中国出口产品质量、汇率传递与出口定价能力 ——基于出口目的国收入分布视角

Journal of Financial Research

2023, Vol. 516

Issue (6): 75-93 DOI:

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

Quality of Chinese Exported Products, Exchange Rate Pass-Through, and Export Pricing Capability: From the Perspective of Income Distribution in Export Destination Countries

ZENG Lifei, JIANG Kai, CAO Wei

School of Finance, Zhejiang Gongshang University;
Huzhou Branch of Hangzhou Bank

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (4)

Download:

PDF (543KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The export pricing capability of a company is a key indicator of its product competitiveness. In 2019, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council detailed four measures in their “Guiding Opinions on Promoting High-Quality Trade Development”: strengthening the industrial foundation for trade, enhancing trade innovation capabilities, improving product quality, and accelerating brand cultivation. These measures were aimed at shifting Chinese export companies from relying solely on cost advantages to competing on quality and structural advantages. In this context, studying the impact of export product quality on exchange rate pass-through can provide valuable policy guidance for Chinese export companies, so they can better manage exchange rate risks, enhance their product pricing capabilities, and promote the high-quality development of foreign trade.
In this paper we address several questions. First, will Chinese export companies adopt a “quality according to market” strategy, whereby they adjust product quality based on the income distribution of the destination country？ Second, how does this approach to quality affect enterprise pricing and, in turn, exchange rate pass-through effects？ Third, what role does the income distribution of export destination countries play in the impact of product quality on exchange rate pass-through effects？ Finally, are there differences in the pricing capabilities of Chinese export companies across different countries？ These questions are important for understanding the evolving landscape of China's foreign trade and for providing policy guidance to export companies as they navigate market fluctuations and changing consumer preferences. The research findings provide several key insights. First, Chinese export companies do tend to adopt a “quality according to market” strategy, by supplying higher-quality products to countries and regions with higher per capita income and lower Gini coefficients. Second, this strategy affects the “price according to market” strategy, and the income distribution in destination countries influences the exchange rate pass-through effect through product quality. Notably, Chinese export companies exhibit greater pricing ability in countries with low per capita income and high Gini coefficients. Finally, the study highlights the importance of improving product quality and diversifying export destinations to promote high-quality development in China's foreign trade.
This paper makes several potential contributions. First, we incorporate income distribution structures into heterogeneous consumer preferences using the Brambilla and Porto (2016) model. The optimal strategies for export companies to implement “quality according to market” or “price according to market” are analyzed when enterprise profits are maximized. Two mechanisms are proposed for the impact of income distribution on exchange rate pass-through effects: through the average quality preference of consumers, which affects enterprise export product quality and thus affects exchange rate pass-through effects, and by regulating the impact of product quality on exchange rate pass-through effects. Second, the influence of income distribution on product quality and exchange rate pass-through effects is examined from the perspectives of income level and income inequality. Third, we calculate the quality of Chinese products at the export company level and destination country consumer level. Our empirical research reveals that product quality from the consumer's perspective has more influence on enterprise product pricing.
We offer the following policy implications. First, Chinese export enterprises should continue to implement diversification measures for export destination countries, particularly to increase export trade to countries along the “Belt and Road” route (most of which are low-income countries). Policy authorities should therefore take the opportunity to “escort” Chinese enterprises to implement diversified measures for export destination countries, particularly in terms of formulating relevant export trade policies to eliminate any concerns of export enterprises. Second, Chinese exporters should continue to improve the quality of their products. “High-quality” is the best weapon Chinese enterprises can employ to deal with the impact of RMB exchange rate changes on export prices, and it is also the most effective approach for Chinese products entering developed markets. Third, our study provides a theoretical basis for implementing the common prosperity policy in China. China's income inequality has currently exceeded the World Bank line, and China has long imported luxury goods at prices much higher than in European countries. China's income inequality is likely to fall with the implementation of the common prosperity policy, making it more likely that China will import cheaper foreign high-quality products to enhance the overall welfare level.

