Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2025, Vol. 536 Issue (2): 150-167    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
融资平台转型:平台实控人持股上市公司的证据
刘津宇, 马千雯, 李奕旻
对外经济贸易大学中国金融学院, 北京 100029;
香港中文大学(深圳)经管学院, 广东深圳 518172;
中海信托股份有限公司,北京 100005
The Marketization and Transformation of Local Government Financing Vehicles: Evidence from Actual Controllers' Equity Holding of Listed Companies
Liu Jinyu, Ma Qianwen, Li Yimin
China School of Banking and Finance, University of International Business and Economics;
School of Management and Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen;
Zhonghai Trust Company Limited
下载:  PDF (558KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以2015-2023年发行的城投债为样本,考察城投平台实控人持股上市公司对城投平台市场化转型的影响。研究发现:城投实控人持有上市公司股权,能够显著降低其后续城投债发行的信用利差,且该效应在高财政透明度地区的城投债和无担保城投债中更为明显。城投实控人持股上市公司,不仅能够有效提高城投平台的造血能力、改善其财务状况,且对当地同行业乃至当地财政产生正向溢出效应,为建立可持续的城投债信用风险化解路径提供了重要支撑。本文的实证结论印证了“以市场化方式化债”、“运用资产化债”理念的可行性,为我国城投平台债务风险纾解提供有益参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘津宇
马千雯
李奕旻
关键词:  城投平台  转型  城投实控人持股上市公司  城投债利差    
Summary:  Local Government Financing Vehicles (LGFVs, or Chengtou platforms) have long played a crucial role in supporting local infrastructure development and economic growth in China. However, with the continuous expansion of municipal corporate bonds (MCBs), the burden of local government implicit debt has become increasingly severe, making the risk resolution of MCBs and the market-oriented transformation of LGFVs a central focus in China's financial stability and development. The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China identified "forestalling major financial risks" as one of the three critical battles. Furthermore, the establishment of the Financial Stability and Development Committee of the State Council marked an important step forward for China towards a risk-prevention-oriented regulatory phase of the financial system. Under this policy backdrop, LGFVs urgently need to explore sustainable market-oriented transformation paths. Currently, the reforms of LGFVs in China can be broadly categorized into two approaches. The first approach emphasizes controlling new debt issuance and converting implicit debt into explicit liabilities, thereby restricting the expansion of MCBs. This paper focuses on the second approach: promoting the marketization and transformation of existing LGFVs into independent and self-sustaining entities. The goal is to shift LGFVs from merely financing tools of local governments to commercially viable platforms capable of supporting their debt through stable revenue streams. The transformation of LGFVs can not only effectively alleviate the debt burden of local governments, but also establish sustainable mechanisms for resolving the credit risks of MCBs and promoting local industrial development, thereby reducing fiscal pressure on local governments.
This study explores a feasible transformation path from the perspective of LGFVs' actual controllers' equity holdings in listed companies. Using a sample of MCBs issued between 2015 and 2023, this paper investigates whether equity holdings by actual controllers help alleviate investors' concerns over default risks, reduce financing costs, and improve the overall financial condition of LGFVs. Our findings show that equity ownership in listed companies by LGFVs' actual controllers significantly reduces the subsequent issuance spread of MCBs in the primary market. Furthermore, the findings suggest that LGFVs with higher equity holdings of listed companies by their actual controllers exhibit greater cash flow stability, enhancing their ability to meet obligations. More importantly, equity holdings in listed companies enable local governments to better mobilize and integrate resources, foster key industries, and improve their fiscal capacity, thereby establishing a more sustainable path for resolving credit risks of MCBs.
This paper contributes to the literature in three main ways. First, the increasingly common cases of LGFV’s actual controllers holding equity in listed companies have not yet been systematically examined by academia. This paper bridges this gap by analyzing the motivations and effects of this path, providing timely insights for policymakers and researchers. Second, we show that the market-oriented transformation of LGFVs enhances not only the pricing performance of MCBs but also the financial resilience and operational capacity of LGFVs, verifying the effectiveness of this path from a fundamental perspective. The results confirm that the motivation behind local governments' equity injections into LGFVs is not merely expanding borrowing capacity. Instead, these actions are more often driven by a long-term strategic vision to reshape the development model of LGFVs and to optimize local industrial structures. Third, local governments not only face the urgent task of addressing existing debt burdens but also have to confront the fundamental question of the future direction of LGFVs. This paper contributes to guiding local governments beyond the traditional mindset of rolling over debt through new borrowing or relying on land sales for repayment. This study provides valuable insights by offering an effective solution to the transformation challenges of traditional LGFVs under the frameworks of “market-oriented debt resolution” and “asset-based debt resolution”. This paper also encourages local governments to recognize the dynamic relationship between assets and liabilities and adopt a more scientific and development-oriented approach in debt management.
Keywords:  Local Government Financing Vehicles    Marketization and Transformation    LGFVs Actual Controllers' Equity Holding of Listed Companies    Spread of MCBs
JEL分类号:  G12   G28  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(72173022)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  李奕旻,硕士研究生,中海信托股份有限公司,E-mail:lymjanuarywu@163.com.   
作者简介:  刘津宇,经济学博士,教授,对外经济贸易大学中国金融学院,E-mail:jinyu.liu@uibe.edu.cn.
马千雯,博士研究生,香港中文大学(深圳)经管学院,E-mail:maqianwen_mww@163.com.
引用本文:    
刘津宇, 马千雯, 李奕旻. 融资平台转型:平台实控人持股上市公司的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 150-167.
