|
|
|
| Low-carbon Transition Risk and Central Bank Policy Regulation |
| ZHUANG Ziguan, ZENG Shiyan, LIN Boyuan
|
School of Finance, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;
School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics;
School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University |
|
|
|
Abstract Despite many countries have slowed down climate actions in response to the global economic downturn, the long-term trend of low-carbon transition will not change and is becoming increasingly urgent. Addressing financial risks stemming from the increasingly pressing transition process is a crucial issue for China's dual carbon targets.
In this paper, we introduce multiple production sectors, environmental externalities, and financial frictions into an Environmental Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium model (E-DSGE). Based on this analytical framework, we first conduct scenario simulations of China's actual low-carbon transition process to explore the underlying transition risk. We further evaluate the effectiveness of the central bank's macroprudential policy and asset purchase policy in preventing and mitigating transition risk.
This paper finds that: First, the temporary slowdown of climate policy not only prevents the economic downturn from evolving into a severe recession, but also reduces the potential aggregate losses during the Carbon Peak Stage (2021-2030). Second, a significant increase of climate policy intensity will cause a sharp depreciation of fossil financial assets, impair banks' balance sheet and threaten macroeconomic and financial stability, which is likely to trigger transition risk. The insufficient motivation of fossil energy firms in reducing carbon emission intensity will drive up carbon price and magnify transition risk. Third, ex-ante macroprudential policy can prevent transition risk by reducing banks' exposure to fossil assets. Ex-post asset purchase policy can mitigate transition risk by injecting liquidity into the financial market. The combination of ex-ante and ex-post policies can significantly stabilize the fluctuations of output and banks' net asset and improve social welfare, effectively mitigating transition risk.
We propose the following policy suggestions: First, establish a transition risk assessment and monitoring system. On the one hand, encourage firms to strengthen the disclosure of carbon emission information, assess transition risk in time and take effective management measures. On the other hand, require financial institutions to actively conduct climate stress tests and enhance their ability to identify and control transition risk. Second, urge carbon-emitting firms to adopt efficient and clean production technologies and reduce the carbon emission intensity, promoting the orderly low-carbon transition. Third, construct a policy toolbox to deal with transition risk. Incorporate transition risk factors into the macroprudential regulatory framework.Levy taxes on banks‘holding of brown assets, provide subsidies for their holding of green assets, and gradually mitigate banks’ exposure to brown assets. Establish an early warning mechanism for the depreciation of carbon-related assets. Once the sharp depreciation of carbon-related assets threatens macroeconomic and financial stability, the central bank should intervene in time and provide targeted liquidity support through asset purchase. In addition, strengthen policy coordination. Macroprudential policy and asset purchase policy should work together to maintain the stability of the financial system and support the smooth transition.
This paper may have the following academic contributions: First, we construct an environmental dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model that includes multiple production sectors, environmental externalities, and financial frictions, providing a theoretical framework to evaluate central banks' policy actions related to low-carbon transition. Second, in the theoretical model and scenario simulation, we depict the realistic process of China's low-carbon transition, which slows down in the early stage and becomes urgent in the later stage. By comparing the realistic scenario with the ideal scenario where policy implementation is not disturbed by the economic cycle, as well as the non-ideal scenario where fossil energy firms do not actively reduce carbon emission intensity, we highlight the importance and necessity of managing transition risk. Third, from the perspectives of ex-ante risk prevention and ex-post risk mitigation, we analyze the effects of macroprudential policy and asset purchase policy targeting differentiated financial assets. We further discuss the performance of the combination of these two policies. This research provides insights into the policy design of a stable low-carbon economic transition.
