|
|
|
| China's Rural Financial Institutions, Loan Availability and Urban-Rural Income Gap |
| HUA Hongyi, LI Yao
|
| School of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics |
|
|
|
Abstract China's rural financial reform has effectively been a top-down storage reform. Before 1990, traditional rural financial institutions (TRIs, including rural credit cooperatives, rural cooperative banks and rural commercial banks) fulfilled a large number of urban construction roles. Following the implementation of China's commercialization and market-oriented reforms, TRIs have preferred to serve urban residents and large and medium-sized enterprises with the goal of making profits. As a result, more financial institutions that originate from rural economies and actively serve rural residents are needed to increase the supply of rural financial services. In 2006, China introduced an innovative reform that encouraged industrial and private capital to invest in new rural financial institutions (NRIs, including village banks, loan companies and rural mutual fund cooperatives). However, the question remains as to whether, under this incremental reform, NRIs are easing financing constraints in rural areas and reducing the urban-rural income gap.
This paper conducts theoretical and empirical studies on NRIs and TRIs. We use the evolutionary game model to examine the results of competition between the two types of rural financial institutions and show, using the income model, that they change the urban-rural income gap by changing the availability of resident loans. In the empirical part, this paper first builds a dynamic panel GMM model using county macroeconomic data and financial institution branch data from 2000 to 2018. The financial institution branch data come from the disclosure of financial license information on the official website of the CBRC, which contains the branch information of more than 200,000 financial institutions in China since 1949 (including address, date of establishment and revocation information). Based on these data, we construct a proportion indicator of rural financial institution branches to explore the different effects of NRIs and TRIs on the income gaps of urban and rural residents. We then use the 2018 China Household Income Survey data (CHIP2018) provided by the China Institute of Income Distribution to build loan availability indexes for urban and rural residents. We use these indexes to test the mediating effects of the loan availability of urban and rural residents on the impact of the increase in rural financial institutions on the income gap.
Our theoretical analysis shows that due to the existence of soft information screening costs and compliance costs, the two types of financial institutions clearly choose to serve customers in different areas. This heterogeneity contributes to the urban-rural income gap, in which the loan availability of residents exerts a mediating effect. Our empirical study also shows that the increase in NRIs has significantly reduced the urban-rural income gap, while the increase in TRIs has widened the gap. Our analysis of the mediating effect shows that the expansion of the two types of rural financial institutions has heterogeneous effects on the loan availability of rural residents and urban residents. Specifically, NRIs improve the loan availability of rural residents, while TRIs reduce it, thus changing the urban-rural income gap.
Overall, our results indicate that the incremental reform of the rural financial market has been more beneficial than the storage reform. However, further reform is needed to reduce the difficulty of market access and strengthen the supervision of the cash flows of NRIs. Moreover, TRIs should be encouraged to increase their investment in microcredit technologies and reduce the difficulty of identifying rural customer risks. Efforts should also be made to enable the human resource advantages of NRIs and the technical advantages of TRIs to jointly serve the rural financial market. According to our proposed new classified supervision model, financial institutions should be able to choose their own regulatory framework and encouraged to build on their strengths and circumvent their weaknesses, and constantly increase their investment in areas where they have comparative advantages. These new institutions, technologies and regulations will help accelerate the establishment of a widely dispersed, multi-level and differentiated banking system in China.
This paper contributes to the literature by exploring the heterogeneous effects of the expansion of two types of rural financial institutions from an intermediate and micro perspective on the evolution of credit constraints and confirming that improving credit constraints has a positive effect on rural residents' incomes. Specifically, we first provide a theoretical basis for formulating policy recommendations by establishing a theoretical model with which to discuss the mechanism of the two types of rural financial institutions in changing the urban-rural income gap by serving different customers. Second, we use county-level data to test the effects of the development of rural financial institutions on changes in loan availability and income. We also reveal more details about the development of NRIs and use micro survey data to confirm the mediating effect of improving credit constraints. Finally, we show that NRIs have better effects in supporting villagers and small businesses. In contrast, as the credit supply of TRIs favors lower risk, TRIs have a better effect on urban residents' credit.
