|
|
|
| Insurance Empowerment, Incentive Mechanisms, and Enterprise Digital Technology Innovation: Evidence from Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance |
| FAN Hongli, ZHUO Zhi, MA Ruixin
|
School of Insurance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics;
Institute of Chinese Financial Studies/Center of Chinese Insurance Studies, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics |
|
|
|
Abstract Report on the Work of the Government in 2025 places significant emphasis on technological and digital advancement. This prioritization occurs within a historical context defined by a deepening technological and industrial transformation. The digital technology innovation serves as a core role for change and updates at an unprecedented pace. Enterprises, in this framework, are the principal architects of digital technological progress. Consequently, a critical academic challenge is to investigate the constitutive factors within the “black box” of enterprise digital technology innovation and to systematically unravel its intrinsic driving mechanisms. Digital technology innovation, marked by high barriers, significant value density, and low substitutability, demands greater investments and bears higher risks and longer cycles than its traditional counterparts. These demands impose considerable decision-making risks on managers, potentially suppressing their innovation motivation and hindering related activities. Thus, cultivating managerial perseverance in innovation and bolstering their risk tolerance and resilience are important for enhancing corporate digital technology innovation capabilities.
Finance plays a key role within the technological innovation However, little attention has been paid to whether finance can mitigate ex-ante managerial decision risks and alleviate managerial constraints in the digital innovation process. Directors' and Officers' (D&O) insurance serves as a risk-diversification tool, and encourages managers to pursue innovation through risk absorption and oversight. Given the high-risk nature of digital technology innovation, it remains unclear whether D&O insurance can effectively promote innovation of firms and support breakthrough advancements. Moreover, how insurance should empower enterprises in digital innovation remains an open question. To date, few studies have directly connected insurance with enterprise digital innovation, leaving theoretical propositions untested. Thus, this study examines the effect of insurance on digital technology innovation, and explores related channels.
Using data from Chinese listed firms (2010-2023), this study employs textual analysis of public documents to identify digital technology innovation and precisely constructs a corresponding measurement metric. The results show that D&O insurance significantly promotes enterprise digital technology innovation. This finding remains robust after addressing endogeneity concerns, replacing indicator variables, and narrowing the research window. Mechanism analysis reveals that D&O insurance promotes enterprise digital technology innovation by mitigating managerial risk exposure, improving corporate governance, elevating investment and financing efficiency, and optimizing the human capital structure. FinTech services significantly strengthen the positive effect, while well-established intellectual property protection systems and digital infrastructure further create multiple overlapping reinforcement effects.
Further extended analyses and heterogeneity tests deepen the understanding of how the insurance industry facilitates digital technology innovation. The promoting effect of D&O insurance on digital technology innovation is stronger among enterprises with longer duration and higher coverage of insurance. This pattern demonstrates significant time-accumulation and intensity-deepening effects. Moreover, the positive effect is further characterized by a “crossover effect”. Specifically, the D&O insurance encourages enterprises to pursue cross-border R&D patenting and guides non-digital firms toward digital transformation. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the positive effect of D&O insurance is more pronounced for high-tech, highly-competitive enterprises, as well as large-scale, state-owned, or technology-intensive enterprises. The positive effect is more significant for listed enterprises in northern regions, helping to narrow the overall “high in the south, low in the north” gap in the scale of digital technology innovation. These findings highlight the importance of targeted, precise, and graduated approaches in strengthening the financial role in promoting enterprise digital technology innovation.
This study offers three key contributions: First, this study provides robust empirical evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. It confirms that D&O insurance promotes digital technology innovation and exhibits time-accumulation and coverage-deepening effects. This finding thereby delineates the specific role of insurance within a national innovation strategy. Second, the study builds a precise measurement of digital technology innovation and then designs a two-tiered indicator system that captures both lower-layer driving innovation and application scenario innovation. It also distinguishes two dimensions of enterprise digital technology innovation, deepening and cross-boundary innovation. Third, this study constructs an integrated framework linking innovation decisions, managerial incentives, and risk management. The results provide a new theoretical foundation for managerial decision-making in high-risk digital innovation.
