|
|
|
| Creditor Right Protection and Convertible Bonds Strategic Issuance: Evidence from the Establishment of China's Specialized Bankruptcy Courts |
| XIE Weimin, GUO Jialu, ZHANG Hengxin
|
School of Accounting, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics;
School of Public Finance & Taxation/School of Accountancy, Shandong University of Finance and Economics |
|
|
|
Abstract In recent years, convertible bonds have become a significant refinancing channel for Chinese listed firms, with their market prominence increasingly highlighted. Compared to traditional bonds and equities, convertible bonds offer greater flexibility in contractual terms, and their complex clauses shape the dynamic balance between their debt and equity features. Specifically, the debt-like nature of convertible bonds is manifested in the bondholders' claim to the face value and fixed interest payments before conversion, while their equity-like nature is reflected in holders' rights to share in the residual value after conversion. However, firms may issue convertible bonds not merely for financing purposes but also to exploit speculative opportunities that promise short-term gains. As an emerging market, China exhibits relatively weaker protection for creditors. The development of bankruptcy legal frameworks, a direct reflection of creditor protection, focuses on building a robust legal system and an efficient judiciary to effectively safeguard creditors' legitimate rights and interests during firm liquidation. Nevertheless, the impact of bankruptcy legal framework development on convertible bond issuance and its underlying motivations remains unexplored. Therefore, in the context of China's increasingly refined bankruptcy legal system, this study aims to investigate the impact of enhanced creditor protection mechanisms on firm convertible bond issuance behavior and its underlying mechanisms.
Based on a quasi-natural experiment of the bankruptcy court establishment in Chinese prefecture-level cities, this study empirically examines the impact of creditor protection on convertible bond issuance from the perspective of bankruptcy legal system development. The findings reveal that after the establishment of bankruptcy courts, local firms are more likely to use convertible bonds for financing, and the equity-like nature of these bonds significantly increases. Furthermore, the mechanism tests show that the “backdoor equity” and “risk shifting” motivations are the primary channels through which bankruptcy courts affect the attributes of convertible bonds. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the establishment of bankruptcy courts has a more pronounced impact on promoting the issuance of equity-like convertible bonds in firms with weak internal governance, inadequate external monitoring, lower creditor protection levels, and in regions with relatively weaker financial regulation. Finally, further tests demonstrate that after the establishment of bankruptcy courts, issuing equity-like convertible bonds reduces investment efficiency, encourages firms to increase investments in speculative financial assets, and decreases funding for R&D projects, providing evidence for the strategic motivations behind convertible bond issuance.
The marginal contributions of this study are threefold. First, in the context of the Chinese market, this study enriches the literature on the economic consequences of creditor protection. By analyzing the impact of bankruptcy courts on the strategic issuance of convertible bonds, it reveals how firms may circumvent legal constraints through the design of financial instruments following the strengthening of creditor protection. This finding not only supplements the discussion on the potential negative effects of creditor protection but also provides practical insights into the dynamic interplay between policy and firm strategies in emerging markets. Second, this study extends the literature on the microeconomic effects of bankruptcy court establishment. By leveraging the exogenous shock of bankruptcy court establishment, it reveals how the development of bankruptcy legal frameworks influences firm strategic choices in convertible bond issuance through the enhancement of creditor protection mechanisms. The findings provide a novel theoretical perspective on the role of bankruptcy courts in financial markets and offer valuable insights for improving bankruptcy legal systems. Third, this study deepens the understanding of the relationship between the legal environment and the contractual design of convertible bonds. It provides a theoretical foundation and policy recommendations for policymakers to refine the design of bankruptcy judicial systems, optimize financial instrument innovation, and promote high-quality development of the financial sector.
|
|
Received: 10 February 2025
Published: 01 February 2026
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
陈文哲、石宁和梁琪,2021,《可转债能促进企业创新吗？——基于资本市场再融资方式的对比分析》,《管理科学学报》第7期,第94～109页。
|
| [2] |
姜军、申丹琳、江轩宇和伊志宏,2017,《债权人保护与企业创新》,《金融研究》第11期,第128～142页。
|
| [3] |
解维敏和方红星,2011,《金融发展、融资约束与企业研发投入》,《金融研究》第5期,第171～183页。
|
| [4] |
解维敏、郭佳璐和张恒鑫,2023,《可转债与企业全要素生产率》,《系统工程理论与实践》第10期,第2787～2806页。
|
| [5] |
李晓溪和饶品贵,2022,《破产制度、去杠杆与资本结构动态调整——基于破产法庭设立的研究证据》,《经济科学》第3期,第95～111页。
|
| [6] |
刘劲松、谢德仁和张新一,2025,《中国可转债高转股之谜——来自促转动机的解释》,《管理世界》第8期,第165～204页。
|
| [7] |
潘越、纪翔阁、宁博和陈怡萍,2023,《破产审判改革、财政减负与企业降税》,《世界经济》第1期,第192～215页。
|
| [8] |
彭俞超、韩珣和李建军,2018,《经济政策不确定性与企业金融化》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第137～155页。
|
| [9] |
唐松、伍旭川和祝佳,2020,《数字金融与企业技术创新——结构特征、机制识别与金融监管下的效应差异》,《管理世界》第5期,第52～66页。
|
| [10] |
王永钦和薛笑阳,2022,《法治建设与金融高质量发展——来自中国债券市场的证据》,《经济研究》第10期,第173～190页。
|
| [11] |
肖万、张宇彤和许林,2020,《期权属性、公司治理与可转债发行》,《南开管理评论》第2期,第142～154页。
|
| [12] |
许年行、王崇骏和章纪超,2023,《破产审判改革、债权人司法保护与企业创新——基于清算与破产审判庭设立的准自然实验》,《金融研究》第6期,第150～168页。
|
| [13] |
周磊、胡可煜和张正平,2024,《破产审判改革、债权人保护与稳就业》,《财经研究》第12期,第62～75页。
|
| [14] |
Acharya, V. V. and K. V. Subramanian, 2009, “Bankruptcy Codes and Innovation”, The Review of Financial Studies, 22(12), pp.4949～4988.
