|
|
|
| The Pricing Mechanism in Chinese Commodity Futures Markets |
| FENG Yulin, TANG Ke, KANG Wenjin
|
School of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics;
Institute of Economics, School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University;
Faculty of Business Administration, University of Macau |
|
|
|
Abstract Commodity markets have become an important part of the modern financial system in China. The trading volumes of commodity futures in the Shanghai Futures Exchange, Dalian Commodity Exchange and Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange rank among the top five in the world. The Chinese commodity futures market is now the second largest in the world, and investors are now more inclined to use commodity futures for hedging and risk management purposes. Commodity futures markets play a crucial role in providing hedging and a price discovery mechanism for investors. The effectiveness of the pricing mechanism affects prices in the commodity spot market and, correspondingly, resource allocation efficiency in the real economy. Therefore, research on the pricing mechanism of commodity futures markets is of great importance for ensuring the stability and vitality of the real economy in China.
Although the pricing mechanism in commodity markets is an important subject of academic research, relatively little research focuses on Chinese commodity markets. Research in this area mainly focuses on the predictive power of macro variables based on traditional economic models. In contrast, the literature on developed markets mainly uses asset pricing factors such as basis, momentum and basis-momentum to explain and predict returns. However, the effectiveness of these pricing factors in China's commodity markets is not adequately studied. Therefore, an appropriate and effective factor pricing model is still needed for Chinese markets.
In this paper, we comprehensively examine the explanation and predictive ability regarding returns of various pricing factors in Chinese commodity futures markets. We find that the basis, momentum and basis-momentum characteristics are important return predictors in Chinese markets. We construct pricing factors and then use the Alpha test, the Gibbons, Ross and Shanken test and an additional empirical test based on the theory of storage to examine the pricing effectiveness of all candidate factor models. Based on our empirical findings, we propose a three-factor pricing model, which includes market, basis and basis-momentum factors. Our paper is the first to provide an in-depth analysis of the pricing mechanism in Chinese commodity futures markets. Furthermore, we provide an intuitive economic explanation for the factors included in the pricing model.
This paper makes the following contributions to the literature. First, in recent years, the pricing mechanism of the commodity futures market has become an increasingly important research topic. In this paper, we conduct a thorough analysis of the effectiveness of basis-momentum, basis and momentum factors, and propose a new factor pricing model for Chinese commodity markets. Our multi-factor pricing model can well explain other factor portfolio returns proposed in the literature, and hence fills the gap in the literature on Chinese commodity markets.
Second, we provide an in-depth explanation of the pricing mechanism for the basis factor based on the theory of storage. We find that the basis factor can effectively explain the returns stemming from the commodity physical inventory status. The basis factor can also serve as a useful proxy for the convenience yield of commodities, which is consistent with the prediction of the theory of storage. Our findings highlight the economic importance and the formation mechanism of the basis factor, and fill a research gap in terms of empirical tests for the theory of storage.
Third, we find that Boons and Prado's (2019) recently proposed basis-momentum factor plays an important role in predicting commodity futures returns in China. These findings thus provide empirical support for the validity of basis-momentum in commodity markets outside the U.S. We also provide an in-depth explanation for the economic intuition of basis-momentum.
Finally, our paper is closely related to the regulatory policies and practices of Chinese commodity futures markets. Regulatory policies on margin requirements and position restrictions are stricter for commodity futures close to maturity. Therefore, investors prefer contracts with longer expiry periods, and these futures contracts have substantially high liquidity. Considering the importance of having sufficient liquidity in commodity futures markets, after conducting a comprehensive comparison of futures contracts of different maturities, we mainly explain the return of the third nearby contract, which is the most actively traded. In general, our paper paves the way for future research on Chinese commodity markets.
