|
|
|
| Financial Leasing, Bank Credit and Enterprise Investment |
| ZHAO Na, WANG Bo, ZHANG Keyu
|
School of Economics, Nankai University;
School of Finance, Nankai University;
Hanqing Advanced Institute of Economics and Finance, Renmin University of China |
|
|
|
Abstract Financial leasing has been developing rapidly and become one of the closest financial forces connected with the real economy in the context of new economic normal. It provides a possibility for private capital to flow into formal financing channels. It also provides financing opportunities for private enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises, and makes up for the lack of state-owned banks' financing functions. As financial leasing and bank credit are equally important financing channels, their relationship and whether financial leasing can serve as an effective alternative to traditional financing channels to promote corporate investment are worthy of in-depth consideration. These issues are also very important for improving financing channels' ability to accurately serve the real economy, establishing a multi-level market system, ensuring stability on the six fronts and securiry in the six areas.
Domestic and foreign literature on the relationship between financial leasing and bank credit is mainly based on two theories: the debt replacement theory (Myers et al., 1976) and the complementary theory (Lewis and Schallheim, 1992). However, more than 90% transactions in China's current leasing market are financial leasing, of which sale-and-leaseback transactions account for a large proportion, reaching as high as 83.9% in 2015. Operating leasing transactions account for only 12.5%. Therefore, it is difficult to apply the complementary theoretical mechanism in China based on the current development of leasing industry and the characteristics of taxation arrangements. In this paper, we manually collect the financial leasing data from the annual reports of all A-share listed companies in China's Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges during 2004 to 2016 for empirical testing. The results show that both financial leasing and bank credit can significantly increase company's investment rate, and financial leasing has a significant substitution effect on bank credit. Since financing constraints play a very important role, we select corporate asset tangibility, asset-liability ratio and corporate ownership as indicators to explore the role they play in the substitution relationship. We find that tighter financing constraints are associated with greater substitution effect of financial leasing on bank credit.
Our study contributes to the literature in the following three aspects. First, most domestic research on financial leasing focuses on macro-level analyses, while there are relatively few micro-level studies (Shi and Xu, 2013). We empirically examine the substitution effect of financial leasing on bank credit from the enterprise level and provide micro evidence for the impact of financial leasing on economic growth, which enriches and expands the research scope of financial leasing. Second, existing research mostly discusses the quantitative change relationship between financial leasing and bank credit (Deloof and Verschueren, 1999; Lin et al, 2013), but this quantitative change may be affected by common factors such as corporate asset structure, etc., which may lead to endogenous problems and estimation biases. Moreover, the quantitative analyses cannot reflect the existence of the substitution effect. Therefore, according to the nature of substitutes in microeconomics, and based on the common characteristics of financial leasing and bank credit--their “financing” attribute as financing channels, we start from the perspective of corporate investment to test whether the substitution relationship between the two exists. Third, we analyze the impact of financing constraints on the substitution effect. The results show that for companies facing stronger financing constraints, financial leasing has a more obvious substitution effect on bank credit, which suggests that financial leasing has a comparative advantage in alleviating corporate financing constraints.
Our findings have the following policy implications. With the advantage of “integration of industry and finance”, the government should actively promote the effective use of the dual attributes of financial leasing, improve its ability to accurately serve the real economy, and provide strong financial support for the construction of a new development pattern. At the same time, in regard to the “credit-like” function of financial leasing, especially the function of sale-and-leaseback transactions, the government should actively improve the relevant policies, standardize and guide them to return to their original source, and promote the transformation of the risk prevention of leasing business from the credit of the lessee to the credit of the leased property to better prevent and resolve systemic financial risks.
|
|
Received: 24 July 2019
Published: 02 February 2021
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
李青原和王红建,2013,《货币政策、资产可抵押性、现金流与公司投资——来自中国制造业上市公司的经验证据》,《金融研究》第6期,第31～45页。
|
| [2] |
刘凤委、李琳和薛云奎,2009,《信任、交易成本与商业信用模式》,《经济研究》第8期,第60～72页。
|
| [3] |
饶品贵和姜国华,2013,《货币政策、信贷资源配置与企业业绩》,《管理世界》第3期,第12～22页。
|
| [4] |
饶艳超和胡奕明,2005,《银行信贷中会计信息的使用情况调查与分析》,《会计研究》第4期,第36～41页。
|
| [5] |
沈永建、徐巍和蒋德权,2018,《信贷管制、隐性契约与贷款利率变相市场化——现象与解释》,《金融研究》第7期,第49～68页。
|
| [6] |
史燕平和徐晓兰,2013,《中国融资(金融)租赁行业发展报告(2013)》,北京:中国经济出版社。
|
| [7] |
孙浦阳、李飞跃和顾凌骏,2014,《商业信用能否成为企业有效的融资渠道——基于投资视角的分析》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1637～1652页。
|
| [8] |
王钰、骆力前和郭琦,2015,《地方政府干预是否损害信贷配置效率？》,《金融研究》第4期,第99～114页。
|
| [9] |
郑江淮、何旭强和王华,2001,《上市公司投资的融资约束 : 从股权结构角度的实证分析》,《金融研究》第11期,第92～99页。
|
| [10] |
Allen, F., J. Qian, C. Zhang and M. Zhao. 2012. “China's Financial System: Opportunities and Challenges” NBER Working Paper, No. 17828.
|
| [11] |
Almeida, H. and M. Campello. 2007. “Financial Constraints, Asset Tangibility, and Corporate Investment” Review of Financial Studies, 20(5):1429～1460.
|
| [12] |
Chen, P., C. Wang and Y. Liu. 2015. “Real Estate Prices and Firm Borrowings: Micro Evidence from China” China Economic Review, 36:296～308.
|
| [13] |
Eisfeldt, A. L. and A. A.Rampini. 2009. “Leasing, Ability to Repossess, and Debt Capacity” Review of Financial Studies, 22(4):1621～1657.
|
| [14] |
Fazzari, S. M., R. G. Hubbard and B. C. Petersen. 2000. “Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities are Useful: A Comment on Kaplan and Zingales” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2):695～705.
|
| [15] |
Lewis, C. M. and J. S. Schallheim. 1992. “Are Debt and Leases Substitutes？” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 27(4):497～511.
|
| [16] |
Lin, J. R., C. J. Wang, D. W. Chou and F. C. Chueh. 2013. “Financial Constraint and the Choice between Leasing and Debt” International Review of Economics & Finance, 27(Complete):171～182.
|
| [17] |
Miller, M. H. and C. W. Upton. 1976. “Leasing, Buying, and the Cost of Capital Services” The Journal of Finance, 31(3):761～786.
|
| [18] |
Myers, S., D. Dill and A. Bautista. 1976. “Valuation of Financial Lease Contracts” The Journal of Finance, 31(3):799～819.
|
| [19] |
Pinkowitz, L., R. Williamson, M. O'Hara. 2001. “Bank Power and Cash Holdings: Evidence from Japan” The Review of Financial Studies, 14(4):1059～1082.
|
| [20] |
Ross, S. P. and R. W. Westerfield. 1998. “Corporate Finance”, St. Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing.
|
| [21] |
Sharpe, S. A. and H. H. Nguyen. 1995. “Capital Market Imperfections and the Incentive to Lease” Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 39(2-3):271-294.
|
| [22] |
Smith, C. W. and L. M. Wakeman. 1985. “Determinants of Corporate Leasing Policy” The Journal of Finance, 40(3):895-908.
|
| [23] |
Stulz, R. and H. Johnson. 1985. “An Analysis of Secured Debt” Journal of Financial Economics, 14(4):501-521.
|
|
|
|
