|
|
|
| Risk Disclosures in Annual Reports and Bank Loan Interest Rate |
| WANG Xiongyuan ,ZENG Jing
|
| School of Accounting, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The literature disagrees on the role of risk disclosures in annual reports. There are three competing hypotheses about the role of risk disclosures. The neutrality hypothesis holds that risk disclosures in annual reports are of little significance to market participants. The convergence hypothesis suggests that risk disclosures provide homogeneous public information and reduce the cost of capital. The divergence hypothesis proposes that such risk disclosures provide heterogeneous information and increase the cost of capital. These contrasting hypotheses indicate that the perceived attributes of risk disclosures in annual reports differ, thus the economic implications for market participants may also be different. Most studies focus on the economic consequences of risk disclosure from the perspective of equity and bond investors rather than that of banks. However, banks may pay more attention to risk disclosures in annual reports, as they are useful for banks to comprehensively assess a firm's credit risk. Therefore, studying the impact of risk disclosures on bank loan interest rates can help in understanding the economic consequences of risk disclosure in annual reports from the bank's perspective. How banks interpret the risk disclosures in annual reports will be reflected in their loan interest rates. If the risk disclosure provides information with low heterogeneity, the information asymmetry should be lower. With transparent information, the bank can assess the credit risk more efficiently and effectively, decreasing the bank's risk perception level, such that the loan interest rate may also decrease. In contrast, if the risk disclosures provide heterogeneous information, it should be more difficult for banks to assess the credit risk. Accordingly, the level of perceived risk will increase, and loan interest rates will increase. Based on 4,339 “firm-year-loan” observations of interest rates from 2008–2017, this paper reports three main findings. (1) Consistent with the convergence hypothesis, annual report risk disclosure by Chinese firms reduces the bank loan interest rate. This finding still holds after we exclude the effects of disclosure momentum, industry disclosure level, bank-enterprise connections, and other endogenous problems. (2) Information quality and risk are incomplete mediators when risk disclosures affect bank loan interest rates; that is, annual report risk disclosures lower the bank loan interest rates through improving information transparency and reducing the bank's risk perception level. (3) The negative correlation between risk disclosures and bank loan interest rates is mainly concentrated in the tight monetary policy group, the non-state-owned enterprises group, and the better corporate governance group. This suggests that banks pay more attention to the risk disclosures of non-state-owned enterprises and firms with better corporate governance during periods of tight monetary policy.There are no studies in the literature on the determinants of loan interest rates from the perspective of risk disclosures in annual reports or on the economic consequences of risk disclosures from the perspective of loan interest rates, which may better reflect the substance of risk disclosures due to the strong ability of banks to interpret this information. This paper is the first to study the relationship between loan interest rates and annual report risk disclosures, thus enriching the literature on risk disclosures and bank loans. The findings show that risk disclosures in annual reports reduce loan interest rates by improving information transparency and reducing the bank's perception of risk. Our findings thus support the convergence hypothesis. This paper shows that in annual report risk disclosures Chinese firms do not provide information with high heterogeneity, which is inconsistent with the intention of the regulatory agency that mandatesthe disclosure of risk information. Therefore, the regulatory agency may need to adjust the regulations or strengthen the penalties to induce companies to disclose more risk information. In addition, the loan interest rate includes more information than the loan amount, but as disclosing loan-level interest rates is not common, regulatory authorities should further require this disclosure. Future research could examine the specific impact of risk disclosures on different types of loans.