|
|
Received: 02 February 2021
Published: 20 January 2023
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
部慧和汪寿阳,2010,《商品期货及其组合通胀保护功能的实证分析》,《管理科学学报》第9期,第26～36+67页。
|
| [2] |
方雯、冯耕中、陆凤彬和汪寿阳,2015,《期货保证金调整对中国钢材市场价格发现的影响研究》,《中国管理科学》第2期,第1～9页。
|
| [3] |
韩立岩和尹力博,2012,《投机行为还是实际需求？——国际大宗商品价格影响因素的广义视角分析》,《经济研究》第12期,第83～96页。
|
| [4] |
何启志、张晶和范从来,2015,《国内外石油价格波动性溢出效应研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第79～94页。
|
| [5] |
蒋舒和吴冲锋,2007,《中国期货市场的有效性:过度反应和国内外市场关联的视角》,《金融研究》第2期,第49～62页。
|
| [6] |
蒋贤锋、史永东和李慕春,2007,《期货市场保证金调整的市场风险控制作用及制度改革——来自大连商品交易所的实证分析》,《金融研究》第2期,第74～88页。
|
| [7] |
李敬辉和范志勇,2005,《利率调整和通货膨胀预期对大宗商品价格波动的影响——基于中国市场粮价和通货膨胀关系的经验研究》,《经济研究》第6期,第61～68页。
|
| [8] |
梁巨方和韩乾,2017,《商品期货可以提供潜在组合多样化收益吗？》,《金融研究》第8期,第129～144页。
|
| [9] |
刘庆富和张金清,2013,《中国商品期货隔夜信息对日间交易的预测能力》,《管理科学学报》第11期,第81～94页。
|
| [10] |
卢斌和华仁海,2010,《基于MCMC方法的中国期货市场流动性研究》,《管理科学学报》第9期,第98～106页。
|
| [11] |
祁华清、李霜和樊琦,2015,《中国粮食金融化的测度、检验及政策启示》,《管理世界》第2期,第172～173页。
|
| [12] |
王孝松和谢申祥,2012,《国际农产品价格如何影响了中国农产品价格？》,《经济研究》第3期,第141～153页。
|
| [13] |
危慧惠、樊承林和朱新蓉,2012,《基于随机便利收益的不完全市场商品期货定价研究》,《中国管理科学》第4期,第37～44页。
|
| [14] |
杨浩和马鹤,2012,《中国对国际大宗农产品的价格影响力研究——基于大豆期货市场的实证分析》,《中国管理科学》第S2期,第848～853页。
|
| [15] |
杨胜刚、陈帅立和王盾,2014,《中国黄金期货价格影响因素研究》,《财经理论与实践》第3期,第44～48页。
|
| [16] |
杨胜刚和汪琛德,2009,《期货保证金的设置原则及方式研究文献综述》,《生产力研究》第8期,第173～176页。
|
| [17] |
尹力博和韩立岩,2015,《对冲通胀风险的战略视角与微观选择》,《管理科学学报》第3期,第64～77页。
|
| [18] |
尹力博和柳依依,2016,《中国商品期货金融化了吗？——来自国际股票市场的证据》,《金融研究》第3期,第189～206页。
|
| [19] |
尹力博、杨清元和韩立岩,2018,《技术指标能够预测商品期货价格吗？来自中国的证据》,《管理科学学报》第6期,第99～109页。
|
| [20] |
殷剑峰,2008,《商品市场的金融化与油价泡沫》,《中国货币市场》第11期,第36～41页。
|
| [21] |
张成思、刘泽豪和罗煜,2014,《中国商品金融化分层与通货膨胀驱动机制》,《经济研究》第1期,第140～154页。
|
| [22] |
张学文和孙文松,2015,《风险溢价与商品期货定价研究——基于标的稀缺性的视角》,《经济学(季刊)》第3期,第983～1004页。
|
| [23] |
赵华和王一鸣,2011,《中国期货价格的时变跳跃性及对现货价格影响的研究》,《金融研究》第1期,第195～206页。
|
| [24] |
郑尊信、王琪和徐晓光,2016,《贸易融资套利、商品价格变动及货币政策效应》,《经济研究》第1期,第55～68页。
|
| [25] |
钟腾和汤珂,2016,《中国商品期货投资属性研究》,《金融研究》第4期,第128～143页。
|
| [26] |
朱学红、邹佳纹、韩飞燕和谌金宇,2018,《引入外部冲击的中国铜期货市场高频波动率建模与预测》,《中国管理科学》第9期,第52～61页。
|
| [27] |
Amihud, Y., 2002, “Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-section and Time-series Effects”, Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31～56.
