|
|
|
| Branch Expansion of Small and Medium-Sized Banks and the Credit Term Structure of Enterprises |
| LI Wanli, LIU Xiaojian, XU Junping
|
College of Finance and Statistics, Hunan University;
Hunan Provincial Branch, The People's Bank of China |
|
|
|
Abstract The Chinese economy is transitioning from a phase of rapid growth to one of high-quality development, with a greater emphasis on innovation-driven and quality-led growth. This requires long-term and stable financial support. However, for a long time, China's banking-dominated financial system has primarily supplied short-term loans, resulting in a significant shortage of long-term credit funds. This inadequacy fails to meet the long-term investment and high-quality development needs of entity enterprises. Existing research indicates that the highly concentrated structure of China's banking industry is a major factor leading to the mismatch between the supply and demand of long-term credit funds. In the institutional environment of financial repression, banks face low competitive pressure. Due to risk control considerations, banks prefer to provide short-term loans to enterprises and are reluctant to provide long-term loans. Meanwhile, large state-owned banks tend to allocate long-term loans to less efficient state-owned enterprises, while small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and private enterprises of higher efficiency struggle to obtain long-term loan support.
According to the optimal financial structure theory, a country's banking structure can more effectively support the real economy only when it aligns with its industrial structure. Currently, China's industrial structure is dominated by SMEs, but the development of small and medium-sized banks (SMBs) has lagged. In 2009, the China Banking Regulatory Commission issued the “Opinions on Adjusting Market Entry Policies for Branches of Small and Medium-sized Commercial Banks (Trial).” This policy removed the restrictions on market entry and the limitations on the number of branches that joint-stock and city commercial banks could establish, leading to a rapid expansion in the number of their branches.
Based on this, this paper examines the impact of the expansion of joint-stock and city commercial bank branches on the term structure of corporate loans. We find that SMB branch expansion can extend the term structure of corporate loans. Compared to large enterprises, it has a stronger effect on SMEs, supporting the hypothesis of “Comparative Advantages of SMBs”. Meanwhile, the effect is more pronounced for private enterprises. Mechanism tests show that SMB branch expansion intensifies banking competition and reduces information asymmetry and agency conflicts by shortening the distance between banks and enterprises, thereby increasing banks' willingness to provide long-term loans to enterprises. We also find that the development of digital finance enhances commercial banks' ability to provide long-term loans to real enterprises, especially to SMEs and private enterprises. Finally, SMB branch expansion helps alleviate the “short-term loans for long-term investments” of enterprises, especially SMEs and private enterprises.
The main contributions of this paper are as follows. First, while most existing studies examine the impact of bank competition on corporate investment and financing based on data from all bank branches, this paper focuses on the expansion of joint-stock and city commercial bank branches. By constructing firm-level spatial distribution data of SMB branches, it captures the specific banking environment changes each firm faces, providing a more direct and precise identification of the microeconomic effects of SMB branching deregulation. Second, through a comparative analysis of the differential impact of SMB branch expansion on the loan terms for large enterprises versus SMEs, we find that SMBs have a greater advantage in serving SMEs. This not only deepens the understanding of the heterogeneous functions of SMBs but also provides micro-level empirical support for the optimal financial structure theory. Third, Zhang et al. (2022) found that digital finance development inhibits the expansion of joint-stock and city commercial banks. We further find that digital finance development enhances banks' capabilities in information acquisition and screening, thus improving their ability to provide long-term credit to entity enterprises, complementing existing research.
