|
|
|
| Can the Establishment of Clearing Banks Promote RMB Settlement in Cross-border Trade: With a Discussion on the Synergistic Effect of CIPS |
| SONG Ke, LI Ting, ZHU Sidi
|
School of Finance/Shenzhen Finance Institute/ International Monetary Institute, Renmin University of China; School of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics; Agricultural Bank of China/ University of International Business and Economics |
|
|
|
Abstract In the current stage, while fully leveraging the role of the market, advancing the internationalization of the renminbi (RMB) in a steady and prudent manner requires more policy support. As a significant measure in the process of RMB internationalization, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) has actively promoted the establishment of RMB clearing banks in recent years, achieving significant progress. By the end of 2023, 33 RMB clearing banks had been authorized in 31 countries and regions. The continuous optimization of the overseas RMB clearing network will facilitate the efficient global circulation of the RMB, providing more convenient service conditions for the use of RMB in cross-border trade payments. Since the inception of the RMB clearing bank model, existing literature has explored the role of RMB clearing banks from multiple dimensions. However, these studies have two major limitations. First, the role of RMB clearing banks in promoting RMB internationalization is often described qualitatively, lacking in-depth theoretical frameworks and empirical analysis. Second, most studies focus on the impact of RMB clearing banks on specific economic and financial indicators, such as payments and trade, without comprehensively examining the underlying logic and mechanisms affecting the international use of the RMB. Therefore, exploring whether RMB clearing banks can effectively enhance the level of RMB internationalization becomes an important but unresolved issue. This paper examines whether the establishment of RMB clearing banks by the People's Bank of China in foreign countries or regions facilitates the use of RMB in these countries, thereby promoting the settlement of cross-border trade in RMB. In the empirical analysis, this paper utilizes data related to cross-border trade RMB settlement between China and other countries. It considers countries and regions that signed RMB clearing bank memorandum agreements with the People's Bank of China from January 2009 to December 2020 as the treatment group, and countries and regions that never signed such agreements during the sample period as the control group. To address potential endogeneity issues arising from reverse causality and omitted variables, this study employs a staggered Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach and controls for as many economic, financial, and institutional factors as possible. This paper makes several contributions to the literature. First, this paper draws on cross-border trade RMB settlement data from the People's Bank of China's RCPMIS database as its primary sample and conducts a robustness check using SWIFT data on actual RMB transactions. Unlike prior studies, it combines official statistical settlement figures with high-precision transaction-level data and employs cross-validation between these two sources to enhance the credibility and reliability of its conclusions, thereby overcoming the perspective limitations caused by insufficient data granularity in earlier research. Second, this paper extends the literature on determinants of cross-border trade RMB settlement. Previous research has largely focused on the domestic macro-environment, exchange-rate volatility, or trade structure, while the role of cross-border financial infrastructure has received scant attention. Exploiting the quasi-natural experiment presented by the establishment of RMB clearing banks, we empirically examine how such infrastructure affects RMB settlement in cross-border trade and unpack its underlying mechanisms. Our findings reveal an asymmetric impact of RMB clearing banks on import versus export settlement and validate two key channels, offshore RMB financing availability and bilateral exchange-rate fluctuations, through which this infrastructure operates. These results indirectly substantiate the policy rationale for establishing RMB clearing banks and enrich the research on cross-border trade RMB settlement. Third, recognizing the China International Payment System (CIPS) as another critical piece of cross-border financial infrastructure, this paper incorporates the interaction between RMB clearing banks and CIPS into its analytical framework. We systematically explore how their joint operation promotes RMB settlement in cross-border trade and demonstrate that CIPS membership amplifies the positive effects of RMB clearing banks, indicating a clear synergistic effect. The conclusions furnish new theoretical underpinnings and empirical evidence to guide the continuous development of RMB-internationalization infrastructure and the prudent, steady advancement of RMB internationalization.
