Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2024, Vol. 531 Issue (9): 77-94    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
客户高质量会计信息与供应商债务违约风险
衣昭颖, 柳建华, 马新啸
首都经济贸易大学会计学院,北京 100070;
中山大学岭南学院,广东广州 510275;
中国海洋大学管理学院/中国企业营运资金管理研究中心,山东青岛 266100
Customer's High-quality Accounting Information and Debt Default Risk of Suppliers
YI Zhaoying, LIU Jianhua, MA Xinxiao
School of Accounting, Capital University of Economics and Business;
Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University;
Management College/China Business Working Capital Management Research Center, Ocean University of China
下载:  PDF (663KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文基于供应商企业债务违约风险的视角,讨论客户披露的高质量会计信息(简称“客户高质量会计信息”)对供应商企业债务违约风险的缓解效应,研究发现:客户高质量会计信息可以有效降低供应商企业的债务违约风险;这一效果通过改善供应商企业经营管理和优化银行信贷决策得以实现,并且在宏观经济增速放缓、供应链经济联系较强以及供应商企业为民营上市公司、专用性资产规模较大时更为明显。本文基于供应链情境拓展了中国企业债务违约风险的治理机制研究,凸显会计信息共享对供应链上企业违约风险防范的重要作用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
衣昭颖
柳建华
马新啸
关键词:  供应商企业  客户  会计信息质量  债务违约风险    
Summary:  With the continuous release of credit risk in the bond market, the phenomenon of corporate debt defaults in China tends to be increasingly common with the number and amount of defaults increasing. The debt default risk is closely related to the supply chain. The supplier affects the procurement and cost of the enterprise, while the customer affects the demand and revenue of the enterprise. Once the supply chain is broken down, the enterprise will be unable to operate, which results in debt defaults. In practice, there are many cases of cascading debt defaults due to the bankruptcy of upstream suppliers or downstream customers, which lead to systemic financial risks. How to effectively reduce the debt default risk of Chinese enterprises in the supply chain, prevent and resolve systemic financial risks and maintain the security and stability in the industry chain has become a very important research topic on national governance.
Exising srudies on corporate debt default risk. existing studies mainly focus on the macro institutional environment and micro corporate characteristics, but have paid little attention to the spillover effect of accounting information on supply chain debt risk. In practice, suppliers and customers are closely connected, and customers' accounting information has spillover effects on the financing and operation of suppliers, which can subsequently affect the debt default risk. Therefore, we want to explore whether and how customers' high-quality accounting information can reduce the debt default risk of suppliers, and under which conditions the risk mitigation effect will be more obvious.
Based on the sample of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2020, this paper explores the mitigation effect and internal mechanism on how customers' high-quality accounting information affects supplier's debt default risk. We find that: Customers' high-quality accounting information can effectively alleviate the debt default risk faced by suppliers. The mechanism tests show that customers' high-quality accounting information can optimize the operation and management activities of suppliers, enhance their assets value, improve the credit decisions of financial institutions, and reduce the scale of excessive debt of suppliers, thereby mitigating debt default risk. Finally, based on the heterogeneity analysis of macroeconomic uncertainty, supply chain characteristics, and corporate ownership structures, we find that when thesr is slower macroeconomic growth, stronger supply chain economic links or more specific assets, and privately controlled suppliers, customers' high-quality accounting information mitigates suppliers' debt default risk more. Our results remain robust across various tests.
The research contributions of this study are as follows: First, it enrich research on influencing factors of corporate debt default risk. Based on the supply chain context, this paper studies the impact of customers' high-quality accounting information on suppliers' corporate debt default risk for the first time. We explore the underlying mechanisms and enrich literature on factors affecting corporate debt default risk.
Second, it expands the spillover effect of accounting information within the supply chain. Information spillover effect is common in the supply chain, which has been widely explored in previous studies. This paper theoretically analyzes and empirically tests the spillover effect of customers' high-quality accounting information on suppliers' corporate debt default risk for the first time, and also considers the impacts of heterogeneous factors. It expands uoon the economic consequences of accounting information spillover effects in supply chain.