|
|
Received: 09 August 2023
Published: 03 July 2024
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
白云霞、邱穆青和李伟,2016,《投融资期限错配及其制度解释——来自中美两国金融市场的比较》,《中国工业经济》第7期,第23～39页。
|
| [2] |
蔡竞和董艳,2016,《银行业竞争与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的经验证据》,《金融研究》第11期,第96～111页。
|
| [3] |
陈耿、刘星和辛清泉,2015,《信贷歧视、金融发展与民营企业银行借款期限结构》,《会计研究》第4期,第40～46+95页。
|
| [4] |
方军雄,2007,《所有制、制度环境与信贷资金配置》,《经济研究》第12期,第82～92页。
|
| [5] |
姜付秀、蔡文婧、蔡欣妮和李行天,2019,《银行竞争的微观效应: 来自融资约束的经验证据》,《经济研究》第6期,第72～88页。
|
| [6] |
李健和陈传明,2013,《企业家政治关联、所有制与企业债务期限结构——基于转型经济制度背景的实证研究》,《金融研究》第3期,第157～169页。
|
| [7] |
李逸飞、李茂林和李静,2022,《银行金融科技、信贷配置与企业短债长用》,《中国工业经济》第10期,第137～154页。
|
| [8] |
李志生和金凌,2021,《银行竞争提高了企业投资水平和资源配置效率吗？——基于分支机构空间分布的研究》,《金融研究》第1期,第111～130页。
|
| [9] |
林毅夫、孙希芳和姜烨,2009,《经济发展中的最优金融结构理论初探》,《经济研究》第8期,第4～17页。
|
| [10] |
刘莉亚、余晶晶、杨金强和朱小能,2017,《竞争之于银行信贷结构调整是双刃剑吗？——中国利率市场化进程的微观证据》,《经济研究》第5期,第131～145页。
|
| [11] |
刘晓光和刘元春,2019,《杠杆率、短债长用与企业表现》,《经济研究》第7期,第127～141页。
|
| [12] |
马君潞、郭牧炫和李泽广,2013,《银行竞争、代理成本与借款期限结构——来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《金融研究》第4期,第71～84页。
|
| [13] |
盛斌和王浩,2022,《银行分支机构扩张与企业出口国内附加值率——基于金融供给地理结构的视角》,《中国工业经济》第2期,第99～117页。
|
| [14] |
盛天翔、王宇伟和范从来,2017,《利率工具、银行决策行为与信贷期限结构》,《中国工业经济》第12期,第22～39页。
|
| [15] |
王红建、杨筝、阮刚铭和曹瑜强,2018,《放松利率管制、过度负债与债务期限结构》,《金融研究》第2期,第100～117页。
|
| [16] |
许和连、金友森和王海成,2020,《银企距离与出口贸易转型升级》,《经济研究》第11期,第174～190页。
|
| [17] |
张海洋、胡英琦、陆利平和蔡卫星,2022,《数字时代的银行业变迁——网点布局与行业结构》,《金融研究》第9期,第 75～92页。
|
| [18] |
张杰、郑文平和新夫,2017,《中国的银行管制放松、结构性竞争和企业创新》,《中国工业经济》第10期,第118～136页。
|
| [19] |
张伟俊、袁凯彬和李万利,2021,《商业银行网点扩张如何影响企业创新:理论与经验证据》,《世界经济》第6期,第204～228页。
|
| [20] |
张一林、林毅夫和龚强,2019,《企业规模, 银行规模与最优银行业结构——基于新结构经济学的视角》,《管理世界》第3期,第31～47页。
|
| [21] |
钟凯、程小可和张伟华,2016,《货币政策适度水平与企业“短贷长投”之谜》,《管理世界》第3期,第87～98+114+188页。
|
| [22] |
邹静娴、申广军和刘超,2022,《减税政策对小微企业债务期限结构的影响》,《金融研究》第6期,第74～93页。
|
| [23] |
Berger, A. N., C. H. S. Bouwman, and D. Kim. 2017. “Small Bank Comparative Advantages in Alleviating Financial Constraints and Providing Liquidity Insurance over Time”, Review of Financial Studies, 30(10): 3416～3454.
|
| [24] |
Chong, T. T. L., L. Lu, and S. Ongena. 2013. “Does Banking Competition Alleviate or Worsen Credit Constraints Faced by Small-and Medium-sized Enterprises？ Evidence from China”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9): 3412～3424.
|
| [25] |
Custódio, C., M. A. Ferreira, and L. Laureano. 2013. “Why are US firms using more short-term debt？”, Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1): 182～212.
|
| [26] |
Fan, J. P. H., S. Titman, and G. Twite. 2012. “An International Comparison of Capital Structure and Debt Maturity Choices”, Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 47: 23～56.
|
| [27] |
John, K., A. Knyazeva, and D. Knyazeva. 2011. “Does Geography Matter？ Firm Location and Corporate Payout Policy”, Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3): 533～551.
|
| [28] |
Knyazeva, A., and D. Knyazeva. 2012. “Does being Your Bank's Neighbor Matter？”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4): 1194～1209.
|
| [29] |
Rajan, R. G. 1992. “Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice Between Informed and Arm's — Length Debt”, Journal of Finance, 47 (4) : 1367～1400.
|
| [30] |
Rice, T., and P. E. Strahan. 2010. “Does Credit Competition Affect Small-Firm Finance”, Journal of Finance, 65(3): 861～889.
|
| [31] |
Song, Z., K. Storesletten, and F. Zilibotti. 2011. “Growing Like China”, American Economic Review, 101(1): 202～239.
|
|
|
|
