|
|
Financial Market Response to Central Bank Communication: Event Study on Stock Market |
ZOU Wenli, WANG Xi, XIE Xiaoping
|
School of Economics and Statistics,Guangzhou University; Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University |
|
|
Abstract Central bank communication occurs when a monetary authority releases information about future policy to the public to change economic agents' policy expectations. These explanations of future policy can even affect the psychology and behavior of economic agents more than the actual operation of the policy itself (Hansen and McMahon, 2016), and central bank communication has become an important tool for implementing monetary policy (Blinder et al., 2008). The literature on central bank communication research in China mainly uses the China Monetary Policy Report (hereafter referred to as the Report) as research material, neglecting the communication information in the minutes of the quarterly meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee (hereafter referred to as the Minutes), which is more timely and forward-looking. In addition, existing researches mainly use the GARCH model, which is more suitable for the analysis of high-frequency data, but the data from Minutes and Report are quarterly. To resolve these shortcomings, we use both the Minutes and Report to identify written central bank communication, and we use Internet search materials to identify oral central bank communication. The event study method is then used to analyze how central bank communication affects stock prices in a relatively short time window. Our study produced the following conclusions based on theoretical analysis. First, different types of central bank communication have different impacts on stock prices. Written communication has a significant impact on stock prices, but oral communication has no obvious effect. The reason may be that written communication is more formal and authoritative than oral communication, and its frequency of publication is more regular, so it more strongly affects economic agents' expectations and actions. Second, written communication has the following effects. (1) Loose information communication increases stock prices, and tight information communication decreases stock prices. (2) Written communication shows strong short-term effects, clearly demonstrating the sensitivity of the Chinese stock market to information. Third, communication based on the Report has three types of effects on stock prices: immediate effect, predictive effect, and lag effect. However, communication based on the Minutes only shows a predictive effect. The reason for this difference is that information based on the Report is more unambiguous, and agents pay more attention to the Report. Fourth, written communication has asymmetric effects on stock prices against different market backgrounds. (1) The magnitude of the positive role of loose information communication in a bear market is less than that of tight information communication's negative role, while the magnitude of the positive role of loose information communication in a bull market is greater than that of tight information communication's negative role. (2) The magnitude of the negative role of tight information communication on stock prices is greater than that in a bull market; the magnitude of the positive role of loose information communication in a bear market is less than that in a bull market in a short period of time, while the magnitude of the positive role of loose information communication in a bear market is greater than that in a bull market in a longer period of time. The policy implications of this study are as follows. (1) Written communication is an effective method of guiding the behaviors of participants in the stock market. (2) The central bank should be aware of the different functions of the Report and Minutes, to ensure the flexible dissemination of information.
|
Received: 26 October 2018
Published: 09 March 2020
|
|
|
|
[1] |
卞志村和张义,2012,《央行信息披露、实际干预与通胀预期管理》,《经济研究》第2期,第15~28页。
|
[2] |
郭豫媚和周璇,2018,《央行沟通、适应性学习和货币政策有效性》,《经济研究》第4期,第77~91页。
|
[3] |
李云峰,2012,《中央银行沟通、实际干预与通货膨胀稳定》,《国际金融研究》第4期,第15~23页。
|
[4] |
李云峰和李仲飞,2011,《中央银行沟通、宏观经济信息与货币政策有效性》,《财贸经济》第1期,第56~63页。
|
[5] |
李云峰和王彦卿,2016,《中央银行沟通在我国货币政策预期管理中的策略研究》,《宏观经济研究》第10期,第88~100页。
|
[6] |
林建浩和赵文庆,2015,《中国央行沟通指数的测度与谱分析》,《统计研究》第1期,第52~58页。
|
[7] |
刘剑文、郭雪萌和姚远,2016,《中央银行沟通设计与社会福利——基于PVAR模型的实证研究》,《南开经济研究》第3期,第3~20页。
|
[8] |
卢新生和孙欣欣,2017,《中央银行政策沟通的市场效应:基于人民币汇率的实证研究》,《金融研究》第1期,第22~34页。
|
[9] |
冀志斌和周先平,2011,《中央银行沟通可以作为货币政策工具吗——基于中国数据的分析》,《国际金融研究》第2期,第25~34页。
|
[10] |
王博和刘翀,2016,《央行沟通的金融市场效应——来自中国的证据》,《经济学动态》第11期,第22~32页。
|
[11] |
王曦、王茜和陈中飞,2016,《货币政策预期与通货膨胀管理——基于消息冲击的DSGE分析》,《经济研究》第2期,第16~29页。
|
[12] |
吴国培和潘再见,2014,《中央银行沟通对金融资产价格的影响——基于中国的实证研究》,《金融研究》第5期,第34~47页。
|
[13] |
徐亚平,2009,《公众学习、预期引导与货币政策的有效性》,《金融研究》第1期,第50~65页。
|
[14] |
曾刚和万志宏,2014,《中央银行沟通与货币政策:最新实践与启示》,《国际金融研究》第2期,第11~18页。
|
[15] |
张强和胡荣尚,2014,《中央银行沟通对利率期限结构的影响研究》,《国际金融研究》第6期,第10~20页。
|
[16] |
朱宁、许艺煊和邱光辉,2016,《中央银行沟通对人民币汇率波动的影响》,《金融研究》第11期,第32~46页。
|
[17] |
邹文理和王曦,2018,《中央银行沟通行为量化指标构建——兼论中央银行沟通的政策效果》,《当代财经》第10期,第58~67页。
|
[18] |
Ashley J. W. 1962. “Stock Prices and Changes in Earnings and Dividends”, Journal of Political Economy, 70(1): 82~85.
