|
|
|
| Asset Transparency, Regulatory Arbitrage, and Bank Systemic Risk |
| CHEN Guojin, JIANG Xiaoyu, LIU Yanzhen, ZHAO Xiangqin
|
Wang Yanan Economic Research Institute/School of Economics, Xiamen University;
Research Institute, The People's Bank of China |
|
|
|
Abstract Regulatory arbitrage and opacity of bank assets were important causes of the 2007-2008 global financial crisis. The full disclosure of information reduces the probability of bank bankruptcy and systemic risk. Banks with greater asset transparency are better able to convey solvency information to the outside world, which makes it easier to attract external refinancing. Conversely, the solvency uncertainty caused by asset opacity may lead to banking crises. Macro-prudential regulation, such as bank capital adequacy ratio regulation, has focused on regulating business on balance sheets. In this context, banks are motivated to move business outside their balance sheets to avoid financial regulation and profit from regulatory arbitrage. There are currently few theoretical or empirical studies on the effects of asset transparency and regulatory arbitrage on banks' systemic risk.
This paper addresses the differences between interbank wholesale financing and retail deposits in depositor market supervision. It further addresses the use of wholesale financing (represented by interbank certificates of deposit) for regulatory arbitrage. Unlike traditional assets and liabilities such as deposits and loans, wholesale financing avoids both investor and depositor supervision and regulatory restrictions. This reduces bank asset transparency and makes banks take greater risks,and excessive connectedness.
This paper first introduces the classical bank moral hazard model in relation to the concepts of bank asset transparency and regulatory arbitrage (represented by correlated risk). We further analyze the effects of asset transparency and regulatory arbitrage on banks' systemic risk from the perspective of theoretical modeling. We also undertake empirical analysis of these effects based on our theoretical model. Drawing on the Wind and Bankfocus databases, we use the rolling window, SRISK and MES methods to measure the asset transparency and systemic risk of China's commercial banks. We fully control for bank level characteristics and macroeconomic factors that may affect systemic risk.
We find that regulatory arbitrage and low asset transparency lead to higher systemic risk. In the case of regulatory arbitrage, the correlation of bank risks and the risk externality of “rarely standing or falling alone” reduce the incentive for bank supervision. This results in collective failure and higher systemic risk. Banks no longer rely entirely on the deposit market for refinancing when interbank regulatory arbitrage occurs. The constraint of transparency on bank risk is weakened and the problem of moral hazard is further aggravated. As a lack of asset transparency weakens banks' financing ability in the deposit market, banks become more active in interbank regulatory arbitrage. Banks may opt for more opaque and risky investments. The homogeneity of assets and risk contagion from interbank certificates of deposit make the banking system more vulnerable. Regulatory arbitrage also weakens the effect of capital regulation on banks' systemic risk.
This paper's contributions are as follows. First, we study systemic risk at the bank level. This paper relaxes the independence setting and introduces asset transparency in the case of heterogeneous portfolios (allowing correlation). We also study the influence of asset transparency on banks' systemic risk. This paper therefore enriches research on the relationship between DELR and bank accounting choice and individual/systemic risk. It also details the mechanism of regulatory arbitrage and its coordination with capital regulation. Second, we study the asymmetric responses of systemically important banks to deposit market supervision using correlation and the setting of creditor and debtor banks. This is another way to support research on the distortion of retail deposit markets by “too big to fail” banks. Third, we add to the retail deposit market literature from the perspective of the wholesale funding market and banks' systemic risk. We also fill the gap in research related tobank asset transpavency and wholesale funding such as shadow banking and Internet finance.
|
|
Received: 24 December 2019
Published: 01 April 2021
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
陈国进、蒋晓宇和赵向琴,2020,《货币政策、宏观审慎监管与银行系统性风险承担》,《系统工程理论与实践》第6期,1419~1438。
|
| [2] |
陈湘鹏、周皓和金涛等,2019,《微观层面系统性金融风险指标的比较与适用性分析——基于中国金融系统的研究》,《金融研究》第5期,第17～36页。
|
| [3] |
邓向荣、张嘉明,2018,《货币政策、银行风险承担与银行流动性创造》,《世界经济》第4期,第28~52页。
|
| [4] |
郭晔、赵静,2017,《存款竞争、影子银行与银行系统风险——基于中国上市银行微观数据的实证研究》,《金融研究》第6期,第81～94页。
|
| [5] |
纪洋、边文龙和黄益平,2018,《隐性存保、显性存保与金融危机:国际经验与中国实践》,《经济研究》第8期,第20~35页。
|
| [6] |
梁琪、李政和郝项超,2013,《我国系统重要性金融机构的识别与监管——基于系统性风险指数 SRISK 方法的分析》,《金融研究》第9期,第56～70页。
|
| [7] |
刘莉亚、黄叶苨和周边,2019,《监管套利、信息透明度与银行的影子》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第1035～1060页。
|
| [8] |
邱晗、黄益平和纪洋,2018,《金融科技对传统银行行为的影响——基于互联网理财的视角》,《金融研究》第11期,第17～30页。
|
| [9] |
汪莉,2017,《隐性存保、“顺周期”杠杆与银行风险承担》,《经济研究》第10期,第69～83页。
|
| [10] |
王永钦、陈映辉和杜巨澜,2016,《软预算约束与中国地方政府债务违约风险:来自金融市场的证据》,《经济研究》第11期,第96～109页。
|
| [11] |
Acharya, V. V., and S. G. Ryan, 2016, “Banks' Financial Reporting and Financial System Stability”, Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2): 277～340.
