|
|
The Effect of the Institutional Environment and Ultimate Control on CorporatePerformance: Based on the Test of Mediator Effect of Agency Costs |
ZHEN Hongxian, ZHANG Xianzhi, CHI Guotai
|
School of Accounting/China Internal Control Research Center,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics; Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology |
|
|
Abstract Existing literatures mostly use the analysis of the “black box” model, that is, deduce the role of governance mechanism from the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and corporate performance reversely. This paper takes the agency cost as the breakthrough point, and reveals the operation mechanism inside the “black box” to some extent, by analyzing different paths of two types of agency costs between ultimate control, institutional environment and corporate performance. Empirical results are as follows: first of all, the concentration on ultimate control could decrease two types of agency costs, and improve the governance efficiency, therefore improve the corporate performance of listed companies. Secondly, at this stage the institutional environment has a significant effect on corporate performances of private listed companies. Thirdly, there is an interaction effect between ultimate control and institutional environment, as the environment is worse, the concentration on ultimate control could dramatically improve corporate performances. Last but not least, ultimate control owned by state could better solve the first and second types of agency problems, therefore have positive mediator effect on corporate performances. The research shows that the concentration on ultimate control and ultimate control owned by state may play a part alternative role in the protection of investors at this stage, in the environment without a perfect investor protection mechanism in our country.
|
Received: 02 March 2015
Published: 19 April 2018
|
|
|
|
[1] |
曹廷求、杨秀丽和孙宇光,2007,《股权结构与公司绩效:度量方法和内生性》,《经济研究》第10期,第126~137页。
|
[2] |
邓晓岚,2011,《政府控制、政府干预与管理者自利》,《南方经济》第12期,第54~69页。
|
[3] |
樊纲、王小鲁和朱恒鹏,2011,《中国市场化指数》,北京:经济科学出版社。
|
[4] |
冯旭南、李心愉和陈工孟,2011,《家族控制、治理环境和公司绩效》,《金融研究》第3期,第149~164页。
|
[5] |
计小青和曹啸,2008,《标准的投资者保护与替代性投资者保护:一个概念性分析框架》,《金融研究》第3 期,第151~162页。
|
[6] |
姜国华和岳衡, 2005, 《大股东占用上市公司资金与上市公司股票回报率关系的研究》,《管理世界》第9期,第119~126页。
|
[7] |
刘慧龙和吴联生,2014,《制度环境、所有权性质与企业实际税率》,《管理世界》第4期,第42~52页。
|
[8] |
刘芍佳、孙霈和刘乃全,2003,《终极产权论、股权结构及公司绩效》,《经济研究》第3期,第51~62页。
|
[9] |
罗进辉,2012,《媒体报道的公司治理作用——双重代理成本视角》,《金融研究》第10期,第153~166页。
|
[10] |
孙铮、刘凤委和李增泉,2005,《市场化程度、政府干预与企业债务期限结构》,《经济研究》第5期,第52~63页。
|
[11] |
汤吉军,2014,《不完全契约视角下国有企业发展混合所有制分析》,《中国工业经济》第12期,第31~43页。
|
[12] |
田利辉,2005,《国有产权、预算软约束和中国上市公司杠杆治理》,《管理世界》第7期,第123~147页。
|
[13] |
王鹏,2008,《投资者保护、代理成本与公司绩效》,《经济研究》第2期,第68~82页。
|
[14] |
温忠麟、张雷、侯杰泰和刘红云,2004,《中介效应检验程序及其应用》,《心理学报》第5期,第614~620页。
|
[15] |
夏立军和方轶强,2005,《政府控制、治理环境与公司绩效》,《经济研究》第5期,第40~51页。
|
[16] |
杨兴全和张照南,2008, 《制度背景、股权性质与公司持有现金价值》,《经济研究》第12期,第111~123页。
|
[17] |
甄红线,2012,《终极所有权结构与公司绩效—理论分析与经验证据》,科学出版社。
|
[18] |
甄红线和史永东,2008,《终极所有权结构研究—来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第11期,第108~118页。
|
[19] |
郑国坚、林东杰和林斌,2014,《大股东股权质押、占款与企业价值》,《管理科学学报》第9期,第72~87页。
|
[20] |
周建和袁德利,2013,《公司治理机制与公司绩效: 代理成本的中介效应》,《预测》第2期,第18~25页。
|
[21] |
Alchian A. 1965. “Some economics of property rights,” IL Politico, 30(4): 816~829.
