Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 509 Issue (11): 58-76    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
工业机器人应用促进了“两业融合”发展吗?——来自中国制造企业投入服务化的证据
高翔, 张敏, 刘啟仁
上海对外经贸大学国际经贸学院,上海 201620;
湖南大学经济与贸易学院,湖南长沙 410006;
广州大学经济与统计学院,广东广州 510006;
南京大学商学院,江苏南京 210008
Does Industrial Robot Application Promote the Integrated Development of Manufacturing and Services? Evidence from Input Servitization of China's Manufacturing Firms
GAO Xiang, ZHANG Min, LIU Qiren
School of International Business and Economics, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics;
School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University;
School of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, School of Business, Nanjing University
下载:  PDF (892KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文利用微观企业数据和区分中国贸易方式的投入产出表,测算了高度细化的企业投入服务化指标,进而考察了工业机器人应用对制造业和服务业“两业融合”的影响。结果表明,工业机器人应用显著促进了中国制造企业的服务增加值率,然而这一促进效应更多是通过推动企业使用国外服务、抑制企业使用国内服务实现的。异质性分析显示,工业机器人应用对“两业融合”的影响主要集中在加工贸易企业、东部地区企业、外资和港澳台企业、劳动密集型和技术密集型企业。从作用机制看,工业机器人应用对“两业融合”的影响主要通过促进技术创新、延长生产链条和提高生产效率来实现,而人力资本投资则存在一定的负向替代作用。最后,本文还讨论了工业机器人应用影响“两业融合”中的“要素替代效应”和“行业扩散效应”。本文结论表明,工业机器人应用对“两业融合”的影响并非是“局部性”的,有必要统筹协调相关政策和制度,更好地促进现代产业体系的加快构建和中国经济的高质量发展。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
高翔
张敏
刘啟仁
关键词:  工业机器人应用  制造企业  投入服务化  两业融合  全球价值链    
Summary:  With a new round of technological revolution and industrial reform, the global manufacturing industry is changing from a “single production” mode to a “production+service” mode. Modern industrial development focuses on integrating the manufacturing and service industries. Therefore, it is important to understand how to accelerate the process of integrating the two industries to enhance the core competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry, build a modern industrial system and achieve high-quality economic development. Industrial robots are being increasingly used in production. Undoubtedly, the introduction of industrial robots will have a profound impact on the process of integrating the two industries in China. However, not many studies have examined the impact of industrial robots on integrating the two industries in China; this study seeks to fill this gap.
First, this study uses data from the China Industrial Enterprise and China Customs Trade databases and the Inter-country Input-Output Tables published by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development to measure the service value added of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The rate of service value added at the enterprise level is divided into the domestic service value added rate and foreign service value added rate, according to the enterprise using the service elements in the source country, to measure the input level of service or manufacturing enterprises and further international federation of robot docking nation-year-industry aspects of statistical data of industrial robots. On this basis, this study investigates the effect of industrial robots on integration of the two industries. The results show that industrial robots significantly increase the service value added rate of Chinese manufacturing enterprises, but this increase is mainly achieved by promoting the use of foreign services and inhibiting the use of domestic services. The results of the heterogeneity test show that the effect of industrial robots on integration of the two industries is mainly concentrated in processing trade enterprises; enterprises in the Eastern region; foreign investments; enterprises in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan; and labor-intensive and technology-intensive enterprises. The effect of industrial robots on integration of the two industries is mainly achieved by increasing technological innovation and production efficiency and extending the production chain, while human capital investment has a negative substitution effect. Finally, this study also discusses the influence of industrial robots on the factor substitution and industry diffusion effects in the integration of the two industries.
This study makes the following contributions. First, it uses enterprise data in China and systematically tests the influence of industrial robots on integration of the two industries by constructing Batik instrumental variables and adopting the propensity score matching method after overcoming potential endogeneity. Second, it explores trade added value accounting and the double advantage of micro measurement based on the combination of macro to micro measurement.
