|
|
Evolution of Banking in the Digital Age: Branches and Industry Structure |
ZHANG Haiyang, HU Yingqi, LU Liping, CAI Weixing
|
School of Banking and Finance, University of International Business and Economics; Institute of Digital Finance, Peking University; School of Finance, Renmin University of China; School of Finance, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics |
|
|
Abstract Advances in digital technology affect the development process of societie and this has become an important force affecting business patterns, factor allocation, and economic structure. As a national strategy, China is developing its digital economy to promote the deep integration of the digital and real economies.Accordingly, this study mainly assesses the impact of digital finance on the branch network distribution and industrial structure changes of traditional banking institutions. As a type of “creative destruction”, the relationship between digital and traditional finance is both competitive and complementary. Simultaneously, the development of traditional finance requires support from the real economy and inevitably varies along with economic and industrial development. Moreover, the impact of digital finance on the development of traditional finance is inevitably influenced by the above factors. China's indirect financial system is dominated by banks,and the banking system's layout and industry structure can reveal the changes in traditional finance in the digital economy era to a certain extent. The main concerns of this study are as follows: How does the rapid development of digital finance affect the banking industry? What kind of banking financial institutions are more affected by digital finance? What factors regulate the impact of digital finance on banking financial institutions? This study uses financial license data from the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, and also uses the Peking University Digital Inclusive Finance Index as a measure of the development of digital finance.This study investigates whether digital finance affects the establishment, change, and exit of local banking financial institutions. We mainly assess whether a significant causal relationship exists between regional digital finance and the growth rate of the number of banking financial institutions. To achieve this goal, we adopt the fixed effects model with panel data. In addition, we adopt identification strategies such as explanatory variables with a lag period and instrumental variable regression to avoid the potential issue of endogeneity. Accordingly, we conduct a battery of robustness checks to ensure that our conclusions are valid. Our findings show that the development of digital finance significantly slows the expansion of physical financial institution outlets in China's banking industry. Moreover, obvious heterogeneity is observed in the results regarding the impact on different types of banks. The development of digital finance slows the expansion of joint-stock and urban commercial banks and mainly affects their grassroots institutions. Although the development of digital finance accelerates the transformation of cooperative financial institutions in rural areas and the withdrawal of outlets, it does not have a significant impact on big state-owned banks. Furthermore, the impact of digital finance improves with economic development and increased regional financial availability but may decline with the improvement of the market power of incumbent banks. This paper quantitatively measures the possible impacts of digital finance on the banking industry and clarifies its mechanism of action, which can serve as an important reference for financial policy making. In the future, the accelerated development of digital finance is bound to create greater changes in the industry. At the same time, using microdata, we may be able to further explore the specific impact of digital finance on the performance of individual banks.
