|
|
|
| How Does Foreign Entry Liberalization Affect Indigenous Firm Innovation？ |
| MAO Qilin
|
| School of Economics, Nankai University |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the past 30 years, especially since joining the WTO, China has attracted substantial international direct investment from foreign-funded enterprises. According to the World Investment Prospects Survey Report 2010–2012 issued by the United Nations Trade and Development Organization, China topped the list of the world's 15 most attractive investment destinations. By 2015, China had accumulated 1.6 trillion U.S. dollars in actual foreign investment, accounting for about 8% of the global total for the same period, the second largest inflow of foreign investment to a single country after the U.S. How has this foreign entry affected the performance of indigenous firms？ Independent innovation is the engine and source of economic growth along with the adjustment and optimization of economic structures. This paper analyzes the impact of foreign entry on innovation by indigenous firms and also the underlying mechanisms, which are of great importance in systematically assessing China's use of FDI in recent years and the future adjustment of its foreign investment policy. The data used in this study are from the Annual Survey of Industrial Enterprises (ASIE) from 1998 to 2007 obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics. The survey covers all state-owned industrial enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises with “above-scale” income (i.e., main business income exceeding 5 million yuan). Based on the quasi-natural experiment of FDI liberalization arising from the revision of the “Industrial Guide for Foreign Investment” in 2002, this paper adopts the difference-in-differences (DID) method to investigate the impact of foreign entry on indigenous firm innovation and its underlying mechanisms. The results show that foreign entry not only helps to promote indigenous firm innovation but also increases the duration of innovation. In addition, we find that good intellectual property insurance tends to strengthen the positive impact of foreign entry on indigenous firm innovation, and this result is robust to alternative measures of both innovation and foreign entry. Last but not least, we explore the mechanisms via which foreign entry affects indigenous firm innovation, and find that “R&D ability improvement” and “financial constraint reduction” are the two important channels through which foreign entry promotes indigenous firm innovation. The results contain significant policy implications. According to the findings, foreign entry significantly promotes indigenous firm innovation, thus China ought to further formulate and improve relevant policies to attract FDI more vigorously. For instance, it is feasible to continuously improve the facilitation of foreign entry through innovative use of the foreign investment system and by conducting national treatment plus negative list management. Another important finding is that regional intellectual property protection not only promotes indigenous firm innovation directly, but also tends to strengthen the positive impact of foreign entry on indigenous firm innovation, thus China should further enhance and improve its regional intellectual property insurance. This paper makes the following contributions. First, most studies on the relation between foreign entry and indigenous firm innovation are based on aggregate data at the macro level, using traditional econometric methods for empirical research. However, this paper is based on micro data and adopts the difference-in-differences method which effectively overcomes endogeneity problems and provides a more accurate evaluation of the impact of foreign entry on indigenous firm innovation than previous studies. Second, this paper not only investigates the impact of foreign entry on indigenous firm innovation, but also analyzes the relation between the two from the perspective of the duration of innovation. Third, considering the significant regional differences in the degree of intellectual property protection in China, this paper integrates intellectual property protection into a unified analytical framework, and finds that good intellectual property insurance tends to strengthen the positive impact of foreign entry on indigenous firm innovation. This finding is important for future policymaking to more effectively utilize foreign capital to promote indigenous firm innovation. Last but not least, based on abundant samples from ASIE, this paper uses a mediation model to test in depth how foreign entry affects indigenous firm innovation.
|
|
Received: 30 September 2017
Published: 01 April 2019
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
樊纲、王小鲁和朱恒鹏,2010,《中国市场化指数:各地区市场化相对进程报告》,经济科学出版社。
|
| [2] |
胡立和郑玉,2014,《知识产权保护、FDI技术溢出与企业创新绩效》,《审计与经济研究》第5期,第105~112页。
|
| [3] |
解维敏和方红星,2011,《金融发展、融资约束与企业研发投入》,《金融研究》第5期,第171~183页。
|
| [4] |
鞠晓生、卢荻和虞义华,2013,《融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性》,《经济研究》第1期,第4~16页。
|
| [5] |
孔东民、徐茗丽和孔高文,2017,《企业内部薪酬差距与创新》,《经济研究》第10期,第146~159页。
|
| [6] |
林进智和郑伟民,2013,《FDI促进内资技术创新产生溢出效应的实证研究》,《科研管理》第11期,第27~35页。
|
| [7] |
路江涌,2008,《外商直接投资对内资企业效率的影响和渠道》,《经济研究》第6期,第95~106页。
|
| [8] |
罗军,2016,《FDI前向关联与技术创新——东道国研发投入重要吗？》,《国际贸易问题》第6期,第3~14页。
|
| [9] |
罗伟和葛顺奇,2015,《跨国公司进入与中国的自主研发:来自制造业企业的证据》,《世界经济》第12期,第29~53页。
|
| [10] |
毛其淋和方森辉,2018,《创新驱动与中国制造业企业出口技术复杂度》,《世界经济与政治论坛》第2期,第1~24页。
|
| [11] |
毛其淋和许家云,2015,《政府补贴对企业新产品创新的影响——基于补贴强度“适度区间”的视角》,《中国工业经济》第6期,第94~107页。
|
| [12] |
毛其淋和许家云,2016,《跨国公司进入与中国本土企业成本加成——基于水平溢出与产业关联的实证研究》,《管理世界》第9期,第12~32页。
|
| [13] |
潘健平、王铭榕和吴沛雯,2015,《企业家精神、知识产权保护与企业创新》,《财经问题研究》第12期,第104~110页。
|
| [14] |
孙浦阳、蒋为和陈惟,2015,《外资自由化、技术距离与中国企业出口——基于上下游产业关联视角》,《管理世界》第11期,第53~69页。
|
| [15] |
田巍和余淼杰,2014,《中间品贸易自由化和企业研发:基于中国数据的经验分析》,《世界经济》第6期,第90~112页。
|
| [16] |
杨道广、陈汉文和刘启亮,2017,《媒体压力与企业创新》,《经济研究》第8期,第125~139页。
|
| [17] |
叶娇和王佳林,2014,《FDI对本土技术创新的影响研究——基于江苏省面板数据的实证》,《国际贸易问题》第1期,第131~138页。
|
| [18] |
尹志锋、叶静怡、黄阳华和秦雪征,2013,《知识产权保护与企业创新:传导机制及其检验》,《世界经济》第12期,第111~129页。
|
| [19] |
于洪霞、龚六堂和陈玉宇,2011,《出口固定成本融资约束与企业出口行为》,《经济研究》第4期,第55~67页。
|
| [20] |
张杰,2015,《进口对中国制造业企业专利活动的抑制效应研究》,《中国工业经济》第7期,第68~83页。
|
| [21] |
张杰、郑文平和翟福昕,2014,《竞争如何影响创新:中国情景的新检验》,《中国工业经济》第11期,第56~68页。
|
| [22] |
张瑜和张诚,2011,《跨国企业在华研发活动对我国企业创新的影响——基于我国制造业行业的实证研究》,《金融研究》第11期,第139~152页。
|
| [23] |
Bertrand M., E. Duflo and S. Mullainathan, 2004, “How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1): 249～275.