Effective utilization of large amounts of information on industry departments and industrial enterprises can be used to build a measure for companies on the basis of the characteristics and source of a service, dual trade structure and other factors. This overcomes the deficiency of neglecting the individual characteristics of enterprises that manufacture inputs. Third, the internal mechanism and the differentiation effect of robots on integrating the two industries are analyzed deeply, and the characteristics of the effects of industrial robots on the service-oriented transformation of manufacturing enterprises are discussed. Fourth, based on the conditions in China, this study finds that industrial robots in processing trade enterprises have significant elements of domestic service rather than foreign service, and the application of industrial robots significantly promotes the integration and development of two-industry manufacturing processes through industry spread and diffusion effects between industries.
Keywords:  Industrial Robot Application    Manufacturing Firms    Input Servitization    Integrated Development of Manufacturing and Services    Global Value Chain
JEL分类号:  D21   L52   O14  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金项目(22ZDA062、20CJL011)、全国统计科学研究一般项目(2021LY012)、教育部人文社科规划项目(22YJA790037)、广东哲学社会科学基金一般项目(GD21CYJ13)、中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2021M690076、2022T150316)资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  张 敏,博士研究生,湖南大学经济与贸易学院,E-mail:zm680417@163.com.   
作者简介:  高 翔,经济学博士,副教授,上海对外经贸大学国际经贸学院,E-mail:gaoxiang19901005@126.com.
刘啟仁,经济学博士,教授,广州大学经济与统计学院,南京大学商学院博士后,E-mail:liuqiren@126.com.
引用本文:    
高翔, 张敏, 刘啟仁. 工业机器人应用促进了“两业融合”发展吗?——来自中国制造企业投入服务化的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 58-76.
GAO Xiang, ZHANG Min, LIU Qiren. Does Industrial Robot Application Promote the Integrated Development of Manufacturing and Services? Evidence from Input Servitization of China's Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 509(11): 58-76.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V509/I11/58
[1] 陈丽娴和沈鸿,2017,《制造业服务化如何影响企业绩效和要素结构—基于上市公司数据的PSM-DID实证分析》,《经济学动态》第5期,第64~77页。
[2] 戴翔,2016,《中国制造业出口内涵服务价值演进及因素决定》,《经济研究》第9期,第44~57+174页。
[3] 高翔和袁凯华,2020,《中国企业制造业服务化水平的测度及演变分析》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第11期,第3~22页。
[4] 郭凯明,2019,《人工智能发展、产业结构转型升级与劳动收入份额变动》,《管理世界》第7期,第60~77+202~203页。
[5] 孔高文、刘莎莎和孔东民,2020,《机器人与就业——基于行业与地区异质性的探索性分析》,《中国工业经济》第8期,第80~98页。
[6] 李建强、高翔和赵西亮,2020,《最低工资与企业创新》,《金融研究》第12期,第132~150页。
[7] 李磊、王小霞和包群,2021,《机器人的就业效应:机制与中国经验》,《管理世界》第9期,第104~119页。
[8] 刘斌和潘彤,2020,《人工智能对制造业价值链分工的影响效应研究》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第10期,第24~44页。
[9] 刘啟仁和铁瑛,2020,《企业雇佣结构、中间投入与出口产品质量变动之谜》,《管理世界》第3期,第1~23页。
[10] 刘维刚和倪红福,2018,《制造业投入服务化与企业技术进步:效应及作用机制》,《财贸经济》第8期,第126~140页。
[11] 吕越、谷玮和包群,2020,《人工智能与中国企业参与全球价值链分工》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第80~98页。
[12] 王永钦和董雯,2020,《机器人的兴起如何影响中国劳动力市场?——来自制造业上市公司的证据》,《经济研究》第12期,第159~175页。
[13] 杨光和侯钰,2020,《工业机器人的使用、技术升级与经济增长》,《中国工业经济》第10期,第138~156页。
[14] 赵宸宇,2021,《数字化发展与服务化转型—来自制造业上市公司的经验证据》,《南开管理评论》第2期,第149~163页。
[15] 周广肃、李力行和孟岭生,2021,《智能化对中国劳动力市场的影响—基于就业广度和强度的分析》,《金融研究》第6期,第39~58页。
[16] 祝树金、罗彦和段文静,2021,《服务型制造、加成率分布与资源配置效率》,《中国工业经济》第4期,第62~80页。
[17] Acemoglu, D. , and Restrepo, P., 2020, “T Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”, Journal of Political Economics, 128(6),pp.2188~2244.
