|
|
The Natural Interest Rate Puzzle in China and Bond Market Pricing: Insights from A Macro-finance Model |
WANG Bo, CHEN Kaipu
|
School of Finance, Nankai University |
|
|
Abstract The natural interest rate is an important concept in macroeconomics and finance, as it provides a benchmark for calibrating the stance of monetary policy. It also affects the price of financial assets and the allocation of large categories of assets by affecting the discount rate in the financial market. However, the natural interest rate is unobservable and is thus estimated in the macroeconomic literature and the financial literature using various methods. An implicit assumption of the finance-based approach is that the financial market is efficient . This implies that additional economic and financial information is needed to jointly predict future trends in interest rates and estimate the natural interest rate. Macro-based estimates of the natural interest rate are heavily dependent on the assumptions of the models used, which often omit important variables. The discrepancy between the natural interest rate estimated using financial methods and that estimated using macroeconomic methods is termed the “natural interest rate puzzle.” This study finds key evidence for such a discrepancy in China and this discrepancy could lead to disturbances in the formulation of monetary policy, which requires a more accurate estimate of the natural interest rate than those that are currently used. In this study, we estimate China's natural interest rate using a financial model and a macroeconomic semi-structural model, and confirm that China also faces the natural interest rate puzzle. We solve the puzzle by constructing a consistent macro-finance model that estimates the natural interest rate by utilizing both macroeconomic variables and yield curve information. The interest rate and the natural interest rate represent an important intersection of macroeconomics and finance research. Specifically, not only do the yield curve and other financial variables have an important impact on the estimation of the natural interest rate, but the accurate estimation of the natural interest rate has an important impact on asset pricing. Identifying the factors influencing bond yields and combining macroeconomics and finance factors are important trends in bond pricing research. Macro-finance theory shows that the trend of inflation and the natural interest rate are the basic determinants of the yield curve. Under the macro-finance framework, we further study the impact of the natural interest rate on bond pricing. We obtain yield data from the CCDC, and use the quarterly values of monthly year-on-year CPI data as the inflation rate. We take the first quarter of 2011 as the base period, and obtain the value of real GDP from the nominal GDP and GDP year-on-year growth rate and quarter-on-quarter growth rate, which are logarithmically processed and seasonally adjusted by X-13. The data are acquired from the Wind Economic Database and CEIC database. The results lead to two conclusions. (1) The macro-finance model could solve China's natural interest rate puzzle, and estimates a lower natural interest rate than that estimated by the macroeconomic model. (2) The natural interest rate has a significant impact on bond yields. Adding the natural interest rate can improve the goodness-of-fit of bond yields to the yield curve across a range of maturities. An important contribution we make in this study is to apply the framework of Brand et al. (2020) to solve a theoretical problem—the natural interest rate puzzle—and expand the application of this method by incorporating fundamental information on China's interest rate liberalization reform. We also empirically test the important role of the consistent natural interest rate that we estimate in describing the dynamics of the bond yield.
|
Published: 02 July 2022
|
|
|
|
[1] |
金中夏和洪浩,2013,《开放经济条件下均衡利率形成机制——基于动态随机一般均衡模型(DSGE)对中国利率变动规律的解释》,《金融研究》第7期,第46~60页。
|
[2] |
李宏瑾、苏乃芳和洪浩,2016,《价格型货币政策调控中的实际利率锚》,《经济研究》第1期,第42~54页。
|
[3] |
李宏瑾和苏乃芳,2016,《货币理论与货币政策中的自然利率及其估算》,《世界经济》第12期,第22~46页。
|
[4] |
马勇和李镏洋,2015,《金融变量如何影响实体经济:基于中国的实证分析》,《金融评论》第1期,第34~50+124~125页。
|
[5] |
单强、吕进中、王伟斌和黄宁,2020,《中国化泰勒规则的构建与规则利率的估算——基于考虑金融周期信息的潜在产出与自然利率的再估算》,《金融研究》第9期,第20~39页。
|
[6] |
尚玉皇、郑挺国和夏凯,2015,《宏观因子与利率期限结构:基于混频Nelson-Siegel模型》,《金融研究》第6期,第14~29页。
|
[7] |
王博和陈开璞,2019,《金融周期对自然利率的影响:金融失衡视角》,《经济学动态》第10期,第38~49页。
|
[8] |
徐忠和贾彦东,2019,《自然利率与中国宏观政策选择》,《经济研究》第6期,第22~39页。
|
[9] |
徐忠和李宏瑾,2019,《货币价格调控模式下政策目标利率的期限选择》,《国际金融研究》第3期,第3~12页。
|
[10] |
杨炳铎和汤教泉,2019,《中国债券收益率的可预测性检验》,《系统工程理论与实践》第4期,第970~985页。
|
[11] |
易纲,2021,《中国的利率体系与利率市场化改革》,《金融研究》第9期, 第1~11页。
|
[12] |
朱超和易祯,2020,《自然利率的人口结构视角解释》,《经济学动态》第6期,第30~46页。
|
[13] |
Adrian, Tobias, Richard K. Crump, and Emanuel Moench. 2013. “Pricing the Term Structure with Linear Regressions”,Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1): 110~138.
|
[14] |
Bauer, Michael D., and Glenn D. Rudebusch. 2020. “Interest Rates under Falling Stars”, American Economic Review, 110(5), 1316~54.
|
[15] |
Bomfim, A. N. 2001. “Measuring Equilibrium Real Interest Rates: What can We Learn from Yields on Indexed Bonds?” The Journal of Fixed Income, 11(3), 61~69.
|
[16] |
Brand, Claus, Gavin Goy, and Wolfgang Lemke. 2020. “Natural Rate Chimera and Bond Pricing Reality” ,DNB Working Paper No.666.
|
[17] |
Davis, Josh, Cristian Fuenzalida, and Alan M. Taylor. 2019. “The Natural Rate Puzzle: Global Macro Trends and the Market-Implied R” ,NBER Working Papers No. w26560.
|
[18] |
Laubach, T., and J. C. Williams. 2003. “Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest”, Review of Economics and Statistics 85(4), 1063~1070.
|
[19] |
Li, Canlin, Linlin Niu, and Gengming Zeng. 2011. “A Generalized Arbitrage-Free Nelson-Siegel Term Structure Model with Macroeconomic Fundamentals”, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1787262.
|
[20] |
Myrdal G. 1939. “Monetary Equilibrium”. London: W. Hodge Press.
|
[21] |
Svensson, Lars E.O. 1994. “Estimating and Interpreting Forward Interest Rates: Sweden 1992-1994”, NBER Working Papers No.4871.
|
[22] |
Wicksell, K. 1898. “Interest and Prices”, Mcmillan, London, 1936. Translation of the 1898 edition by R. F. Kahn.
|
|
|
|