|
|
Received: 09 May 2025
Published: 05 December 2025
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
陈德球和胡晴,2022,《数字经济时代下的公司治理研究:范式创新与实践前沿》,《管理世界》第6期,第213～240页。
|
| [2] |
冯晨、梁书宁、迟淑娴和钟世虎,2024,《企业生产网络内的差异化税率与投资效率损失》,《经济学(季刊)》第6期,第1993～2008页。
|
| [3] |
冯启良、安琪和方炜,2024,《数字技术赋能中国高技术制造企业关键核心技术创新的影响研究》,《管理学报》第11期,第1～10页。
|
| [4] |
郭丰、任毅、段云桂和尹俊杨,2025,《知识产权保护对企业数字技术创新的影响效应研究——来自中国上市公司的证据》,《管理评论》第1期,第1～16页。
|
| [5] |
黄勃、李海彤、刘俊岐和雷敬华,2023,《数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展——来自企业数字专利的证据》,《经济研究》第3期,第97～115页。
|
| [6] |
胡国柳、赵阳和胡珺,2019,《D&O保险、风险容忍与企业自主创新》,《管理世界》第8期,第121～135页。
|
| [7] |
胡增玺和马述忠,2023,《市场一体化对企业数字创新的影响——兼论数字创新衡量方法》,《经济研究》第6期,第155～172页。
|
| [8] |
冀云阳、周鑫和张谦,2023,《数字化转型与企业创新——基于研发投入和研发效率视角的分析》,《金融研究》第4期,第111～129页。
|
| [9] |
李从刚和许荣,2020,《保险治理与公司违规——董事高管责任保险的治理效应研究》,《金融研究》第6期,第188～206页。
|
| [10] |
李兰、董小英、彭泗清、戴亦舒、叶丽莎和王云峰,2022,《企业家在数字化转型中的战略选择与实践推进——2022·中国企业家成长与发展专题调查报告》,《南开管理评论》第5期,第191～204页。
|
| [11] |
李双圆和徐晓莉,2025,《金融科技与企业突破式绿色创新效率——兼论金融科技与科技金融的协同效应》,《金融监管研究》第7期,第97~114页。
|
| [12] |
凌士显和白锐锋,2017,《董事高管责任保险的公司治理作用——基于双重代理成本的视角》,《财贸经济》第12期,第95～110页。
|
| [13] |
刘冬姣和马堂玉,2024,《保险资金持股对企业绿色创新的影响研究——基于险资ESG投资路径分析》,《财经论丛》第12期,第64～75页。
|
| [14] |
刘志伟和张秋生,2024,《数据要素赋能企业投资效率研究——基于公共数据开放的准自然实验》,《经济学家》第9期,第42～52页。
|
| [15] |
宋德勇、朱文博和丁海,2022,《企业数字化能否促进绿色技术创新——基于重污染行业上市公司的考察》,《财经研究》第4期,第34～48页。
|
| [16] |
宋敏、周鹏和司海涛,2021,《金融科技与企业全要素生产率:赋能与信贷配给的双重视角》,《中国工业经济》第4期,第138～155页。
|
| [17] |
陶锋、朱盼、邱楚芝、王欣然,2023,《数字技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第5期,第68～91页。
|
| [18] |
王杰和王军,2025,《分支机构空间分布、银行竞争与企业数字技术创新》,《系统管理学报》第2期,第509～524页。
|
| [19] |
王霞、连立帅和周萍,2021,《高管后代性别与民营企业资本配置效率》,《世界经济》第6期,第178～203页。
|
| [20] |
王正文、韩子涵、李委铮和耿智祥,2025,《董事高管责任保险与大股东掏空》,《金融研究》第6期,第189～206页。
|
| [21] |
吴非、胡慧芷、林慧妍和任晓怡,2021,《企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据》,《管理世界》第7期,第130～144页。
|
| [22] |
徐照宜、巩冰、陈彦名和成程,2023,《金融科技、数字化转型与企业突破性创新:基于全球专利引用复杂网络视角的分析》,《金融研究》第10期,第47～56页。
|
| [23] |
余明桂、安剑锋和张萌萌,2024,《董监高法律责任、投资者保护与债券市场高质量发展——来自新〈证券法〉实施的证据》,《金融研究》第12期,第152～169页。
|
| [24] |
张古鹏、梁艳、黄杜鹃和高波,2025,《政府混合激励政策如何影响多元数字技术创新》,《科学学研究》,第1～23页。
|
| [25] |
周冬华、罗晟哲和赵玉洁,2022,《董责险与企业创新》,《科研管理》第4期,第201～208页。
|
| [26] |
Firk, S., Y. Gehrke, A. Hanelt and M. Wolff, 2021, “Top Management Team Characteristics and Digital Innovation: Exploring Digital Knowledge and TMT Interfaces”, Long Range Planning, 55(3), 102166.
|
| [27] |
Khan, S., S. J. Park, S. Veliotis and J. K. Wald, 2022, “Director and Officer Liability and Corporate Tax Avoidance”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 50(7-8), pp.1338～1371.
|
| [28] |
Martini, M., D. Setiawan, R.T. Suryandari, R.K. Brahmana and A. Asrihapsari, 2023, “Determinants of Digital Innovation in Micro and Small Industries”, Economies, 11(6), p.172.
|
| [29] |
Tumbas, S., N. Berente and J. Brocke, 2018, “Digital Innovation and Institutional Entrepreneurship: Chief Digital Officer Perspectives of Their Emerging Role”, Journal of Information Technology, 33(3), pp.188～202.
|
|
|
|