[18] Aghion, P. ,B. F. Jone., and C. I. Jones 2017, “Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth”, NBER Working Paper, No.23929.
[19] Cusumano, M. A., Kahl, S. J., and Suarez, F. F,2015, “Services, Industry Evolution, and The Competitive Strategies of Product Firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 36(4),pp.559~575.
[20] D. Chor, K. Manova, and Z. Yu, 2021, “Growing Like China: Firm Performance and Global Production Lineposition”, Journal of International Economics, 130,103445.
[21] Graetz, G., and G. Michaels, 2018, “Robots at Work”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5),pp.753~768.
[22] Gunter, L., Gopani, G., Angela, J., and Sabine, B, 2010, “The Relevance of Service in European Manufacturing Industries”, Journal of Service Management, 21(5),pp.715~726.
[23] Kee, H. L., and Tang, H, 2016, “Domestic Value Added in Exports: Theory and Firm Evidence from China”, American Economic Review, 106(6), pp.1402~1436.
[24] Koopman, R., Wang, Z., and Wei, S. J, 2014, “Tracing Value Added and Double Counting in Gorss Exports”, American Economic Review, 104(2), pp.459~494.
[25] Yu, M, 2015, “Processing Trade, Tariff Reductions and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Firms”, Economic Journal, 125(585),pp. 943~988.
[1] 许家云, 张俊美, 刘竹青. 遭遇反倾销与多产品企业的出口行为——来自中国制造业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 491(5): 97-116.
[2] 彭红枫, 刘海莹. 双边出口全球价值链实际 有效汇率弹性理论测度及解析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 56-74.
[3] 唐遥, 陈贞竹, 刘柯含. 需求和供给冲击对企业投资以及价值链的影响——基于突发事件的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 480(6): 40-59.
[4] 张鹏杨, 徐佳君, 刘会政. 产业政策促进全球价值链升级的有效性研究——基于出口加工区的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 76-95.
[5] 吕越, 吕云龙, 包群. 融资约束与企业增加值贸易——基于全球价值链视角的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 63-80.
[6] 吕越, 罗伟, 刘斌. 融资约束与制造业的全球价值链跃升[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 81-96.
[1] 张牧扬, 潘妍, 余泳泽. 社会信用、刚兑信仰与地方政府隐性债务[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 1 -19 .
[2] 郭晔, 未钟琴, 方颖. 金融科技布局、银行信贷风险与经营绩效——来自商业银行与科技企业战略合作的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 20 -38 .
[3] 潘敏, 刘红艳, 程子帅. 极端气候对商业银行风险承担的影响——来自中国地方性商业银行的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 39 -57 .
[4] 祝梓翔, 高然. 通胀—增长权衡和中国菲利普斯曲线的平坦化[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 1 -20 .
[5] 邢秉昆. 碳减排约束下中国工业企业信用评级[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 77 -97 .
[6] 刘建建, 王忏, 赵扶扬, 龚六堂. 住房耐用品、土地市场分割与货币失踪之谜[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 21 -39 .
[7] 徐佳, 李冠华, 齐天翔. 中国家庭偿债能力:衡量与影响因素[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 98 -116 .
[8] 李孟哲, 麻志明, 吴联生. 上市公司数量与非上市公司创新[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 171 -188 .
[9] 朱永华, 张一林, 林毅夫. 赶超战略与大银行垄断——基于新结构经济学的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 40 -57 .
[10] 吴锟, 吴卫星, 王沈南. 金融教育是有效的吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 117 -135 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1