Liu Jinyu, Ma Qianwen, Li Yimin. The Marketization and Transformation of Local Government Financing Vehicles: Evidence from Actual Controllers' Equity Holding of Listed Companies. Journal of Financial Research, 2025, 536(2): 150-167.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V536/I2/150
[1]曹婧、毛捷和薛熠,2019,《城投债为何持续增长:基于新口径的实证分析》,《财贸经济》第5期,第5~22页。
[2]陈宝东和潘巧,2023,《地方债务的风险表现、化债实践与路径选择》,《财会月刊》第21期,第146~153页。
[3]陈暮紫、王美惠和杨晓光,2022,《第三方担保对城投债增信作用的前后背离研究》,《管理科学学报》第11期,第85~108页。
[4]郭传辉,2022,《基于可偿债资产的地方政府偿债能力研究》,《现代经济探讨》第2期,第83~93页。
[5]韩鹏飞和胡奕明,2015,《政府隐性担保一定能降低债券的融资成本吗?——关于国有企业和地方融资平台债券的实证研究》,《金融研究》第3期,第116~130页。
[6]韩文丽和谭明鹏,2019,《监管趋严背景下地方政府融资平台债务现状、评判及对策探析》,《西南金融》第1期,第55~63页。
[7]何杨和满燕云,2012,《地方政府债务融资的风险控制——基于土地财政视角的分析》,《财贸经济》第5期,第45~50页。
[8]李升和陆琛怡,2020,《地方政府债务风险的形成机理研究:基于显性债务和隐性债务的异质性分析》,《中央财经大学学报》第7期,第3~16+47页。
[9]刘煜辉和沈可挺,2011,《中国地方政府公共资本融资:问题、挑战与对策——基于地方政府融资平台债务状况的分析》,《金融评论》第3期,第1~18+123页。
[10]楼继伟,2019,《40年重大财税改革的回顾》,《财政研究》第2期,第3~29页。
[11]罗荣华和刘劲劲,2016,《地方政府的隐性担保真的有效吗?——基于城投债发行定价的检验》,《金融研究》第4期,第83~98页。
[12]潘俊、王亮亮和吴宁等,2016,《财政透明度与城投债信用评级》,《会计研究》第12期,第72~78+96页。
[13]潘琰和吴修瑶,2017,《可流动性资产对地方政府债务违约风险的影响——来自城投债的实证检验》,《经济学家》第4期,第82~88页。
[14]饶海阔和毛国育,2021,《白酒上市公司股权划转 “输血”效应研究——基于事件研究法分析》,《财务与金融》第4期,第11~16页。
[15]汪莉和陈诗一,2015,《政府隐性担保、债务违约与利率决定》,《金融研究》第9期,第66~81页。
[16]吴田,2016,《市场化:地方政府投融资平台困局破解路径》,《财会通讯》第14期,第9~12+129页。
[17]武彰纯和李平,2021,《地方政府投融资平台转型改革面临的债务风险及防范》,《西南金融》第5期,第77~88页。
[18]徐忠,2018,《新时代背景下中国金融体系与国家治理体系现代化》,《经济研究》第7期,第4~20页。
[19]张莉、年永威和刘京军,2018,《土地市场波动与地方债——以城投债为例》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第1103~1126页。
[20]张路,2020,《地方债务扩张的政府策略——来自融资平台“城投债”发行的证据》,《中国工业经济》第2期,第44~62页。
[21]Krugman, P., 1992, Geography and Trade, America: Published by MIT Press.
[22]Weber, A., 1922, Ueber den Standort der Industrien, Germany: Published by JCB Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
[1] 赵静, 刘姝江. 数据治理对银行风险的影响——基于《银行业金融机构数据治理指引》的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 58-75.
[2] 罗章权, 郭凯明, 吴红晨. 生产结构转型与生产率——基于全球视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 1-19.
[3] 卢垚, 战明华. 银行数字化转型、信息结构与商业信用和银行信用间的替代性[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 531(9): 39-58.
[4] 沈坤荣, 闫佳敏. 高铁开通与企业数字化转型——基于信息学习效应与资源集聚效应的双重视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 150-168.
[5] 陈国进, 丁赛杰, 赵向琴. 绿色结构性货币政策、政策预期与经济绿色转型[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 526(4): 1-19.
[6] 王亮亮, 祁媛媛, 张海洋, 徐星美. 数字化转型与公司税负水平的动态调整[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 526(4): 188-206.
[7] 徐飘洋, 王博. “双支柱”政策的结构性功能——基于产业绿色转型视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 524(2): 19-37.
[8] 王钰冰, 郭凯明, 龚六堂. 结构性就业矛盾、劳动时间配置与人工智能技术革命[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 523(1): 1-18.
[9] 陈国进, 丁赛杰, 赵向琴. 气候政策、银行风险与宏观审慎监管创新[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 519(9): 38-57.
[10] 戴翔, 马皓巍, 张二震. 数字化转型一定能提升企业加成率吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 134-151.
[11] 卢国军, 崔小勇, 王弟海. 自动化技术、结构转型与中国收入分配格局的演化[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 514(4): 19-35.
[12] 冀云阳, 周鑫, 张谦. 数字化转型与企业创新——基于研发投入和研发效率视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 514(4): 111-129.
[13] 陈奉功, 张谊浩. 绿色债券发行、企业绿色转型与市场激励效应[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 131-149.
[14] 方明月, 聂辉华, 阮睿, 沈昕毅. 企业数字化转型与经济政策不确定性感知[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 512(2): 21-39.
[15] 刘哲希, 王兆瑞, 吴韬. 老龄化与“高TFP贡献率、低增长”问题[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 522(12): 1-19.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1