Third, it provides important theoretical guidance and policy recommendations for Chinese enterprises to better resolve debt default risks. Since 2020, macroeconomic growth has slowed down and corporate debt defaults have occurred more frequently making prevention and resolution of systemic financial risks increasingly important. We find that customers' high-quality accounting information can reduce the debt default risk of suppliers, which can effectively curb the contagion and accumulation of debt default risk in supply chain. Our findings provide policy references for maintaining supply chain security and stability and for comprehensively deepening the supply-side structural reform, as emphasized in the report of the 20th National Congress.
Keywords:  Suppliers    Customers    Accounting Information Quality    Debt Default Risk
JEL分类号:  G10   G14   G33  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(72372167,71972187)、国家自然科学基金青年项目(72402144,72302224)、广东省自然科学基金项目(2023A1515012721)、“泰山学者”工程专项经费(tsqn202306100)和中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2023M733331)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  马新啸,管理学博士,副教授,中国海洋大学管理学院/中国企业营运资金管理研究中心,E-mail:mxx5530@ouc.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  衣昭颖,管理学博士,讲师,首都经济贸易大学会计学院,E-mail:yizhy@cueb.edu.cn.柳建华,管理学博士,教授,中山大学岭南学院,E-mail:liujhua8@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
衣昭颖, 柳建华, 马新啸. 客户高质量会计信息与供应商债务违约风险[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 531(9): 77-94.
YI Zhaoying, LIU Jianhua, MA Xinxiao. Customer's High-quality Accounting Information and Debt Default Risk of Suppliers. Journal of Financial Research, 2024, 531(9): 77-94.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V531/I9/77
[1] 蔡贵龙、邓景、葛锐和郑国坚,2022,《客户行业竞争地位与供应商企业绩效》,《会计研究》第11期,第72~86页。
[2] 陈德球、刘经纬和董志勇,2013,《社会破产成本、企业债务违约与信贷资金配置效率》,《金融研究》第11期,第68~81页。
[3] 黄秋萍、赵先德、杨君豪和梁超杰,2014,《供应商关系管理中的金融关系行为研究》,《南开管理评论》第17期,第66~77页。
[4] 黄宪和王旭东,2015,《我国央行货币政策实施力度和节奏的规律及效果研究——基于历史演进和时变分析的视角》,《金融研究》第11期,第15~32页。
[5] 李春涛、宋敏和张璇,2014,《分析师跟踪与企业盈余管理——来自中国上市公司的证据》,《金融研究》第7期,第124~139页。
[6] 李心合、王亚星和叶玲,2014,《债务异质性假说与资本结构选择理论的新解释》,《会计研究》第12期,第3~10页。
[7] 陆正飞、祝继高和孙便霞,2008,《盈余管理、会计信息与银行债务契约》,《管理世界》第3期,第152~158页。
[8] 陆正飞、何捷和窦欢,2015,《谁更过度负债:国有还是非国有企业?》,《经济研究》第12期,第54~67页。
[9] 孟庆斌、侯粲然和鲁冰,2019,《企业创新与违约风险》,《世界经济》第10期,第169~192页。
[10] 申慧慧和吴联生,2012,《股权性质、环境不确定性与会计信息的治理效应》,《会计研究》第8期,第8~16页。
[11] 王雄元和高开娟,2017,《客户关系与企业成本黏性:敲竹杠还是合作》,《南开管理评论》第1期,第132~142页。
[12] 王雄元和彭旋,2016,《稳定客户提高了分析师对企业盈余预测的准确性吗?》,《金融研究》第5期,第156~172页。
[13] 魏明海、衣昭颖和李晶晶,2018,《中国情境下供应链中客户盈余信息传递效应影响因素研究》,《会计研究》第6期,第19~25页。
[14] 徐忠、沈艳、王小康和沈明高,2009,《市场结构与我国银行业绩效:假说与检验》,《经济研究》第10期,第75~86页。
[15] 衣昭颖、郑国坚和马新啸,2023,《高质量客户信息能够缓解企业融资约束吗?——基于供应链信息传递的视角》,《世界经济文汇》第5期,第68~85页。
[16] 余明桂和潘红波,2010,《金融发展,商业信用与产品市场竞争》,《管理世界》第8期,第117~129页。
[17] 张敏、张胜、王成方和申慧慧,2010,《政治关联与信贷资源配置效率——来自我国民营上市公司的经验证据》,《管理世界》第11期,第143~153页。
[18] 周宏、徐兆铭、彭丽华和杨萌萌,2011,《宏观经济不确定性对中国企业债券信用风险的影响——基于2007—2009年月度面板数据》,《会计研究》第12期,第41~45页。
[19] Ak, B. K. and P. N. Patatoukas, 2016, “Customer-Base Concentration and Inventory Efficiencies: Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector”,Production and Operations Management, 25(2), pp.258~272.