|
[19] |
Ball, R.and P. Brown. 1968. “An Empirical Analysis of Accounting Income Numbers”, Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2): 159~178.
|
[20] |
Beck, M. K., B. Hayo, and M. Neuenkirch. 2013. “Central Bank Communication and Correlation between Financial Markets: Canada and the United States”, International Economics and Economic Policy, 10(2): 277~296.
|
[21] |
Belke, A.and J. Beckmann. 2015. “Monetary Policy and Stock Prices-Cross-country Evidence from Cointegrated VAR Models”, Journal of Banking and Finance, May: 254~265.
|
[22] |
Bjørnland, H. C.and K. Leitemo. 2009. “Identifying the Interdependence between US Monetary Policy and the Stock Market”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(2): 275~282.
|
[23] |
Blinder, A. S., M. Ehrmann, M. Fratzscher, J. De Haan, and D. J. Jansen. 2008. “Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy: A Survey of Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Economic Literature, 46(6): 910~945.
|
[24] |
Born, B., M. Ehrmann, and M. Fratzscher. 2014. “Central Bank Communication on Financial Stability”, The Economic Journal, 124(577): 701~734.
|
[25] |
Campbell, J. Y.and A. C. Mackinlay. 1997. The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton University Press.
|
[26] |
Dolley, J. C. 1933. “Characteristics and Procedure of Common Stock Split-Ups”, Harvard Business Review, 11(3): 316~326.
|
[27] |
Fama, E. F., L. Fisher, C. Jensen, and R. Roll. 1969. “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information”, International Economic Review, 10(1): 1~21.
|
[28] |
Guthrie, G.and J. Wright. 2000. “Open Mouth Operations”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 46(2): 489-516.
|
[29] |
Hansen, S.and M. Mcmahon. 2016. “Shocking Language: Understanding the Macroeconomic Effects of Central Bank Communication”, NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics: 114~133.
|
[30] |
Hayo, B. and M. Neuenkirch. 2015. “Central Bank Communication in the Financial Crisis: Evidence from a Survey of Financial Market Participants”, Journal of International Money and Finance, December: 166~181.
|
[31] |
Hayo, B., A. M. Kutan, and M. Neuenkirch. 2011. “Communication Matters: U.S. Monetary Policy and Commodity Price Volatility”, Economics Letters, 117(1): 247~249.
|
[32] |
Hayo, B., A. M. Kutan, and M. Neuenkirch. 2012. “Federal Reserve Communications and Emerging Equity Markets”, Southern Economic Association, 78(3): 1041~1056.
|
[33] |
Hayo, B., A. M. Kutan, and M. Neuenkirch. 2010. “The Impact of U.S. Central Bank Communication on European and Pacific Equity Markets”, Economics Letters, 108(2): 172~174.
|
[34] |
Kohn, D. L.and B. Sack. 2004. “Central Bank Talk: Does it Matter and Why?” In Macroeconomics, Monetary Policy, and Financial Stability, eds. by Bank of Canada: 175~206.
|
[35] |
Lucca, O. D.and T. Francesco. 2011. “Measuring Central Bank Communication: An Automated Approach with Application to FOMC”, NBER Working Paper No. 15367.
|
[36] |
Myers, J. H.and A. J. Bakay. 1948. “Influence of Stock Split-ups on Market Price”, Harvard Business Review, 26(2): 251~265.
|
[37] |
Reeves, R.and M. Sawicki. 2007. “Do Financial Markets React to Bank of England Communication?” European Journal of Political Economy, 23(1): 207~227.
|
[38] |
Romer, C. D.and D. H. Romer. 1989. “Does Monetary Policy Matter? A New Test in the Spirit of Friedman and Schwartz”, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 4(4): 121~184.
|
[39] |
Rosa, C. 2011. “Words That Shake Traders: The Stock Market's Reaction to Central Bank Communication in Real Time”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(5): 915~934.
|
[40] |
Rosa, C. 2016. “Fedspeak: Who Moves U.S. Asset Prices?” International Journal of Central Banking, December: 223~261.
|
[41] |
Sharpe, W. 1964. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk”, The Journal of Finance, 19(3): 425~442.
|
[42] |
Thorbecke, W. 1997. “On Stock Market Returns and Monetary Policy”, The Journal of Finance, 52(2): 635~654.
|
No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|