金融素养与家庭储蓄率——基于理财规划与借贷约束的解释[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 119 -137 .
[10] 王春飞, 郭云南. 半强制股利政策与股权融资成本[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 172 -189 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1