|
|
|
| Analysis of Systemic Risk Spillover Effects among China's Real Estate Companies Based on the Tail Risk Network Model |
| ZHANG Weiping, CAO Tingqiu
|
| School of Economics, Shandong University |
|
|
|
Abstract At present, China's economic development faces the threefold pressure of demand contraction, supply shock, and expected recession. The liquidity risk, delivery risk, debt default risk, and credit risk caused by ruptures in the capital chain of real estate companies may not only hinder economic growth but also induce systemic financial risks. Therefore, to control financial risks and ensure stable economic growth, it is important to accurately measure real estate companies' financial risk and systemically identify companies in need of supervision or rescue. This is also in line with the goal of “promoting a virtuous circle and healthy development of the real estate industry” set out at the 2021 Central Economic Work Conference.
This paper uses data on listed real estate companies in China's A-share market. First, based on the SIM single-index quantile regression method, a new systemic risk indicator SIM-CoVaR is proposed, and the systemic risk of listed real estate companies is measured. Next, by combining it with the forward-looking TENET model, we construct dynamically evolving real estate market tail risk networks and reveal the time-varying spillover effect of systemic risk in the real estate market through the dynamic network topology. Second, we calculate the systemic risk contribution index and exposure index, and we capture systemically important companies with strong tail risk correlation through the index ranking. Furthermore, through the block model method, we explore the clustering of systemic risk spillover effects and the contagion path between blocks. Finally, we investigate the influence of the overall network structure on systemic risk spillovers in the real estate market.
The empirical results show the following. (1) There is an extensive systemic risk co-movement and spillover effects across real estate companies, and the tail risk network presents heterogeneity. A diversified business structure strengthens the diversified relationship between real estate companies, broadens the channels for dispersing risks, and further reduces the risk spillover level of the overall real estate market. (2) The risk spillover intensity between real estate companies during the 2008 financial crisis was greater than that during the 2015 domestic stock market crash. This difference is affected by the external economy, related policy, and internal linkage, and the real estate industry has become an amplifier of systemic risk spillovers during economic recessions. (3) The systemic risk spillover effect has significant clustering characteristics in the tail risk network. The tail risk network can be divided into four blocks with different functions. In the process of systemic risk transmission, the roles and functions of each block show clear time-varying characteristics. (4) From the perspective of the impact mechanism of spillover effects, the reduction of network aggregation, network efficiency, and network matching can significantly reduce systemic risk spillover. In addition, during periods of economic prosperity and steady development, the real estate sector tends to hide potential risks, and the spillover effects of systemic risks are weakened.
The study makes the following contributions. First, TENET incorporates more companies into the regression through the SIM selection technology and captures the nonlinear risk spillover relationships between real estate companies in a complex higher-dimensional environment, thereby overcoming the limitations of existing models such as high-dimensional interconnection and multivariate variable selection. Second, this paper uses the block model from social network theory to investigate the aggregation, trigger mechanism, and propagation path of risk spillover in the real estate market. Third, this paper discusses the formation mechanism of real estate market risks from the micro-level of companies, which is in line with the actual needs of real estate companies facing a capital dilemma and deeper supply-side regulation in this real estate cycle. The findings provide a useful reference for multi-level real estate market supervision and regulation, and for promoting the healthy development of the real estate industry.
