|
|
The Effects of Demand and Supply Shocks on Firm Investment and the Global Value Chain: A Study based on Unexpected Events |
TANG Yao, CHEN Zhenzhu, LIU Kehan
|
Guanghua School of Management, Peking University |
|
|
Abstract The Covid-19 pandemic of 2019 is significantly affecting the development of the Chinese economy. Against this background, we study how various historical events that led to supply and demand shocks affected firm investment and the global value chain. We find that the demand shock associated with the 2008 economic crisis had a significant but short-lived impact on the investment of firms listed in China, with the effects mainly limited to the first half of 2008. Investment reverted to normal after the Chinese government rolled out stimulus policies, but in 2009 the crisis significantly dampened trade and the global value chain (GVC). Although the level of GVC participation recovered quickly in most countries, different trends in the weight in global output were evidentin three core regions of manufacturing GVC. The shares of key countries in the European Union and North America declined after 2008, and in ASEAN+3 countries (ASEAN plus China, Japan, and Korea) the shares rose significantly, with much of the rise attributed to domestic stimulus in China. We investigate supply shocks by first comparing the investment behavior of listed firms from Beijing and Guangdong, two regions at the center of the SARS outbreak in 2003, to those in other provinces at and after the outbreak. We observe weaker investment by firms in Beijing and Guangdong but no difference was evident after three quarters, presumably because of the effective control of the SARS epidemic. We also find the 2011 Japanese earthquake significantly affected Japan's position in the manufacturing GVC. In particular, the manufacturing value added lost its positive long-term trend. In the short-term, Japan's clout in the GVC was also diminished. The above findings provide insights about how China should react to the Covid-19 pandemic. First, when faced with external shocks, policies aimed at shoring up domestic demand not only stabilize firm investment but also strengthen China's position in the GVC and hence form the basis for further growth in the manufacturing sector. Second, long-lasting supply shocks, such as the 2011 Japanese earthquake, can significantly impact a country's manufacturing output, and hence require serious responses. While China achieved control over the Covid-19 pandemic and promptly restarted the economy, the multiple risks associated with the worldwide impact of the pandemic should be recognized. In addition to affecting the supply chain of China, the continued spread of Covid-19 will increase tension in international economic relations and may even lead to a significant reversal of globalization. China should continue to open its economy to the world, but it also needs to consider its potential responses to substantial change in the international economic landscape. In light of the current economic situation, our findings lead to various implications about economic policies.First, the policy responses to the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2008 economic crisis demonstrate that a sound domestic economy is the key to economic stability. Thus, fiscal and monetary policies should be used to effectively boost domestic demand. While maintaining control over the pandemic, local governments should be encouraged to tailor and differentiate their policies to restart the economy, revive daily life, and restore normal societal order.Second, the threat to the GVC and the supply chain posed by the pandemic in other economies indicates that China should adjust, consolidate, and optimize its industrial capacity. To address risks in the upstream supply, domestic firms should be encouraged to source from domestic suppliers, building up the resilience of the supply chain. In an uncertain international economic environment, some firms may delay moving their capacity overseas. Local governments should help these firms to stabilize their output, thus minimizing their operation risk and supporting employment. In addition to stabilizing key firms along the supply chain, China should consolidate its industrial capacity and speed up the transformation of technologically backward capacity. During the process of economic stabilization, China should not protect firms that would have been forced out by market competition. Third, China should uphold the principle of opening up and international economic cooperation when faced with an uncertain international economic and political environment. Given that the GVC may become more concentrated in specific regions, China may consider strengthening its cooperation with neighboring countries and those engaged in the Belt-and-Road initiative in terms of the GVC and supply chains. By avoiding protectionism and achieving mutual economic development, countries can significantly contribute to the reform and improvement of governance mechanisms in the international economic community post Covid-19.
