|
|
Financing Constraints, Financial Liberalization, and the Export Domestic Value-Added Rate of Manufacturing Firms |
ZHANG Panpan, ZHANG Shengli, CHEN Jianguo
|
School of Economics, Nankai University; School of Economics, Zhejiang University; School of Economics/Collaborative Innovation Center for China Economy, Nankai University |
|
|
Abstract Since China's accession to the WTO, its foreign trade has developed rapidly. However, China's trade gains, i.e., its domestic value added rate of exports (DVAR), remain relatively low. Moreover, China's current international trade situation is increasingly difficult. In recent years, China has repeatedly stressed the need to strengthen financial services to benefit the real economy. Therefore, it is of great theoretical significance to study how financing constraints affect China's export DVAR and how they are regulated by financial liberalization, to strengthen financial services and improve the profitability of foreign trade in the current complex international situation. This paper takes Chinese manufacturing export firms as the research object and focuses on the effect of financing constraints on the export DVAR of manufacturing firms. First, it examines the negative impact of financing constraints on enterprises' export DVAR and the mechanism by which reduced technological innovation due to financing constraints negatively impacts enterprises' export DVAR. On this basis, this paper analyzes these heterogeneous negative impacts from four perspectives: trade mode, productivity, ownership, and region. Furthermore, it analyzes the regulatory role of financial liberalization in these negative impacts. Finally, it carries out a robustness test to address potential measurement error and endogeneity problems. In the empirical test, we used fixed effects model. This paper has two theoretical bases. The first is that financing constraints may inhibit export DVAR through reduced technological innovation. The second is that financial liberalization may affect the negative impact of financing constraints on enterprises' export DVAR. Three data sources are used in this study. The first is the China Industry Business Performance Database, from the National Bureau of Statistics of China. The second is the China Customs Statistics Database, from the China General Administration of Customs. The third is the China Patent Database Abstracts, from the China National Intellectual Property Office. The main conclusions are as follows. Chinese manufacturing firms' financing constraints significantly inhibit the promotion of their export DVAR, and technological innovation is the main mechanism. Interest rate liberalization can effectively alleviate this inhibition, while increased shadow banking aggravates it. Therefore, we suggest that the government attempt to alleviate the financing constraints of enterprises by continuing to implement cost reduction measures to ease internal financing constraints and increasing financial liberalization to ease external financing constraints. More financing support should also be given to processing trade enterprises, private enterprises, foreign-owned enterprises, low-productivity enterprises, and enterprises in eastern regions. Lastly, measures should be taken to increase enterprises' technological innovation, such as promoting the financing of technology and creating special funds. This paper makes several contributions to the literature. First, it constructs comprehensive indicators to measure the financing constraints of enterprises and comprehensively measures their export DVAR. In contrast, the indicators of financing constraints selected by previous studies were relatively simple and the measure of export DVAR of enterprises was not comprehensive. Second, the paper more deeply examines the impact of financing constraints on manufacturing firms' export DVAR and explains the low DVAR of Chinese enterprises' exports from the perspective of financing constraints. Third, this paper examines the regulatory role of financial liberalization on interest rate liberalization and the expanding scale of the shadow banking system. Fourth, this paper makes policy suggestions for the promotion of China's export DVAR.