|
|
Received: 10 May 2021
Published: 05 August 2022
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
曾祥渭、刘志东和刘雯宇, 2015,《我国城市群商品住宅价格波动传导与波动性外溢研究》,《管理评论》第9期, 第3～13页。
|
| [2] |
范小云、荣宇浩和王博, 2021,《我国系统重要性银行评估:网络层次结构视角》,《管理科学学报》第2期,第48～74页。
|
| [3] |
范小云、王道平和刘澜飚, 2012,《规模、关联性与中国系统重要性银行的衡量》,《金融研究》第11期, 第16～30页。
|
| [4] |
方意、赵胜民、黄丽灵和荆中博, 2021,《房地产市场与银行业系统性风险》,《管理科学学报》第11期, 第26～43页。
|
| [5] |
宫晓莉和熊熊, 2020,《波动溢出网络视角的金融风险传染研究》,《金融研究》第5期, 第39～58页。
|
| [6] |
顾云、张栋浩、杜在超和黄在鑫, 2022,《系统性风险度量CoES的建模和检验》,《统计研究》第1期, 第132-145页。
|
| [7] |
李政、梁琪和涂晓枫, 2016,《我国上市金融机构关联性研究——基于网络分析法》,《金融研究》第8期, 第95～110页。
|
| [8] |
李政、刘淇和梁琪, 2019,《基于经济金融关联网络的中国系统性风险防范研究》,《统计研究》第2期, 第23～37页。
|
| [9] |
刘海云和吕龙,2018,《城市房价泡沫及其传染的“波纹”效应》,《中国工业经济》第12期,第42～59页。
|
| [10] |
刘向丽和顾舒, 2014,《房地产对金融体系风险溢出效应研究——基于AR-GARCH-CoVaR方法》,《统计研究》第34(S1)期, 第106～111页。
|
| [11] |
谭政勋和陈铭,2012,《房价波动与金融危机的国际经验证据:抵押效应还是偏离效应》, 《世界经济》第3期, 第146～159页。
|
| [12] |
王锦阳和刘锡良, 2014,《住宅基本价值,泡沫成分与区域溢出效应》,《经济学季刊》第4期, 第1283～1302页。
|
| [13] |
杨子晖、陈雨恬和张平淼, 2020,《股票与外汇市场尾部风险的跨市场传染研究》,《管理科学学报》,第8期, 第54～77页。
|
| [14] |
杨子晖,陈雨恬和谢锐楷,2018,《我国金融机构系统性金融风险度量与跨部门风险溢出效应研究》,《金融研究》第10期,第19～37页。
|
| [15] |
张杰、杨连星和新夫,2016,《房地产阻碍了中国创新么？——基于金融体系贷款期限结构的解释》,《管理世界》第5期,第64～80页。
|
| [16] |
郑挺国、龚金金和宋涛,2021,《中国城市房价泡沫测度及其时变传染效应研究》,《世界经济》第4期,第151～177页。
|
| [17] |
Acharya, V., L. H. Pedersen, T. Philippon, et al., 2017. Measuring Systemic Risk, Review of Financial Studies, 30(1): 2～47.
|
| [18] |
Adrian, T., and M. K. Brunnermeier, 2016. CoVaR, American Economic Review, 106: 1705～1741.
|
| [19] |
Billio, M., M. Getmansky, A.W. Lo, et al., 2012. Econometric Measures of Connectedness and Systemic Risk in the Finance and Insurance Sectors, Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 535～559.
|
| [20] |
Billio, M., W. L. Andrew, P. Loriana, et al., 2021. Global Realignment in Financial Market Dynamics: Evidence from ETF Networks, SAFE Working Paper, No. 304, Pages 37.
|
| [21] |
Diebold, F. X., and K. Yilmaz, 2014. On the Network Topology of Variance Decompositions: Measuring the Connectedness of Financial Firms, Journal of Econometrics, 182: 119～134.
|
| [22] |
Fan, J., and R. Li, 2001. Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and Its Oracle Oroperties. Journal of the American statistical Association, 96(456): 1348～1360.
|
| [23] |
Hrdle, W. K., W. N. Wang, and L. N. Yu, 2016. TENET: Tail-event Driven NETwork Risk, Journal of Econometrics, 192: 499～513.
|
| [24] |
Hautsch N., J. Schaumburg, and M. Schienle, 2015. Financial Network Systemic Risk Contributions, Review of Finance, 19(2): 685～738.
|
| [25] |
Hoesli, M., and K. Reka, 2013. Volatility Spillovers, Comovements and Contagion in Securitized Real Estate Markets, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 47(1): 1～35.
|
| [26] |
Khandani, A. E., A. W. Lo, and R. C. Merton, 2013. Systemic Risk and the Refinancing Ratchet Effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1): 29～45.
|
| [27] |
Li X. F., M. H. Sun, and K. Boersma, 2019. Policy Spillover and Regional Linkage Characteristics of the Real Estate Market in China's Urban Agglomerations, Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 4:189～210.
|
| [28] |
Mian, A., and A. Sufi, 2009. Home Equity-Based Borrowing, and the US Household Leverage Crisis. American Economic Review, 101 (5): 2132～56.
|
| [29] |
Zhang, W., P., X. T. Zhuang, J. Wang, et al., 2020. Connectedness and Systemic Risk Spillovers Analysis of Chinese Sectors based on Tail Risk Network. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 101248.
|
| [30] |
Zhu, B., R. Fuss, and N. B. Rottke, 2013. Spatial Linkages in Returns and Volatilities among U.S Regional Housing Markets, Real Estate Economics, 41(1): 29～64.
|
|
|
|