|
| [12] |
Acharya, V. V., L. Pedersen, T. Philippon, and M. Richardson, 2017, “Measuring Systemic Risk”, Review of Financial Studies, 30(1): 2～47.
|
| [13] |
Allen, F., E. Carletti, and R. Marquez, 2011, “Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation”, Review of Financial Studies, 24(4): 983～1018.
|
| [14] |
Benoit, Slvain, J. Colliard, C. Hurlin, and C. Pérignon, 2017, “Where the Risks Lie: A Survey on Systemic Risk”,, Review of Finance, 21(1): 109～52.
|
| [15] |
Brownlees, C., and R. F. Engle, 2017, “SRISK: A Conditional Capital Shortfall Measure of Systemic Risk”, Review of Financial Studies, 30(1): 48～79.
|
| [16] |
Brunnermeier, M. K., 2009, “Deciphering the Liquidity and Credit Crunch 2007-2008”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1): 77～100.
|
| [17] |
Brunnermeier M, S Rother, I Schnabel, 2020, “Asset Price Bubbles and Systemic Risk”. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(9): 4272～4317.
|
| [18] |
Buchak, G, G. Matvos, T. Piskorski, et al., 2018, “Fintech, Regulatory Arbitrage, and the Rise of Shadow Banks”, Journal of Financial Economics, 130(3): 453～483.
|
| [19] |
Bushman, R. M., and C. D. Williams, 2015, “Delayed Expected Loss Recognition and the Risk Profile of Banks”, Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3): 511～553.
|
| [20] |
Cerutti, E., S. Claessens, and L. Laeven, 2017, “The Use and Effectiveness of Macroprudential Policies: New Evidence”, Journal of Financial Stability, 28(2): 203～224.
|
| [21] |
Chen, Q., I. Goldstein, Z. Huang, et al., 2019, “Bank Transparency and Deposit Flows”, SSRN Working Paper, NO. 3212873.
|
| [22] |
Cordella, T., G. Dell'Ariccia, and R. Marquez, 2018, “Government Guarantees, Transparency, and Bank Risk-taking”, IMF Economic Review.
|
| [23] |
Dang, T. V., G. Gorton, B. Holmström, et al., 2017, “Banks as Secret Keepers”, American Economic Review, 107(4):1005～29.
|
| [24] |
Dell’Ariccia, G., and L. Ratnovski, 2019, “Bailouts and Systemic Insurance”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 105(8):166～177.
|
| [25] |
Dell’Ariccia, G., L. Laeven, and R. Marquez, 2014, “Real Interest Rates, Leverage, and Bank Risk-taking”, Journal of Economic Theory, 149(149): 65～99.
|
| [26] |
Demyanyk, Y., and E. Loutskina, 2016, “Mortgage Companies and Regulatory Arbitrage”, Journal of Financial Economics, 122(2): 328～351.
|
| [27] |
Egan, M., A. Hortaçsu, and G. Matvos, 2017, “Deposit Competition and Financial Fragility: Evidence From the US Banking Sector”, American Economic Review, 107(1): 169～216.
|
| [28] |
Goldstein, I., and Y. Leitner, 2018, “Stress Tests and Information Disclosure”, Journal of Economic Theory, 177(9): 34～69.
|
| [29] |
Granja, J., 2018, “Disclosure Regulation in the Commercial Banking Industry: Lessons from the National Banking Era”, Journal of Accounting Research, 56(1): 173～216.
|
| [30] |
Hachem, K., and M. Z. Song, 2017, “Liquidity Rules and Credit Booms”, NBER Working Paper.
|
| [31] |
Houston, J. F., C. Lin, and Y. Ma, 2012, “Regulatory Arbitrage and International Bank Flows”, Journal of Finance, 67(5): 1845～1895.
|
| [32] |
Iyer, R., M. Puri, and N. Ryan, 2016, “A Tale of Two Runs: Depositor Responses to Bank Solvency Risk”, Journal of Finance, 71(6): 2687～2726.
|
| [33] |
Iyer, R., T. L. Jensen, N. Johannesen, et al., 2019, “The Distortive Effects of Too Big To Fail: Evidence from the Danish Market for Retail Deposits”, Review of Financial Studies, 32(12): 4653～4695.
|
| [34] |
Jiang, L. L., R. Levine, and C. Lin, 2016, “Competition and Bank Opacity”, Review of Financial Studies, 29(7): 1911～1942.
|
| [35] |
Karolyi, G. A., and A. G. Taboada, 2015, “Regulatory Arbitrage and Cross‐border Bank Acquisitions”, Journal of Finance, 70(6): 2395～2450.
|
| [36] |
Lambert, C., F. Noth, and U. Schüwer, 2017, “How Do Insured Deposits Affect Bank Risk？ Evidence from the 2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 29: 81～102.
|
| [37] |
Mistrulli, P. E., 2011, “Assessing Financial Contagion in the Interbank Market: Maximum Entropy versus Observed Interbank Lending Patterns”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(5): 1114～1127.
|
| [38] |
Perignon, C., D. Thesmar, and G. Vuillemey, 2017, “Wholesale Funding Dry-Ups”, Journal of Finance, 73 (2): 575～617.
|
| [39] |
Ratnovski, L., 2013, “Liquidity and Transparency in Bank Risk Management”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(3): 422～439.
|
|
|
|
