Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2024, Vol. 529 Issue (7): 96-114    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
增值税留抵退税、预期与企业雇佣
陈宇, 陈超凡, 李钊, 邓磊
中央财经大学财政税务学院,北京市 102200;
北京工商大学经济学院,北京市 100048
VAT credit refund, expectations, and employment by enterprises
CHEN Yu, CHEN Chaofan, LI Zhao, DENG Lei
School of Public Finance and Taxation,Central University of Finance and Economics;
School of Economics,Beijing Technology And Business University
下载:  PDF (586KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以2016—2022年A股上市公司为研究样本,利用多期DID模型研究增值税留抵退税政策对企业雇佣规模的影响。研究发现,增值税留抵退税政策使得企业雇佣规模平均扩大了2.31%,并且该效应对资本密集型、处于成长期的企业、非国有企业和融资约束大的企业影响更为显著。机制检验表明,该效应通过缓解企业流动性约束、改变要素投资决策、提振经营主体信心实现。此外,政府预期管理水平更高的地区,留抵退税的就业促进效应更大。本文关于留抵退税政策对企业雇佣的影响研究结论,可为进一步发挥留抵退税政策的就业效应提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈宇
陈超凡
李钊
邓磊
关键词:  增值税留抵退税  企业雇佣  预期  多期DID  文本分析    
Summary:  In the current context of significant employment pressure and weak economic expectations, "ensuring employment stability and strengthening confidence" has become a key factor in further promoting economic recovery and improvement. The VAT credit refund is the "highlight" of large-scale tax reduction and fee reduction, a major measure to reduce the burden on enterprises and stimulate market vitality, and a major choice for macro policies to support steady growth, employment and structural adjustment. Therefore, it is of great theoretical value and practical significance to study the impact of the tax refund policy on employment.
This paper studies the impact of VAT credit refund on employment scales of enterprises, using A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2022 as the research sample and multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) model. Robustness tests were carried out in a number of aspects. The micro data of enterprises in this paper are derived from CSMAR database and Wind database, the macroeconomic data are derived from CEInet Statistics Database, and the text data of enterprise expectations and government expectations management level are derived from the economic news database in CNRDS database and infobank database.
The study finds that the VAT credit refund led to an average increase of 2.31% in enterprise employment scale. Moreover, this effect was more pronounced for capital-intensive, growth-oriented, non-state-owned, and financially constrained enterprises. Mechanism tests indicate that this effect is achieved through alleviating corporate liquidity constraints, altering factor investment decisions, and boosting the confidence of business entities. Additionally, the study pays attention to the expectation management of fiscal policy, and finds that in regions with higher government expectation management levels, the employment promotion effect of the VAT credit refund is more pronounced. This shows that strengthening the expectation management of fiscal policy can give full play to the policy effect, and it is necessary to do a good job of expectation management from the two-way interaction between enterprises and government.
This paper comprehensively evaluates the impact of the VAT credit refund on enterprise employment, providing important insights into how to further give full play to the employment effect of this policy. Firstly, as the most important preferential tax policy in recent years, the tax refund policy has provided valuable cash flow support to enterprises through unprecedented tax rebates, thereby significantly expanding the employment scale of enterprises, and playing an important supporting role in ensuring the employment of residents and protecting business entities. Secondly, the tax refund policy can directly provide enterprises with funds to alleviate the liquidity constraints of enterprises. In order to give full play to the regulatory role of the policy, we can further pay attention to the implementation of tax rebates for non-state-owned, capital-intensive and capital-constrained enterprises, and effectively provide support for these enterprises with relatively greater financial pressure, which is of far-reaching significance for stabilizing the micro-subjects and developing the macroeconomy. Thirdly, the tax rebate can play a role in stabilizing employment by improving enterprise expectations, and good local government expectation management can amplify the employment effect of tax refunds, which provides an empirical basis for the importance and necessity of "stabilizing expectations and strengthening confidence" work.
