|
|
|
| Digital Transformation and Firm Innovation for R&D Investment Efficiency |
| JI Yunyang, ZHOU Xin ZHANG Qian
|
School of Economics & Trade, Hunan University;
School of Economics, Dongbei University of Finance & Economics;
School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University of Technology and Business |
|
|
|
Abstract As a driving force of high-quality development, innovation must run throughout the Chinese-style modernization process. With the simultaneous arrival of the digital economy era, innovation is becoming a new driving force for global economic growth. The 14th Five-Year Plan for the Development of Digital Economy released in January 2022 clearly states that the added value from core industries in the digital economy will increase to 10% of the gross domestic product by 2025. As the main carrier of the integrated development of digital and real economies, the effect of enterprises' digital transformation has attracted much attention. In this context, the practical question is whether digital transformation can improve enterprises' technological innovation ability and thus become an important engine for their high-quality development. This paper explores the mechanism of action and whether the innovation effect of digital transformation differs among enterprises. The findings will help us to obtain a deep understanding of how digital transformation can boost high-quality economic development and provide important references for accelerating the construction of a modern industrial system.
By constructing a theoretical model for how digital transformation affects innovative enterprise decision-making practices, this paper elaborates on the internal influencing mechanism between these two factors. Based on listed companies' digital transformation data from 2010 to 2020 and the perspective of research and development (R&D) investment and efficiency, this paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the impact and heterogeneity of enterprises' digital transformation on their technological innovation. This paper's innovative points can be summarized into three aspects. First, digitalization's inherent characteristics are combined to build a more general framework for theoretical analyses. This paper focuses on enterprises' production, operation, and innovation choices, and establishes a general equilibrium model to demonstrate the active mechanisms of profit guarantees, cost control, and the spillover and scale effects on enterprises' innovative decisions systematically. Hence, this paper expands the research scope of the economic effect of digital transformation and the influencing factors of enterprise innovation. Second, based on the dual perspectives of R&D investment and efficiency, this paper uses model reasoning and empirical testing to investigate the impact of digital transformation on enterprise innovation and its heterogeneity systematically. This paper explores the enhancement effect of R&D efficiency caused by the scale and spillover effects during digital transformation and empirically provides an in-depth understanding of the innovation effect of enterprises' digital transformation. Third, in terms of policies, this paper scientifically verifies the innovative effect of digital transformation, which has important implications for how to promote enterprises' high-quality development and realize the national innovation-driven development strategy and Chinese-style modernization in the digital economy era. In addition, the results also provide empirical support for the formulation and implementation of relevant policies.
This paper makes three contributions to the research literature. First, digital transformation has significantly promoted enterprises' innovation output. Second, the improvement of R&D input and efficiency is the key mechanism for digital transformation to promote enterprises' technological innovation. The improvement of R&D inputs benefits from the profit guarantee and cost control mechanisms during digital transformation, while R&D efficiency comes from the impact of the scale and spillover effects. Third, digital transformation has a more obvious promoting effect for larger-scale enterprises with fewer specific assets in addition to enterprises in areas with better property rights protection. These conclusions indicate that digital transformation can become an important driving force for improving Chinese enterprises' innovation capability under the new development plan.
This paper's policy recommendations are as follows. First, the Chinese government should speed up the construction of new digital infrastructure, vigorously promote the intelligent upgrading of physical infrastructure, and lay the foundation for enterprises' digital transformation. Second, we should continue to optimize the market environment so that it is suitable for digital economic development, improve the digital industry ecology, and coordinate the promotion of digital industrialization and industrial digitalization. Finally, enterprises should speed up their construction of technical, organizational, and operational support for digital transformation. By improving their value and innovation performance, these enterprises should give full play to the promoting role of digital transformation in corporate governance and technological innovation. In addition, they should further promote the cost reduction, quality improvement, and efficiency improvement of digitally empowered enterprises.