[20] Altman, E. I., 1968, “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy”, Journal of Finance, (23),pp.589~609.
[21] Bharath, S. T., Sunder, J. and S. V. Sunder, 2008, “Accounting Quality and Debt Contracting”, Accounting Review, (83),pp.1~28.
[22] Bharath, S. T. and T. Shumway, 2008, “Forecasting Default with the Merton Distance to Default Model”, Review of Financial Studies, 21 (3),pp.1339~1369.
[23] Ciampi, F., 2015, “Corporate Governance Characteristics and Default Prediction Modeling for Small Enterprises:an Empirical Analysis of Italian Firms”, Journal of Business Research, 68 (5),pp.1012~1025.
[24] Dechow, P. M. and I. D. Dichev, 2002, “The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors”, Accounting Review, 77(Supplement),pp.35~59.
[25] Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G. and A. P. Hutton, 1995, “Detecting Earnings Management”, Accounting Review, 70(2),pp.193~225.
[26] Files, R. and U. G. Gurun, 2017, “Lenders' Response to Peer and Customer Restatements,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 35 (1),pp.464~493.
[27] Guan, Y., Wong, F. and Y. Zhang, 2015, “Analyst Following along the Supply Chain”, Review of Accounting Studies, 20 (1),pp.210~241.
[28] Hertzel, M., Li, Z., Officer, M. and K. Rodgers, 2008, “Inter-firm Linkages and the Wealth Effects of Financial Distress along the Supply Chain”, Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2),pp.374~387.
[29] Huang, L. and J. R. Kale, 2013, “Product Market Linkages, Manager Quality, and Mutual Fund Performance”, Review of Finance, 17(6),pp.1895~1946.
[30] Itzkowitz, J., 2015, “Buyers as Stakeholders: How Relationships Affect Suppliers Financial Constraints”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 31, pp.54~66.
[31] Kim, J. B., Song, B. Y. and Y. Zhang, 2015, “Earnings Performance of Major Customers and Bank Loan Contracting with Suppliers”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 59(10),pp.384~398.
[32] Merton, R. C., 1974, “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: the Risk Structure of Interest rates”, Journal of Finance, 29(2),pp.449~470.
[33] Panteghini, P. M. and S. Vergalli, 2016, “Accelerated Depreciation, Default Risk and Investment Decisions”, Journal of Economics, (2),pp.113~130.
[34] Patatoukas, P. N., 2012, “Customer-Base Concentration: Implications for Firm Performance and Capital Markets”, The Accounting Review, 87(2),pp.363~392.
[35] Radhakrishnan, S., Wang, Z. and Y. Zhang, 2014, “Customers' Capital Market Information Quality and Suppliers' Performance”, Production and Operations Management, 23(10),pp.1690~1705.
[36] Sarkar, S., 2008, “Can Tax Convexity be Ignored in Corporate Financing Decisions”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32 (7),pp.1310~1321.