|
|
Received: 21 October 2024
Published: 02 July 2025
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
陈国进、陈凌凌、金昊和赵向琴,2023a,《气候转型风险与宏观经济政策调控》,《经济研究》第5期,第60～78页。
|
| [2] |
陈国进、丁赛杰和赵向琴,2023b,《气候政策、银行风险与宏观审慎监管创新》,《金融研究》第9期,第38～57页。
|
| [3] |
段宏波和汪寿阳,2019,《中国的挑战:全球温控目标从2℃到1.5℃的战略调整》,《管理世界》第10期,第50～63页。
|
| [4] |
何莎,2023,《中央银行碳减排支持工具、政策模拟与评估——基于环境动态随机一般均衡模型分析》,《国际金融研究》第11期,第16～27页。
|
| [5] |
马勇和陈雨露,2013,《宏观审慎政策的协调与搭配:基于中国的模拟分析》,《金融研究》第8期,第57～69页。
|
| [6] |
王博和徐飘洋,2021,《碳定价、双重金融摩擦与“双支柱”调控》,《金融研究》第12期,第57～74页。
|
| [7] |
王遥、潘冬阳、彭俞超和梁希,2019,《基于DSGE模型的绿色信贷激励政策研究》,《金融研究》第11期,第1～18页。
|
| [8] |
解振华、何建坤、李政和张希良,2020,《中国长期低碳发展战略与转型路径研究》,《中国人口·资源与环境》第11期,第1～25页。
|
| [9] |
徐飘洋和王博,2024,《“双支柱”政策的结构性功能——基于产业绿色转型视角》,《金融研究》第2期,第19～37页。
|
| [10] |
张希良、黄晓丹、张达,耿涌、田立新、范英和陈文颖,2022,《碳中和目标下的能源经济转型路径与政策研究》,《管理世界》第1期,第35～66页。
|
| [11] |
张云、李俊青和张四灿,2020,《双重金融摩擦、企业目标转换与中国经济波动》,《经济研究》第1期,第17～32页。
|
| [12] |
中国人民银行研究局课题组,2020,《气候相关金融风险——基于央行职能的分析》,中国人民银行工作论文,No. 2020 /3。
|
| [13] |
庄子罐、邹金部和刘鼎铭,2022,《金融冲击、去杠杆与中国宏观经济波动》,《财贸经济》第1期,第91～106页。
|
| [14] |
Battiston, S., A. Mandel, I. Monasterolo, F. Schütze and G. Visentin, 2017, “A Climate Stress-Test of the Financial System”, Nature Climate Change, 7(4), pp.283～288.
|
| [15] |
Bolton, P. and M. Kacperczyk, 2021, “Do Investors Care about Carbon Risk？”, Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), pp.517～549.
|
| [16] |
Carattini, S., G. Heutel and G. Melkadze, 2023, “Climate Policy, Financial Frictions, and Transition Risk”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 51(12), pp.778～794.
|
| [17] |
Diluiso, F., B. Annicchiarico, M. Kalkuhl and J. C. Minx, 2021, “Climate Actions and Macro-Financial Stability: The Role of Central Banks”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 110, 102548.
|
| [18] |
Ehlers, T., F. Packer and K. De Greiff, 2022, “The Pricing of Carbon Risk in Syndicated Loans: Which Risks are Priced and Why？”, Journal of Banking ＆ Finance, 136, 106180.
|
| [19] |
Engle, R. F., S. Giglio, B. Kelly, H. Lee and J. Stroebel, 2020, “Hedging Climate Change News”, The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), pp.1184～1216.
|
| [20] |
Ferrari, A. and V. N. Landi, 2024, “Whatever It Takes to Save the Planet？ Central Banks and Unconventional Green Policy”, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 28(2), pp.299～324.
|
| [21] |
Gertler, M. and P. Karadi, 2011, “A Model of Unconventional Monetary Policy”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(1), pp.17~34.
|
| [22] |
Gibson, J. and G. Heutel, 2023, “Pollution and Labor Market Search Externalities over the Business Cycle”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 151, 104665.
|
| [23] |
Heutel, G., 2012, “How should Environmental Policy Respond to Business Cycles？ Optimal Policy under Persistent Productivity Shocks”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 15(2), pp.244～264.
|
| [24] |
Huang, B., M. T. Punzi and Y. Wu, 2021, “Do Banks Price Environmental Transition Risks？ Evidence from A Quasi-Natural Experiment in China”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 101983.
|
| [25] |
Ivanov, I. T., M. S. Kruttli and S. W. Watugala, 2024, “Banking on Carbon: Corporate Lending and Cap-and-Trade Policy”, The Review of Financial Studies, 37(5), pp.1640～1684.
|
| [26] |
Jung, J., K. Herbohn and P. Clarkson, 2018, “Carbon Risk, Carbon Risk Awareness and the Cost of Debt Financing”, Journal of Business Ethics, 150, pp.1151～1171.
|
| [27] |
Meinerding, C., Y. S. Schüler and P. Zhang, 2024, “Shocks to Transition Risk”, Available at SSRN 3654155.
|
| [28] |
Rotemberg, J., 1982, “Sticky Prices in the United States”, Journal of Political Economy, 90(6), pp.1187～1211.
|
| [29] |
Seltzer, L. H., L. Starks and Q. Zhu, 2022, “Climate Regulatory Risk and Corporate Bonds”, NBER Working Paper No. w29994.
|
|
|
|
