Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2020, Vol. 476 Issue (2): 147-166    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国个人投资者处置效应研究——一个非理性信念的视角
武佳薇, 汪昌云, 陈紫琳, JieMichaelGuo
中证金融研究院期货与衍生品研究部,北京 100033;
中国人民大学中国财政金融政策研究中心,北京 100872;
南方基金管理股份有限公司宏观研究与资产配置部,广东深圳 518017;
杜伦大学商学院,英国杜伦
A Study of Disposition Effect among China's Individual Investors: the Perspective of Irrational Beliefs
WU Jiawei, WANG Changyun, CHEN Zilin, Jie Michael Guo
Futures and Derivatives Research Department, China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets;
China Financial Policy Research Center, Renmin University of China;
Macro Research and Asset Management Department, China Southern Asset Management Co. Ltd.;
Durham University Business School
下载:  PDF (891KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 处置效应是指投资者过早卖出盈利股票而长期持有亏损股票的现象。大量文献表明金融市场投资者存在显著的处置效应,但其产生的原因和机理存在争议。本文在前景理论框架下,构建了包含投资者非理性预期的离散时间投资组合决策模型,发现处置效应随投资者情绪升高而减弱。本文使用我国某券商2007—2009年近177万个人投资者股票账户的交易数据进行了实证分析,得到与理论模型预测的一致结果,即投资者情绪与投资者处置效应之间呈现显著的负相关关系。而且,受情绪影响,投资者处置效应在估值难度较大的股票中更弱。本文结论对理解投资者处置效应、优化投资者卖出决策和加强资本市场基础制度建设具有一定理论和实践意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
武佳薇
汪昌云
陈紫琳
Jie Michael Guo
关键词:  处置效应  投资者情绪  非理性预期    
Summary:  The disposition effect refers to a robust trading phenomenon in which both individual and institutional investors are more likely to sell an asset when it is at a gain than when it is at a loss. The disposition effect is common in the stock market, the futures market, the real estate market, and other financial markets. However, as widespread as the disposition effect is, the literature has not reached consensus on its mechanism. We extend the literature by showing the significant impact of investor sentiment on the disposition effect both theoretically and empirically.
   The theory of investor preference and the theory of rational belief are the two main explanations for the disposition effect. Kahneman and Tversky's (1979) prospect theory attributes the disposition effect to the features of investors' preferences, as described by the S-shaped value function. Investors are more risk averse when facing profits and more risk seeking when facing a loss. Therefore, investors prefer to sell profitable stocks to realize gains and hold loss stocks to wait for recovery. One basic assumption of present prospect theory models and relevant modified models is that investors' expectations regarding the probability of stock price change are equal to the real probability (Barberis and Huang, 2008; Barberis and Xiong, 2009). As this assumption fails to describe the fact that investors usually have irrational expectations, the present prospect theory model does not include the documented impact of investor sentiment on trading behavior and asset pricing (Antoniou et al., 2013; Da et al., 2015). To fill this gap, we introduce investor sentiment into the prospect theory model and study the potential impact of investor sentiment on the disposition effect.
   Irrational investors usually fail to properly estimate the price expectation of a risky financial asset (normally a stock). Therefore, we describe investor sentiment by using investor expectation bias on the probability of stock price change for different cases (Barberis et al., 1998) and modify the prospect theory model based on the binomial tree model in Barberis and Xiong (2009). We define investors' irrational expectations regarding the probability of stock price increase as πs and the actual probability of stock price increase as πo. The difference (Δ) between πs and πo represents the extent to which an investor overestimates the probability of stock price increase (Dumas et al., 2009; Shefrin and Statman, 1994). When market sentiment is high, investors are often more overconfident and more optimistic, such that Δ>0. We construct a discrete-time portfolio decision-making model derived from investors' irrational expectations and obtain a series of simulation results for investors' optimal portfolio choices under limited capital based on the parameters in Barberis and Xiong (2009) and the PGR/PLR measures of the disposition effect used in Odean (1998). The results indicate that investors' disposition effect decreases as Δ increases, showing the essential role of investor sentiment in the disposition effect.