The main innovation of this paper mainly lies in the following three aspects: Firstly, it explores the new mechanism of action. By constructing the enterprise expectation index based on the tone of the corporate annual report, this paper discusses whether the tax refund affects the employment of enterprises through the expectation of enterprises, and further analyzes the impact of government expectation management on the policy effect from the perspective of the government, which provides a new perspective for how the government can promote the full play of the role of fiscal and taxation policies. What's more, this paper expands the existing literature, further identifies the impact of the tax refund policy on business entities from the perspective of employment, and clarifies that the tax refund policy can "stabilize employment and strengthen confidence", which enriches the research on the impact of tax reform on the employment scale of enterprises. Finally, This paper refines the identification strategy within the scope of available data. According to the 2018-2022 policy documents on the enterprise industry, enterprise size, corporate tax credit, and whether it is the beneficiary of other tax refund policies, this paper is more accurate to identify the experimental group of enterprises than only industry identification.
It should be noted that this paper takes A-share listed companies as the research sample. Although the impact of the 2022 tax refund policy on the employment scale of small and micro enterprises is considered in the empirical evidence, due to the large scale of listed enterprises, the research sample of small and micro enterprises involved in this paper is very limited. In future research, we can consider using the research samples of small and micro enterprises to further enrich the analysis of the effect of the tax refund policy.
Keywords:  VAT Credit Refund    Employment by Enterprises    Expectations    Multi-period DID    Textual Analysis
JEL分类号:  E24   E62   H20  
基金资助: *本文感谢国家社会科学基金项目(20BGL066)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  邓 磊,经济学博士,副教授,北京工商大学经济学院,E-mail: denglei@btbu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  陈 宇,经济学博士,副教授,中央财经大学财政税务学院,E-mail: chenyu_hut@163.com.陈超凡,硕士研究生,中央财经大学财政税务学院,E-mail: 18662811187@163.com.李 钊,经济学博士,助理教授,中央财经大学财政税务学院,E-mail: li_zhao@cufe.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
陈宇, 陈超凡, 李钊, 邓磊. 增值税留抵退税、预期与企业雇佣[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 96-114.
CHEN Yu, CHEN Chaofan, LI Zhao, DENG Lei. VAT credit refund, expectations, and employment by enterprises. Journal of Financial Research, 2024, 529(7): 96-114.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V529/I7/96
[1]卞志村和张义,2012,《央行信息披露、实际干预与通胀预期管理》,《经济研究》第12期,第15~28页。
[2]蔡伟贤、沈小源、李炳财和柴美华,2022,《增值税留抵退税政策的创新激励效应》,《财政研究》第5期,第31~48页。
[3]曾庆生、周波、张程和陈信元,2018,《年报语调与内部人交易:“表里如一”还是“口是心非”,《管理世界》第9期,第143~160页。
[4]崔惠玉、田明睿和王倩,2022,《增值税留抵税款抑制了企业研发投入吗》,《财贸经济》第8期,第59~73页。
[5]崔小勇、蔡昀珊和卢国军,2023,《增值税留抵退税能否促进企业吸纳就业?——来自2019年试行留抵退税制度的证据》,《管理世界》第9期,第15~38页。
