Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 505 Issue (7): 94-114    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国房地产企业间系统性风险溢出效应分析——基于尾部风险网络模型
张伟平, 曹廷求
山东大学经济学院,山东济南 250100
Analysis of Systemic Risk Spillover Effects among China's Real Estate Companies Based on the Tail Risk Network Model
ZHANG Weiping, CAO Tingqiu
School of Economics, Shandong University
下载:  PDF (1166KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以2007—2021年沪深A股上市房企为样本,首先基于SIM单指数分位数回归技术提出测量系统性风险的新指标SIM-CoVaR,并结合前沿的TENET网络模型,构造跨房地产企业风险动态传染的尾部风险网络,然后采用块模型探究房地产市场系统性风险溢出的聚类性、触发机制及传播路径,最后考察网络整体结构和宏观经济变量对房地产市场系统性风险溢出的影响。研究表明:(1)我国房地产企业间存在明显的系统性风险联动性和溢出效应,在市场动荡时期房地产部门是金融风险溢出的放大器;(2)评估系统重要性节点企业时,除考虑企业规模等内部属性,还应考虑房企间关联结构,利用系统性风险指数可有效捕捉网络中系统重要性节点;(3)跨房企的系统性风险溢出具有显著的聚类特征,尾部风险网络可被划分为4个不同的功能模块,各模块的成员及其角色呈现明显的时变特性,监管部门可据此从供给端“因企施策”;(4)网络聚集性、网络效率和网络匹配性的降低能显著降低房地产市场的系统性风险溢出效应。本文从企业微观层面探讨房地产市场风险的形成机制,为促进房地产业健康发展和防范化解宏观层面的系统性金融风险提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张伟平
曹廷求
关键词:  房地产市场  系统性风险  风险溢出  尾部风险网络  块模型    
Summary:  At present, China's economic development faces the threefold pressure of demand contraction, supply shock, and expected recession. The liquidity risk, delivery risk, debt default risk, and credit risk caused by ruptures in the capital chain of real estate companies may not only hinder economic growth but also induce systemic financial risks. Therefore, to control financial risks and ensure stable economic growth, it is important to accurately measure real estate companies' financial risk and systemically identify companies in need of supervision or rescue. This is also in line with the goal of “promoting a virtuous circle and healthy development of the real estate industry” set out at the 2021 Central Economic Work Conference.
This paper uses data on listed real estate companies in China's A-share market. First, based on the SIM single-index quantile regression method, a new systemic risk indicator SIM-CoVaR is proposed, and the systemic risk of listed real estate companies is measured. Next, by combining it with the forward-looking TENET model, we construct dynamically evolving real estate market tail risk networks and reveal the time-varying spillover effect of systemic risk in the real estate market through the dynamic network topology. Second, we calculate the systemic risk contribution index and exposure index, and we capture systemically important companies with strong tail risk correlation through the index ranking. Furthermore, through the block model method, we explore the clustering of systemic risk spillover effects and the contagion path between blocks. Finally, we investigate the influence of the overall network structure on systemic risk spillovers in the real estate market.
The empirical results show the following. (1) There is an extensive systemic risk co-movement and spillover effects across real estate companies, and the tail risk network presents heterogeneity. A diversified business structure strengthens the diversified relationship between real estate companies, broadens the channels for dispersing risks, and further reduces the risk spillover level of the overall real estate market. (2) The risk spillover intensity between real estate companies during the 2008 financial crisis was greater than that during the 2015 domestic stock market crash. This difference is affected by the external economy, related policy, and internal linkage, and the real estate industry has become an amplifier of systemic risk spillovers during economic recessions. (3) The systemic risk spillover effect has significant clustering characteristics in the tail risk network. The tail risk network can be divided into four blocks with different functions. In the process of systemic risk transmission, the roles and functions of each block show clear time-varying characteristics. (4) From the perspective of the impact mechanism of spillover effects, the reduction of network aggregation, network efficiency, and network matching can significantly reduce systemic risk spillover. In addition, during periods of economic prosperity and steady development, the real estate sector tends to hide potential risks, and the spillover effects of systemic risks are weakened.
The study makes the following contributions. First, TENET incorporates more companies into the regression through the SIM selection technology and captures the nonlinear risk spillover relationships between real estate companies in a complex higher-dimensional environment, thereby overcoming the limitations of existing models such as high-dimensional interconnection and multivariate variable selection. Second, this paper uses the block model from social network theory to investigate the aggregation, trigger mechanism, and propagation path of risk spillover in the real estate market. Third, this paper discusses the formation mechanism of real estate market risks from the micro-level of companies, which is in line with the actual needs of real estate companies facing a capital dilemma and deeper supply-side regulation in this real estate cycle. The findings provide a useful reference for multi-level real estate market supervision and regulation, and for promoting the healthy development of the real estate industry.