|
|
Received: 17 September 2021
Published: 20 January 2023
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
陈斌开和林毅夫,2013,《发展战略、城市化与中国城乡收入差距》,《中国社会科学》第4期,第81～102页。
|
| [2] |
程惠霞,2014,《农村金融“市场失灵”治理前提再判断:供给不足还是金融排斥——基于5省26家新型农村金融机构覆盖地域内1938个农户样本调查》,《经济理论与经济管理》第11期,第101～112页。
|
| [3] |
冯海红,2016,《小额信贷、农民创业与收入增长——基于中介效应的实证研究》,《审计与经济研究》第5期,第111～119页。
|
| [4] |
甘犁、尹志超、贾男、徐舒和马双,2013,《中国家庭资产状况及住房需求分析》,《金融研究》第4期,第1～14页。
|
| [5] |
葛永波、周倬君和马云倩,2011,《新型农村金融机构可持续发展的影响因素与对策透视》.《农业经济问题》第12期,第48～54+111页。
|
| [6] |
何德旭和苗文龙,2015,《金融排斥、金融包容与中国普惠金融制度的构建》,《财贸经济》第3期,第5～16页。
|
| [7] |
江艇,2022,《因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第100～120页。
|
| [8] |
李健旋和赵林度,2018,《金融集聚、生产率增长与城乡收入差距的实证分析——基于动态空间面板模型》,《中国管理科学》第12期,第34～43页。
|
| [9] |
陆铭和陈钊,2004,《城市化、城市倾向的经济政策与城乡收入差距》,《经济研究》第6期,第50～58页。
|
| [10] |
齐红倩和李志创,2018,《小额信贷对我国城乡收入差距的影响——基于小额贷款公司省际面板数据的实证分析》,《南京社会科学》第9期,第31～39页。
|
| [11] |
孙学涛,2021,《农业机械化能否缩小城乡收入差距？》,《首都经济贸易大学学报》第1期,第81～93页。
|
| [12] |
孙永强,2012,《金融发展、城市化与城乡居民收入差距研究》,《金融研究》第4期,第98～109页。
|
| [13] |
王修华和邱兆祥,2011,《农村金融发展对城乡收入差距的影响机理与实证研究》,《经济学动态》第2期,第71～75页。
|
| [14] |
王修华和赵亚雄,2022,《数字金融发展与城乡家庭金融可得性差异》,《中国农村经济》第1期,第44～60页。
|
| [15] |
王征和鲁钊阳,2011,《农村金融发展与城乡收入差距——基于我国省级动态面板数据模型的实证研究》,《财贸经济》第7期,第55～62页。
|
| [16] |
徐晓萍和李猛,2008,《我国三十年来农村地区金融改革的逻辑轨迹——基于新比较经济学分析框架的研究》,《财经研究》第5期,第15～28页。
|
| [17] |
叶志强、陈习定和张顺明,2011,《金融发展能减少城乡收入差距吗？——来自中国的证据》,《金融研究》第2期,第42～56页。
|
| [18] |
张正平和杨丹丹,2017,《市场竞争、新型农村金融机构扩张与普惠金融发展——基于省级面板数据的检验与比较》,《中国农村经济》第1期,第30～43页。
|
| [19] |
Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E. and Taber, C. R., 2005, “Selection On Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools”, Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 151～184.
|
| [20] |
Arellano, M. and Bond, S., 1991, “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”, The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277～297.
|
| [21] |
Banerjee, A. V. and A. F. Newman, 1993, “Occupational Choice and the Process of Development”, The Journal of Political Economy, 101(2), 274～298.
|
| [22] |
Claessens, S. and E. Perotti, 2007, “Finance and Inequality, Channels and Evidence”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 748～773.
|
| [23] |
Freyaldenhoven, S., Hansen, C. and Shapiro, J. M., 2019, “Pre-Event Trends in the Panel Event-study Design”, American Economic Review, 109(9), 3307～3338.
|
| [24] |
Galor, O. and J. Zeira, 1993, “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics”, The Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), 35～52.
|
| [25] |
Grigoli, F., Koczan, Z. and Topalova, P., 2020, “Automation and Labor Force Participation in Advanced Economies: Macro and Micro Evidence”, European Economic Review, 126, 103443.
|
| [26] |
Hayes, A. F., 2017, “Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach”, Guilford publications.
|
| [27] |
Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M. and Williams, J., 2004, “Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99～128.
|
| [28] |
Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G. and Sheets, V., 2002, “A Comparison of Methods to Test Mediation and Other Intervening Variable Effects.”, Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83.
|
| [29] |
Menkhoff, L. and O. Rungruxsirivorn, 2011, “Do Village Funds Improve Access to Finance？ Evidence From Thailand”, World Development, 39(1), 110～122.
|
| [30] |
Mookerjee, R. and P. Kalipioni, 2010, “Availability of Financial Services and Income Inequality, The Evidence from Many Countries”, Emerging Markets Review, 11(4), 404～408.
|
| [31] |
Varghese, A., 2005, “Bank-moneylender Linkage as an Alternative to Bank Competition in Rural Credit Markets”, Oxford Economic Papers, 57(2), 315～335.
|
|
|
|
