|
|
The Impact of Automation and Artificial Intelligence on China's Labor Market: Quantity and Intensity of Employment |
ZHOU Guangsu, LI Lixing, MENG Lingsheng
|
School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China; National School of Development, Peking University; Department of Economics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong |
|
|
Abstract Automation and artificial intelligence (AI) are major trends in the workplace that have significantly improved production efficiency. Through the Internet+, big data, and cloud computing, AI has sparked a global technological revolution that has changed the traditional social order. While automation and AI have a positive impact on economic growth, they also negatively affect many traditional occupations. Many jobs may be replaced by automation. Studies show that the decline in the employment and wages of low-and medium-skilled workers can be attributed to the application of automation and AI. The rapid development of the AI industry and the aging of the population have drawn attention to how automation and AI affect China's labor market. Unlike the previous three technological revolutions in which machines and equipment replaced manual labor, automation and AI are being integrated into the production process. This not only requires machines to approximate human dexterity but, more importantly, it means that machines are gradually developing cognitive abilities similar to those of a human. This transformation will have a significant impact on the labor market. In China, the impact of automation and AI will be more pronounced, partly because China is at the forefront of AI development, and partly because of its large population and labor-intensive industrial structure. However, little research (especially quantitative research) examines how China's labor market will be affected by automation and AI. This study estimates the effect of automation and AI on China's labor market and suggests relevant countermeasures. Based on Frey and Osborne's (2017) estimation of the probability of computerization for 702 detailed occupations, this paper estimates the probability that each occupation in China will be replaced by automation. Based on these estimates, we use data from latest Census and China Family Panel Studies to estimate the automation-substitution probability by city, and gauge the macro impact of automation on China's labor market. Finally, we empirically examine the effect of automation on labor market outcomes, such as employment at the city level and individual working hours. The results show that automation has a significant and negative impact on employment but a positive impact on working hours. The effect is larger among vulnerable groups in the labor market, such as women, those with a low level of education, the elderly, and migrants. The contributions of this paper are as follows. First, it shows how the labor market in developing countries is affected by automation. Second, it estimates the replacement probability for each occupation in China, and comprehensively assesses the possible substitution effect of automation. Third, it estimates the impact of automation on the quantity and intensity of employment and conducts a heterogeneity analysis using labor force characteristics, to provide a comprehensive assessment of the impact of automation. Finally, the paper uses data on EU robots as a proxy for AI in China to examine the impact of AI on the labor market from different perspectives. Although this study focuses on showing correlations rather than inferring causality, it is nonetheless informative about the impact of automation and AI on China's labor market, and has important policy implications. While China promotes the development of new technologies such as AI, it needs to address their potential negative impact on the labor market. First, this impact needs to be comprehensively assessed, because its effect will differ across industries and workers. Second, more attention needs to be paid to vulnerable groups in the labor market (e.g., women, low-educated workers, older workers, and migrants). Efforts to improve their labor skills and human capital through vocational training are needed to alleviate the negative impact of automation and AI on them. Finally, attention needs to be paid to the impact of automation and AI on the welfare of workers, particularly the polarization of income and social class. Technological progress needs to be harnessed to promote economic development while improving the welfare of workers and maintaining social equity.
|
Received: 21 May 2020
Published: 02 July 2021
|
|
|
|
[1] |
蔡跃洲和陈楠, 2019,《新技术革命下人工智能与高质量增长、高质量就业》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第5期,第3~22页。
|
[2] |
耿志祥和孙祁祥,2017,《人口老龄化、延迟退休与二次人口红利》,《金融研究》第1期,第52~68页。
|
[3] |
郭凯明, 2019,《人工智能发展、产业结构转型升级与劳动收入份额变动》,《管理世界》第7期,第60~77+202~203页。
|
[4] |
鞠建东、马弘、魏自儒、钱颖一和刘庆,2012,《中美贸易的反比较优势之谜》,《经济学(季刊)》第11卷第3期,第805~832页。
|
[5] |
李彬和白岩,2020,《学历的信号机制:来自简历投递实验的证据》,《经济研究》第10期,第176~192页。
|
[6] |
任莉颖、李力和马超,2012,《中国家庭动态跟踪调查2010年职业行业编码》,《北京大学中国家庭动态跟踪调查技术报告系列:CFPS-8》。
|
[7] |
邵文波和盛丹,2017,《信息化与中国企业就业吸纳下降之谜》,《经济研究》第6期,第120~136页。
|
[8] |
孙婧芳,2017,《城市劳动力市场中户籍歧视的变化:农民工的就业与工资》,《经济研究》第8期,第171~186页。
|
[9] |
王春超和丁琪芯,2019,《智能机器人与劳动力市场研究新进展》,《经济社会体制比较》第3期,第178~188页。
|
[10] |
王永钦和董雯,2020,《机器人的兴起如何影响中国劳动力市场?——来自制造业上市公司的证据》,《经济研究》第10期,第159~175页。
|
[11] |
熊彼特,1990,《经济发展理论》,何畏、易家译,北京:商务印书馆。
|
[12] |
闫雪凌、朱博楷和马超,2020,《工业机器人使用与制造业就业:来自中国的证据》,《统计研究》第37卷第1期,第74~87页。
|
[13] |
杨伟国、邱子童和吴清军,2018,《人工智能应用的就业效应研究综述》,《中国人口科学》第5期,第109~119+128页。
|
[14] |
Acemoglu, D., and D. Autor, 2011, “Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings”, Handbook of labor economics, 4: 1043~1171.
