我国多层次场内股票市场板块互动关系研究——基于种间关系的视角

Journal of Financial Research

2016, Vol. 431

Issue (5): 82-96 DOI:

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

The Interactive Board-Level Relationship of Stock Exchange Market in China:Based on the Perspective of Interspecific Relationship

LI Jianyong, PENG Weihan, LIU Tianhui

Institute of Chinese Financial Studies, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download:

PDF (1914KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract We use extended Lotka-Volterra model to analyze the interactive board-level relationship quantitively based on different periods. We find that firstly, the multilevel structure makes the security market more inclusive for all kinds of enterprises, improves the security market’s stability and strengthens its ability to resist negative impacts. Secondly, we find that the competition between Shanghai and Shenzhen Security Exchange plays a key role in determining the construction of the multilevel capital market system in China. Thirdly, the administrative suspension of IPO brings about negative impacts on the interactive relationship among different boards. After the restart of IPO, main board in Shenzhen Exchange tends to be in a better position and the firms on it tend to be similar to those on Growth Enterprises Market (GEM) board, which causes internal competition. Finally, we give some suggestions on how to build a harmonious multilevel capital market.

Key words： Multilevel Capital Market Interactive Board-level Relationship Lotka-Volterra Model

Received: 14 October 2015 Published: 12 April 2018

JEL分类号:	C32
	G14
	N20

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Jianyong
	PENG Weihan
	LIU Tianhui

Cite this article:

LI Jianyong,PENG Weihan,LIU Tianhui. The Interactive Board-Level Relationship of Stock Exchange Market in China:Based on the Perspective of Interspecific Relationship[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2016, 431(5): 82-96.

URL:

http://www.jryj.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.jryj.org.cn/EN/Y2016/V431/I5/82

[1]	陈守东、陈雷和刘艳武,2003,《中国沪深股市收益率及波动性相关分析》,《金融研究》第7期,第80~85页。
[2]	郭乃幸、杨朝军、吴海燕和刘景方,2013,《中国股市主板与创业板市场溢出效应研究》,《上海管理科学》第1期,第76~80页。
[3]	胡海峰和罗惠良,2010,《多层次资本市场建设的国际经验及启示》,《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》第1期,第72~77页。
[4]	胡海峰和罗惠良,2011,《我国多层次资本市场的生成机理与演化路径》,《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》第5期,第17~23页。
[5]	姜凤利和王雪标,2013,《基于VAR模型中小板和创业板关系的实证研究》,《哈尔滨商业大学学报:社会科学版》第6期,第59~64页。
[6]	李腊生、关敏芳和沈萍,2010,《中国多层资本市场体系风险配置效率研究》,《广东金融学院学报》第5期,第26~39页。
[7]	廖士光、朱伟骅和徐辉,2014,《创业板市场与主板市场关系研究——来自沪深证券市场的经验证据》,《财经研究》第6期,第27~37页。
[8]	刘道远,2010,《多层次资本市场改革语境下证券交易制度研究》,《法学论坛》第1期,第69~75页。
[9]	陆文山,2010,《推进我国债券市场发展的若干问题再认识——兼论资本市场功能的完善》,《证券市场导报》第4期,第4~8页。
[10]	慕刘伟,2002,《现代中国证券市场不规范的制度分析》,《金融研究》第9期,第94~99页。
[11]	王旻、杨朝军和廖士光,2009,《创业板市场对主板市场的冲击效应研究——香港股市与深圳中小企业板的经验证据与启示》,《财经研究》第5期,第63~73页。
[12]	闻岳春和徐晓雯, 2010, 《创业板现状分析及在我国多层次资本市场中的定位研究》, 《上海金融》第10期, 第55~60页。
[13]	徐诺金,2005,《论我国的金融生态问题》,《金融研究》第2期,第35~45页。
[14]	周小川,2004,《完善法律制度改进金融生态》,《金融时报》第7期。
[15]	曾英姿,2010,《我国多层次资本市场特点与“转板机制”设计》,《广东社会科学》第4期,第45~48页。
[16]	朱玲玲和胡日东,2007,《我国中小企业板块和主板关系的实证分析》,《华侨大学学报:哲学社会科学版》第2期,第32~37页。
[17]	Lotka , A.J.. 1925. “Elements of Physical Biology.” Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
[18]	Sprott , J.C. 2004. “Competition with Evolution in Ecology and Finance.” Physics Letters A, 325(5-6):329~333.
[19]	Leslie, P.H..1958. “A Stochastic Model for Studying the Properties of Certain Biological Systems by Number Methods.” Biometrika, 45(1/2):16~31.
[20]	Modis, T.. 1999. “Technological Forecasting at the Stock Market.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 62(3):173~202.
[21]	Volterra, V.. 1926. “Variazioni e Fluttuazioni del Numero D'individui in Specie Animali Conviventi.” Mem. R. Accad. Naz. dei Lincei, 6(2):31~113.
[22]	Cheung, William. and Kejing Liu. 2013. “ A Comparison of China's Main Board and Growth Enterprise Market Board — Market Microstructure Approach.” Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets & Policies, 17(2):1~29.