|
|
|
| Can Market-oriented Reforms Promote the Development of Industrial Technology？ Empirical Evidence from China's High-tech Industries |
| DAI Kuizao, LIU Youjin
|
| School of Business,Hunan University of Science and Technology |
|
|
|
Abstract In this paper, we theoretically analyze the mechanism through which China's market-oriented reform has affected the development of industrial technology.The two-step SYS-GMM method is used to test the influence of marketization on the industrial technological progress in China based on the industrial marketization index and 1995-2014 panel data on the high-tech industry. A recursive model is also used to explore the transmission mechanism of how marketization affects the development of industrial technology. On this basis, this paper explores the impact of five features of marketization, and uses the product-term method to examine whether marketization has different effects on industries with different technological characteristics.
This paper makes three important findings. First, marketization is found to greatly promote the development of China's high-tech industry, and the promotion effect is enhanced after China's accession to the WTO. Marketization is also found to promote technical progress through the mechanisms of improving the efficiency of capital allocation, increasing investment in R&D, and promoting the diffusion of technologies. Second, the five features of industrial marketization are found to have different effects on technological development, with institutional improvement having the most significant impact, followed by the development of the non-state-owned economy, the development of product markets and factor market, and finally the relationship between the government and the market. Third, marketization has heterogeneous effects on industries with different technological characteristics, with the greatest effect being on industries with high technological intensity.
This paper makes the following contributions. First, this paper is the first to explore the effects of marketization on the development of China's high-tech industries using the industry market-oriented index. Second, using a recursive model, this paper explores the ways in which marketization affects the development of industrial technology, such as by improving the efficiency of capital allocation, increasing the investment in R&D, and enhancing the diffusion of technology. The findings in this area deepen our understanding of the basic laws of how marketization affects industrial technological progress. Third, the five features of marketization are found to have different effects on technological progress, and marketization is found to have different effects on industries with different technological characteristics. Thus, this paper enriches the research on the relationship between marketization and technological progress.
To a certain extent, this paper clarifies the important role that marketization plays in driving the development of industrial technology. In addition, the results of this paper can serve as a reference for policy makers seeking to promote China's ongoing marketization and the development of the high-tech industries.
The findings of this paper have the following policy implications. First, to promote the development of high-tech industry, it is necessary to coordinate marketization with the policies on industrial-science-and-technology and industrial development. Moreover, as the marketization process advances, greater focus should be placed on industries with a lower degree of marketization. Second, to effectively promote the development of industrial technology, the marketization process needs to be coordinated with policies on improving the capital efficiency, R&D, and technology trading. Third, the government needs to promote the reform of the five features of marketization according to their degree of influence and progress, place greater emphasis on the factor market, and improve the relationship between the government and the market.