Key words： Export Product Quality Exchange Rate Pass-through Export Pricing Capability Income Distribution

Received: 17 January 2022 Published: 02 July 2023

:	D31
	D40
	F31

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZENG Lifei
	JIANG Kai
	CAO Wei

Cite this article:

ZENG Lifei,JIANG Kai,CAO Wei. Quality of Chinese Exported Products, Exchange Rate Pass-Through, and Export Pricing Capability: From the Perspective of Income Distribution in Export Destination Countries[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 516(6): 75-93.

URL:

http://www.jryj.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.jryj.org.cn/EN/Y2023/V516/I6/75

[1]	曹伟和申宇,2013,《人民币汇率传递、行业进口价格与通货膨胀:1996—2011》,《金融研究》第10期,第68～80页。
[2]	曹伟、万谍、金朝辉和钱水土,2019,《“一带一路”背景下人民币汇率变动的进口价格传递效应研究》,《经济研究》第6期,第136～150页。
[3]	杜威剑和李梦洁,2015,《目的国市场收入分配与出口产品质量——基于中国企业层面的实证检验》,《当代财经》第10期,第89～96页。
[4]	韩剑、郑秋玲和邵军,2017,《多产品企业、汇率变动与出口价格传递》,《管理世界》第8期,第14～26页。
[5]	胡冬梅、郑尊信和谢帆,2014,《商品质量是汇率传递异质性的来源吗——以中日贸易为例》,《国际贸易问题》第12期,第144～156页。
[6]	江艇,2022,《因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第100～120页。
[7]	李坤望、蒋为和宋立刚,2014,《中国出口产品品质变动之谜:基于市场进入的微观解释》,《中国社会科学》第4期,第80～103页。
[8]	李世刚、李晓萍和江飞涛,2018,《收入分配与产品质量前沿》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第24～40页。
[9]	李胜旗和佟家栋,2016,《产品质量、出口目的地市场与企业加成定价》,《国际经贸探索》第1期,第4～17页。
[10]	李怀建和沈坤荣,2015,《出口产品质量的影响因素分析——基于跨国面板数据的检验》,《产业经济研究》第6期,第62～72页。
[11]	马弘和秦若冰,2020,《收入水平、收入分布与进口需求》,《经济科学》第2期,第20～33页。
[12]	王雅琦、戴觅和徐建炜,2015,《汇率、产品质量与出口价格》,《世界经济》第5期,第17～35页。
[13]	王雅琦和余淼杰,2020,《进口、产品质量和出口价格汇率传递率》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第847～874页。
[14]	文洋和张振华,2011,《收入分配差距对我国进口贸易的影响》,《国际贸易问题》第11期,第43～52页。
[15]	项后军和许磊,2013,《汇改后的人民币汇率传递、出口商品价格与依市定价(PTM)行为研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第16～29页。
[16]	向训勇、陈婷和陈飞翔,2016,《进口中间投入、企业生产率与人民币汇率传递——基于我国出口企业微观数据的实证研究》,《金融研究》第9期,第33～49页。
[17]	谢建国和杨海燕,2015,《互补还是替代——中美贸易竞争关系的测度与分析》,《国际贸易问题》第11期,第62～72页。
[18]	杨勇、刘思婕和陈艳艳,2020,《“FTA战略”是否提升了中国的出口产品质量？》,《世界经济研究》第10期,第63～75+136页。
[19]	易靖韬、刘昕彤和蒙双,2019,《中国出口企业的人民币汇率传递效应研究》,《财贸经济》第5期,第112～126页。
[20]	曾利飞,2016,《全球供应竞争下汇率传递效应研究》,《世界经济研究》第3期,第25～35页。
[21]	邹宗森、王秀玲和陈俊州,2020,《人民币汇率传递存在非对称性效应吗？兼论“汇率调整之谜”》,《世界经济研究》第12期,第77～88页。
[22]	Auer, R., and R. Schoenle. 2016. “Market Structure and Exchange Rate Pass-through”,Journal of International Economics, 98:60～77.
[23]	Auer, R., T. Chaney and P. Sauré. 2018. “Quality Pricing-to-market”, Journal of International Economics, 110:87～102.
[24]	Auer, R. 2009. “Exchange Rate Pass-Through in a Competitive Model of Pricing-to-market”,Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(1):151～174.
[25]	Basile R.,S. D.Nardis, and A.Girardi. 2012.“Pricing to Market, Firm Heterogeneity and the Role of Quality”, Review of World Economics, 148(4):595～615.
[26]	Boug, P., A. Cappelen, and T. Eikam. 2013. “Exchange Rate Pass-through in a Small Open Economy: the Importance of the Distribution Sector”, Open Economies Review, 24(5):853～879.