Keywords:  Real Estate Market    Systemic Risk    Risk Spillover    Tail Risk Network    Block Model
JEL分类号:  C50   G10   G14  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA091)和中国博士后基金(2021M702005)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  曹廷求,管理学博士,泰山学者特聘教授,山东大学经济学院,E-mail:tqc@126.com   
作者简介:  张伟平,博士后,山东大学经济学院,E-mail:wpzhang0904@outlook.com.
引用本文:    
张伟平, 曹廷求. 中国房地产企业间系统性风险溢出效应分析——基于尾部风险网络模型[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 94-114.
ZHANG Weiping, CAO Tingqiu. Analysis of Systemic Risk Spillover Effects among China's Real Estate Companies Based on the Tail Risk Network Model. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 505(7): 94-114.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V505/I7/94
[1] 曾祥渭、刘志东和刘雯宇, 2015,《我国城市群商品住宅价格波动传导与波动性外溢研究》,《管理评论》第9期, 第3~13页。
[2] 范小云、荣宇浩和王博, 2021,《我国系统重要性银行评估:网络层次结构视角》,《管理科学学报》第2期,第48~74页。
[3] 范小云、王道平和刘澜飚, 2012,《规模、关联性与中国系统重要性银行的衡量》,《金融研究》第11期, 第16~30页。
[4] 方意、赵胜民、黄丽灵和荆中博, 2021,《房地产市场与银行业系统性风险》,《管理科学学报》第11期, 第26~43页。
[5] 宫晓莉和熊熊, 2020,《波动溢出网络视角的金融风险传染研究》,《金融研究》第5期, 第39~58页。
[6] 顾云、张栋浩、杜在超和黄在鑫, 2022,《系统性风险度量CoES的建模和检验》,《统计研究》第1期, 第132-145页。
[7] 李政、梁琪和涂晓枫, 2016,《我国上市金融机构关联性研究——基于网络分析法》,《金融研究》第8期, 第95~110页。
[8] 李政、刘淇和梁琪, 2019,《基于经济金融关联网络的中国系统性风险防范研究》,《统计研究》第2期, 第23~37页。
[9] 刘海云和吕龙,2018,《城市房价泡沫及其传染的“波纹”效应》,《中国工业经济》第12期,第42~59页。
[10] 刘向丽和顾舒, 2014,《房地产对金融体系风险溢出效应研究——基于AR-GARCH-CoVaR方法》,《统计研究》第34(S1)期, 第106~111页。
[11] 谭政勋和陈铭,2012,《房价波动与金融危机的国际经验证据:抵押效应还是偏离效应》, 《世界经济》第3期, 第146~159页。
[12] 王锦阳和刘锡良, 2014,《住宅基本价值,泡沫成分与区域溢出效应》,《经济学季刊》第4期, 第1283~1302页。
[13] 杨子晖、陈雨恬和张平淼, 2020,《股票与外汇市场尾部风险的跨市场传染研究》,《管理科学学报》,第8期, 第54~77页。
[14] 杨子晖,陈雨恬和谢锐楷,2018,《我国金融机构系统性金融风险度量与跨部门风险溢出效应研究》,《金融研究》第10期,第19~37页。
[15] 张杰、杨连星和新夫,2016,《房地产阻碍了中国创新么?——基于金融体系贷款期限结构的解释》,《管理世界》第5期,第64~80页。
[16] 郑挺国、龚金金和宋涛,2021,《中国城市房价泡沫测度及其时变传染效应研究》,《世界经济》第4期,第151~177页。
[17] Acharya, V., L. H. Pedersen, T. Philippon, et al., 2017. Measuring Systemic Risk, Review of Financial Studies, 30(1): 2~47.
[18] Adrian, T., and M. K. Brunnermeier, 2016. CoVaR, American Economic Review, 106: 1705~1741.
[19] Billio, M., M. Getmansky, A.W. Lo, et al., 2012. Econometric Measures of Connectedness and Systemic Risk in the Finance and Insurance Sectors, Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 535~559.
[20] Billio, M., W. L. Andrew, P. Loriana, et al., 2021. Global Realignment in Financial Market Dynamics: Evidence from ETF Networks, SAFE Working Paper, No. 304, Pages 37.
[21] Diebold, F. X., and K. Yilmaz, 2014. On the Network Topology of Variance Decompositions: Measuring the Connectedness of Financial Firms, Journal of Econometrics, 182: 119~134.
[22] Fan, J., and R. Li, 2001. Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and Its Oracle Oroperties. Journal of the American statistical Association, 96(456): 1348~1360.
[23] Hrdle, W. K., W. N. Wang, and L. N. Yu, 2016. TENET: Tail-event Driven NETwork Risk, Journal of Econometrics, 192: 499~513.