[6]郭峰、王靖一、王芳、孔涛、张勋和程志云,2020,《测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征》,《经济学季刊》第4期,第1401~1418页。
[7]何杨、邓粞元和朱云轩,2019,《增值税留抵退税政策对企业价值的影响研究——基于我国上市公司的实证分析》,《财政研究》第5期,第104~17页。
[8]洪永淼、刘俸奇和薛涧坡,2023,《政府与市场心理因素的经济影响及其测度》,《管理世界》第3期,第30~51页。
[9]侯巧铭、宋力和蒋亚朋,2017,《管理者行为、企业生命周期与非效率投资》,《会计研究》第3期,第61~67+95页。
[10]姜富伟、孟令超和唐国豪,2021,《媒体文本情绪与股票回报预测》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1323~1344页。
[11]解洪涛和张建顺,2020,《所得税减半征收政策对小微企业就业影响评估——基于全国税源调查数据的断点回归分析》,《经济评论》第3期,第21~36页。
[12]李俊成、彭俞超和王文蔚,2023,《绿色信贷政策能否促进绿色企业发展?——基于风险承担的视角》,《金融研究》第3期,第112~130页。
[13]李拉亚,2011,《预期管理理论模式述评》,《经济学动态》第7期,第113~119页。
[14]李永友,2012,《市场主体信心与财政乘数效应的非线性特征——基于SVAR模型的反事实分析》,《管理世界》第1期,第46~58+187页。
[15]刘朝阳、李傲洋、王硕和王贺,2023,《留抵退税政策对制造业企业投资与就业的影响研究》,《中央财经大学学报》第3期,第31~42页。
[16]刘贯春、吴佳其、叶永卫和黄馨,2023,《增值税留抵退税的就业创造效应》,《财经研究》第11期,第19~33+94页。
[17]刘贯春、叶永卫和张军,2021,《社会保险缴费、企业流动性约束与稳就业——基于《社会保险法》实施的准自然实验》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第152~169页。
[18]刘啟仁和赵灿,2020,《税收政策激励与企业人力资本升级》,《经济研究》第4期,第70~85页。
[19]刘怡和耿纯,2018,《增值税留抵规模、分布及成本估算》,《税务研究》第3期,第28~36页。
[20]刘长庚、谷阳、张磊和吴雄,2022,《增值税留抵退税政策的就业促进效应》,《财政研究》第9期,第44~57页。
[21]鲁桐和党印,2014,《公司治理与技术创新:分行业比较》,《经济研究》第6期,第115~128页。
[22]陆雪琴和鲁建坤,2022,《投资税收激励与劳动收入份额——来自东北增值税转型试点的证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第6期,第2001~2020页。
[23]马国旺和王天娇,2022,《数字普惠金融对就业的影响及空间效应研究》,《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》第3期,第138~152页。
[24]宋弘、封进和杨婉彧,2021,《社保缴费率下降对企业社保缴费与劳动力雇佣的影响》,《经济研究》第1期,第90~104页。
[25]唐跃军和左晶晶,2014,《所有权性质、大股东治理与公司创新》,《金融研究》第6期,第177~192页。
[26]汪莉和王先爽,2015,《央行预期管理、通胀波动与银行风险承担》,《经济研究》第10期,第34~48页。
[27]王贝贝,陈勇兵,李震,2022,《减税的稳就业效应:基于区域劳动力市场的视角》,《世界经济》第7期,第98~125页。
[28]王帅、王亚男和秦睿祺,2023,《地方政府欠款治理与民营企业劳动雇佣决策》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第12期,第172~193页。
[29]吴怡俐、吕长江和倪晨凯,2021,《增值税的税收中性、企业投资和企业价值——基于“留抵退税”改革的研究》,《管理世界》第8期,第180~194页。
[30]张成思、孙宇辰和阮睿,2021,《宏观经济感知、货币政策与微观企业投融资行为》,《经济研究》第10期,第39~55页。
[31]张玉鹏和王茜,2016,《政策不确定性的非线性宏观经济效应及其影响机制研究》,《财贸经济》第4期,第116~133页。
[32]钟油子,2023,《增值税留抵退税政策的实践与思考》,《税务研究》第1期,第21~25页。
[33]Callaway,B. and P. H.C. Sant'Anna,2018,“Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods”,Journal of Econometrics,225(2),pp.200~230.
[34]Costa Filho, A.E., 2018,“Fiscal Policy and Expectations in Brazil”,Economia Aplicada,22(3),pp.27~52.
[35]Dickinson,V., 2011, “Cash Flow Patterns as A Proxy for Firm Life Cycle”,The Accounting Review,86(6), pp.1969~1994.
[36]End, N. and G. H. Hong,2022,“Trust What You Hear: Policy Communication, Expectations, and Fiscal Credibility“,IMF Working Papers,No.036.
[37]Goodman-Bacon,A.,2021,“Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing”,Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), pp.254~227.
[38]Guimaraes,B.,C. Machado and M. Ribeiro,2016,“A Model of the Confidence Channel of Fiscal Policy”,Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48(7),pp.1363~1395.
[39]Hadlock, C. J. and J. R. Pierce,2010,“New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the Kz Index”, Review of Financial Studies, 23(5),pp.1909~1940.
[40]Konstantinou,P. and A. Tagkalakis,2011,“Boosting Confidence: Is There A Role for Fiscal Policy?” ,Economic Modelling, 28(4),pp. 1629~1641.