|
| [28] |
Amihud, Y., Hameed, A., Kang, W. and H. Zhang, 2015. “The Illiquidity Premium: International Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, 117(2), 350～368.
|
| [29] |
Amihud, Y., H. Mendelson and L.H. Pedersen, 2006. “Liquidity and Asset Prices”, Netherlands: Now Publishers Inc.
|
| [30] |
Asness, C.S., T.J. Moskowitz, and L.H. Pedersen, 2013. “Value and Momentum Everywhere”, Journal of Finance, 68(3), 929～985.
|
| [31] |
Bakshi, G., X. Gao and A.G. Rossi, 2019. “Understanding the Sources of Risk Underlying the Cross Section of Commodity Returns”, Management Science, 65(2), 619～641.
|
| [32] |
Basak, S. and A. Pavlova, 2016. “A Model of Financialization of Commodities”, Journal of Finance, 71(4), 1511～1556.
|
| [33] |
Boons, M. and M.P. Prado, 2019. “Basis‐Momentum”, Journal of Finance, 74(1), 239～279.
|
| [34] |
Gorton, G.B., F. Hayashi and K.G. Rouwenhorst, 2013. “The Fundamentals of Commodity Futures Returns”, Review of Finance, 17(1), 35～105.
|
| [35] |
Gorton, G. and K.G. Rouwenhorst, 2006. “Facts and Fantasies about Commodity Futures”, Financial Analysts Journal, 62(2), 47～68.
|
| [36] |
Kang, W., K.G. Rouwenhorst and K. Tang, 2020. “A Tale of Two Premiums: The Role of Hedgers and Speculators in Commodity Futures Markets”, Journal of Finance, 75(1), 377～417.
|
| [37] |
Kang, W. and H. Zhang, 2014. “Measuring Liquidity in Emerging Markets”, Pacific-basin Finance Journal, 27, 49～71.
|
| [38] |
Koijen, R.S., T.J. Moskowitz, L.H. Pedersen and E.B. Vrugt, 2018. “Carry”, Journal of Financial Economics, 127(2), 197～225.
|
| [39] |
Li, B., D. Zhang, and Y. Zhou, 2017. “Do Trend Following Strategies Work in Chinese Futures Markets？”, Journal of Futures Markets, 37(12), 1226～1254.
|
| [40] |
Liu, Q. and Y. An, 2011. “Information Transmission in Informationally Linked Markets: Evidence from US and Chinese Commodity Futures Markets”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(5), 778～795.
|
| [41] |
Menkhoff, L., L. Sarno, M. Schmeling and A. Schrimpf, 2012. “Carry Trades and Global Foreign Exchange Volatility”, Journal of Finance, 67(2), 681～718.
|
| [42] |
Miffre, J. and G. Rallis, 2007. “Momentum Strategies in Commodity Futures Markets”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(6), 1863～1886.
|
| [43] |
Rouwenhorst, K.G. and K. Tang, 2012. “Commodity Investing”, Annual Review of Finance and Economics, 4(1), 447～467.
|
| [44] |
Szymanowska, M., F. De Roon, T. Nijman and R. van Den Goorbergh, 2014. “An Anatomy of Commodity Futures Risk Premia”, Journal of Finance, 69(1), 453～482.
|
| [45] |
Tang, K. and W. Xiong, 2012, “Index Investment and Financialization of Commodities”, Financial Analyst Journal, 68, 54～74.
|
| [46] |
Yang, J. and Y. Zhou, 2020. “Return and Volatility Transmission Between China's and International Crude Oil Futures Markets: A First Look”, Journal of Futures Markets, 40(6), 860～884.
|
|
|
|