|
|
Received: 25 May 2018
Published: 01 April 2019
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
江伟和曾业勤,2013,《金融发展、产权性质与商业信用的信号传递作用》,《金融研究》第6期,第89~103页。
|
| [2] |
靳庆鲁、孔祥和侯青川,2012,《货币政策、民营企业投资效率与公司期权价值》,《经济研究》第5期,第96~106页。
|
| [3] |
李志军和王善平,2011,《货币政策、信息披露质量与公司债务融资》,《会计研究》第10期,第56~62页。
|
| [4] |
饶品贵和姜国华,2011,《货币政策波动、银行信贷与会计稳健性》,《金融研究》第3期,第51~71页。
|
| [5] |
孙铮、李增泉和王景斌,2006,《所有权性质、会计信息与债务契约——来自我国上市公司的经验证据》,《管理世界》第10期,第100~107页。
|
| [6] |
王雄元、李岩琼和肖忞,2017,《年报风险信息披露有助于提高分析师预测准确度吗？》,《会计研究》第10期,第37~43页。
|
| [7] |
王雄元和高曦,2018,《年报风险披露与权益资本成本》,《金融研究》第1期,第174~190页。
|
| [8] |
温忠麟和叶宝娟,2014,《中介效应分析:方法和模型发展》,《心理科学进展》第5期,第731~745页。
|
| [9] |
谢盛纹和陶然,2017,《年报预约披露推迟、分析师关注与股价崩盘风险》,《会计与经济研究》第1期,第3~19页。
|
| [10] |
邢立全和陈汉文,2013,《产品市场竞争、竞争地位与审计收费——基于代理成本与经营风险的双重考量》,《审计研究》第3期,第50~58页。
|
| [11] |
尹志宏、姜付秀和秦义虎,2010,《产品市场竞争、公司治理与信息披露质量》,《管理世界》第1期,第133~188页。
|
| [12] |
袁卫秋和刘春江,2013,《利率变动与企业短期债务结构——基于我国制造业上市公司的经验分析》,《会计与经济研究》第2期,第29~39页。
|
| [13] |
赵刚、梁上坤和王玉涛,2014,《会计稳健性与银行借款契约——来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《会计研究》第12期,第18~24页。
|
| [14] |
周开国、应千伟和陈晓娴,2014,《媒体关注度、分析师关注度与盈余预测准确度》,《金融研究》第2期,第139~152页。
|
| [15] |
Berger, Allen N. and Gregory F. Udell. 1990. “Collateral, Loan Quality and Bank Risk,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 25(1):21~42.
|
| [16] |
Bharath, Sreedhar T., J. Sunder, and Shyam V. Sunder. 2008. “Accounting Quality and Debt Contracting,” Accounting Review, 83(1):1~28.
|
| [17] |
Blackwell, David W. and Drew B. Winters. 1997. “Banking Relationships and the Effect of Monitoring on Loan Pricing,” Journal of Financial Research, 20(2):275~289.
|
| [18] |
Brown, Stephen V., X. Tian, and Jenny W. Tucker. 2018. “The Spillover Effect of SEC Comment Letters on Qualitative Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from the Risk Factor Disclosure,” Forthcoming Contemporary Accounting Research.
|
| [19] |
Campbell, John L., H. Chen, Dan S. Dhaliwal, H. Lu, and Logan B. Steele. 2014. “The Information Content of Mandatory Risk Factor Disclosures in Corporate Filings,” Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1):396~455.
|
| [20] |
Chiu, T., Y. Guan, and Jeong B. Kim. 2017. “The Effect of Risk Factor Disclosures on the Pricing of Credit Default Swaps,” Social Science Electronic Publishing.
|
| [21] |
Core, John E.. 2001. “A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature: Discussion,” Journal of Accounting & Economics, 31(1–3):441~456.
|
| [22] |
Dhaliwal, Dan S., Oliver Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Yong G. Yang. 2011. “Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting,” The Accounting Review, 86(1):59~100.
|
| [23] |
Diamond, Douglas W. and Robert E. Verrecchia. 1991. “Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital,” Journal of Finance, 46(4):1325~1359.
|
| [24] |
Drago, D. and R. Gallo. 2018. “Do Multiple Credit Ratings Affect Syndicated Loan Spreads？” Social Science Electronic Publishing.
|
| [25] |
Elmy, Frederick J., Louis P. Leguyader, and Thomas J. Linsmeier. 1998. “A Review of Initial Filings under the SEC's New Market Risk Disclosure Rules,” Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 9(4):33~45.
|
| [26] |
Eriksson, T.. 1999. “Executive Compensation and Tournament Theory: Empirical Tests on Danish Data,” Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2):262~280.
|
| [27] |
Hasan, I., Chun K. Hoi, Q. Wu, and H. Zhang. 2017. “Social Capital and Debt Contracting: Evidence from Bank Loans and Public Bonds,” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 53(3):1017~1047.
|
| [28] |
Heinle, Mirko S. and Kevin C. Smith. 2017. “A Theory of Risk Disclosure,” Review of Accounting Studies, 22(4):1459~1491.