[37] Yi, Z. Y., Xu, X. W., Wei, M. H. and B. X. Lin, 2023, “Foreign Institutional Ownership Externalities and Supplier Innovation”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 80, pp.1~20.
[1] 顾明, 任蓝翔, 李东旭. 政策规范、同群效应与资本市场震慑——来自A股上市公司随意停牌的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 95-112.
[2] 徐亚飞, 孟庆玺. 并购业绩承诺完成质量何以提升?——来自媒体监督的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 528(6): 188-206.
[3] 杨子晖, 张平淼, 林师涵. 股票市场与债券市场的风险联动与预测研究——基于机器学习的前沿视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 523(1): 131-149.
[4] 叶彦艺, 刘碧波, 施展. 债务协商、再融资风险与信用债定价 ——来自中国债券市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 520(10): 104-124.
[5] 彭凯翔, 陈志武, 袁为鹏. 17至20世纪初中国的商业利率变迁:以金融组织演进为线索的考察[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 516(6): 187-206.
[6] 林兟, 何为, 余剑峰, 熊熊. 公募基金改善了市场定价效率吗?——持股基金质量与股票收益[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 514(4): 149-167.
[7] 杨子晖, 王姝黛, 李东承, 冷铁成. 债务风险传染的多重网络研究[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 38-56.
[8] 陈奉功, 张谊浩. 绿色债券发行、企业绿色转型与市场激励效应[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 131-149.
[9] 顾明, 曾力, 陈海强, 倪博. 交易限制与股票市场定价效率——基于创业板涨跌幅限制放宽的准自然实验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 509(11): 189-206.
[10] 潘越, 林淑萍, 张鹏东. 专利提前公开的资本市场动因——基于企业被并购压力视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 189-206.
[11] 张伟平, 曹廷求. 中国房地产企业间系统性风险溢出效应分析——基于尾部风险网络模型[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 94-114.
[12] 段丙蕾, 汪荣飞, 张然. 南橘北枳:A股市场的经济关联与股票回报[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 500(2): 171-188.
[13] 孙广宇, 李志辉, 杜阳, 王近. 市场操纵降低了中国股票市场的信息效率吗——来自沪市A股高频交易数据的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 151-169.
[14] 吴卫星, 张旭阳, 吴锟. 金融素养与家庭储蓄率——基于理财规划与借贷约束的解释[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 119-137.
[15] 梁若冰, 张东荣, 方心, 林细细. 限购政策是否降低了上市房地产企业价值?——基于强度双重差分法的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8): 42-60.
[1] 肖欣荣, 周晏伊. 中国A股涨跌停交易制度与投资者处置效应[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 531(9): 153 -170 .
[2] 叶帅, 张劲帆, 郑凯轩. 中国新基金过度发行之谜和投资者保护[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 531(9): 171 -188 .
[3] 王熙, 黄德金, 高明. 波动率指数与价格发现——基于中国市场的理论拓展[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 113 -131 .
[4] 宋芳秀, 宋奎壁. 公众异质预期、信息成本与货币政策传导[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 1 -19 .
[5] 沈艳, 江弘毅, 胡诗云, 赵家琪, 黄卓. 数字金融支持高质量发展:理论、机制和证据[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 20 -39 .
[6] 栾稀, 朱浣君, 彭雨洁, 徐奇渊. 地缘政治冲击下的主权债务风险:溢出效应和传导渠道[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 1 -19 .
[7] 陈学彬, 李鑫. 关联网络视角下的国际外汇市场汇率风险溢出研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 20 -38 .
[8] 李政, 李薇, 李丽雯. 美国三类不确定性冲击、生产网络传导与中国行业尾部风险[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 39 -57 .
[9] 欧阳远芬, 王秋实. 基于隐性担保和显性担保比较的城投债定价研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 77 -94 .
[10] 杨娇辉, 王伟, 冯云. 经济政策不确定性、国家宏观风险与国际证券投资[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 58 -76 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1