|
[22] |
Allen F., J. Qian, and M. Qian. 2005. “Law,Finance,and Economic Growth in China,” Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1): 57~116.
|
[23] |
Ang J. S. , R. A. Cole, and J. W. Lin. 2000. “Agency Cost and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Finance, 55(1): 81~106.
|
[24] |
Baron R. M. and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6): 1173~1182.
|
[25] |
Berle A. and G. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York.
|
[26] |
Chernykh L. 2008. “Ultimate Ownership and Control in Russia,” Journal of Financial Economics, 88(1): 169~192.
|
[27] |
Chow G. C. 1997. “Challenges of China’s Economic System for Economic Theory,” American Economic Review, 87(2): 321~327.
|
[28] |
Claessens S. and J. P. Fan. 2002. “Corporate Governance in Asia: A Survey,” International Review of finance, 3(2):71~103.
|
[29] |
Claessens S. and S. Djankov. 1999. “Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance in the Czech Republic,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 27(3): 498~513.
|
[30] |
Claessens S., S. Djankov, and L. Lang. 2000. “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations,” Journal of financial Economics, 58(1): 81~112.
|
[31] |
Claessens S., S. Djankov, J. P. Fan, and H. P. Lang. 2002. “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings,” Journal of finance, 57(6): 2741~2771.
|
[32] |
Fan, J. P., T. J. Wong, and T. Zhang. 2012. “Institutions and Organizational Structure: the Case of State-owned Corporate Pyramids,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(6): 1217~1252.
|
[33] |
Gul S.,M. Sajid,and N. Razzaq. 2012. “Agency Cost,Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure,” International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(9):268~277.
|
[34] |
Jensen M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(3):305~360.
|
[35] |
Jian M. 2003. “Earnings Management and Tunneling through Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Chinese Corporate groups,” Doctoral dissertation, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
|
[36] |
Johnson S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2000. “Tunneling,” American Economic Review, 90(2): 22~27.
|
[37] |
La Porta R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. “Law and Finance,” Journal of Political Economy, 106(6): 1113~1155.
|
[38] |
La Porta R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 2000. “Investor Protection and Corporate Governance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1):3~27.
|
[39] |
La Porta R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 2002. “Investor Protection and Corporate valuation,” Journal of Finance, 57(3): 1147~1170.
|
[40] |
La Porta R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. “Corporate Ownership Around the World,” Journal of finance, 54(2):471~517.
|
[41] |
Li H. and L. Zhou. 2005. “Political Turnover and Economic Performance: The Incentive Role of Personnel Control in China,” Journal of Public Economics, 89:1743~1762.
|
[42] |
MacKinnon D. P., C. M. Lockwood, J. M. Hoffman, S. G. West, and V. Sheets. 2002. “A Comparison of Methods to Test Mediation and Other Intervening Variable Effects,” Psychological Methods, 7 (1): 83~104.
|
[43] |
Shirley M. and P. Walsh. 2000. “Public Vs Private Ownership: The Current State of the Debate,” Working Paper, the World Bank.
|
[44] |
Shleifer A. and R. Vishny. 1997. “A Survey of Corporate Governance,” Journal of Finance, 52(2): 737~ 783.
|
[45] |
Shumba V., M. Sibongile, and N. Njabulo. 2014. “The Effects of Separating Ownership and Control on the Performance of Retail Stores in Southern Zimbabwe,” International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management,6(2):1~17.
|
[46] |
Sobel M. E. 1982. “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models,” Sociological methodology, 13(7): 290~312.
|
[47] |
Tian L. H. and S. Estrin. 2008. “State Shareholding in Chinese PLCs: Does Government Ownership Always Reduce Corporate Value? ” Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(1):74~89.
|
[48] |
Wu L., Y. Wang, B. Lin, C. Li, and S. Chen. 2007. “Local Tax Rebates, Corporate Tax Burdens and Firm Migration: Evidence from China,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(5):555~583.
|
|
|
|