|
| [15] |
Bajo, E. and M. Barbi, 2012, “The Role of Time Value in Convertible Bond Call Policy”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(2), pp.550～563.
|
| [16] |
Bharath, S. T. and T. Shumway, 2008, “Forecasting Default with the Merton Distance to Default Model”, The Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), pp.1339～1369.
|
| [17] |
Biddle, G. C., G. Hilary and R. S. Verdi, 2009, “How Does Financial Reporting Quality Relate to Investment Efficiency？”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), pp.112～131.
|
| [18] |
Chen, W. E. I., P. Hribar and S. Melessa, 2018, “Incorrect Inferences when Using Residuals as Dependent Variables”, Journal of Accounting Research, 56(3), pp.751～796.
|
| [19] |
De Vito, A. and M. Jacob, 2023, “The Role of Creditor Protection in Lending and Tax Avoidance”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 58(5), pp.2096～2130.
|
| [20] |
Djankov, S., O. Hart, C. McLiesh and A. Shleifer, 2008, “Debt Enforcement Around the World”, Journal of Political Economy, 116(6), pp.1105～1149.
|
| [21] |
Dutordoir, M. and L. Van de Gucht., 2009, “Why Do Western European Firms Issue Convertibles Instead of Straight Debt or Equity？”, European Financial Management, 15(3), pp.563～583.
|
| [22] |
Fan, J. P. H., J. Huang and N. Zhu, 2013, “Institutions, Ownership Structures, and Distress Resolution in China”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 23, pp.71～87.
|
| [23] |
Gennaioli, N. and S. Rossi, 2010, “Judicial Discretion in Corporate Bankruptcy”, The Review of Financial Studies, 23(11), pp.4078～4114.
|
| [24] |
Ingersoll Jr, J. E., 1977, “A Contingent-claims Valuation of Convertible Securities”, Journal of Financial Economics, 4(3), pp.289～321.
|
| [25] |
Iverson, B., J. Madsen, W. Wang and Q. Xu, 2023, “Financial Costs of Judicial in Experience: Evidence from Corporate Bankruptcies”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 58(3), pp.1111～1143.
|
| [26] |
Krishnaswami, S. and D. Yaman, 2008, “The Role of Convertible Bonds in Alleviating Contracting Costs”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48(4), pp.792～816.
|
| [27] |
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, 1998, “Law and Finance”, Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), pp.1113～1155.
|
| [28] |
Lee, C. F., K. W. Lee and G. H. H. Yeo, 2009, “Investor Protection and Convertible Debt Design”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(6), pp.985～995.
|
| [29] |
Li, B. and J. Ponticelli, 2022, “Going Bankrupt in China”, Review of Finance, 26(3), pp.449～486.
|
| [30] |
Mayers, D., 1998, “Why Firms Issue Convertible Bonds: The Matching of Financial and Real Investment Options”, Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), pp.83～102.
|
| [31] |
Müller, K., 2022, “Busy Bankruptcy Courts and the Cost of Credit”, Journal of Financial Economics, 143(2), pp.824～845.
|
| [32] |
Myers, S. C., 1977, “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing”, Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), pp.147～175.
|
| [33] |
Ponticelli, J. and L. S. Alencar, 2016, “Court Enforcement, Bank Loans, and Firm Investment: Evidence from a Bankruptcy Reform in Brazil”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), pp.1365～1413.
|
| [34] |
Stein, J. C., 1992, “Convertible Bonds as Backdoor Equity Financing”, Journal of Financial Economics, 32(1), pp.3～21.
|
| [35] |
Tarantino, E., 2013, “Bankruptcy Law and Corporate Investment Decisions”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), pp.2490～2500.
|
| [36] |
Zhou, Z., X. Zhou, X. Zhang and W. Chen, 2025, “Judicial Waves, Ethical Shifts: Bankruptcy Courts and Corporate ESG Performance”, Journal of Business Ethics, 198(3), pp.537～557.
|
|
|
|