   We base this study on a transaction-level dataset of approximately 1.77 million individual investors from a large anonymous national Chinese broker from 2007 to 2009. We also include investors' daily positions so that we can match and calculate the PGR and PLR indexes. The sample covers a striking bull and bear period for China's stock market, which offers a natural environment in which to study the impact of investor sentiment on the disposition effect. Consistent with previous studies, our results show strong evidence of the disposition effect in China's stock market. On average, the likelihood of a sale for Chinese stock investors is 20% higher when a gain is realized than when a loss is realized. We regress the monthly measure of the disposition effect on monthly market investor sentiment after controlling the market momentum variable. The results verify our hypothesis that investors' disposition effect decreases when market sentiment is higher. Specifically, the disposition effect is 0.1% lower when market sentiment increases by 1%. Additionally, the disposition effect is even weaker in stocks that are more difficult to evaluate (e.g., stocks with a low book-to-market ratio and lower capitalization) due to the mechanism of investor sentiment. Our results are robust when controlling the potential endogeneity using the dummy variable of the 2008 financial crisis as the instrumental variable.
   We contribute to the literature by studying the impact of investor sentiment on the disposition effect both theoretically and empirically. Affected by sentiment, investors hold biased expectations about future stock prices, thus changing their selling decisions toward profits and losses. Our results also shed light on the optimization of investors' decision-making processes.
Keywords:  Disposition Effect,Investor Sentiment,Irrational Belief
JEL分类号:  G11   G40   G41  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金项目“信念、投资者卖出行为与处置效应”(71874194)资助
通讯作者:  汪昌云,金融学博士,教授,中国人民大学中国财政金融政策研究中心,E-mail:wangchy@ ruc.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  武佳薇,经济学博士,助理研究员,中证金融研究院期货与衍生品研究部,E-mail:wjw7251@163.com.陈紫琳,经济学博士,分析师,南方基金管理股份有限公司宏观研究与资产配置部,E-mail:chenzilin@southernfund.com.Jie Michael Guo, 金融学博士,教授,杜伦大学商学院, E-mail:jie.guo@dur.ac.uk.
引用本文:    
武佳薇, 汪昌云, 陈紫琳, Jie Michael Guo. 中国个人投资者处置效应研究——一个非理性信念的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 147-166.
WU Jiawei, WANG Changyun, CHEN Zilin, Jie Michael Guo. A Study of Disposition Effect among China's Individual Investors: the Perspective of Irrational Beliefs. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 476(2): 147-166.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V476/I2/147
[1] 李学峰、王兆宇和苏晨,2011,《什么导致了处置效应:基于不同市场环境的模拟研究与经验检验》,《世界经济》第12期,第140~155页。
[2] 林树、俞乔、汤震宇和周建,2006,《投资者“热手效应”与“赌徒谬误”的心理实验研究》,《经济研究》第8期,第58~69页。
[3] 阎石,2013,《投资者的处置效应研究——基于有限理性在行为金融中的应用》,科学出版社。
[4] 易志高和茅宁,2009,《中国股市投资者情绪测量研究:CICSI的构建》,《金融研究》第11期,第174~184页。
[5] 赵学军和王永宏,2001,《中国股市“处置效应”的实证分析》,《金融研究》第7期,第92~97页。
[6] An L.. 2016, “Asset Pricing When Traders Sell Extreme Winners and Losers”. Review of Financial Studies,29(3):823~861
[7] Andreassen, P. B.. 1988. “Explaining the Price-Volume Relationship: The Difference between Price Changes and Changing Prices”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processe, 41(3):371~389.
[8] Antoniou, C., Doukas, J. A., and Subrahmanyam, A.. 2013. “Cognitive Dissonance, Sentiment, and Momentum”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(1):245~275.
