|
|
A Study of Disposition Effect among China's Individual Investors: the Perspective of Irrational Beliefs |
WU Jiawei, WANG Changyun, CHEN Zilin, Jie Michael Guo
|
Futures and Derivatives Research Department, China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets; China Financial Policy Research Center, Renmin University of China; Macro Research and Asset Management Department, China Southern Asset Management Co. Ltd.; Durham University Business School |
|
|
Abstract The disposition effect refers to a robust trading phenomenon in which both individual and institutional investors are more likely to sell an asset when it is at a gain than when it is at a loss. The disposition effect is common in the stock market, the futures market, the real estate market, and other financial markets. However, as widespread as the disposition effect is, the literature has not reached consensus on its mechanism. We extend the literature by showing the significant impact of investor sentiment on the disposition effect both theoretically and empirically. The theory of investor preference and the theory of rational belief are the two main explanations for the disposition effect. Kahneman and Tversky's (1979) prospect theory attributes the disposition effect to the features of investors' preferences, as described by the S-shaped value function. Investors are more risk averse when facing profits and more risk seeking when facing a loss. Therefore, investors prefer to sell profitable stocks to realize gains and hold loss stocks to wait for recovery. One basic assumption of present prospect theory models and relevant modified models is that investors' expectations regarding the probability of stock price change are equal to the real probability (Barberis and Huang, 2008; Barberis and Xiong, 2009). As this assumption fails to describe the fact that investors usually have irrational expectations, the present prospect theory model does not include the documented impact of investor sentiment on trading behavior and asset pricing (Antoniou et al., 2013; Da et al., 2015). To fill this gap, we introduce investor sentiment into the prospect theory model and study the potential impact of investor sentiment on the disposition effect. Irrational investors usually fail to properly estimate the price expectation of a risky financial asset (normally a stock). Therefore, we describe investor sentiment by using investor expectation bias on the probability of stock price change for different cases (Barberis et al., 1998) and modify the prospect theory model based on the binomial tree model in Barberis and Xiong (2009). We define investors' irrational expectations regarding the probability of stock price increase as πs and the actual probability of stock price increase as πo. The difference (Δ) between πs and πo represents the extent to which an investor overestimates the probability of stock price increase (Dumas et al., 2009; Shefrin and Statman, 1994). When market sentiment is high, investors are often more overconfident and more optimistic, such that Δ>0. We construct a discrete-time portfolio decision-making model derived from investors' irrational expectations and obtain a series of simulation results for investors' optimal portfolio choices under limited capital based on the parameters in Barberis and Xiong (2009) and the PGR/PLR measures of the disposition effect used in Odean (1998). The results indicate that investors' disposition effect decreases as Δ increases, showing the essential role of investor sentiment in the disposition effect. We base this study on a transaction-level dataset of approximately 1.77 million individual investors from a large anonymous national Chinese broker from 2007 to 2009. We also include investors' daily positions so that we can match and calculate the PGR and PLR indexes. The sample covers a striking bull and bear period for China's stock market, which offers a natural environment in which to study the impact of investor sentiment on the disposition effect. Consistent with previous studies, our results show strong evidence of the disposition effect in China's stock market. On average, the likelihood of a sale for Chinese stock investors is 20% higher when a gain is realized than when a loss is realized. We regress the monthly measure of the disposition effect on monthly market investor sentiment after controlling the market momentum variable. The results verify our hypothesis that investors' disposition effect decreases when market sentiment is higher. Specifically, the disposition effect is 0.1% lower when market sentiment increases by 1%. Additionally, the disposition effect is even weaker in stocks that are more difficult to evaluate (e.g., stocks with a low book-to-market ratio and lower capitalization) due to the mechanism of investor sentiment. Our results are robust when controlling the potential endogeneity using the dummy variable of the 2008 financial crisis as the instrumental variable. We contribute to the literature by studying the impact of investor sentiment on the disposition effect both theoretically and empirically. Affected by sentiment, investors hold biased expectations about future stock prices, thus changing their selling decisions toward profits and losses. Our results also shed light on the optimization of investors' decision-making processes.
|
Received: 10 February 2018
Published: 09 March 2020
|
|
|
|
[1] |
李学峰、王兆宇和苏晨,2011,《什么导致了处置效应:基于不同市场环境的模拟研究与经验检验》,《世界经济》第12期,第140~155页。
|
[2] |
林树、俞乔、汤震宇和周建,2006,《投资者“热手效应”与“赌徒谬误”的心理实验研究》,《经济研究》第8期,第58~69页。
|
[3] |
阎石,2013,《投资者的处置效应研究——基于有限理性在行为金融中的应用》,科学出版社。
|
[4] |
易志高和茅宁,2009,《中国股市投资者情绪测量研究:CICSI的构建》,《金融研究》第11期,第174~184页。
|
[5] |
赵学军和王永宏,2001,《中国股市“处置效应”的实证分析》,《金融研究》第7期,第92~97页。
|
[6] |
An L.. 2016, “Asset Pricing When Traders Sell Extreme Winners and Losers”. Review of Financial Studies,29(3):823~861
|
[7] |
Andreassen, P. B.. 1988. “Explaining the Price-Volume Relationship: The Difference between Price Changes and Changing Prices”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processe, 41(3):371~389.