|
[15] |
Acemoglu, D. and P. Restrepo, 2018, “The Race between Machine and Man: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares and Employment”, American Economic Review, 108(6): 1488~1542.
|
[16] |
Acemoglu, D., and P. Restrepo, 2020, “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”, Journal of Political Economy, 128(6): 2188~2244.
|
[17] |
Aghion, P., and P. Howitt, 1994, “Growth and Unemployment”, Review of Economic Studies, 61(3): 477~494.
|
[18] |
Arntz, M., T. Gregory, and U. Zierahn, 2016, “The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No.189.
|
[19] |
Autor, D. H., 2015, “Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3): 3~30.
|
[20] |
Autor, D. H., and D. Dorn, 2013, “The Growth of Low-skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market”, American Economic Review, 103(5): 1553~1597.
|
[21] |
Autor, D. H., F. Levy, and R. J. Murnane, 2003, “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4): 1279~1333.
|
[22] |
Bakhshi, H., J. M. Downing, M. A. Osborne, and P. Schneider, 2017, The Future of Skills: Employment in 2030, London: Pearson.
|
[23] |
Bartel, A., C. Ichniowski, and K. Shaw, 2007, “How Does Information Technology Affect Productivity? Plant-level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement, and Worker Skills”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4): 1721~1758.
|
[24] |
Bloom, D. E., M. McKenna, and K. Prettner, 2018, “Demography, Unemployment, Automation, and Digitalization: Implications for the Creation of (Decent) Jobs, 2010-2030 (No. w24835)”, National Bureau of Economic Research.
|
[25] |
Brynjolfsson, E., and A. McAfee, 2014, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, WW Norton & Company.
|
[26] |
Cheng, H., R. Jia, D. Li, and H. Li, 2019, “The Rise of Robots in China”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2): 71~88.
|
[27] |
David, B., 2017, “Computer Technology and Probable Job Destructions in Japan: An Evaluation”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 43 (1): 77~87.
|
[28] |
Frey, C. B., and M. A. Osborne, 2017, “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114: 254~280.
|
[29] |
Goos, M., and A. Manning, 2007, “Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1): 118~133.
|
[30] |
Goos, M., A. Manning, and A. Salomons, 2014, “Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-biased Technological Change and Offshoring”, The American Economic Review, 104(8): 2509~2526.
|
[31] |
Graetz, G., and G. Michaels, 2018, “Robots at Work”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5): 753~768.
|
[32] |
Hémous, D., and M. Olsen, 2016, “The Rise of the Machines: Automation, Horizontal Innovation and Income Inequality”, Working Paper.
|
[33] |
Katz, L. F., and R. A. Margo, 2014, “Technical Change and the Relative Demand for Skilled Labor: The United States in Historical Perspective”, In Human Capital in History: The American Record(pp. 15-57), University of Chicago Press.
|
[34] |
Kleinaltenkamp, M. J., 2017, “Understanding the Impact of Job Automation on Chinese Employment - A Quantitative Investigation”, Peking University Master's Thesis.
|
[35] |
Luo, D., and C. Xing, 2016, “Population Adjustments in Response to Local Demand Shifts in China”, Journal of Housing Economics, 33: 101~114.
|
[36] |
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P., and Dewhurst, M., 2017, “A Future That Works: Automation, Employment, and Productivity”, McKinsey Global Institute, pp. 119~135.
|
[37] |
Michaels, G., A. Natraj, and J. Van Reenen, 2014, “Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-five Years”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1): 60~77.
|
[38] |
Neumark, D., 2018, “Experimental Research on Labor Market Discrimination”, Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3): 199~866.
|
[39] |
Oschinski, M., and R. Wyonch, 2017, “Future Shock? The Impact of Automation on Canada's Labour Market”, C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, No.472.
|
[40] |
Susskind, D., 2017, “A Model of Technological Unemployment”, Economics Series Working Papers.
|
[41] |
Zhou, G., G. Chu, L. Li, and L. Meng, 2019, “The Effect of Artificial Intelligence on China's Labor Market”, China Economic Journal, 13(1): 24~41.
|
|
|
|