|
Abstract Chinese economy has become the high-quality development stage from the high growth period, which means the financial policy should de-emphasize the quality targets and measures to fully play the role of the price leverage in financial resources allocation. With the interest rate liberalization reform was preliminary accomplished, due to financial innovation and disintermediation as well as the more sophisticated financial market and products, it is urgent to transform China’s monetary policy from the quantity based mode to the price based mode, which is also the necessary step to achieve the high quality economic development. We first elaborately review the theory of monetary policy and practices in the advanced economies. We find out that the quantity and price are the two sides of one coin and it is equivalent of the quantity based monetary policy and the price based monetary policy in theory. The quantity policy takes effects directly but is prone to contort the price mechanism and individual behaviors. The price policy takes effects with the adjustment of the individuals which needs a good financial market and interest policy transmission. The development of financial market and monetary policy channel play an important role for the monetary policy mode. The retrospect of monetary policy in China shows that the necessary conditions for monetary policy transformation have been satisfied, but we also point out that the practice of monetary policy in modern sense lasts for only around twenty years, after abandoning the direct controls on credit behavior and turning to the quantity indirect policy with the money supply as the intermediate target in 1998. Central bank in China is always confronting the impetus of investment and credit expansion due the traditional growth-led economic mode. Because of the governmental preference to a higher growth rate, there are soft budget constraint sectors such as the local government vehicles, stated owned firms and housing industry enterprises. The supervisory affaires of the central bank in China were separated. While, due to the industry development dominance of the supervisory ideology, there are race to the bottom in the financial supervision, which promote the rapid growth of the shadow banking in recent years and financial risks are accumulated heavily. Although there is enough market breadth of the financial market, there are still too strict regulations and the market depth is relatively low. The monetary markets and bond markets are still separated, the admittance of the market, esp. the derivative markets are sill strictly controlled, the financial products are immature and there are still implicit dual interest track. The exchange rate is still lack of edacity. So, with the problems above, monetary policy in China still needs quantity measures and we should do lots of preparations to fulfill the sufficient conditions for the monetary policy transformation. The crucial point is the development of the financial market system, including mature financial micro foundations, good guards of financial institutions and well functional financial product markets. Financial markets developments also promote the interest policy transmission and will ensure the success of the monetary policy transformation. With the deepening of the supply-side reform and reform in the difficult areas of hedge risks, esp. the improvements of the governmental debts and supervisory systems, we should vigorously promote price-based monetary policy transformation, with which to enhance economic and financial high quality development.
