|
|
|
| How We Monitor and Control the Risks of Real Economy and Financial Markets |
| FANG Yi, CHEN Ziyu, JIA Yanyan
|
National School of Development and Strategy, Renmin University of China;
School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics;
School of Finance, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics |
|
|
|
Abstract “Stabilizing growth” refers to maintaining steady economic growth, while “risk prevention” refers to safeguarding against financial risks. Finance is at the core of the modern economy, and maintaining financial stability while preventing financial risks is crucial for ensuring high-quality economic development. Conversely, stable economic development helps to prevent and resolve various risks that may arise during economic operations. However, achieving the goals of stabilizing growth and preventing risks is challenging.
First, the goal of “stabilizing growth” faces challenges. In recent years, China's economy has experienced some downward pressure, making it urgent to ensure healthy and stable economic growth, highlighting the need to identify economic downturn risks especially important. In terms of investment, since the onset of the “new normal” in the economy, the country's growth rate has shifted gears, and corporate profitability has declined, reducing corporate investment willingness. On the consumption side, the slowdown in residents' income growth has led to a deceleration in consumption growth.
Second, achieving the “risk prevention” goal should not be taken lightly. The negative impacts of the global pandemic have not yet dissipated, and geopolitical conflicts continue to escalate, exacerbating financial fragility risks globally. Financial markets, as high-frequency trading markets, are highly susceptible to external shocks, with risks rapidly rising in a short period.
This paper proposes two objectives: First, to dynamically monitor the risk status and risk spillovers in the real economy and financial markets and, from a network perspective, identify periods of high risk in both, thus determining whether a focus on stabilizing growth or preventing risks is needed during different periods. Second, after identifying the policy regulation targets for different periods, this paper explores the effects of various macroeconomic policies to implement the optimal regulatory policies during each period.
To achieve this, the paper first employs a mixed-frequency risk spillover approach to construct risk spillover indicators, using these indicators to assess the spillover relationship between the financial market and the real economy. Second, it uses the Markov regime-switching model to identify high-and low-risk states in both the financial market and the real economy. By combining the net risk spillover indicators between the financial market and the real economy with high-risk state indicators, the paper identifies other periods for “stabilizing growth” or “preventing risks” to address risk warning issues over time. Finally, the paper uses a TVP-VAR model to examine the regulatory effects of different types of macroeconomic policies during various periods, providing recommendations for policymakers on implementing macroeconomic policies.
The main contributions of this paper include two aspects: First, it explicitly defines the conditions for “stabilizing growth” and “preventing risks” periods. The paper argues that two prerequisites must be met: 1) stabilizing growth cannot come at the cost of significantly increasing financial risks, and preventing risks must also consider stable economic development, with coordination between the two objectives; 2) policymakers should focus on extreme risks when implementing regulatory measures and avoid frequent interventions. Second, it compares and analyzes the effects of different types of policies during various periods. The paper innovatively uses the TVP-VAR model to examine how monetary and fiscal policies affect risk spillovers and volatility between the financial market and the real economy during different periods. By comparing the implementation effects of different economic policies, the paper contributes to providing theoretical guidance for macroeconomic policy regulation aimed at “stabilizing growth” and “preventing risks.”
Based on the empirical analysis, the paper suggests that, in the short term, efforts to prevent systemic risks in the economic and financial network should focus on the financial market, while in the long term, the emphasis should shift to the real economy. For short-term regulation of systemic risks, attention should be directed toward the frequent fluctuations of the financial market. Conversely, for long-term regulation, the focus should be on the long-term trend changes in real economy risks. Additionally, during “stabilizing growth” periods, efforts should primarily focus on stabilizing industrial growth, while in “preventing risks” periods, priority should be given to preventing risks in the stock market. Finally, volatility and net risk spillover indicators can be combined to provide timely risk warnings. To ensure the effectiveness of policy regulation, interventions should target relatively extreme risks and should not be too frequent, with different focuses during different periods.