|
Received: 06 April 2020
Published: 02 July 2020
|
|
|
|
[1] |
陈华和赵俊燕,2009,《美国金融危机传导过程、机制与路径研究》,《经济与管理研究》,第2期,第104~111页。
|
[2] |
丁纯和王磊,2010,《金融危机中欧盟典型国家表现和成因分析》,《学术交流》,第7期,第102~110页。
|
[3] |
郭文博,2011,《浅析企业供应链全球化的弊端及对策——基于日本地震对汽车产业影响的反思》,《经济视角旬刊》,第3期,第69,71页。
|
[4] |
韩剑和王灿,2019,《自由贸易协定与全球价值链嵌入:对FTA深度作用的考察》,《国际贸易问题》,第2期,第58~71页。
|
[5] |
江瑞平,2011,《东日本大地震对日本经济的深广影响》,《日本学刊》,第4期,第3~16页。
|
[6] |
刘钧霆和王冬,2011,《金融危机下中国与日韩产业内分工合作研究》,《经济与管理研究》,第10期,第112~117页。
|
[7] |
刘星、张超和辛清泉,2016,《融资约束还是需求冲击?——金融危机期间中国上市公司资本投资研究》,《金融研究》,第11期,第83~98页。
|
[8] |
梅冬州和崔小勇,2017,《制造业比重、生产的垂直专业化与金融危机》,《经济研究》,第2期,第98~112页。
|
[9] |
倪红福和夏杰长,2016,《垂直专业化与危机中的贸易下滑》,《世界经济》,第4期,第95~119页。
|
[10] |
沈铭辉和李淑娟,2011,《日本大地震对日本和世界经济的影响》,《武汉金融》,第5期,第42~44页。
|
[11] |
孙丽,2013,《东日本大地震对汽车产业链的冲击及其调整》,《日本研究》,第4期,第31~35页。
|
[12] |
田中则仁和崔岩,2012,《日本企业的国际战略——产品制造的继承与课题》,《日本研究》,第3期,第27~33页。
|
[13] |
汪勇和李雪松,2019,《外生冲击、房地产价格与企业投资》,《财经研究》第3期,第60~72页。
|
[14] |
吴崇伯和姚云贵,2019,《东盟的“再工业化”:政策、优势及挑战》,《东南亚研究》,第4期,第50~71,154~155页。
|
[15] |
徐光伟、孙铮和刘星,2019,《不确定性冲击与企业投资动态——来自供给侧结构性改革的准自然实验》,《财经研究》,第12期,第86~98页。
|
[16] |
曾爱民、傅元略和魏志华,2011,《金融危机冲击, 财务柔性储备和企业融资行为——来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《金融研究》第10期,第155~169页。
|
[17] |
曾爱民、张纯和魏志华,2013,《金融危机冲击, 财务柔性储备与企业投资行为——来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《管理世界》,第4期,第107~120页。
|
[18] |
张季风,2011,《东日本大地震对日本经济与世界经济的影响》,《现代日本经济》,第4期,第1~9页。
|
[19] |
张茉楠,2019,《贸易战对全球价值链、产业链、供应链的冲击破坏及中国对策》,《国际商务财会》,第6期,第3~5页。
|
[20] |
张咏华,2015,《制造业全球价值链及其动态演变——基于国际产业关联的研究》,《世界经济研究》,第6期,第63~72,130页。
|
[21] |
张玉来,2011,《从震灾看全球产业链上的“日本元素”——以半导体产业为核心》,《日本研究》,第3期,第32~38页。
|
[22] |
朱武祥、张平、李鹏飞和王子阳,2020,《疫情冲击下中小微企业困境与政策效率提升——基于两次全国问卷调查的分析》,《管理世界》,第4期,第13~26页。
|
[23] |
Ando, M. . 2010. “Machinery trade in East Asia and the Global Financial Crisis”, Korea and the World Economy, 11(2):361~394.
|
[24] |
Aslam, A., N. Novta and F. Rodrigues-Bastos. 2017. "Calculating Trade in Value Added", IMF Working Papers.
|
[25] |
Campello, M., J. R. Graham and C. R. Harvey. 2010. "The Real Effects of Financial Constraints: Evidence from a Financial Crisis", Journal of Financial Economics, 97(3):470~487.
|
[26] |
Chongvilaivan, A. . 2012. “Thailand's 2011 Flooding: Its Impact on Direct Exports and Global Supply Chains”, ARTNET Working Paper Series.
|
[27] |
Gourio, F. . 2012. “Disaster Risk and Business Cycles”, American Economic Review, 102(6): 2734~66.
|
[28] |
Hyun, S. S. . 2019. “What is Behind the Recent Slowdown?”, Presentation at the “Public Finance Dialogue”, Workshop Arranged by German Federal Ministry of Finance and Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW).
|
[29] |
Kahle, K. M. and R. M. Stulz. 2013. “Access to Capital, Investment, and the Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2): 280~299.
|
[30] |
Meng, B., Xiao, H., Ye, J and Li, S. 2018. “Are Global Value Chains Truly Global? A New Perspective Based on the Measure of Trade in Value-added”, IDE Discussion Paper, 736, IDE-JETRO, Chiba City, Japan.
|
[31] |
Mian, A. and A. Sufi. 2010. “The Great Recession: Lessons from Microeconomic Data”, American Economic Review, 100(2): 51~56.
|
[32] |
Sheffi Y. . 2001. “Supply Chain Management under the Threat of International Terrorism”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(2): 1~11.
|
|
|
|