|
|
Foreign Capital Entry and National Value Chain Upgrade |
GUO Juanjuan, XIAN Guoming, XU Bangdong
|
Institute of World Economy, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences; School of Economics, Nankai University; School of Economics and Management; Weifang University |
|
|
Abstract Given the uncertain international situation, China should take full advantage of the strength of its domestic market by tapping the potential of domestic demand to establish a new development paradigm with domestic circulation as its mainstay, thereby resolving the impact of external shocks and demand contraction.Besides, China should also continue to expand its high-level opening-up to the outside world to attract more foreign investment and accelerate the implementation of major foreign-funded projects. This wouldnot only promote the country's industrial transformation and upgrading,but also enhance its status and infuence in global industrial chains, supply chains, and innovation chains. Investment from multinational enterprises is key for developing national value chains and promoting the connection between domestic and international circulation, and thus will underpin the formation of a new development pattern in which domestic and international circulations promote each other. Accordingly, this study explores the impact of foreign investment on the upgrading of China's national value chains by systematically examining an interregional input-output table of 30 provinces using exploratory spatial data analysis and spatial weight matrices. The empirical results show that FDI has a significant promoting effect on the upgrading of China's national value chains. Regions that receive FDI not only obtain a direct technology spillover but also benefit from “involuntary” spillovers from neighboring regions. The spillover effect of FDI is strongest within the province. Compared in regions with lower levels of technology and FDI, in regions with higher levels of technology and FDI, national value chains are more strongly promoted by FDI entry. Compared with inland areas, FDI entry in coastal areas is more conducive to the upgrading of national value chains. Furthermore, the higher the degree of marketization in an area, the more that FDI entry promotes domestic value chains in the area, and the spillover is most strengthened within the area. Finally, FDI can significantly optimize local industrial structures by upgrading national value chains, and its direct upgrading effect is more significant than its indirect upgrading effect. This study makes several contributions. First, it investigates the impact of foreign capital entry on the upgrading of China's national value chain. The findings could serve as a reference to aid the promotion of China's national value chain and the balanced and coordinated development of various regions, and could also contribute to the establishment of a new development pattern of domestic and international circulation. Second, given the strong spatial correlations among the national value chains in different regions, the spatial econometric model adopted in this study is a useful methodological tool with which to measure the spatial correlation and spillover effect of FDI into adjacent areas. This model is also less susceptible to reverse causality than other models, which enhances the credibility of our empirical results. Third, considering that national value chains play a key role in improving regional industrial structures, and that attracting foreign investment is required for developing national value chains and constructing an integrated domestic market, this study further analyzes the effect of foreign investment on the upgrading of local industrial structures through the channel of domestic value chains.
|
Received: 17 June 2021
Published: 01 June 2022
|
|
|
|
[1] |
陈国亮和陈建军,2012,《产业关联、空间地理与二三产业共同集聚——来自中国212个城市的经验考察》,《管理世界》第4期,第82~100页。
|
[2] |
陈敏、桂琦寒、陆铭和陈钊,2008,《中国经济增长如何持续发挥规模效应?——经济开放与国内商品市场分割的实证研究》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第129~154页。
|
[3] |
戴翔和金碚,2014,《产品内分工、制度质量与出口技术复杂度》,《经济研究》第7期,第4~17+43页。
|
[4] |
樊纲、王小鲁和朱恒鹏,2011,《中国市场化指数———各地区市场化相对进程 2011年报告》,北京:经济科学出版社。
|
[5] |
黎峰,2020,《双重价值链嵌入下的中国省级区域角色——一个综合理论分析框架》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第136~154页。
|
[6] |
黎峰,2017,《进口贸易、本土关联与国内价值链重塑》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第25~43页。
|
[7] |
黎峰,2017,《外资进入如何影响了中国国内价值链分工?》,《财经研究》第11期,第70~83页。
|
[8] |
黎峰,2016,《中国国内价值链是怎样形成的?》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第9期,第76~94页。
|
[9] |
刘志彪和张少军,2008,《中国地区差距及其纠偏:全球价值链和国内价值链的视角》,《学术月刊》第5期,第49~55页。
|
[10] |
陆铭和陈钊,2009,《分割市场的经济增长——为什么经济开放可能加剧地方保护?》,《经济研究》第3期,第42~52页。
|
[11] |
彭水军和舒中桥,2021,《服务贸易开放、市场化改革与中国制造业企业生产率》,《金融研究》第11期,第22~40页。
|
[12] |
沈剑飞,2018,《流通活动、市场分割与国内价值链分工深度》,《财贸经济》第9期,第89~104+121页。
|
[13] |
盛斌和毛其淋,2011,《贸易开放、国内市场一体化与中国省际经济增长:1985~2008年》,《世界经济》第11期,第44~66页。
|
[14] |
史宇鹏和周黎安,2007,《地区放权与经济效率:以计划单列为例》,《经济研究》第1期,第17~28页。
|
[15] |
王小鲁、樊纲和余静文,2017,《中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)》,北京:社会科学文献出版社。
|
[16] |
许和连、成丽红和孙天阳,2017《制造业投入服务化对企业出口国内增加值的提升效应——基于中国制造业微观企业的经验研究》,《中国工业经济》第10期,第62~80页。
|
[17] |
徐敏和姜勇,2015,《中国产业结构升级能缩小城乡消费差距吗?》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第3期,第3~21页。
|
[18] |
张杰、李勇和刘志彪,2010,《制度对中国地区间出口差异的影响:来自中国省际层面4分位行业的经验证据》,《世界经济》第2期,第83~103页。
|
[19] |
Anselin, L., 1988, “Lagrange Multiplier Test Diagnostics for Spatial Dependence and Spatial Heterogeneity”,Geographical Analysis, 20(1),pp. 1~17.
|
[20] |
Du, L., Harrison, A., and Jefferson, G., 2014, “FDI Spillovers and Industrial Policy: The Role of Tariffs and Tax Holidays”,World Development, 64,pp. 366~383.
|
[21] |
Fernandes, A. M., and Paunov, C., 2012, “Foreign Direct Investment in Services and Manufacturing Productivity: Evidence for Chile”, Journal of Development Economics,97 (2),pp. 305~321.
|
[22] |
Koopman, R., Powers, W., and Wang, Z., et al., 2010, “Give Credit Where Credit is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains”,National Bureau of Economic Research.
|
[23] |
Long, C., Yang, J., and Zhang, J., 2015, “Institutional Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in China”, World Development, 66(2),pp. 31~48.
|
[24] |
Taglioni, D., and Winkler, D., 2016, “Making Global Value Chains Work for Development”,The World Bank.
|
[25] |
Wang, Z., Wei, S. J., and Zhu, K., 2013, “Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels”, National Bureau of Economic Research, No.19677.
|
[26] |
Waxman A.,Liang Y.,Li S., et al., 2020, “Tightening Belts to Buy a Home: Consumption Responses to Rising Housing Prices in Urban China”, Journal of Urban Economics, 115, pp.103~190.
|
[27] |
Wrenn, D. H.,Yi J., and Zhang B., 2019, “House Prices and Marriage Entry in China”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 74,pp.118~130.
|
[28] |
Wright, Jr. G. C., 1976, “Linear Models for Evaluating Conditional Relationships”,American Journal of Political Science, pp. 349~373.
|
[29] |
Zipf, G. K., 1946, “The P1 P2/D Hypothesis: on the Intercity Movement of Persons”,American Sociological Review, 11(6),pp. 677~686.
|
|
|
|