|
|
Received: 26 April 2022
Published: 01 August 2025
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
陈创练、高锡蓉和刘晓彬,2022,《“稳增长”与“防风险”双目标的宏观调控政策抉择》,《金融研究》第1期,第1～19页。
|
| [2] |
陈小亮,2025,《宏观政策取向一致性评估探析:基于健全宏观经济治理体系的视角》,《改革》第1期,第16～25页。
|
| [3] |
陈小亮和马啸,2016,《“债务—通缩”风险与货币政策财政政策协调》,《经济研究》第8期,第28～42页。
|
| [4] |
董兵兵、徐慧伦和谭小芬,2021,《货币政策能够兼顾稳增长与防风险吗？——基于动态随机一般均衡模型的分析》,《金融研究》第4期,第19～37页。
|
| [5] |
方意和黄丽玲,2019,《系统性风险、抛售博弈与宏观审慎政策》,《经济研究》第9期,第41～55页。
|
| [6] |
方意,2021,《前瞻性与逆周期性的系统性风险指标构建》,《经济研究》第9期,第191～208页。
|
| [7] |
李政、刘淇和梁琪,2019,《基于经济金融关联网络中的中国系统性风险防范研究》,《统计研究》第2期,第24～36页。
|
| [8] |
刘冲、傅家范和周边,2019,《金融市场冲击、融资成本与经济波动》,《国际金融研究》第3期,第76～86页。
|
| [9] |
马勇和付莉,2020,《“双支柱”调控、政策协调搭配与宏观稳定效应》,《金融研究》第8期,第1～17页。
|
| [10] |
王学凯和姜卫民,2020,《去杠杆与稳增长能同时实现吗？:基于58个国家面板数据的实证研究》,《世界经济研究》第7期,第76～89页。
|
| [11] |
杨子晖,2020,《金融市场与宏观经济的风险传染关系——基于混合频率的实证研究》,《中国社会科学》第12期,第160～180页。
|
| [12] |
张晓晶和刘磊,2020,《宏观分析新范式下的金融风险与经济增长——兼论新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情冲击与在险增长》,《经济研究》第6期,第4～21页。
|
| [13] |
Abbassi, P., R. Iyer and J. Peydró,2016, “Securities Trading by Banks and Credit Supply: Micro-evidence From the Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics, 121(3),pp.569～594.
|
| [14] |
Allen, F., A. Babus and E. Carletti,2012, “Asset Commonality, Debt Maturity and Systemic Risk”, Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3),pp.519～534.
|
| [15] |
Benoit, S., J. E. Colliard, C. Hurlin and C. Pérignon,2017, “Where the Risks Lie:A Survey on Systemic Risk”, Review of Finance, 21(1),pp.109～152.
|
| [16] |
Brownlees, C. and R. F. Engle,2017, “SRISK,pp.A Conditional Capital Shortfall Measure of Systemic Risk”, Review of Financial Studies, 30(1),pp.48～79.
|
| [17] |
Chira, I., J. Madura and A. M. Viale,2013, “Bank Exposure to Market Fear”, Journal of Financial Stability,9(4),pp.451～459.
|
| [18] |
Cotter J., M. Hallam and K. Yilmaz, 2020, “Macro-Financial Spillovers”, KU-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum, Working Paper, 1704.
|
| [19] |
Engle, F. R. and G. J. Rangel,2008, “The Spline-GARCH Model for Low-Frequency Volatility and Its Global Macroeconomics Causes”, The Review of Financial Studies,21 (3),pp.1187～1222.
|
| [20] |
Krugman, P., 2015, “Rethinking Japan”, New York Times, October 20,The Opinions Pages.
|
| [21] |
Primiceri, G., E., 2005, “Time Varying Structural Vector Autoregressions and Monetary Policy”, The Review of Economic Studies, 72(3),pp.821～852.
|
| [22] |
Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny,2010, “Asset Fire Sales and Credit Easing”. American Economic Review, 100(2),pp.46～50.
|
|
|
|