[41]Vintilǎ, G., M. Onofreiand and I. Tibulcǎ, 2018, “An Analysis of the Impact of Tax Reforms on Business Confidence: Empirical Evidence from the EU Member States”, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences,14,pp.92~110.
[1] 宋芳秀, 宋奎壁. 公众异质预期、信息成本与货币政策传导[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 1-19.
[2] 董青马, 张皓越, 马剑文, 尚玉皇. 央行沟通与资产价格——识别“潜在”未预期货币政策信息[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 528(6): 40-59.
[3] 林建浩, 陈良源, 黄颖平. 识别货币政策操作的多重冲击及其经济效应[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 527(5): 20-38.
[4] 陈国进, 丁赛杰, 赵向琴. 绿色结构性货币政策、政策预期与经济绿色转型[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 526(4): 1-19.
[5] 牛晓健, 强皓凡, 吕斌, 王聪. 企业跨界竞争与债务违约风险——基于机器学习与复杂网络方法[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 525(3): 150-168.
[6] 李尚宸, 张英广, 胡佳胤, 张峥. 房价外推预期和长租需求——基于住房租赁合同数据的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 523(1): 76-95.
[7] 王辉, 朱家雲, 胡诣聪. 央行预期引导可以降低银行系统性金融风险吗?——基于市场解读偏离的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 519(9): 1-19.
[8] 庄子罐, 韩恺明, 刘鼎铭, 王熙. 资产价格、预期冲击与中国宏观经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 518(8): 1-18.
[9] 陈彬彬, 刘善存, 张强, 曾庆铎. 基于理性预期均衡的金融期货定价研究:信息驱动还是套利驱动?[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 518(8): 170-188.
[10] 成程, 田轩, 徐照宜. 供应链金融与企业效率升级 ——来自上市公司公告与地方政策文件的双重证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 516(6): 132-149.
[11] 张一帆, 林建浩, 樊嘉诚. 新闻文本大数据与消费增速实时预测——基于叙事经济学的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 152-169.
[12] 王勇, 窦斌, 宋培睿, 何昕晟. 管理层语调偏离会影响投资者决策吗?——基于我国上市公司文本与财务数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 169-187.
[13] 吕有吉, 郑伟, 谢志伟. 老农保参保经历会提升养老金预期准确性吗?——来自CHARLS的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 522(12): 113-131.
[14] 王宇伟, 刘宏雅. 央行言辞沟通与银行信贷投放:总量与结构效应[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 521(11): 78-96.
[15] 华秀萍, 程思睿, 李婉宁, 王勇. 非正式融资中的文化力量 ——企业文化对商业信用的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 520(10): 186-206.
[1] 王劲松, 唐洛秋, 黄佳祥, 武文慧, 韩向宇. 房价波动对地方政府债务稳定性的影响——基于隐性担保和支出效率的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 528(6): 60 -77 .
[2] 李好, 李志生, 梁释. 互联网企业并购抑制了企业创新吗?——基于分层式垄断竞争结构的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 115 -132 .
[3] 李鑫, 佟岩, 赵泽与. 承销商声誉受损与公司债券发行上市审核压力——基于证券交易所审核反馈意见函的文本分析[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 133 -151 .
[4] 宋芳秀, 宋奎壁. 公众异质预期、信息成本与货币政策传导[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 1 -19 .
[5] 沈艳, 江弘毅, 胡诗云, 赵家琪, 黄卓. 数字金融支持高质量发展:理论、机制和证据[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 20 -39 .
[6] 马理, 张人中, 马威. 绿色结构性货币政策的实施效果与传导机理研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 40 -58 .
[7] 温兴春, 梅冬州, 龚六堂. 金融机构跨境借贷、汇率制度选择与跨境融资监管[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 59 -76 .
[8] 巩冰, 张蓓, 杨斯尧, 徐照宜. “双碳”目标下碳减排支持工具对商业银行市场价值的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 77 -95 .
[9] 尹恒, 张道远, 李辉. 中国劳动收入份额的演变趋势及基于制造业的驱动力探索[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 152 -169 .
[10] 王梦真, 李文军. 基于生命周期理论的个人养老筹资评估与规划[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 529(7): 170 -187 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1