|
[8] |
Antoniou, C., Doukas, J. A., and Subrahmanyam, A.. 2013. “Cognitive Dissonance, Sentiment, and Momentum”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(1):245~275.
|
[9] |
Baker, M., and Wurgler, J.. 2006. “Investor Sentiment and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns”,Journal of Finance,61(4):1645~1680.
|
[10] |
Barber, B. M., Lee, Y. T., Liu, Y. J., and Odean, T.. 2007. “Is the Aggregate Investor Reluctant to Realize Losses? Evidence from Taiwan”, European Financial Management, 13(3):423~447.
|
[11] |
Barberis, N., and Huang, M.. 2008. “Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices”, American Economic Review, 98(5):2066~2100.
|
[12] |
Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.. 1998. “A Model of Investor Sentiment”, Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3):307~343.
|
[13] |
Barberis, N. and Xiong, W.. 2009. “What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of a Long-standing Preference-based Explanation”, Journal of Finance, 64(2):751~784.
|
[14] |
Ben-David, I., and Hirshleifer, D.. 2012. “Beyond the Disposition Effect: Do Investors Really Like Realizing Gains More Than Losses”, Review of Financial Studies, 25(8):2485~2532.
|
[15] |
Black, F.. 1986. “Noise”, Journal of Finance, 41(3):528~543.
|
[16] |
Brown, P., Chappel, N., da Silva Rosa, R., and Walter, T.. 2006. “The Reach of the Disposition Effect: Large Sample Evidence across Investors Classes”, International Review of Finance, 6(1-2):42~78.
|
[17] |
Calvet, L. E., Campbell, J. Y., and Sodini, P.. 2009. “Measuring the Financial Sophistication of Households”, American Economic Review, 99(2):393~98
|
[18] |
Carhart, M. M.. 1997. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Finance, 52(1):57~82.
|
[19] |
Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., and Rui, O. M.. 2007. “Trading Performance, Disposition Effect, Overconfidence, Representativeness Bias, and Experience of Emerging Market Investors”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4): 425~451.
|
[20] |
Cheng T Y, Lee C I, and C H. Lin, 2013, “An Examination of the Relationship between the Disposition Effect and Gender, Age, the Traded Security, and Bull-bear Market Conditions”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 21:195~213.
|
[21] |
Da, Z., Engelberg, J., and Gao, P.. 2015. “The Sum of all FEARS: Investor Sentiment and Asset Prices”, Review of Financial Studies, 28(1):1~32.
|
[22] |
De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., and Waldmann, R. J.. 1990. “Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets”, Journal of Political Economy, 98(4):703~738.
|
[23] |
Dumas, B., Kurshev, A., and Uppal, R.. 2009. “Equilibrium Portfolio Strategies In the Presence of Sentiment Risk and Excess Volatility”, Journal of Finance, 64(2):579~629.
|
[24] |
Grinblatt, M., Han, B.. 2005. “Prospect Theory, Mental Accounting, and Momentum”, Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2):311~339
|
[25] |
Hartzmark, S, M.. 2014. “The Worst, the Best, Ignoring all the Rest: The Rank Effect and Trading Behavior”, Review of Financial Studies, 28(4):1024~1059.
|
[26] |
Ingersoll, J. E., and Jin, L. J.. 2013. “Realization Utility with Reference-Dependent Preferences”, Review of Financial Studies, 26(3):723~767.
|
[27] |
Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S.. 1993. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implication for Stock Market Efficiency”, Journal of Finance, 48(1):65~91.
|
[28] |
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrica, 47(2):363~391.
|
[29] |
Kaustia, M.. 2010. “Prospect Theory and the Disposition Effect”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(3):791~812.
|
[30] |
Lakonishok, J., and Smidt, S.. 1986. “Volume for Winners and Losers: Taxation and Other Motives for Stock Trading”, Journal of Finance, 41(4):951~974.
|
[31] |
Lehenkari, M., and Perttunen, J.. 2004, “Holding on to the Losers: Finnish Evidence”. Journal of Behavioral Finance,5(2):116~126.
|
[32] |
Locke, P. R., and Mann, S. C.. 2005. “Professional Trader Discipline and Trade Disposition”, Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2):401~444.
|
[33] |
Odean, T.. 1998. “Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?”, Journal of Finance, 53(5):1775~1798.
|
[34] |
Ranguelova, E.. 2001. “Disposition Effect and Firm Size: New Evidence on Individual Investor Trading Activity”, Harvard University Working Paper, SSRN 293618.
|
[35] |
Shefrin, H. M., and Statman, M.. 1985. “The Disposition to Sell Winners too Early and Ride Losers too Long: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Finance, 40(3):777~790.
|
[36] |
Shu, P. G., Yeh, Y. H., Chiu, S. B., and H. C. Chen. 2005. “Are Taiwanese Individual Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(2):201~223.
|
[37] |
Shumway T., and Guojun Wu. 2005. “Does Disposition Drive Momentum?”, AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper.
|
[38] |
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., 1992, “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4):297~323.
|
[39] |
Weber, M., and Camerer, C. F.. 1998. “The Disposition Effect in Securities Trading: An Experimental Analysis”, Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 33(2):167~184.
|
No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|