|
Received: 23 January 2018
Published: 01 November 2018
|
|
|
|
[1] |
戴根有,2003,《中国央行公开市场业务操作实践和经验》,《金融研究》第1期,第55~56页。
|
[2] |
管涛,2018,《发展外汇市场是深化汇改的重头戏》,《中国外汇》第1期,第28~29页。
|
[3] |
纪敏、严宝玉和李宏瑾,2017,《杠杆率结构、水平及其与金融风险的关系》,《金融研究》第2期,第1~25页。
|
[4] |
纪敏和牛慕鸿,2014,《确立央行政策利率预期锚》,《中国金融》第9期,第19~22页。
|
[5] |
纪洋、谭语嫣和黄益平,2016:《金融双轨制与利率市场化》,《经济研究》第6期,第45~57页。
|
[6] |
李宏瑾和苏乃芳,2017,《金融创新、金融脱媒与信用货币创造》,《财经问题研究》第10期,第40~50页。
|
[7] |
罗长林和邹恒甫,2014,《预算软约束问题再讨论》,《经济学动态》第5期,第115~124页。
|
[8] |
马骏和王红林,2014,《政策利率传导机制的理论模型》,《金融研究》第12期,第1~22页。
|
[9] |
牛慕鸿、张黎娜和张翔,2017,《利率走廊、利率稳定性和调控成本》,《金融研究》第7期,第16~28页。
|
[10] |
潘功胜,2016,《中国债券市场的改革与发展》,《读懂“十三五”》,中国人民大学出版社。
|
[11] |
徐忠,2015, 《中国债券市场发展中热点问题及其认识》,《金融研究》第2期,第29~35页。
|
[12] |
徐忠,2017,《中国稳健货币政策的实践经验与货币政策理论的国际前沿》, 《金融研究》第1期,第1~21页。
|
[13] |
易纲,2006,《宏观经济政策与市场配置资源》,《财经》第3期,第22~23页。
|
[14] |
易纲,2009a,《中国改革开放三十年的利率市场化进程》,《金融研究》第1期,第1~14页。
|
[15] |
易纲,2009b,《改革开放三十年的中国货币政策》,《中国改革30年》,中国发展出版社。
|
[16] |
易纲,2013,《利率市场化与当前我国利率现状的利弊》,中国金融四十人论坛研究周报第219期。
|
[17] |
易纲,2016,《继续深化汇率改革》,《资本市场》第4期,第8页。
|
[18] |
易纲,2018a,《货币政策回顾与展望》,《中国金融》第2期,第9~11页。
|
[19] |
易纲,2018b,《在博鳌亚洲论坛2018年年会分论坛的问答实录》,www.pbc.gov.cn,4月11日。
|
[20] |
易纲和汤弦,2001,《汇率制度的“角点解假设”的一个理论基础》,《金融研究》第8期,第5~17页。
|
[21] |
张杰,2011,《中国金融制度的结构与变迁》,中国人民大学出版社。
|
[22] |
张平,2015,《通缩机制对中国经济的挑战与稳定化政策》,《经济学动态》第4期,第4~11页。
|
[23] |
张晓慧,2011,《国际收支顺差条件下货币政策工具的选择、使用和创新》,www.pbc.gov.cn,3月24日。
|
[24] |
张晓慧,2015,《货币政策的发展、挑战与前瞻》,《中国金融》第19期,第28~30页。
|
[25] |
张晓慧,2017,《货币政策的回顾与展望》,《中国金融》第3期,第12~15页。
|
[26] |
周黎安,2007,《中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究》,《经济研究》第7期,第36~50页。
|
[27] |
周小川,2004,《当前完善货币政策传导机制需要关注的几个问题》,www.pbc.gov.cn,4月14日。
|
[28] |
周小川,2011,《建立符合国情的金融宏观调控体系》,《中国金融》第13期,第9~13页。
|
[29] |
周小川,2013,《新世纪以来中国货币政策的主要特点》,《中国金融》第2期,第9~14页。
|
[30] |
周小川,2015,《在“博鳌亚洲论坛2015年年会”上的发言》, www.pbc.gov.cn, 4月2日。
|
[31] |
周正庆,1993,《中国货币政策研究》,中国金融出版社6月。
|
[32] |
Bernanke, B. and M. Gertler, 1995, “Inside the Black Box”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4): 27~48.
|
[33] |
Bindseil, U., 2004, Monetary Policy Implementation. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
[34] |
Blanchard, O., G. Dell'Ariccia and P. Mauro, 2010, “Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(S1)” 199~215.
|
[35] |
Borio, C. and A. Zabai, 2016, “Unconventional Monetary Policies”, BIS Working Paper, No.570.
|
[36] |
Ehlers,T., S. Kong and F. Zhu, 2018, “Mapping Shadow Banking in China”, BIS Working Papers, No.701.
|
[37] |
Friedman, B. and K. Kuttner, 2011, “Implementation of Monetary Policy”, in Handbook of Monetary Economics, 3(2):1345~1438, North Holland: Elsevier.
|
[38] |
He, D. and H. Wang, 2012, “Dual-Track Interest Rate and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in China”, China Economic Review, 23(4): 928~947.
|
[39] |
IMF,2017, “2017 Article IV Consultation”, IMF Countries Report, No. 17/326.
|
[40] |
Kamber, G. and M. Mohanty, 2018, “Do Interest Rates Play A Major Role in Monetary Policy Transmission in China?”, BIS Working Paper, No.714.
|
[41] |
Mishkin, F., 2009, The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets, Pearson Education.
|
[42] |
Nelson, E., 2007, “Milton Friedman and U.S. Monetary History: 1961-2006”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 89(May):153~182.
|
No related articles found! |
|
|
|