[24] Hautsch N., J. Schaumburg, and M. Schienle, 2015. Financial Network Systemic Risk Contributions, Review of Finance, 19(2): 685~738.
[25] Hoesli, M., and K. Reka, 2013. Volatility Spillovers, Comovements and Contagion in Securitized Real Estate Markets, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 47(1): 1~35.
[26] Khandani, A. E., A. W. Lo, and R. C. Merton, 2013. Systemic Risk and the Refinancing Ratchet Effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1): 29~45.
[27] Li X. F., M. H. Sun, and K. Boersma, 2019. Policy Spillover and Regional Linkage Characteristics of the Real Estate Market in China's Urban Agglomerations, Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 4:189~210.
[28] Mian, A., and A. Sufi, 2009. Home Equity-Based Borrowing, and the US Household Leverage Crisis. American Economic Review, 101 (5): 2132~56.
[29] Zhang, W., P., X. T. Zhuang, J. Wang, et al., 2020. Connectedness and Systemic Risk Spillovers Analysis of Chinese Sectors based on Tail Risk Network. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 101248.
[30] Zhu, B., R. Fuss, and N. B. Rottke, 2013. Spatial Linkages in Returns and Volatilities among U.S Regional Housing Markets, Real Estate Economics, 41(1): 29~64.
[1] 张琳, 廉永辉, 方意. 政策连续性与商业银行系统性风险[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 503(5): 95-113.
[2] 王永钦, 段白鸽, 钱佳辉. 中国的“影子保险”:来自监管自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 502(4): 18-38.
[3] 赵静, 郭晔. 金融产品持股与银行系统性风险——兼论《商业银行股权管理暂行办法》的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 499(1): 57-75.
[4] 徐国祥, 吴婷, 王莹. 基于共同冲击和异质风险叠加传导的风险传染研究——来自中国上市银行网络的传染模拟[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 490(4): 38-54.
[5] 陈国进, 蒋晓宇, 刘彦臻, 赵向琴. 资产透明度、监管套利与银行系统性风险[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 489(3): 18-37.
[6] 白鹤祥, 刘社芳, 罗小伟, 刘蕾蕾, 郝威亚. 基于房地产市场的我国系统性金融风险测度与预警研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 54-73.
[7] 王辉, 梁俊豪. 基于动态因子Copula模型的我国银行系统性风险度量[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 485(11): 58-75.
[8] 李政, 梁琪, 方意. 中国金融部门间系统性风险溢出的监测预警研究——基于下行和上行ΔCoES指标的实现与优化[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 40-58.
[9] 方意, 王晏如, 黄丽灵, 和文佳. 宏观审慎与货币政策双支柱框架研究——基于系统性风险视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 106-124.
[10] 李伦一, 张翔. 中国房地产市场价格泡沫与空间传染效应[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 169-186.
[11] 何青, 钱宗鑫, 刘伟. 中国系统性金融风险的度量——基于实体经济的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 454(4): 53-70.
[12] 黄卓, 邱晗, 沈艳, 童晨. 测量中国的金融不确定性——基于大数据的方法[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 30-46.
[13] 杨子晖, 陈雨恬, 谢锐楷. 我国金融机构系统性金融风险度量与跨部门风险溢出效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 19-37.
[14] 李志辉, 李源, 李政. 中国银行业系统性风险监测研究——基于SCCA技术的实现与优化[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 92-106.
[15] 苟文均, 袁鹰, 漆鑫. 债务杠杆与系统性风险传染机制—基于CCA模型的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 74-91.
[1] 罗进辉, 向元高, 金思静. 中国资本市场低价股的溢价之谜[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 191 -206 .
[2] 李万福, 杜静, 张怀. 创新补助究竟有没有激励企业创新自主投资——来自中国上市公司的新证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 130 -145 .
[3] 吴锟, 吴卫星. 理财建议可以作为金融素养的替代吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 161 -176 .
[4] 温日光. 风险观念、并购溢价与并购完成率[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 422(8): 191 -207 .
[5] 刘国强. 我国消费者金融素养现状研究——基于2017年消费者金融素养问卷调查[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 1 -20 .
[6] 何青, 钱宗鑫, 刘伟. 中国系统性金融风险的度量——基于实体经济的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 454(4): 53 -70 .
[7] 邱晗, 黄益平, 纪洋. 金融科技对传统银行行为的影响——基于互联网理财的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 17 -30 .
[8] 张博, 范辰辰. 文化多样性与民间金融:基于方言视角的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 457(7): 69 -89 .
[9] 郑路, 徐旻霞. 传统家庭观念抑制了城镇居民商业养老保险参与吗?———基于金融信任与金融素养视角的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 133 -151 .
[10] 邓路, 刘欢, 侯粲然. 金融资产配置与违约风险:蓄水池效应,还是逐利效应?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 172 -189 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1