|
|
Textual Information of Central Bank Monetary Policy Report, Macroeconomy and Stock Market Performance |
JIANG Fuwei, HU Yichi, HUANG Nan
|
School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics; School of Economics, Peking University; Harvest Fund Management Co., Ltd |
|
|
Abstract Since the 1990s, central bank communication has become a hot issue in macroeconomics and finance. Many scholars have conducted meaningful research on the issues such as the measurement of central bank communication, central bank communication and inflation expectations, and central bank communication and financial markets. Among them, the influence of central bank communication on financial markets and asset prices has received wide attention. A large number of empirical studies have shown that central bank communication has a significant impact on the stock market, the bond market and the foreign exchange market. As the People's Bank of China (PBOC) has paid increasing attention to policy communication in recent years, many Chinese scholars have conducted research on the impact of PBOC’s communication on China's financial markets. However, there are two major shortcomings in the existing studies. First, they only focus on monetary policy tendency of PBOC’s communication and ignore other information contained in the communication. Second, most scholars construct quantitative indicators by manual reading and scoring, making the results highly subjective. This paper uses text analysis techniques to analyze 71 Monetary Policy Implementation Reports (hereinafter referred to as “the reports”) of PBOC, calculates the text sentiment (tone), the similarity and readability and other text indicators of the reports, and explores the relationship between these text indicators and the macro economy and the stock market. Based on the Chinese financial sentiment dictionary developed by Jiang et al. (2020), this paper uses the sentiment unit method to calculate the tone of the reports. In addition, this paper uses TF-IDF weighted cosine similarity to characterize the similarity of the reports, and uses average sentence length to characterize the readability of the reports. The paper then uses correlation analysis to examine the relationship between the tone of the reports and macroeconomic indicators such as economic growth, inflation, and interest rates. With reference to Ehrmann and Fratzscher (2009), Zhang and Hu (2014), this paper adds tone, similarity and readability to the EGARCH model to explore whether textual indicators of the reports affect stock market returns and the volatility on the trading day after the release. Furthermore, this paper decomposes the content of the reports into two parts: economic and financial fundamentals and central bank policy guidelines, calculates the tone of the two parts and examines their impacts on the stock market respectively. The empirical results show that the tone of the reports is significantly correlated with macroeconomic indicators such as economic growth, inflation, and employment levels, and higher value of tone indicates better economic situation. After controlling for variables such as economic growth and monetary policy, the tone of the report has a significant positive impact on stock market return after the report is released. The similarity of the report has a significantly negative impact on stock market volatility, whereas the readability of the report does not have a significant impact on stock market volatility. Further research shows that it is the part reflecting the central bank's policy guidelines rather than the part reflecting macroeconomic and financial fundamentals that has a significant impact on stock market returns. This paper fills a number of gaps in the field of central bank communication and text analysis. First, this paper is the first to use cutting-edge text analysis techniques to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the monetary policy reports of PBOC. Second, this paper fills the gap in quantitative analysis of the sentiment of central bank communication in China's academia. Third, this paper conducts an empirical study on the mechanism of PBOC’s communication affecting the stock market, and proves that the report's tone affects the stock market only through the policy guidance channel. The findings of this paper are of great significance to strengthening financial supervision and promoting macro-prudential management in China. The results show that PBOC communication can significantly affect the stock market, which fully affirms the effectiveness of PBOC’s communication. Through adequate communication with the market, PBOC can influence asset prices, thereby achieving the purpose of monetary policy regulation and maintaining financial stability. In addition, this paper points out that the part of PBOC’s reports that affects the market is the part that reflects central bank's predictions of the future economic situation and its policy guidance. Therefore, PBOC should use its authority and influence to manage market expectations more effectively through timely announcements and clear explanations of economic and financial situation predictions and monetary policy guidance.