[9] Baker, M., and Wurgler, J.. 2006. “Investor Sentiment and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns”,Journal of Finance,61(4):1645~1680.
[10] Barber, B. M., Lee, Y. T., Liu, Y. J., and Odean, T.. 2007. “Is the Aggregate Investor Reluctant to Realize Losses? Evidence from Taiwan”, European Financial Management, 13(3):423~447.
[11] Barberis, N., and Huang, M.. 2008. “Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices”, American Economic Review, 98(5):2066~2100.
[12] Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.. 1998. “A Model of Investor Sentiment”, Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3):307~343.
[13] Barberis, N. and Xiong, W.. 2009. “What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of a Long-standing Preference-based Explanation”, Journal of Finance, 64(2):751~784.
[14] Ben-David, I., and Hirshleifer, D.. 2012. “Beyond the Disposition Effect: Do Investors Really Like Realizing Gains More Than Losses”, Review of Financial Studies, 25(8):2485~2532.
[15] Black, F.. 1986. “Noise”, Journal of Finance, 41(3):528~543.
[16] Brown, P., Chappel, N., da Silva Rosa, R., and Walter, T.. 2006. “The Reach of the Disposition Effect: Large Sample Evidence across Investors Classes”, International Review of Finance, 6(1-2):42~78.
[17] Calvet, L. E., Campbell, J. Y., and Sodini, P.. 2009. “Measuring the Financial Sophistication of Households”, American Economic Review, 99(2):393~98
[18] Carhart, M. M.. 1997. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Finance, 52(1):57~82.
[19] Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., and Rui, O. M.. 2007. “Trading Performance, Disposition Effect, Overconfidence, Representativeness Bias, and Experience of Emerging Market Investors”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4): 425~451.
[20] Cheng T Y, Lee C I, and C H. Lin, 2013, “An Examination of the Relationship between the Disposition Effect and Gender, Age, the Traded Security, and Bull-bear Market Conditions”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 21:195~213.
[21] Da, Z., Engelberg, J., and Gao, P.. 2015. “The Sum of all FEARS: Investor Sentiment and Asset Prices”, Review of Financial Studies, 28(1):1~32.
[22] De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., and Waldmann, R. J.. 1990. “Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets”, Journal of Political Economy, 98(4):703~738.
[23] Dumas, B., Kurshev, A., and Uppal, R.. 2009. “Equilibrium Portfolio Strategies In the Presence of Sentiment Risk and Excess Volatility”, Journal of Finance, 64(2):579~629.
[24] Grinblatt, M., Han, B.. 2005. “Prospect Theory, Mental Accounting, and Momentum”, Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2):311~339
[25] Hartzmark, S, M.. 2014. “The Worst, the Best, Ignoring all the Rest: The Rank Effect and Trading Behavior”, Review of Financial Studies, 28(4):1024~1059.
[26] Ingersoll, J. E., and Jin, L. J.. 2013. “Realization Utility with Reference-Dependent Preferences”, Review of Financial Studies, 26(3):723~767.
[27] Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S.. 1993. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implication for Stock Market Efficiency”, Journal of Finance, 48(1):65~91.
[28] Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrica, 47(2):363~391.
[29] Kaustia, M.. 2010. “Prospect Theory and the Disposition Effect”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(3):791~812.
[30] Lakonishok, J., and Smidt, S.. 1986. “Volume for Winners and Losers: Taxation and Other Motives for Stock Trading”, Journal of Finance, 41(4):951~974.
[31] Lehenkari, M., and Perttunen, J.. 2004, “Holding on to the Losers: Finnish Evidence”. Journal of Behavioral Finance,5(2):116~126.
[32] Locke, P. R., and Mann, S. C.. 2005. “Professional Trader Discipline and Trade Disposition”, Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2):401~444.
[33] Odean, T.. 1998. “Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?”, Journal of Finance, 53(5):1775~1798.
[34] Ranguelova, E.. 2001. “Disposition Effect and Firm Size: New Evidence on Individual Investor Trading Activity”, Harvard University Working Paper, SSRN 293618.
