|
|
|
| Can Compulsory Education Law Improve Intergenerational Mobility？ |
| CHEN Binkai, ZHANG Shujuan, SHEN Guangjun
|
School of Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics;
Government Big Data Lab, Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data;
Lingnan (University) College, Sun Yat-sen University |
|
|
|
Abstract Social mobility affects national stability and long-term growth. Equality of opportunity is crucial to the stable development of society. Since the reform and opening up began, China's economy has experienced rapid growth, leading to significant improvement in people's living standards. This has led to the realization of the concept stated as “some people get better off earlier” and an increasingly insurmountable gap in social class. Additionally, the correlation coefficient of intergenerational education and income in China has continued to rise over the past 30 years, indicating a decline in intergenerational mobility.
Although research focuses extensively on measuring and describing intergenerational mobility, relatively few studies examine the ability of public policy to increase social mobility. Drawing on data from the Chinese Household Income Project Survey 2013 and National Population Survey 2005, this paper uses temporal and geographical variations in the implementation of the Compulsory Education Law (CEL) as an exogenous shock to identify how education policy impacts intergenerational mobility. We find that the CEL has a significant beneficial effect on intergenerational education mobility, as the greatest benefits are incurred by children whose parents have low levels of education and employment and earn fewer benefits.
This paper makes four major novel contributions to the literature. First, this study of intergenerational mobility is focused on the factors that influence educational mobility; therefore, this paper fills a gap in the literature, which is focused mainly on income or occupational mobility. Second, this paper examines the mechanism underlying the effect of compulsory education on intergenerational mobility, whereas the literature focuses on the measurement and definition of intergenerational mobility but fails to explore what influences it. Third, this paper identifies the impact of public policies on social mobility, using the CEL as an exogenous shock; thus, it addresses the identification of cause and effect, which is the main challenge encountered in studying the factors influencing mobility. Fourth, the literature contains many discussions on the effects of compulsory education policy on the rates of return and health. This paper extends these discussions from the influence of compulsory education policy in China to intergenerational mobility. It thus complements the literature and provides a reference for adjusting compulsory education policy.
The findings also have important policy implications. For example, a policy of compulsory nine-year education is shown to have a positive impact on the promotion of educational mobility because it significantly promotes the education of children of lower socioeconomic status by mitigating family constraints. Therefore, this policy effectively promoted the accumulation of human capital in the early stages of the reform and opening up and laid a good foundation for subsequent economic and social development. However, some recent changes emphasize the need to extend the duration of compulsory education. On one hand, rapid economic and social development have increased the demand for high-quality labor; on the other hand, the trend of overall social mobility in China remains negative. Extending the number of years of compulsory education can simultaneously alleviate both of these socioeconomic issues, thus enabling China to achieve educational equity and, importantly, to improve the overall national quality. The ability of public policy to improve intergenerational mobility should be further exploited to promote social equity and justice by equalizing educational opportunities.
|
|
Received: 20 August 2020
Published: 02 July 2021
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
李力行和周广肃,2014,《代际传递、社会流动性及其变化趋势:来自收入、职业、教育、政治身份的多角度分析》,《浙江社会科学》第5期,第11～22页。
|
| [2] |
李力行和周广肃,2014,《家庭借贷约束、公共教育支出与社会流动性》,《经济学(季刊)》第14卷第1期,第65～82页。
|
| [3] |
林莞娟和张戈,2015,《教育的代际流动:来自中国学制改革的证据》,《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》第2期,第118～129页。
|
| [4] |
刘生龙、周绍杰和胡鞍钢,2016,《义务教育法与中国城镇教育回报率:基于断点回归设计》,《经济研究》第2期,第154～167页。
|
| [5] |
申广军和张川川,2016,《收入差距、社会分化与社会信任》,《经济社会体制比较》第1期,第121～136页。
|
| [6] |
王学龙和袁易明,2015,《中国社会代际流动性之变迁:趋势与原因》,《经济研究》第9期,第58～71页。
|
| [7] |
阳义南和连玉君,2015,《中国社会代际流动性的动态解析:CGSS与CLDS混合横截面数据的经验证据》,《管理世界》第4期,第79～91页。
|
| [8] |
杨中超,2016,《教育扩招促进了代际流动？ 》,《社会》第6期,第180～208页。
|
| [9] |
张建华和万千,2018,《高校扩招与教育代际传递》,《世界经济》第4期,第168～192页。
|
| [10] |
周广肃、樊纲和申广军,2014,《收入差距、社会资本与健康水平——基于中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的实证分析》,《管理世界》第7期,第12～21页。
|
| [11] |
Black, S., and P. J. Devereux. 2011. “Recent Developments in Intergenerational Mobility”, Handbook of Labor Economics, 4: 1487～1541.
|
| [12] |
Chen, B., D. Liu, and M. Lu. 2016.“Land of Opportunity in Development: City Size and Rural Income Mobility in China”, Shanghai Jiao Tong University working paper.
|
| [13] |
Chen, Y., S. Naidu, T. Yu, and N. Yuchtman. 2015. “Intergenerational Mobility and Institutional Change in 20th Century China”, Explorations in Economic History, 58: 44～73.
|
| [14] |
Chetty, R., N. Hendren, P. Kline, and E Saez, 2014. “Where is the Land of Opportunity？ The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4): 1553～1623.
|
| [15] |
Connelly, R., and Z. Zheng. 2003. “Determinants of Primary and Middle School Enrollment of 10-18 Year Olds in China”, Economics of Education Review, 22(4): 379～390.
|
| [16] |
Fan, Y. 2016. “Intergenerational Income Persistence and Transmission Mechanism:Evidence from Urban China”, China Economic Review, 41: 299～314.
|
| [17] |
Fan, Y., J. Yi, and J. Zhang, 2021. “Rising Intergenerational Income Persistence in China”, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(1): 202～230.
|
| [18] |
Fang, H., N. E. Karen, and A. R. John. 2012. “The Returns to Education in China: Evidence from the 1986 Compulsory Education Law”, NBER Working Paper, No. 18189.
|
| [19] |
Galor, O., and J. Zeira. 1993. “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics”, Review of Economic Studies, 60: 35～52.
|
| [20] |
Hannum, E. 2005. “Market Transition, Educational Disparities, and Family Strategies in Rural China: New Evidence on Gender Stratification and Development”, Demography, 42(2): 275～299.
|
| [21] |
Hannum, E., J. Behrman, M. Wang, and J. Liu. 2008.“Education in the Reform Era”, in L. Brandt and T. G. Rawski (ed.), China's Great Economic Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
| [22] |
Huang, W. 2015. “Understanding the Effects of Education on Health: Evidence from China”, Harvard University and IZA, Discussion Paper, No. 9225.
|
| [23] |
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2014. Education at a Glance 2014: Highlights. Paris: OECD Publishing.
|
| [24] |
Tang, C., L. Zhao, and Z. Zhao. 2020. “Does Free Education Help Combat Child Labor？ The Effect of A Free Compulsory Education Reform in Rural China”, Journal of Population Economics, 33(2): 601～631.
|
| No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|