|
Received: 07 January 2019
Published: 30 June 2020
|
|
|
|
[1] |
陈邦强、傅蕴英和张宗益,2007,《金融市场化进程中的金融结构、政府行为、金融开放与经济增长间接影响研究》,《金融研究》第10期,第1~14页。
|
[2] |
戴觅和余淼杰,2014,《中国出口企业生产率之谜:加工贸易的作用》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第675~698页。
|
[3] |
耿伟和杨晓亮,2019,《最低工资与企业出口国内附加值率》,《南开经济研究》第4期,第188~208页。
|
[4] |
纪洋、徐建炜和张斌,2015,《利率市场化的影响、风险与时机——基于利率双轨制模型的讨论》,《经济研究》第1期,第38~51页。
|
[5] |
简泽、徐扬、吕大国、卢任和李晓萍,2018,《中国跨企业的资本配置扭曲:金融摩擦还是信贷配置的制度偏向》,《中国工业经济》第11期,第24~41页。
|
[6] |
鞠晓生和卢荻,2013,《融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性》,《经济研究》第1期,第4~16页。
|
[7] |
罗长远和张军,2014,《附加值贸易——基于中国的实证分析》,《经济研究》第6期,第4~19页。
|
[8] |
李胜旗和毛其淋,2017,《制造业上游垄断与企业出口国内增加值——来自中国的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第3期,第101~119页。
|
[9] |
刘啟仁和黄建忠,2016,《产品创新如何影响企业加成率》,《世界经济》第11期,第28~53页。
|
[10] |
刘维林,2015,《中国式出口的价值创造之谜——基于全球价值链的解析》,《世界经济》第3期,第3~28页。
|
[11] |
吕越、吕云龙和包群,2017,《融资约束与企业增加值贸易——基于全球价值链视角的微观证据》,《金融研究》第5期,第81~98页。
|
[12] |
吕越、盛斌和吕云龙,2018,《中国的市场分割会导致企业出口国内附加值率下降吗?》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第5~23页。
|
[13] |
马述忠、张洪胜和王笑笑,2017,《融资约束与全球价值链地位提升——来自中国加工贸易企业的理论与证据》,《中国社会科学》第1期,第83~107页。
|
[14] |
邵朝对和苏丹妮,2019,《产业集聚与企业出口国内附加值:GVC升级的本地化路径》,《管理世界》第8期,第9~29页。
|
[15] |
毛其淋和许家云,2019,《贸易自由化与中国企业出口的国内附加值》,《世界经济》第1期,第3~25页。
|
[16] |
盛丹和王永进,2014,《“企业间关系”是否会缓解企业的融资约束》,《世界经济》第10期,第104~122页。
|
[17] |
苏丹妮、盛斌、邵朝对和陈帅,2017,《全球价值链分工、产业集聚与企业生产率:“远亲”与“近邻”如何互动?》,《经济研究》工作论文WP1191。
|
[18] |
王碧珺、谭语嫣、余淼杰和黄益平,2015,《融资约束是否抑制了中国民营企业对外直接投资》,《世界经济》第12期,第87~98页。
|
[19] |
魏悦羚和张洪胜,2019,《进口自由化会提升中国出口国内增加值率吗——基于总出口核算框架的重新估计》,《中国工业经济》第3期,第24~42页。
|
[20] |
许和连、成丽红和孙天阳,2017,《制造业投入服务化对企业出口国内增加值的提升效应》,《中国工业经济》第10期,第62~80页。
|
[21] |
阳佳余,2012,《融资约束与企业出口行为:基于工业企业数据的经验研究》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1504~1524页。
|
[22] |
余淼杰、金洋和张睿,2018,《工业企业产能利用率衡量与生产率估算》,《经济研究》第5期,第56~71页。
|
[23] |
战明华和李欢,2018,《金融市场化进程是否改变了中国货币政策不同传导渠道的相对效应?》,《金融研究》第5期,第20~36页。
|
[24] |
张杰、陈志远和刘元春,2013,《中国出口国内增加值的测算与变化机制》,《经济研究》第10期,第124~138页。
|
[25] |
张杰、芦哲、郑文平和陈志远,2012,《融资渠道与企业R&D投入》,《世界经济》第10期,第66~90页。
|
[26] |
中国财政科学研究院,2017,《降成本:2017年的调查与分析》,《财政研究》第10期,第2~42页。
|
[27] |
周小川,2015,《深化金融体制改革》,《中国金融》第22期,第58~61页。
|
[28] |
诸竹君、黄先海和余骁,2018,《进口中间品质量、自主创新与企业出口国内增加值率》,《中国工业经济》第8期,第116~134页。
|
[29] |
Brandt L.J. Van Biesebroeck, and Y. Zhang. 2012. “Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction? Firm-Level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing”, Journal of Development Economics, 97(2): 339~351.
|
[30] |
Chor D. and Manova K.. 2012. “Off the Cliff and Back? Credit Conditions and International Trade During the Global Financial Crisis”, Journal of International Economics, 87(1): 117~133.
|
[31] |
Eaton J. and Kortum S.. 2008. “Technology, Geography and Trade”, Econometrica, 70(5): 1741~1779.
|
[32] |
Hadlock C.J., and Pierce J.R.. 2010. “Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index”, Review of Financial Studies, 23(5): 1909~1940.
|
[33] |
Kee H.L. and H. Tang. 2016. “Domestic Value Added in Exports: Theory and Firm Evidence from China”, American Economic Review, 106(6): 1402~1436.
|
[34] |
Koopman R., Z. Wang, and S. J. Wei. 2012. “Estimating Domestic Content in Exports When Processing Trade Is Pervasive”, Journal of Development Economics, 99(1): 178~189.
|
[35] |
Manova K.. 2008. “Credit Constraints, Equity Market Liberalizations and International Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 76(9): 33~47.
|
[36] |
Manova K. and Zhihong Yu. 2016. “How Firms Export: Processing VS Ordinary Trade with Financial Frictions”, Journal of International Economics, 100(5): 120~137.
|
[37] |
Melitz, Marc J.. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity”, Econometrica, 71(6): 1695~1725.
|
[38] |
Upward R., Z. Wang,and J. Zheng. 2013. “Weighing China's Export Basket: The Domestic Content and Technology Intensity of Chinese Exports”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(5): 527~543.
|
[39] |
World Bank Group, IDE-JETRO, OECD, UIBE, and WTO. 2017. “Measuring and Analyzing the Impact of GVCs on Economic Development”, Global Value Chain Development Report: 37~60.
|
[40] |
Yu Miaojie. 2015. “Processing Trade, Tariff Reductions and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Firms”, Economic Journal, 125(6): 943~988.
|
|
|
|