|
|
Received: 14 January 2019
Published: 09 March 2020
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
才国伟、钱金保和舒元,2009,《我国资本配置中的趋同与效率:1952—2007》,《统计研究》第6期,第38~44页。
|
| [2] |
蔡卫星,2019,《银行业市场结构对企业生产率的影响——来自工业企业的经验证据》,《金融研究》第4期,第39~55页。
|
| [3] |
蔡海亚和徐盈之,2017,《贸易开放是否影响了中国产业结构升级？ 》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第10期,第3~22页。
|
| [4] |
陈仲常和余翔,2007,《企业研发投入的外部环境影响因素研究:基于产业层面的面板数据分析》,《科研管理》第3期,第78~84页。
|
| [5] |
戴魁早,2018,《技术市场发展对出口技术复杂度的影响及其作用机制》,《中国工业经济》第7期,第117~135页。
|
| [6] |
戴魁早和刘友金,2013,《行业市场化进程与创新绩效:中国高技术产业的经验分析》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第9期,第37~54页。
|
| [7] |
戴魁早和刘友金,2016,《要素市场扭曲如何影响创新绩效》,《世界经济》第11期,第54~79页。
|
| [8] |
樊纲、王小鲁和马光荣,2011,《中国市场化进程对经济增长的贡献》,《经济研究》第9期,第4~16页。
|
| [9] |
方军雄,2007,《所有制、市场化进程与资本配置效率》,《管理世界》第11期,第27~35页。
|
| [10] |
何兴强、欧燕、史卫和刘阳,2014,《FDI技术溢出与中国吸收能力门槛研究》,《世界经济》第10期,第52~76页。
|
| [11] |
黄赜琳和姚婷婷,2020,《市场分割与地区生产率——作用机制与经验证据》,《财经研究》第1期,第96~110页。
|
| [12] |
景光正、李平和许家云,2017,《金融结构、双向 FDI 与技术进步》,《金融研究》第7期,第62~77页。
|
| [13] |
蒋殿春和张宇,2008,《经济转型与外商直接投资技术溢出效应》,《经济研究》第7期,第26~38页。
|
| [14] |
李平和刘雪燕,2015,《市场化制度变迁对我国技术进步的影响:基于自主创新和技术引进的视角》,《经济学动态》第4期,第42~50页。
|
| [15] |
林毅夫和张鹏飞,2005,《后发优势、技术引进和落后国家的经济增长》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第53~74页。
|
| [16] |
刘小鲁,2011,《知识产权保护、自主研发比重与后发国家的技术进步》,《管理世界》第10期,第10~19页。
|
| [17] |
马光荣,2014,《制度、企业生产率与资源配置效率:基于中国市场化转型的研究》,《财贸经济》第8期,第104~114页。
|
| [18] |
毛其淋和许家云,2015,《市场化转型、就业动态与中国地区生产率增长》,《管理世界》第10期,第7~23页。
|
| [19] |
沈春苗和郑江淮,2019,《中国企业“走出去”获得发达国家“核心技术”了吗?——基于技能偏向性技术进步视角的分析》,《金融研究》第1期,第111~127页。
|
| [20] |
孙早、刘李华和孙亚政,2014,《市场化程度、地方保护主义与R&D的溢出效应:来自中国工业的经验证据》,《管理世界》第8期,第78~89页。
|
| [21] |
唐未兵、傅元海和王展祥,2014,《技术创新、技术引进与经济增长方式转变》,《经济研究》第7期,第31~43页。
|
| [22] |
王定星,2016,《企业异质性、市场化与生产率分布》,《统计研究》第8期,第96~105页。
|
| [23] |
王磊和张肇中,2019,《国内市场分割与生产率损失: 基于企业进入退出视角的理论与实证研究》,《经济社会体制比较》第7期,第30~42页。
|
| [24] |
温忠麟、张雷、侯杰泰和刘红云,2004,《中介效应检验程序及其应用》,《心理学报》第5期,第614~620页。
|
| [25] |
吴延兵,2006,《R&D存量、知识函数与生产效率》,《经济学(季刊) 》第4期,第1129~1156页。
|
| [26] |
吴延兵,2008,《自主创新、技术引进与生产率:基于中国地区工业的实证研究》,《经济研究》第8期,第51~64页。
|
| [27] |
解维敏和方红星,2011,《金融发展、融资约束与企业研发投入》,《金融研究》第5期,第171~183页。
|
| [28] |
许培源和章燕宝,2014,《行业技术特征、知识产权保护与技术创新》,《科学学研究》第6期,第950~960页。
|
| [29] |
余明桂、钟慧洁和范蕊,2019,《民营化、融资约束与企业创新:来自中国工业企业的证据》,《金融研究》第4期,第75~91页。
|
| [30] |
张杰、李克和刘志彪,2011,《市场化转型与企业生产效率》,《经济学(季刊) 》第2期,第571~602页。
|
| [31] |
张杰和芦哲,2012,《知识产权保护、研发投入与企业利润》,《中国人民大学学报》第5期,第88~98页。
|
| [32] |
Acemoglu D., Griffith R., Aghion P., and F. Zilibotti, 2007, “Vertical Integration and Technology: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol.8(8):989~1033.
|
| [33] |
Aghion P., and P. Howitt, 1992, “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction”,Econometrica,Vol.60, (2):323~351.
|
| [34] |
Baumol, William J., 2002, The Free Mmarket Innovation Machine-Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, Princeton University Press.
|
| [35] |
Coe, David T., and Helpman, Elhanan, 1995, “International R&D Spillovers”, European Economic Review, Vol.39(5):859~887.
|
| [36] |
Costinot, A., 2009, “On the Origins of Comparative Advantage”, Journal of International Economics, Vol.77(2):255~264.
|
| [37] |
Grossman G. M., and E. Helpman, 1991, “Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth”,The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.58(1):43~61.
|
| [38] |
Jefferson, Gary H., Bai Huamao, Guan Xiaojing, and Yu Xiaoyun, 2006, “R&D Performance in Chinese Industry”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.15(4):2~13.
|
| [39] |
Qian Yingyi, Xu Chenggang,1998, “Innovation and Bureaucracy Under Soft and Hard Budget Constraints”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol.65 (1):151~164.
|
| No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|