|
Received: 06 December 2021
Published: 12 October 2022
|
|
|
|
[1] |
蔡宁伟,2019,《中国商业银行ATM业务兴衰的实证研究(2007—2017)——基于新常态、现金流通、银行业务与第三方支付兴起的多维分析》,《上海立信会计金融学院学报》第2期,第37~55 页。
|
[2] |
曹凤岐,2015,《互联网金融对传统金融的挑战》,《金融论坛》第1期,第3~6 页。
|
[3] |
程林、王法辉和修春亮,2015,《城市银行网点及其与人口—经济活动关系的空间分析——以长春市中心城区为例》,《人文地理》第4期,第72~78 页。
|
[4] |
戴东红,2014,《互联网金融对小微企业融资支持的理论与实践——基于小微企业融资视角的分析》,《理论与改革》第4期,第91~96 页。
|
[5] |
郭峰、王靖一、王芳、孔涛、张勋和程志云,2020,《测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1401~1418 页。
|
[6] |
郭品和沈悦,2019,《互联网金融、存款竞争与银行风险承担》,《金融研究》第8期,第58~76 页。
|
[7] |
贺灿飞和刘浩,2013,《银行业改革与国有商业银行网点空间布局——以中国工商银行和中国银行为例》,《地理研究》第1期,第111~122 页。
|
[8] |
黄益平,2017,《数字普惠金融的机会与风险》,《金融发展评论》第8期,第14~19 页。
|
[9] |
黄益平和黄卓,2018,《中国的数字金融发展:现在与未来》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1489~1502 页。
|
[10] |
李智山、黄光庆、陈凤桂和周章伟,2014,《中国全国性股份制商业银行地理分布特征研究》,《经济地理》第2期,第19~27 页。
|
[11] |
刘澜飚、沈鑫和郭步超,2013,《互联网金融发展及其对传统金融模式的影响探讨》,《经济学动态》第8期,第73~83 页。
|
[12] |
彭迪云和李阳,2015,《互联网金融与商业银行的共生关系及其互动发展对策研究》,《经济问题探索》第3期,第133~139 页。
|
[13] |
沈悦和郭品,2015,《互联网金融、技术溢出与商业银行全要素生产率》,《金融研究》第3期,第160~175 页。
|
[14] |
王馨,2015,《互联网金融助解“长尾”小微企业融资难问题研究》,《金融研究》第9期,第128~139 页。
|
[15] |
王雪和何广文,2019,《县域银行业竞争与普惠金融服务深化——贫困县与非贫困县的分层解析》,《中国农村经济》第4期,第55~72 页。
|
[16] |
王洋、杨忍、李强和席文凯,2016,《广州市银行业的空间布局特征与模式》,《地理科学》第5期,第742~750 页。
|
[17] |
吴晓求,2015,《互联网金融:成长的逻辑》,《财贸经济》第2期,第5~15 页。
|
[18] |
吴晓求,2014,《中国金融的深度变革与互联网金融》,《财贸经济》第1期,第14~23 页。
|
[19] |
谢平、邹传伟和刘海二,2015,《互联网金融的基础理论》,《金融研究》第8期,第1~12 页。
|
[20] |
谢平和邹传伟,2012,《互联网金融模式研究》,《金融研究》第12期,第11~22 页。
|
[21] |
熊德平、陆智强和李红玉,2017,《农村金融供给、主发起行跨区经营与村镇银行网点数量——基于中国865家村镇银行数据的实证分析》,《中国农村经济》第4期,第30~45 页。
|
[22] |
张海洋和李静婷,2012,《村庄金融环境与农户信贷约束》,《浙江社会科学》第2期,第11~20 页。
|
[23] |
张海洋和袁雁静,2011,《村庄金融环境与农户创业行为》,《浙江社会科学》第7期,第2~12 页。
|
[24] |
张强、陶江和吴敏,2012,《中国商业银行网点布局绩效研究——基于主要商业银行的比较》,《金融研究》第5期,第123~135 页。
|
[25] |
赵涛、张智和梁上坤,2020,《数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据》,《管理世界》第10期,第65~76 页。
|
[26] |
中国工商银行江苏省分行课题组、黄纪宪、兰强、曹松林、张寅、陈燕、黄晨和唐黎炜,2015,《互联网时代国有控股商业银行渠道转型研究》,《金融论坛》第5期,第71~80 页。
|
[27] |
周建波和曾江,2020,《银行、票号兴替与清末民初金融变革》,《中国社会科学》第8期,第178~203 页。
|
[28] |
Agarwal S. and R. Hauswald, 2010, Distance and Private Information in Lending. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(7):2757~2788.
|
[29] |
Berger A. N. and G. F. Udell, 2002, “Small Business Credit Availability and Relationship Lending: The Importance of Bank Organisational Structure”, The Economic Journal, 112(477):F32-F53.
|
[30] |
Burstein F., J. Cowie, A. Zaslavsky and J. S. Pedro, 2008, “Support for Real-Time Decision Making in Mobile Financial Applications”, Information Systems and e-Business Management, 6(3):257~278.
|
[31] |
Carl S. and H. Varian, 1998, Information Rules. McGraw-Hill Professional.
|
[32] |
Han L. and F. Greene, 2007, “The Determinants of Online Loan Applications From Small Businesses”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3):478~486.
|
[33] |
Lapavitsas C. and P. L. Dos Santos, 2008, “Globalization and Contemporary Banking: On the Impact of New Technology”, Contributions to Political Economy, 27(1):31~56.
|
[34] |
Lee M., 2009, “Predicting and Explaining the Adoption of Online Trading: An Empirical Study in Taiwan”, Decision Support Systems, 47(2):133~142.
|
[35] |
Lin C., C. Ma, Y. Sun and Y. Xu, 2021, “The Telegraph and Modern Banking Development, 1881-1936”, Journal of Financial Economics, (forthcoming).
|
[36] |
Marcus A. J., 1984, “Deregulation and Bank Financial Policy”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 8(4):557~565.
|
[37] |
Mookerjee R. and P. Kalipioni, 2010, “Availability of Financial Services and Income Inequality: The Evidence From Many Countries”, Emerging Markets Review, 11(4):404~408.
|
[38] |
Nunn N. and N. Qian, 2014, “US Food Aid and Civil Conflict”, American Economic Review, 104(6):1630~1666.
|
|
|
|