[27]	Brambilla, I., and G. Porto. 2016. “High-income Export Destinations, Quality and Wages”, Journal of International Economics, 98:21～35.
[28]	Chen, N., and L. Juvenal, J. 2016. “Quality, Trade, and Exchange Rate Pass-Through”, Journal of International Economics, 100:61～80.
[29]	Choi, Y., D. Hummels, and C. Xiang. 2009. “Explaining Import Quality: The Role of the Income Distribution”, Journal of International Economics,77(2):265～275.
[30]	Ciani, A. 2021. “Income Inequality and the Quality of Imports”, Review of World Economics, 157(2):375～416.
[31]	Devereux, M., and J. Yetman. 2010.“Price Adjustment and Exchange Rate Pass-through”, Journal of International Money and Finance,29(1):181～200.
[32]	Fajgelbaum, P., G. Grossman, and E. Helpman. 2011.“Income Distribution, Product Quality, and International trade”, Journal of Political Economy,119(4):721～765.
[33]	Fan, H., Y. Li, and S. Yeaple. 2015. “Trade Liberalization, Quality, and Export Prices”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(5):1033～1051.
[34]	Feenstra, R., and J. Romalis. 2014. “International Prices and Endogenous Quality”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2):477～528.
[35]	Flach, L., E. Janeba. 2017. “Income Inequality and Export Prices Across Countries”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 50(1):162～200.
[36]	Frankel, J., D. Parsley, and S. J. Wei. 2012. “Slow Pass-through Around the World: a New Import for Developing Countries？”, Open Economies Review,23:213~251.
[37]	Frederick, S., 2009. “Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database”, Social Science Quarterly, 90(2) : 231～242
[38]	Hummels, D., and K. Lee. 2018. “The Income Elasticity of Import Demand: Micro Evidence and an Application”, Journal of International Economics, 113: 20～34.
[39]	Hallak, J. 2006. “Product Quality and the Direction of Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 68(1):238～265.
[40]	Hallak, J. 2010. “A Product-Quality View of the Linder Hypothesis”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3):453～466.
[41]	Khandelwal, A. 2010. “The Long and Short (of) Quality Ladders”, The Review of Economic Studies, 77(4):1450～1476.
[42]	Khandelwal, A., P. Schott, and S. Wei. 2013. “Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters”, American Economic Review, 103(6):2169～2195.
[43]	Linder, S. 1961. “An Essay on Trade and Transformation”, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.1961.
[44]	Mallick, S., and H. Marques. 2016. “Does Quality Differentiation Matter in Exporters' Pricing Behaviour？ Comparing China and India”, China Economic Review, 40:71～90.
[45]	Montfaucon, A. F. 2022. “Invoicing Currency and Symmetric Pass-Through of Exchange Rates and Tariffs: Evidence from Malawian Imports from the EU”, International Economics, 169: 191～207.
[46]	Ozkan, I., and L. Erden. 2015. “Time-varying Nature and Macroeconomic Determinants of Exchange Rate Pass-through”, International Review of Economics & Finance, 38:56～66.