|
| [29] |
Hodder, L., L. Koonce, and Mary L. Mcanally. 2001. “SEC Market Risk Disclosures: Implications for Judgment and Decision Making,” Accounting Horizons, 15(1):49~70.
|
| [30] |
Hollisas, H., Daniel W. Collins, William R. Kinney, and R. Lafond. 2009. “The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity,” Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1):1~43.
|
| [31] |
Hope, Ole K., D. Hu, and H. Lu. 2016. “The Benefits of Specific Risk-Factor Disclosures,” Review of Accounting Studies, 21(4):1005~1045.
|
| [32] |
Jensen, Michael C. and William H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” Social Science Electronic Publishing, 3(4):305~360.
|
| [33] |
Jiménez, G., S. Ongena, José L. Peydró, and J. Saurina. 2012. “Credit Supply and Monetary Policy: Identifying the Bank Balance-Sheet Channel with Loan Applications,” American Economic Review, 102(5):2301~2326.
|
| [34] |
Kim, Jeong B., Byron Y. Song, and Z. Wang. 2017. “Special Purpose Entities and Bank Loan Contracting,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 74(1):133~152.
|
| [35] |
Kim, O. and Robert E. Verrecchia. 1991. “Trading Volume and Price Reactions to Public Announcements,” Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2):302~321.
|
| [36] |
Klein, Roger W. and Vijay S. Bawa. 1976. “The Effect of Estimation Risk on Optimal Portfolio Choice,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(3):215~231.
|
| [37] |
Kothari, S. P., S. Shu, and Peter D. Wysocki. 2009. “Do Managers Withhold Bad News？” Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1):241~276.
|
| [38] |
Kravet, T. and V. Muslu. 2013. “Textual Risk Disclosures and Investors' Risk Perceptions,” Review of Accounting Studies, 18(4):1088~1122.
|
| [39] |
Lehavy, R., F. Li, and Kenneth J. Merkley. 2011. “The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst Following and the Properties of their Earnings Forecasts,” The Accounting Review, 86(3):1087~1115.
|
| [40] |
Li, F.. 2006. “Do Stock Market Investors Understand the Risk Sentiment of Corporate Annual Reports？” Social Science Electronic Publishing.
|
| [41] |
Longstaff, Francis A. and Eduardo S. Schwartz. 1995. “A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky Fixed and Floating Rate Debt,” Journal of Finance, 50(3):789~819.
|
| [42] |
Merton, Robert C.. 1987. “A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information,” Journal of Finance, 42(3):483~510.
|
| [43] |
Park, Jong C. and Q. Wu. 2009. “Financial Restatements, Cost of Debt and Information Spillover: Evidence from the Secondary Loan Market,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(9‐10):1117~1147.
|
| [44] |
Pstor, L'. and P. Veronesi. 2013. “Political Uncertainty and Risk Premia,” Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3):520~545.
|
| [45] |
Plumlee, M., Y. Xie, M. Yan, and Jeff J. Yu. 2015. “Bank Loan Spread and Private Information: Pending Approval Patents,” Review of Accounting Studies, 20(2):593~638.
|
| [46] |
Plummer, Elizabeth C. and Senyo Y. Tse. 1999. “The Effect of Limited Liability on the Informativeness of Earnings: Evidence from the Stock and Bond Markets,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(3):541~574.
|
| [47] |
Rahaman, Mohammad M. and Ashraf A. Zaman. 2013. “Management Quality and the Cost of Debt: Does Management Matter to Lenders？” Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(3):854~874.
|
| [48] |
Sengupta, P..1998. “Corporate Disclosure Quality and the Cost of Debt,” Accounting Review, 73(4):459~474.
|
| [49] |
Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1981. “Facts and Fears: Societal Perception of Risk,” Advances in Consumer Research, 8(1):497~502.
|
| [50] |
Stiglitz, Joseph E. and A. Weiss. 1981. “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information,” American Economic Review, 71(3):393~410.
|
| [51] |
Talavera, O., A. Tsapin, and O. Zholud. 2012. “Macroeconomic Uncertainty and Bank Lending: The Case of Ukraine,” Economic Systems, 36(2):279~293.
|
|
|
|
