|
|
The Value of Governmental Favoritism: Evidence from Export Performance ofChinese Industrial Enterprises |
LU Shengfeng, CHEN Sixia
|
Economic and Management School, Wuhan University; School of Public Finance and Taxation, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law |
|
|
Abstract Within the framework of Chinese decentralization style, the local governments have been given a strong motivation for policy competition in the key tax sources and GDP. And the exogenous administrative restructuring, which is known as “Annexation of suburban counties by cities” Reform, can be used to identify the variation of governmental favoritism, because it decreased the policies for supporting the firms. Applying panels of firms data from the Chinese Industrial Enterprises Database for the period 1999 to 2009 with the natural experiment, this paper outlines the extent to which local governments favoritism influenced firms’ export performance. We find that: compared to other firms located in the control group, the export performance become worse after the governmental favoritism is reduced. The causal mechanism is firms suffer from a worse-off export performance for the reduced governmental favoritism as a result of getting the worse polices, such as less subsidies and more taxation.
|
Received: 24 March 2016
Published: 16 April 2018
|
|
|
|
[1] |
陈平和黄健梅,2003,《中国出口退税效应分析:理论与实证》,《管理世界》第12期,第25~31页。
|
[2] |
纪志宏、周黎安、王鹏和赵鹰妍,2014,《地方官员晋升激励与银行信贷——来自中国城市商业银行的经验证据》,《金融研究》第1期,第1~15页。
|
[3] |
李维安和徐业坤,2013,《政治身份的避税效应》,《金融研究》第3期,114~129页。
|
[4] |
卢洪友、卢盛峰和陈思霞,2011,《关系资本、制度环境与财政转移支付有效性——来自中国地市一级的经验证据》,《管理世界》第7期,第17~27页。
|
[5] |
马光荣和杨恩艳,2010,《打到底线的竞争——财政分权、政府目标与公共品的提供》,《经济评论》第6期,第59~69页。
|
[6] |
苏振东、洪玉娟和刘璐瑶,2012,《政府生产行补贴是否促进了中国企业出口——基于制造业企业面板数据的微观计量分析》,《管理世界》第5期,第24~42页。
|
[7] |
谭之博和周黎安,2015,《官员任期与信贷和投资周期》,《金融研究》第6期,第80~93页。
|
[8] |
王雷、李丛丛、应清等,2012,《中国1990—2010年城市扩张卫星遥感制图》,《科学通报》第16期,第1388~1399页。
|
[9] |
王孝松、李坤望、包群和谢申祥,2010,《出口退税的政策效果评估:来自中国纺织品对美出口的经验证据》,《世界经济》第4期,第47~67页。
|
[10] |
Alvarez, R. and G. Crespi, 2000, “Exporter Performance and Promotion Instruments: Chilean Empirical Evidence”, Estudios de Economia, 27(2):225~241.
|
[11] |
Bernard, A.B. and J. B. Jensen, 2004,“Why Some Firms Export?”,Review of Economics and Statistics,86:561~569.
|
[12] |
Chao, C. C., Chou, W. L. and Yu,E.S.,2001,“Export Duty Rebates and Export Performance: Theory and China’s Experience”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 29:314~326.
|
[13] |
Chao, C., E. Yu, and W. Yu, 2006, “China’s Import Duty Drawback and VAT Rebate Policies: A General Equilibrium Analysis”, China Economic Review, 17(4):432~448.
|
[14] |
Chen, C.H., Mai, C.C. and Yu, H. C., 2006, “The Effect of Export Tax Rebates on Export Performance: Theory and Evidence from China”, China Economic Review, 17:226~235.
|
[15] |
Girma, S., Gong, Yundan, Gorg H. and Zhihong Yu, 2009, “Can Production Subsidies Explain China’s Export Performance? Evidence from Firm-level Data”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111: 863~891.
|
[16] |
Gorg,H, Henry, M., Strobl, E., 2008, “Grant Support and Exporting Activity”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1): 168~174.
|
[17] |
Oi, J. C., 1992, “Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China”, World Politics, 45(1): 99~126.
|
[18] |
Oi, J. C., 1995, “The Role of the Local State in China’s Transitional Economy”, The China Quarterly, 144: 1132~1149.
|
[19] |
Oi, Jean C., 1999, “Rural China Takes OFFs: Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform”, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
|
[20] |
Qian, Y. Y.,and Q. R. Weingast, 1997, “ Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11: 83~92.
|
[21] |
Volpe,M.C, Carballo, J., 2008, “Is Export Promotion Effective in Developing Countries? Firm-level Evidence on the Intensive and Extensive Margins of Exports”, Journal of International Economics, 76(1):89~106.
|
[22] |
Xu, C. G., 2011, “The Fundamental Institutions of China’s Reforms and Development”, Journal of Economic Literature, 49(4): 1076~1151.
|
|
|
|