|
Received: 03 December 2018
Published: 02 July 2021
|
|
|
|
[1] |
卞志村和张义,2012,《央行信息披露、实际干预与通胀预期管理》,《经济研究》第12期,第15~28页。
|
[2] |
陈银娥和江媛,2017,《管理层权力、制度环境与董事会报告可读性——来自我国上市公司的经验证据》,《珞珈管理评论》第3期,第84~99页。
|
[3] |
冀志斌和宋清华,2012,《中央银行沟通的金融市场效应——基于中国数据的实证分析》,《宏观经济研究》第9期,第45~53页。
|
[4] |
姜富伟、孟令超和唐国豪,2020,《媒体文本情绪与股票回报预测》,《 经济学(季刊)》已接收。
|
[5] |
姜富伟、凃俊、David E.Rapach、Jack K.Strauss和周国富,2011,《中国股票市场可预测性的实证研究》,《金融研究》第9期,第107~121页。
|
[6] |
林建浩和赵文庆,2015,《中国央行沟通指数的测度与谱分析》,《统计研究》第1期,第52~58页。
|
[7] |
罗炜、何顶、洪莉莎和常国珍,2017,《媒体报道可以预测创业企业的发展前景吗》,《金融研究》第8期,第177~191页。
|
[8] |
吴国培和潘再见,2014,《中央银行沟通对金融资产价格的影响——基于中国的实证研究》,《金融研究》第5期,第34~47页。
|
[9] |
谢德仁和林乐,2015,《管理层语调能预示公司未来业绩吗?——基于我国上市公司年度业绩说明会的文本分析》,《会计研究》第2期,第20~27页+第93页。
|
[10] |
熊海芳和王志强,2012,《货币政策意外、利率期限结构与通货膨胀预期管理》,《世界经济》第6期,第30~55页。
|
[11] |
游家兴和吴静,2012,《沉默的螺旋:媒体情绪与资产误定价》,《经济研究》第7期,第141~152页。
|
[12] |
张强和胡荣尚,2013,《中央银行沟通对金融资产价格的影响——以股票市场为例》,《财贸经济》第8期,第67~77页。
|
[13] |
张强和胡荣尚,2014,《中央银行沟通对利率期限结构的影响研究》,《国际金融研究》第6期,第10~20页。
|
[14] |
朱宁、许艺煊和邱光辉,2016,《中央银行沟通对人民币汇率波动的影响》,《金融研究》第11期,第32~46页。
|
[15] |
Acosta M., and E. Meade 2015. “Hanging on Every Word: Semantic Analysis of the FOMC's Postmeeting statement”, FEDS Notes.
|
[16] |
Amaya D., and J.-Y. Filbien. 2015. “The Similarity of ECB’s Communication”, Finance Research Letters, 13:234-242.
|
[17] |
Baker, S., N.Bloom,and S. Davis, 2016. “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4):1593~1636.
|
[18] |
Beine M.,G. Janssen, and Lecourt C. 2009. “Should Central Bankers Talk to the Foreign Exchange Markets?”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(5):776~803.
|
[19] |
Cieslak A., A.Morse and Vissing‐Jorgensen A. 2019. “Stock Returns over the FOMC Cycle”, The Journal of Finance, 74:2201~2248.
|
[20] |
Demiralp, S. and J. Oscar. 2002. “The Announcement Effect Evidence from Open Market Desk Data”, FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 8(1):1~20.
|
[21] |
Ehrmann, M., and M.Fratzscher 2009. “Purdah-on The Rationale for Central Bank Silence around Policy Meetings”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(2-3):517~528.
|
[22] |
Ehrmann, M., and J. Talmi 2017. “Starting from a Blank Page? Semantic Similarity in Central Bank Communication and Market Volatility” Staff Working Papers.
|
[23] |
Garcia, D. 2013. “Sentiment During Recessions”, Journal of Finance, 68(3):1267~1300.
|
[24] |
Guthrie, G., and J. Wright. 2000. “Open Mouth Operations”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 46:489~516.
|
[25] |
Huang, A., A.Zang, and R. Zheng 2014. “Evidence on the Information Content of Text in Analyst Reports”, Accounting Review, 89(6):2151~2180.
|
[26] |
Jansen, David-Jan, and Jakob De Haan. 2007. “Were Verbal Efforts to Support the Euro Effective: A High-frequency Analysis of ECB Statements”, European Journal of Political Economy, 23:245~259.
|
[27] |
Jansen, D. J. 2011. “Does the Clarity of Central Bank Communication Affect Volatility in Financial Markets? evidence from humphrey‐hawkins Testimonies”, Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(4):494~509.
|
[28] |
Jegadeesh, N., and D.Wu 2013. “Word Power: A New Approach for Content Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3):712~729.
|
[29] |
Jiang, F., Lee J.,X. Martin , and G. Zhou 2019. “Manager Sentiment and Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 132(1):126~149.
|
[30] |
Loughran, T., and B. Mcdonald 2011. “When is a Liability not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10-Ks”, Journal of Finance, 66(1):35~65.
|
[31] |
Loughran, T., and B. Mcdonald 2014. “Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures”, The Journal of Finance, 69(4):1643~1671.
|
[32] |
Lucca, D. O., and E. Moench 2015. “The pre-fomc announcement drift”, Journal of Finance, 70(1):329~371.
|
[33] |
Reid, M. 2009. “The Sensitivity of South African Inflation Expectations to Surprises”, South African Journal of Economics, 77(3):414~429.
|
[34] |
Ricardo, C.,G. Keshav , Londono J. M., and Nathan M. 2021. “Sentiment in Central Banks' Financial Stability Reports”, Review of Finance,25(1)85~120.
|
[35] |
Tetlock, P. C. 2007. “Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market”, Journal of Finance, 62(3):1139~1168.
|
|
|
|