|
|
What Drives the Financialization of China's Real Sector: Monetary Expansion, Profit-Seeking Capital or Risk Aversion? |
ZHANG Chengsi, ZHENG Ning
|
School of Finance,Renmin University of China |
|
|
Abstract In recent years, studies have focused on the financialization trend among Chinese real sector firms and analyzed the factors driving the financialization of Chinese non-financial firms by establishing investment portfolio models. The relative risks of industrial investment dominate the financialization of Chinese real sector firms. However, the literature does not consider the possible impact of macro-monetary factors on the financialization of micro-firms. The analytical expressions of the theoretical models after including macro-factors would be more complicated and affect the interpretation of the mechanism driving the financialization of micro-enterprises. This paper first considers the influence of monetary factors on firms' portfolio selection using a theoretical model. It then deduces firms' optimal financial asset ratio based on three factors, namely monetary expansion, profit-seeking capital and risk aversion. Finally, it conducts detailed empirical analysis and statistical testing based on 2007-2018 half-year panel data on non-financial firms listed in the China A-share stock market. The results of the benchmark model show that monetary expansion, profit-seeking capital and risk aversion are the key factors affecting non-financial firms' financialization. The influence of monetary expansion on the proportion of corporate financial assets has a direct suppression effect and an indirect promotion effect. However, the indirect promotion effect cannot offset the direct suppression effect. When using the financial channel profit ratio to measure the level of corporate financialization, risk aversion remains a significant driving factor and the profit-driven nature of capital no longer has a driving role. This paper further investigates the benchmark regression from two perspectives. The first adds economic policy uncertainty to the benchmark model as a macro-risk factor. The second tests whether the financialization mechanism of firms driven by ownership is different and shows heterogeneity. The results of adding macro-risk factors show that after introducing economic policy uncertainty, the originally significant coefficient of the monetary factor variable is no longer significant or the absolute value decreases. This indicates that the role of macro-monetary factors in the financialization of non-financial firms may indeed realize an indirect impact through the macro-risk channel. The empirical results of dividing the samples according to the nature of firms' ownership show that the financialization-driving mechanism of non-financial firms does demonstrate heterogeneity due to different ownership attributes. The financialization of state-owned enterprises is mainly affected by the monetary and risk aversion factors; it is also affected by asset size and leverage ratio. The proportion of private enterprises' financial assets is mainly driven by risk aversion and profit-seeking capital. The proportion of profits obtained through financial channels is mainly affected by monetary factors. The financialization of the other types of enterprises is significantly affected by monetary factors and risk aversion, but profit-seeking capital is not a main driving factor. The results of the model that incorporates economic policy uncertainty further show that for all types of enterprise, when the model contains macro-risk factors, the originally significant monetary factors are no longer significant or the absolute value is significantly reduced. This further demonstrates that monetary factors may affect the financialization of enterprises through economic policy uncertainty. Regardless of whether the financial level of Chinese non-financial firms is measured in terms of financial investment motivation or financial investment results, risk aversion is the most critical driver of firms' financialization. Profit-seeking capital has a significant driving effect on the proportion of private enterprises' financial investment. Simultaneously, neither the benchmark model nor the robustness test results provide statistically significant evidence that monetary expansion drives firms from real to virtual. The results indicate that further research is needed to clarify the transmission channels through which macro-monetary policy can release funds and guide micro-enterprises to make correct investment decisions.
|
Received: 26 August 2019
Published: 02 October 2020
|
|
|
|
[1] |
陈享光,2016,《金融化与现代金融资本的积累》,《当代经济研究》第1期,第5~15页。
|
[2] |
成家军和成雨,2016,《从“舍本逐末”到“去实向虚”——论经济金融化趋势》,《清华金融评论》,第10期,第49~51页。
|
[3] |
何其春和邹恒甫,2015,《信用膨胀、虚拟经济、资源配置与经济增长》,《经济研究》第4期,第36~49页。
|
[4] |
刘津宇、王正位和朱武祥,2014,《产权性质、市场化改革与融资歧视——来自上市公司投资—现金流敏感性的证据》,《南开管理评论》第5期,第126~135页。
|
[5] |
罗琦、肖文翀和夏新平,2007,《融资约束抑或过度投资——中国上市企业投资—现金流敏感度的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第103~110页。
|
[6] |
沈红波、廖冠民和曹军,2011,《金融发展、产权性质与上市公司担保融资》,《中国工业经济》第6期,第120~129页。
|
[7] |
徐光伟和孙峥,2015,《货币政策信号、实际干预与企业投资行为》,《财经研究》第7期,第54~67页。
|
[8] |
张成思,2019,《金融化的逻辑与反思》,《经济研究》第11期,第4~20页。
|
[9] |
张成思和刘贯春,2018,《中国实业部门投融资决策机制研究——基于经济政策不确定性和融资约束异质性视角》,《经济研究》第12期,第51~67页。
|
[10] |
张成思和张步昙,2016,《中国实业投资率下降之谜,经济金融化视角》,《经济研究》第12期,第32~46页。
|
[11] |
张成思和郑宁,2018,《中国非金融企业的金融投资行为影响机制研究》,《世界经济》第12期,第3~24页。
|
[12] |
张成思和郑宁,2019,《中国实业部门金融化的异质性》,《金融研究》第7期,第1~18页。
|
[13] |
张敏、吴联生和王亚平,2010,《国有股权,公司业绩与投资行为》,《金融研究》第12期,第115~130页。
|
[14] |
朱云来,“中国当前经济问题点评”,青岛中国财富论坛上的发言,2017年6月18日。
|
[15] |
Baker, S.R., N. Bloom, and S.J. Davis, 2016. “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593~1636.
|
[16] |
Demir, F., 2009. “Financial Liberalization, Private Investment and Portfolio Choice:Financialization of Real Sectors in Emerging Markets”, Journal of Development Economics, 88(2), 314~324.
|
[17] |
Hansen, L. P., 1982. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators”, Econometrica, 50(4), 1029~1054.
|
[18] |
Kleibergen, F., and R. Paap, 2006. “Generalized Reduced Rank Rests Using the Singular Value Decomposition”, Journal of Econometrics, 133(1), 97~126.
|
[19] |
Krippner, G., 2005, “The Financialization of the American Economy”, Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 173~208.
|
|
|
|