|
| [24] |
Blomstrm, M. and A. Kokko, 1998, “Multinational Corporations and Spillovers”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3): 247～277.
|
| [25] |
Brandt, L., J. Van Bieseboreck and Y. Zhang, 2012, “Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction？ Firm-level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing”, Journal of Development Economics, 97(2): 339～351.
|
| [26] |
Cohen, W. M., 2010, “Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance”. in Hal1. B. H. and N. Rosenberg, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, North-Holland: 129～213.
|
| [27] |
Esteve-Pérez, S., V. Pallardó-López and F. Requena-Silvente, 2012, “The Duration of Firm-destination Export Relationships: Evidence from Spain, 1997-2006”, Economic Inquiry, 51: 1～22.
|
| [28] |
Feenstra, R. C., Z. Li and M. Yu, 2014, “Exports and Credit Constraints under Incomplete Information: Theory and Evidence from China”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4): 729～744.
|
| [29] |
García, F., B. Jin and R. Salomonm, 2013, “Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Improve the Innovative Performance of Local Firms”, Research Policy, 42: 231～244.
|
| [30] |
Greene, W. H., 2004, “Econometric analysis”, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
|
| [31] |
Hall, B.H., 2002, “The Financing of Research and Development”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1): 35～51.
|
| [32] |
Hal, G. and C. Long, 2006, “FDI Spillovers and Firm Ownership in China: Labor Markets and Backward Linkages”, Working Paper Series No.2006-25.
|
| [33] |
Hess, W. and M. Persson, 2012, “The Duration of Trade Revisited: Continuous-time Versus Discrete-time Hazards”, Empirical Economics, 43: 1083～1107.
|
| [34] |
Howell, A., 2016, “Firm R&D, Innovation and Easing Financial Constraints in China: Does Corporate Tax Reform Matter”, Research Policy, 45(10): 1996～2007.
|
| [35] |
Javorcik, B. S., 2004, “Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms？ In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages”, American Economic Review, 94(3): 605～627.
|
| [36] |
Kanwar, S. and R. Evenson, 2003, “Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change”, Oxford Economic Papers, 55(2): 235～264.
|
| [37] |
Klemperer, P., 1990, “How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be”, RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1): 113～130.
|
| [38] |
Levinsohn, J. and A. Petrin, 2003, “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables”, Review of Economic Studies, 70(2): 317～341.
|
| [39] |
Liu, Q. and L. D. Qiu, 2016, “Intermediate input imports and Innovations: Evidence from Chinese Firms' Patent Filings”, Journal of International Economics, 103: 166～183.
|
| [40] |
Lu, Y., Z. Tao and L. Zhu, 2017, “Identifying FDI Spillovers”, Journal of International Economics, 107: 75～90.
|
| [41] |
Olley, S. and A. Pakes, 1996, “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry”, Econometrica, 64(6): 1263～1297.
|
| [42] |
Sasidharan, S. and V. Kathuria, 2011, “Foreign Direct Investment and R&D: Substitutes or Complements—A Case of Indian Manufacturing after 1991 Reforms”, World Development, 39 (7): 1226～1239.
|
| [43] |
Scherer, F. M. and K. Huh, 1992, “R&D Reactions to High-Technology Import Competition”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 74 (2): 202～212.
|
| [44] |
Sobel, M., 1987, “Direct and Indirect Effects in Linear Structural Equation Models”, Sociological Methods Research, 16(1): 155～176.
|
| [45] |
Tassey, G., 2004, “Policy Issues for R&D Investment in a Knowledge-Based Economy”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(2): 153～185.
|
| [46] |
Teshima, K., 2009, “Import Competition and Innovation at the Plant Level: Evidence from Mexico”, Columbia University Working Paper.
|
| [47] |
Tian, W. and M. Yu, 2017, “Firm R&D, Processing Trade and Input Trade Liberalisation: Evidence from Chinese Firms”, World Economy, 40(2): 297～313.
|
| [48] |
Yu, M., 2015, “Processing Trade, Tariff Reductions and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Firms”, Economic Journal, 125 (585): 943～988.
|
|
|
|