[35] Shefrin, H. M., and Statman, M.. 1985. “The Disposition to Sell Winners too Early and Ride Losers too Long: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Finance, 40(3):777~790.
[36] Shu, P. G., Yeh, Y. H., Chiu, S. B., and H. C. Chen. 2005. “Are Taiwanese Individual Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(2):201~223.
[37] Shumway T., and Guojun Wu. 2005. “Does Disposition Drive Momentum?”, AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper.
[38] Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., 1992, “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4):297~323.
[39] Weber, M., and Camerer, C. F.. 1998. “The Disposition Effect in Securities Trading: An Experimental Analysis”, Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 33(2):167~184.
[1] 朱红兵, 张兵. 价值性投资还是博彩性投机?——中国A股市场的MAX异象研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 167-187.
[2] 刘杰, 陈佳, 刘力. 投资者关注与市场反应——来自中国证券交易所交易公开信息的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 189-206.
[3] 蒋涛, 董兵兵, 张远. 中国城镇家庭的资产配置与消费行为:理论与证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 133-152.
[4] 尹力博, 廖辉毅. 中国A股市场存在品质溢价吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 170-187.
[5] 郭白滢, 周任远. 信息互动、投资决策与股票价格——基于机构投资者信息网络的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 188-206.
[6] 尹志超, 公雪, 潘北啸. 移动支付对家庭货币需求的影响——来自中国家庭金融调查的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 40-58.
[7] 王正位, 王新程, 廖理. 信任与欺骗:投资者为什么陷入庞氏骗局?——来自e租宝88.9万名投资者的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 96-112.
[8] 陈国进, 丁杰, 赵向琴. “好”的不确定性、“坏”的不确定性与股票市场定价——基于中国股市高频数据分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 174-190.
[9] 朱菲菲, 李惠璇, 徐建国, 李宏泰. 短期羊群行为的影响因素与价格效应——基于高频数据的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 191-206.
[10] 杨筝, 王红建, 戴静, 许传华. 放松利率管制、利润率均等化与实体企业“脱实向虚”[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 20-38.
[11] 黄隽, 李越欣. 中国艺术品投资收益:离岸与在岸市场的特征和互动[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 188-206.
[12] 余静文, 姚翔晨. 人口年龄结构与金融结构——宏观事实与微观机制[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 20-38.
[13] 徐丽鹤, 吕佳玮, 何青. 信用卡、风险应对与城镇家庭股市参与[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 149-167.
[14] 余粤. 风险资产配置与货币政策规则——黏性价格均衡下的宏观资产配置模型初探[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 111-128.
[15] 李志冰, 刘晓宇. 基金业绩归因与投资者行为[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 188-205.
[1] 周小川. 养老金改革考验我们经济学的功底和智慧[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 475(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 邹文理, 王曦, 谢小平. 中央银行沟通的金融市场响应──基于股票市场的事件研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 34 -50 .
[3] 卢冰, 王雅琦, 洪圣杰. 人民币预期汇率变动与虚假贸易——基于套汇视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 475(1): 9 -27 .
[4] 陈雨露. 当前全球中央银行研究的若干重点问题[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 1 -14 .
[5] 张礼卿, 钟茜. 全球金融周期、美国货币政策与“三元悖论”[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 15 -33 .
[6] 戴静, 杨筝, 刘贯春, 许传华. 银行业竞争、创新资源配置和企业创新产出——基于中国工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 51 -70 .
[7] 戴魁早, 刘友金. 市场化改革能推进产业技术进步吗?——中国高技术产业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 71 -90 .
[8] 程新生, 武琼, 刘孟晖, 程昱. 企业集团现金分布、管理层激励与资本配置效率[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 91 -108 .
[9] 顾雷雷, 郭建鸾, 王鸿宇. 企业社会责任、融资约束与企业金融化[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 109 -127 .
[10] 姜军, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 企业创新效率研究——来自股权质押的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 128 -146 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1