|
|
Published: 02 May 2023
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
陈爱贞和张鹏飞,2019,《并购模式与企业创新》,《中国工业经济》第12期,第115～133页。
|
| [2] |
陈德球和胡晴,2022,《数字经济时代下的公司治理研究:范式创新与实践前沿》,《管理世界》第6期,第213～240页。
|
| [3] |
党琳、李雪松和申烁,2021,《数字经济、创新环境与合作创新绩效》,《山西财经大学学报》第11期,第1～15页。
|
| [4] |
董雪兵、朱慧、康继军和宋顺锋,2012,《转型期知识产权保护制度的增长效应研究》,《经济研究》第8期,第4～17页。
|
| [5] |
杜明威、耿景珠和刘文革,2022,《企业数字化转型与中国出口产品质量升级:来自上市公司的微观证据》,《国际贸易问题》第6期,第55～72页。
|
| [6] |
杜勇和娄靖,2022,《数字化转型对企业升级的影响及溢出效应》,《中南财经政法大学学报》第5期,第119～133页。
|
| [7] |
何帆和刘红霞,2019,《数字经济视角下实体企业数字化变革的业绩提升效应评估》,《改革》第4期,第137～148页。
|
| [8] |
黄群慧、余泳泽和张松林,2019,《互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验》,《中国工业经济》第8期,第5～23页。
|
| [9] |
李春涛、闫续文、宋敏和杨威,2020,《金融科技与企业创新——新三板上市公司的证据》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第81～98页。
|
| [10] |
李雪、吴福象和竺李乐,2021,《数字经济与区域创新绩效》,《山西财经大学学报》第5期,第17～30页。
|
| [11] |
马述忠和房超,2021,《跨境电商与中国出口新增长——基于信息成本和规模经济的双重视角》,《经济研究》第6期,第159～176页。
|
| [12] |
聂秀华、江萍、郑晓佳和吴青,2021,《数字金融与区域技术创新水平研究》,《金融研究》第3期,第132～150页。
|
| [13] |
祁怀锦、曹修琴和刘艳霞,2020,《数字经济对公司治理的影响——基于信息不对称和管理者非理性行为视角》,《改革》第4期,第50～64页。
|
| [14] |
沈国兵和袁征宇,2020a,《互联网化、创新保护与中国企业出口产品质量提升》,《世界经济》第11期,第127～151页。
|
| [15] |
沈国兵和袁征宇,2020b,《企业互联网化对中国企业创新及出口的影响》,《经济研究》第1期,第33～48页。
|
| [16] |
谭洪涛和陈瑶,2019,《集团内部权力配置与企业创新——基于权力细分的对比研究》,《中国工业经济》第12期,第134～151页。
|
| [17] |
王小鲁、樊纲和胡李鹏,2019,《中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)》,社会科学文献出版社,2019年2月。
|
| [18] |
吴非、胡慧芷、林慧妍和任晓怡,2021,《企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据》,《管理世界》第7期,第130～144+10页。
|
| [19] |
肖土盛、吴雨珊和亓文韬,2022,《数字化的翅膀能否助力企业高质量发展——来自企业创新的经验证据》,《经济管理》第5期,第41～62页。
|
| [20] |
许宪春、张美慧和张钟文,2021,《数字化转型与经济社会统计的挑战和创新》,《统计研究》第1期,第15～26页。
|
| [21] |
徐翔和赵墨非,2020,《数据资本与经济增长路径》,《经济研究》第10期,第38～54页。
|
| [22] |
袁淳、肖土盛、耿春晓和盛誉,2021,《数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第137～155页。
|
| [23] |
易巍、龙小宁和林志帆,2021,《地理距离影响高校专利知识溢出吗——来自中国高铁开通的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第99～117页。
|
| [24] |
叶永卫、李鑫和刘贯春,2022,《数字化转型与企业人力资本升级》,《金融研究》第12期,第74～92页。
|
| [25] |
张华和顾新,2022,《供应链竞争下制造商数字化转型的博弈均衡研究》,《中国管理科学》第4期,第1～12页。
|
| [26] |
张勋、万广华、张佳佳和何宗樾,2019,《数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长》,《经济研究》第8期,第71～86页。
|
| [27] |
张国胜和杜鹏飞,2022,《数字化转型对我国企业技术创新的影响:增量还是提质？》,《经济管理》第6 期,第82～96页。
|
| [28] |
张楠、高梦媛和寇璇,2021,《卫生公平的文化壁垒——跨方言区流动降低了公共卫生服务可及性吗》,《财贸经济》第2期,第36～50页。
|
| [29] |
赵宸宇、王文春和李雪松,2021,《数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率》,《财贸经济》第7期,第114～129页。
|
| [30] |
赵涛、张智和梁上坤,2020,《数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据》,《管理世界》第10期,第65～76页。
|
| [31] |
Acs, Z., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D., and Carlson, B. 2009. “The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship”, Small Business Economics, 32(1):15～30.
|
| [32] |
Akcigit, U., Caicedo, S., Miguelez, E., Stantcheva S., and Sterzi, V. 2018. “Dancing with the Stars: Innovation through Interactions”, CEPR Discussion Papers.
|
| [33] |
Berger, A. N., and Udell, G. F. 1990. “Collateral, Loan Quality and Bank Risk”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 25(1): 21～42.
|
| [34] |
Chen, Z., Zhang, J., and Zi, Y. 2021. “A Cost-Benefit Analysis of R&D and Patents: Firm-Level Evidence from China”, European Economic Review, 133(103633):1～28.
|
| [35] |
De, Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., and Unger, G. 2020. “The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2): 561～644.
|
| [36] |
Galindo-Martín, M., Castaño-Martínez, M., and Méndez-Picazo, M. 2019. “Digital Transformation, Digital Dividends and Entrepreneurship: A Quantitative Analysis”, Journal of Business Research, 101: 522～527.
|
| [37] |
Goldfarb, A., and Tucker, C. 2019. “Digital Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1): 3～43.
|
| [38] |
Keller W., and Olney, W. W. 2021. “Globalization and Executive Compensation”, Journal of International Economics, 129(103408):1～24.
|
| [39] |
Lashkari, D. Arthur, B., and Jocelyn, B. 2022. “Information Technology and Returns to Scale”, Working Paper.
|
| [40] |
Lewbel, A. 2012. “Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 30(1): 67～80.
|
| [41] |
Melitz, M. J. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity”, Econometrica, 71(6):1695～1725.
|
| [42] |
Peters, B., Roberts, M. J., Vuong, V. A. and Fryges, H. 2017. “Estimating Dynamic R&D Choice: An Analysis of Costs and Long-run Benefits”, The RAND Journal of Economics, 48(2): 409～437.
|
|
|
|