|
|
Received: 13 October 2024
Published: 05 December 2025
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
陈卫东和赵雪情,2020,《人民币国际化发展路径研究——基于十年发展的思考》,《国际经济评论》第4期,第28~37页。
|
| [2] |
丁一兵、张晓鸥和刘紫薇,2023,《境外人民币清算行对中国OFDI效率的影响及机制研究》,《国际金融研究》第11期,第28~39页。
|
| [3] |
傅缨捷、张兴健和张洪胜,2024,《中资银行“走出去”对中国境外投资企业绩效影响及机制研究》,《国际金融研究》第11期,第75~85页。
|
| [4] |
国家外汇管理局课题组,2009,《人民币在对外交往中计价结算问题研究》,《金融研究》第1期,第42~49页。
|
| [5] |
何帆、张斌、张明、徐奇渊和郑联盛,2011,《香港离岸人民币金融市场的现状、前景、问题与风险》,《国际经济评论》第3期,第84~108页。
|
| [6] |
贾俊雪、李紫霄和秦聪,2018,《社会保障与经济增长:基于拟自然实验的分析》,《中国工业经济》第11期,第42~60页。
|
| [7] |
李超,2010,《中国的贸易基础支持人民币区域化吗?》,《金融研究》第7期,第1~17页。
|
| [8] |
李婧,2011,《从跨境贸易人民币结算看人民币国际化战略》,《世界经济研究》第2期,第13~19页。
|
| [9] |
李青原和吴滋润,2022,《资本账户开放与资源配置效率——来自跨国样本的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第8期,第82~98页。
|
| [10] |
林乐芬和王少楠,2016,《“一带一路”进程中人民币国际化影响因素的实证分析》,《国际金融研究》第2期,第75~83页。
|
| [11] |
芦东、谢宏杰、刘韬、刘家琳和俄美合,2025,《双边本币互换与国际货币格局演变——来自人民币的证据》,《金融研究》第8期,第56~74页。
|
| [12] |
马光明,2023,《汇率波动、境外持有人民币资产规模与人民币结算比重》,《国际金融研究》第8期,第53~64页。
|
| [13] |
缪延亮、郝阳和杨媛媛,2021,《外汇储备、全球流动性与汇率的决定》,《经济研究》第8期,第39~55页。
|
| [14] |
潘功胜,2019,《人民币国际化十年回顾与展望》,《中国金融》第14期,第9~11页。
|
| [15] |
石峰,2019,《耐用品贸易与人民币汇率波动》,《世界经济》第6期,第72~93页。
|
| [16] |
宋科、侯津柠、夏乐和朱斯迪,2022a,《“一带一路”倡议与人民币国际化——来自人民币真实交易数据的经验证据》,《管理世界》第9期,第49~67页。
|
| [17] |
宋科、朱斯迪和夏乐,2022b,《双边货币互换能够推动人民币国际化吗——兼论汇率市场化的影响》,《中国工业经济》第7期,第25~43页。
|
| [18] |
谭小芬、张坷坷、王雅琦和杨措,2024,《数字金融发展与跨境贸易人民币结算——来自省级—国家跨境贸易人民币结算数据的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第6期,第5~22页。
|
| [19] |
王孝松、刘韬和胡永泰,2021,《人民币国际使用的影响因素——基于全球视角的理论及经验研究》,《经济研究》第4期,第126~142页。
|
| [20] |
张策、梁柏林和何青,2023,《人民币国际化与中国企业的汇率风险》,《中国工业经济》第3期,第58~76页。
|
| [21] |
张明、陈胤默、王喆和张冲,2022,《如何破解两岸贸易人民币结算的主要障碍?——基于对江苏省昆山市的调查研究》,《国际经济评论》第4期,第48~73页。
|
| [22] |
Allen, M., C. D. Gautam and L. Juvenal, 2023. “Currencies of External Balance Sheets”, IMF Working Paper, No. 2023/237.
|
| [23] |
Amiti, M., O. Itskhoki and J. Konings, 2022, “Dominant Currencies: How Firms Choose Currency Invoicing and Why It Matters”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(3), pp. 1435~1493.
|
| [24] |
Bahaj, S. and R. Reis, 2020, “Jumpstarting an International Currency”, Bank of England Working Paper, No. 874.
|
| [25] |
Bailey, M., A. Strezhnev and E. Voeten, 2017, “Estimating Dynamic State Preferences From United Nations Voting Data”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(2), pp. 430~456.
|
| [26] |
Eichengreen, B., A. J. Mehl and L. Chitu, 2017, “Mars or Mercury? The Geopolitics of International Currency Choice”, NBER Working Paper, No. 24145.
|
| [27] |
Friberg, R. and F. Wilander, 2008, “The Currency Denomination of Exports—A Questionnaire Study”, Journal of International Economics, 75(1), pp. 54~69.
|
| [28] |
Goldberg, L. S. and C. Tille, 2008, “Vehicle Currency Use in International Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 76(2), pp. 177~192.
|
| [29] |
Gopinath, G. and J. C. Stein, 2021, “Banking, Trade, and the Making of A Dominant Currency”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(2), pp. 783~830.
|
| [30] |
Ito, H. and M. Chinn, 2014, “The Rise of the ‘Redback' and the China's Capital Account Liberalization: An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Invoicing Currencies”, ADBI Working Papers, No. 473.
|
| [31] |
McKinsey, 2018, “A Vision for the Future of Cross-Border Payments”, McKinsey and Company / SWIFT report, No. 2018-10-22.
|
| [32] |
Rosenbaum, P. and D. Rubin, 1983, “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects”, Biometrika, 70(1), pp. 41~55.
|
| No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|